1. Do you use the same controller for the SK and the QX reactors?
2. Are you able to control multiple SK reactors in a manner similar to that used in the QX reactors?
3. Would another metal or other material allow for even higher operating temperatures than a reactor based on Nickel?
Jenny:
Good question.
It depends on what you mean with the term “direct current”.
If you mean that a direct current is characterized by the fact that electrons move in an unipolar field, so that instead of “push and pull” as the AC does it continuously either pushes or pulls, even if the voltage changes at a certain frequency allows such a current as the one we have in the Ecat to be dubbed DC. But another common way to define DC is a flat line parallel to the X Cartesian ax: in this case, our current would have to be defined “unipolar current with frequently changing voltage”.
By the way, this difference is why we need an oscilloscope to measure the electricity that enters the Ecat: a Voltmeter, even the more sophisticated, can be not able to read the frequency of a unipolar current when it is not flat and horizontal as the current from a battery.
So, it’s up to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Erika Sgro:
As far as we sell a service invoicing heat, tariffs are not an issue, because our Ecats will remain property of Leonardo Corporation, so they won’t pay any sale tariff at any border. In general, the solution that will be adopted will be the one of Harley Davidson: make the products directly inside the commercial union where the same products have to be sold. I think this will become the most common solution of the problem. Enterpreneurs will have to evolve from being international remaining at home, into being international expanding internationally. The ones that are too small to do this, will have to make consortiums, or find niches of market wherein their quality is so special, that tariffs are not an issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
In the video
Youtube Ecat QX demonstration in Stckholm Nov 24 2018
the oscilloscope shows series of sinusoidal variations only in the positive field. Do you consider it a direct current?
Did you get significant thrust and torque with the SK reactor? Could you already communicate some measures?
Off topic, would you be related to Paolo Rossi a very talented footballer of the 80s that allowed Italy to be world champion in 82?
Sorry for Sweden. My crystal ball needs a serious maintenance intervention.
All my support for the industrialization of E-Cat
Best regards
Dear Andrea
Interesting the Feynmann diagram you suggested:is the photon raised by the two electrons the result of the annihilation of virtual particles?
Dear Andrea,
I am sure that you are aware of the fact that Net Power in Huston uses a gas-turbine that is fired by pure O2 and natural gas in atmosphere of super critical CO2 which is recycled.
Pure CO2 is stored.
A large part of the installation can be omitted when using the E-cat SK. It seem to me a perfect match.
See: https://qz.com/1292891/net-powers-has-successfully-fired-up-its-zero-emissions-fossil-fuel-power-plant/ but there are other articles as well.
Kind regards, Gerard
JPR:
Yes, it will be necessary to have the authorizations. If this will be a problem, we will resolve showing the products not in operation, and a video of the same in operation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes. Wien, because there is no other way to measure these temperatures, Boltzmann, because we want to know exactly the energy produced inside the reactor.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
draw the continuous trajectory of one electron that makes an angle, draw a symmetrical trajectory in front of it of another electron so that the vertixes of the angles are where the trajectories are closest, then trace a wavy line between the vertixes to represent the photons generated by the annihilation of the virtual e.p. raised when the T of the field raises above to the mass of the same e.p.
Like 2 “L” with the vertixes closer than the other points and united by a wave.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said that you will show the industrialized Ecat QX and/or SK in the east Coast in a meeting place. Do you think it will be necessary to have the authorizations to operate devices that now have a significant power, by orders of magnitude superior than the 20 W of the prototype shown in Stockholm?
I wish you full success,
JPR
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How would you describe by a Feynmann diagram your theoretical hypothesis about virtual particles and antiparticles generated at the temperature of 2 eV?
Chuck Davis, Joseph Fine:
It is true that graphene, that I know very well, is a good conductor, being a single atom layer substance, which leaves a high level of freedom to the electrons, but the price of graphene is higher than the price of industrial diamonds: obviously, when we talk of diamonds for this kind of use, we are not talking of jewels grade diamonds…we are talking of powder of diamonds obtained from the residuals of diamonds cuts not useful for jewelry purposes, like, for example, the diamonds powder used in the disks of the glass or steel cutters.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
You write that you are “planning to see QX as the first industrial Ecat product”; why not to add some SK in combination?
Viktor Shipachev
Dear Andrea, As many people are aware physics and maths is a closely related subject. Wikipedia with regards ‘Set theory’ is an interesting but complex subject and probably will only be of interest to certain readers but it is important in understanding a branch of physics that helps to explain structure as a composite of four dimensions within a systemic system. A cubic neutral has its event horizon and within which, is a flux tube. However a cubic neutral is enclosed within its event horizon that contains four flux tubes and within each flux tube are four ‘Sets’/dimensions of density, between which are minor ‘end sets’. Thereby sixteen dimensions/‘Sets’ and each’Set’ contains four dimensions of density i.e. 64 units to a structure. The four inner most ‘Sets’ are the most positive and the four outer most ‘Sets’ are the most negative. The Russell paradox within ‘Set theory’ is with regards the ‘End Set’. The inner most ‘End Set’ is the power towards which all structures are drawn and that which is surrounded by the four most positive ‘Sets’. Surrounding the most outermost negative ‘Sets’ is an outer circumferential ‘End Set’ being therefore in a contradictory position to that of the inner ‘End Set’. The transfinite number Wikipedia explain this paradox by explaining the location of the ‘End Set’. See lowest finite ordinal number being omega and first transfinite cardinal number being Aleph-null i.e. Alpha. What ‘Set theory’ is attempting to explain is a concept with regards a hierarchy that communicates by a mutual understanding of structure and a mathematical agreement due to comprehending an all inclusive situation regarding a structure comprised of its many parts. This introductory information is able to explain power and potential and how the two are intertwined but can be separated to explain two types of reactions. As previously mentioned EVOs i.e. exotic vacuum objects are extremely powerful forces, VPs i.e.virtual particles are less powerful and can be considered soft potentials. A Power system is a reaction involving four ‘Sets’, a potential of the Power is one that involves two ‘Sets’ i.e. between two minor ‘end sets’ both interactions involving the Lorenz force. Unifying field oscillation technology that is embodied in the linearizing propulsion mechanism is able to demonstrate ‘Set theory’ and ,I believe, a LENr is connected in part to this understanding. Woodward mach input engine is with regards EVOs. If you can understand anything about End Set theory you will be able to understand the mach engine with regards the maths, degrees and methodology as I intend to explain. Also to understand Topology and Stone Space will help to explain why its important to grasp new technologies. Yes climate change is occurring but its not entirely by human activity. Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. Andrea have you accessed Old Quantum Theory, Wikipedia, Hydrogen Atom Sommerfeld model. Also I have just turned up Fine Structure Constant which I feel is important to virtual particles. I hope to post this information soon.
Congratulations on all the latest advancements. The decision to sell heat and not E-cats is brilliant. I’m looking forward to the start of the industrialization. Will the components be hand made or are the robots ready?
Dear Andrea, Did you spam my last reply, its ok if you did but have experienced problems with my computer regarding collaborations. Regards Eric Ashworth
CC:
I have been told it will not be long, provided are respected all the regulations in terms of safety and only certified components are used: so told me the certified engineer that is preparing the papers for a Customer we will have to supply the plant to. In general, it will depend also on the locations.
Warm regards,
A.R.
I would like to comment on your comments to Mr. Paoli. I recall that I am not a physicist and that my understanding of the nuclear reactions is VERY VERY limited.
I remember the controversy over the work of Dr. Fleishmann and Dr. Pons rejected by the scientific community because it did not fit with quantum theory. Although this is true, it is not because the experiment does not obey the theory, however solid, that the work of Dr. Fleishmann and Dr. Pons should be rejected. However doubts were allowed at the time. The experiment could not be reproduced either by an independent laboratory or by the authors themselves who stopped their work for lack of funding.
It was not until an extraordinary person was convinced that things in the field that were not yet explained by the theory could be dispensed with.
It is possible that your effect falls within the framework of the current theory, which seems to be your belief. It is also possible that the Rossi effect obeys something of which the much larger whole would integrate the current quantum theory.
All my support for your current and future work
Best regards
My crystal ball plans a FRANCE – SWEDEN in World Cup final
Raffaele:
No. As I said , I hope we will start out industrialization within December-January, but I still do not have a certainty of this. We still have to work on the preparation of the Ecats, besides, before installing a plant, there will be the necessity to get the licenses along the laws of the sites where our Clients are. Anyway I realistically can hope we will start by January 2019.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What are the main things that need to take place now before you start the industrial productions of your industrial E-Cats?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Steven N. Karels:
1- no
2- yes
3- not that I am aware of
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Do you use the same controller for the SK and the QX reactors?
2. Are you able to control multiple SK reactors in a manner similar to that used in the QX reactors?
3. Would another metal or other material allow for even higher operating temperatures than a reactor based on Nickel?
Jenny:
Good question.
It depends on what you mean with the term “direct current”.
If you mean that a direct current is characterized by the fact that electrons move in an unipolar field, so that instead of “push and pull” as the AC does it continuously either pushes or pulls, even if the voltage changes at a certain frequency allows such a current as the one we have in the Ecat to be dubbed DC. But another common way to define DC is a flat line parallel to the X Cartesian ax: in this case, our current would have to be defined “unipolar current with frequently changing voltage”.
By the way, this difference is why we need an oscilloscope to measure the electricity that enters the Ecat: a Voltmeter, even the more sophisticated, can be not able to read the frequency of a unipolar current when it is not flat and horizontal as the current from a battery.
So, it’s up to you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
1- (SK) no
2- (footballer) no
3- (crystal ball) yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Erika Sgro:
As far as we sell a service invoicing heat, tariffs are not an issue, because our Ecats will remain property of Leonardo Corporation, so they won’t pay any sale tariff at any border. In general, the solution that will be adopted will be the one of Harley Davidson: make the products directly inside the commercial union where the same products have to be sold. I think this will become the most common solution of the problem. Enterpreneurs will have to evolve from being international remaining at home, into being international expanding internationally. The ones that are too small to do this, will have to make consortiums, or find niches of market wherein their quality is so special, that tariffs are not an issue.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How can the stormy weather of the tariffs war between USA, CHINA, Europe affect the commercialization of the Ecat?
Thanks,
Erika
Dr Andrea Rossi
In the video
Youtube Ecat QX demonstration in Stckholm Nov 24 2018
the oscilloscope shows series of sinusoidal variations only in the positive field. Do you consider it a direct current?
Hello A. Rossi
Did you get significant thrust and torque with the SK reactor? Could you already communicate some measures?
Off topic, would you be related to Paolo Rossi a very talented footballer of the 80s that allowed Italy to be world champion in 82?
Sorry for Sweden. My crystal ball needs a serious maintenance intervention.
All my support for the industrialization of E-Cat
Best regards
Raffaele
Giuseppe:
God allowing, at ninety I think I will allow myself to retire.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Savanna:
I suppose so.
We are preparing a series of experiments to find evidence of this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
youtube ecat demo stockholm nov 24 2018
Very convincing
Dear Andrea
Interesting the Feynmann diagram you suggested:is the photon raised by the two electrons the result of the annihilation of virtual particles?
Mr Rossi,
Now you are 68. When do you think you will retire?
Giuseppe
Anthony Garofalo:
I think so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am sure that you are aware of the fact that Net Power in Huston uses a gas-turbine that is fired by pure O2 and natural gas in atmosphere of super critical CO2 which is recycled.
Pure CO2 is stored.
A large part of the installation can be omitted when using the E-cat SK. It seem to me a perfect match.
See: https://qz.com/1292891/net-powers-has-successfully-fired-up-its-zero-emissions-fossil-fuel-power-plant/ but there are other articles as well.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Rossi,
Is the Ecat SK mostly destined to gas turbines?
Anthony
JPR:
Yes, it will be necessary to have the authorizations. If this will be a problem, we will resolve showing the products not in operation, and a video of the same in operation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes. Wien, because there is no other way to measure these temperatures, Boltzmann, because we want to know exactly the energy produced inside the reactor.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
draw the continuous trajectory of one electron that makes an angle, draw a symmetrical trajectory in front of it of another electron so that the vertixes of the angles are where the trajectories are closest, then trace a wavy line between the vertixes to represent the photons generated by the annihilation of the virtual e.p. raised when the T of the field raises above to the mass of the same e.p.
Like 2 “L” with the vertixes closer than the other points and united by a wave.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do you use also the Wien and Boltzmann equations to calculate the energy generated by both the Ecat QX and the SK?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
You said that you will show the industrialized Ecat QX and/or SK in the east Coast in a meeting place. Do you think it will be necessary to have the authorizations to operate devices that now have a significant power, by orders of magnitude superior than the 20 W of the prototype shown in Stockholm?
I wish you full success,
JPR
Dr Andrea Rossi,
How would you describe by a Feynmann diagram your theoretical hypothesis about virtual particles and antiparticles generated at the temperature of 2 eV?
Wendy:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wes Moore:
Maybe.
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
is snow melting a good fit for the Ecat?
Take a look to this:
http://www.impactlab.net/2018/07/08/google-is-building-a-city-of-the-future-in-toronto-would-anyone-want-to-live-there/#more-137382
Warm Regards,
Wes Moore
Source Energy Mechanical
Chuck Davis, Joseph Fine:
It is true that graphene, that I know very well, is a good conductor, being a single atom layer substance, which leaves a high level of freedom to the electrons, but the price of graphene is higher than the price of industrial diamonds: obviously, when we talk of diamonds for this kind of use, we are not talking of jewels grade diamonds…we are talking of powder of diamonds obtained from the residuals of diamonds cuts not useful for jewelry purposes, like, for example, the diamonds powder used in the disks of the glass or steel cutters.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I watched the video youtube Ecat demonstration November 24 Stockholm
Very convincing, congratulations.
Wendy
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
I read about the “Old Quantum Mechanic” euristic experimentations.
Viktor Shipachev:
This depends if the Ecat QX will be ready.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Joseph Fine:
Graphene is even more conductive than diamonds and much cheaper,
Cheers
Chuck Davis
Dear Dr Rossi,
You write that you are “planning to see QX as the first industrial Ecat product”; why not to add some SK in combination?
Viktor Shipachev
Dear Andrea, As many people are aware physics and maths is a closely related subject. Wikipedia with regards ‘Set theory’ is an interesting but complex subject and probably will only be of interest to certain readers but it is important in understanding a branch of physics that helps to explain structure as a composite of four dimensions within a systemic system. A cubic neutral has its event horizon and within which, is a flux tube. However a cubic neutral is enclosed within its event horizon that contains four flux tubes and within each flux tube are four ‘Sets’/dimensions of density, between which are minor ‘end sets’. Thereby sixteen dimensions/‘Sets’ and each’Set’ contains four dimensions of density i.e. 64 units to a structure. The four inner most ‘Sets’ are the most positive and the four outer most ‘Sets’ are the most negative. The Russell paradox within ‘Set theory’ is with regards the ‘End Set’. The inner most ‘End Set’ is the power towards which all structures are drawn and that which is surrounded by the four most positive ‘Sets’. Surrounding the most outermost negative ‘Sets’ is an outer circumferential ‘End Set’ being therefore in a contradictory position to that of the inner ‘End Set’. The transfinite number Wikipedia explain this paradox by explaining the location of the ‘End Set’. See lowest finite ordinal number being omega and first transfinite cardinal number being Aleph-null i.e. Alpha. What ‘Set theory’ is attempting to explain is a concept with regards a hierarchy that communicates by a mutual understanding of structure and a mathematical agreement due to comprehending an all inclusive situation regarding a structure comprised of its many parts. This introductory information is able to explain power and potential and how the two are intertwined but can be separated to explain two types of reactions. As previously mentioned EVOs i.e. exotic vacuum objects are extremely powerful forces, VPs i.e.virtual particles are less powerful and can be considered soft potentials. A Power system is a reaction involving four ‘Sets’, a potential of the Power is one that involves two ‘Sets’ i.e. between two minor ‘end sets’ both interactions involving the Lorenz force. Unifying field oscillation technology that is embodied in the linearizing propulsion mechanism is able to demonstrate ‘Set theory’ and ,I believe, a LENr is connected in part to this understanding. Woodward mach input engine is with regards EVOs. If you can understand anything about End Set theory you will be able to understand the mach engine with regards the maths, degrees and methodology as I intend to explain. Also to understand Topology and Stone Space will help to explain why its important to grasp new technologies. Yes climate change is occurring but its not entirely by human activity. Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. Andrea have you accessed Old Quantum Theory, Wikipedia, Hydrogen Atom Sommerfeld model. Also I have just turned up Fine Structure Constant which I feel is important to virtual particles. I hope to post this information soon.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Martin Pietsch:
1- at this time none is yet under construction
2- confidential
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Mr Rossi,
how many Ecats of what size will you build for your customers at this time?
What is the status of the production site and are there already pictures of it?
Thank you so much,
Martin
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Diamond has very high thermal conductivity, about 5 times higher than copper. However, Diamond is expensive.
Enriched 12C (or C-12) isotopically pure Diamond is even more expensive but has even higher thermal conductivity.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopically_pure_diamond
Boron Arsenide, a compound developed at the University of Houston, has about half the thermal conductivity of Diamond, but at much less cost.
https://phys.org/news/2018-07-upend-conventional-wisdom-thermal.html
You may find this material useful.
Thermal regards,
Joseph Fine
Eric Ashworth:
I did not spam it. Please send it again,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Morrissey:
The industrial production has not been started yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Iggy Dalrymple:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Have any governmental entities, domestic or foreign, expressed interest in being a customer for your heat?
Regards,
Iggy
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on all the latest advancements. The decision to sell heat and not E-cats is brilliant. I’m looking forward to the start of the industrialization. Will the components be hand made or are the robots ready?
Thank you
Bernie Morrissey
Dear Andrea, Did you spam my last reply, its ok if you did but have experienced problems with my computer regarding collaborations. Regards Eric Ashworth
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for your insight.
I was hoping your crystal ball to be right, but it has not been so…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
I have been told it will not be long, provided are respected all the regulations in terms of safety and only certified components are used: so told me the certified engineer that is preparing the papers for a Customer we will have to supply the plant to. In general, it will depend also on the locations.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
How much time do you think will it take to obtain the licence and authorization from the states to install and start up the Ecats?
CC
Hello A. Rossi
I would like to comment on your comments to Mr. Paoli. I recall that I am not a physicist and that my understanding of the nuclear reactions is VERY VERY limited.
I remember the controversy over the work of Dr. Fleishmann and Dr. Pons rejected by the scientific community because it did not fit with quantum theory. Although this is true, it is not because the experiment does not obey the theory, however solid, that the work of Dr. Fleishmann and Dr. Pons should be rejected. However doubts were allowed at the time. The experiment could not be reproduced either by an independent laboratory or by the authors themselves who stopped their work for lack of funding.
It was not until an extraordinary person was convinced that things in the field that were not yet explained by the theory could be dispensed with.
It is possible that your effect falls within the framework of the current theory, which seems to be your belief. It is also possible that the Rossi effect obeys something of which the much larger whole would integrate the current quantum theory.
All my support for your current and future work
Best regards
My crystal ball plans a FRANCE – SWEDEN in World Cup final
Raffaele
Raffaele:
No. As I said , I hope we will start out industrialization within December-January, but I still do not have a certainty of this. We still have to work on the preparation of the Ecats, besides, before installing a plant, there will be the necessity to get the licenses along the laws of the sites where our Clients are. Anyway I realistically can hope we will start by January 2019.
Warm Regards,
A.R.