United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

20,098 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    TheFutureIsNow:
    1- I do not know
    2- confidential
    3- confidential
    4- confidential
    5- not yet, but it is a sector of our interest
    6- confidential
    7- confidential
    8- yes, but the results are confidential so far
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • TheFutureIsNow

    Dear Andrea,

    1) How long do you estimate – not asking for an exact answer – it will be until one of your clients is willing to go on the record with a statement that they are purchasing energy from you produced by SK units at an economically attractive price per unit of thermal energy?

    2) Oxygen is a long time killer of LENR reactions in a wide variety of systems. This is especially true in at least some powder based systems. Does this theme of oxygen being a reaction inhibitor apply to the QX/SK reaction?

    3) Have you weighed the electrodes before and after an extended run and if so what was the weight difference before and after?

    4) In the Stockholm presentation it seems like a high voltage impulse was applied to start the reaction going and then DC pulses of much lower voltage and current were applied to keep the reactions going for a few seconds until the off period. If more active cooling had been applied to the reactor and/or power supply, could the lower voltage and current been continuously applied without an off period?

    5) Have attempted to make any contacts in the indoor agriculture industry to find out if they would be interested in an economically advantageous source of ecologically friendly heat?

    6) Have you ever pushed a QX to self destruction and if so what happened?

    7) To push a 20 kilowatt rated SK to self destruction, how high must the output go?

    8) Have you attempted to utilize a laser inferometer setup to determine if any modification of the active vacuum of space near the QX/SK is taking place? If so, what were the results?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White%E2%80%93Juday_warp-field_interferometer

  • Harvey

    Dear Andrea,
    In your recent reply to Steven, you said that the Ecat was producing heat for your client and it was not a test. If we can conclude from your answer that Leonardo Corporation is now earning revenue for providing LENR energy to a commercial client, this would certainly constitute a major milestone in the history of LENR and your personal long struggle. To my knowledge, no other organization can make such a claim. I certainly apologise if my conclusion is incorrect. Otherwise,a hearty CONGRATULATIONS! to you and your team.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    With the E-Cat SK, do you need one controller per SK reactor, or if not, how may SKs can be operated by a single reactor?

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Klas:
    I answered. Grey energy will be reduced in proportion to the COP. Please see on Wikipedia what is the grey energy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lotr Mileykowsky:
    The control panel does not affect the cost so much as you say.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    1- it was a module making heat for the Client
    2- it is not a test
    3- yes
    3 a and b: it is not a test
    4- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Maybe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi, you’re right, thanks for your explanations.
    For an electric car the energy supplied to its batteries is not free, but comes from other plants that have polluted.
    For Ecat, the energy it supplies comes from within and has not generated pollution.
    Therefore, its gray energy for making it and putting in service has an ever lower percentage value for a high COP and a long operational life.

    Another question, please: what do you think about the heat that humans throw in the environment?
    From the Sankey diagram that you see at this link

    https://www.visualcapitalist.com/u-s-energy-consumption-one-giant-diagram/

    one can notice that a total of 60% of all energy produced in the United States is wasted.
    It’s a huge amount of energy thrown into the environment.

    Do you think that in the very long term the Ecat could help to reduce this percentage?

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Stephen

    Hi Andrea Rossi

    May I ask some questions about your recent testing

    1. Am I correct in understanding that you were recently testing ecat at your customer’s sites? (I remember you mentioning you were happy the way things are goi g it was cozy in side whilst out side it was cold). Or was that a kind of Factory acceptance test before delivery?

    2. is this test still continuing in the long term?
    3. Were you able to test the remote control aspects of the set up?
    3a. If so were you happy with this aspect?
    3b. Is that part of the test more or less continuous or intermittent testing now and then?
    3c Is that part of the test continuing?
    4. Was the test performed with one of the automanously produced e-cat SK’s.?

    Thanks and Best Regards
    Stephen

  • Lotr Mileikowsky

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    here our whole community are fans of e-cat since 2011.
    We have no doubts that your last version of reactors are magnificence, as You stated.
    We have concern about control units. Although it is known that with mass scale of production costs may be lower, is it true, that manufacturing costs of your control units are prohibitively high?
    So much high, that it is unaffordable for households, thus irrelevant whether it is or is not certified for common folks use?

  • Klas

    Dear Andrea,

    Clearly we have a misunderstanding of my question.
    I am well aware of that Ecat does not directly emits any greenhouse gases as this is one of the beatiful facts of LENR energy.
    However my question concerned the total footprint as it is used in Global Warming debate.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint
    The indirect part from Ecat SK should therefore mainly arrive from the reactor manufacturing process, total process producing fuel and total logistics involved during one year.
    I am still expecting a very low value og CO2 kg/Kwh and this is again the beaty as e.g electric cars due to the batteries and how the are charged have much larger footprints than most people are aware of.

    Best regards
    Klas

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dan C.:
    He is a top manager of a potential Client of us. We are in contact.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    When an electric car does not emit CO2 it is because a thermoelectric plant has emitted the CO2 on its behalf, because to produce the electricity consumed by an electric car you have to produce that electricity.
    About the grey energy. which is what you are talking of, the COP is the issue that makes the difference, because if the COP is higher, the grey energy is more diluted in proportion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bob Belovich:
    1- There is no relation as far as I saw in the experiments.
    2- n.a.
    3- n.a.
    A.R.

  • Bob Belovich

    Dear Andrea Rossi

    1. In your experiments with operating the e-cat at different temperatures, were you able to obtain information about the relationship between temperature attained and “fuel” consumed?

    2. If yes, were the results a surprise or what you expected.

    3. Will such information be found in your next paper?

    Thanks

    Bob Belovich

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    During operation in its life, a gasoline car emits CO2, but a pure electric car doesn’t. Even the Ecat doesn’t emit CO2 when is working.

    However all these devices are responsible for pollution when they have been manufactured by machine emitting CO2.

    And so at the end of their working life there will be other pollution for recycling.

    So, for every device it is possible compute the level of pollution in their separate phases of life birth – life – dead.

    Are these values for Ecat known?

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    Are you still working/consulting with Eng. William S. Hurley(and/or his associates) that was present at the QX demo in Stockholm?

    Warm Regards,
    Dan C.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Carla:
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Klas:
    The Ecat does not emit carbon hydroxide.
    About the grey energy, it is arithmetically inversally proportional to the COP respect a normal source.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Klas

    Dear Andrea,

    Can you already present a rough value for the EPA Carbon Footprint (CO2 weight/kWh) from a Ecat SK 20kW generator running continously during the first year?
    I assume included the manufacturing of generator and original fuel incl. first fuel change.
    How much less for year 2 and following?

    Best Regards
    Klas

  • Carla

    Dear Andrea:
    I read yesterday http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    Thank you for sharing with us this story. Very moving.
    All the best,
    Carla

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gretchen Banks:
    Thank you for the reference,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mason:
    Thank you very much for the inspiring link and for your kind consideration of the work made by our Team.
    The sustain of persons like you is very important and helps a lot.
    Warm Regardsand best wishes to you and your family.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- so far I am satisfied, we start with caution
    2- we calculate20 kW as nominal rating
    Thank you for your offer of help: I take advice of it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gretchen Banks

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Again on Power Engineering December 6 2018: Power-Gen speakers- Energy world has changed, so chenge with it.
    Seems your Ecat fits perfectly!
    Cheers
    Gretchen

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    It is a true achievement that you can now produce the ECats automatically!
    Congratulations to you and your team.
    If I understand it rightly you have now (unofficially) entered the commercial stage. That is even a more important step!
    1. Are you happy with your portfolio, or do you want us to promote the Ecat?
    2. Will the standard Ecat SK now be 27 kW nominal or is that just a test and do you still calculate 20 kW as nominal output?
    Thanks and kind regards, Gerard

  • Mason

    Dear Andrea:

    The day of your market introduction is drawing close. It is fitting that it is part of the holiday season and a harbinger of a new year’s future harvest.

    For years, I have watched and read at E-CatWorld how the promise inherent in the Ecat has become a bit mysterious, taking on the hopes as pieces of clothing of the many who follow and share their views of the real life drama of you and your team’s efforts. I think you and your team should be reminded of this.

    I believe a speech by Charlie Chaplin from 1940 expresses this mysterious inspiration some feel regarding the Ecat. Though his deeply emotional speech was focused upon the very different topic of global politics in 1940, it is easy to say that at E-CatWorld many feel a similarity, a likeness between the two. They express the belief that the Ecat will bring a great benefit equivalent to Charlie Chaplin’s deeply felt thoughts. You may feel and see it as being an overblown comparison, but people will believe what they will.

    Happy Holidays to you, your team, and your wife.

    Sincerely & respectfully,

    Mason Ainsworth

    Charlie Chaplin’s message for all humanity:
    Link>> https://youtu.be/CsgaFKwUA6g

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    The answer is: yes.
    Sorry not to have understood immediately your question,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    I may have phrased the inquiry poorly. To insure his satisfaction, will a client be able to buy heat from you like your current client is doing, in phases? (ie start with 1 MW, increase to 10 MW?)

    I understand very well that you are not selling product, and while that breaks my heart, I recognize the high quality of your decision to market this way. Please accept my apology if I offended you.

    Sincerely,

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    We do not sell plants, we sell heat.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    Congratulation again on the progress you have made on the innovative design of the Ecats this last several years and the upcoming presentation of the 27 kW model, and the plants that can be constructed from this revision. Beware if your current client client asks you to get a motel room and wait there for a decision, though. (… Tesla …)

    Q1: If a client wants to heat/cool larger spaces (sections of his factory), would a 1 MW plant including heat exchanger be available to order this January?

    Q2: … 5 MW this January?

    Warm regards,

    Tom

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    The numbers will be given in due time, but I share your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- yes
    2- the production will follow the demand
    3- yes
    4- yes
    5- this is up to the Client
    6- this information is not public
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Niall Bohan:
    Thank you for your question, we have to correct our text, that is ambiguous. We intended to say that Ni in the Earth is almost limitless in relation to our consume, not in absolute.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rod Walton

    Please see on Power Engineering December 5 2018: ABB, Emerson, OUC, leaders echo digital themes at Power Engineering Keynote
    Best Regards,
    Rod Walton

  • Niall Bohan

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Are you sure the nickel is almost limitless as written in http://www.ecat.com?
    Thanks,
    Niall Bohan

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Just a few questions:
    1. Can you tell us if you are already able to produce the ECats automatically?
    2. By when do you intend to start production, or has production started already?
    3. Will you also produce the ECat controllers in your production plants?
    4. I have always thought that the 40 MW unit is a single unit that will produce electricity. Now I understand that there will be multiple smaller units that will be located at different sites. Is the latter the right interpretation?
    5. Do they intend to produce electricity with the (collection of) 40 MW unit(s)?
    6. How much percent of the 40 MW units(s) is ready?
    Thank you for answering our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi, in the future there will certainly be an Ecat + turbine + alternator system for the production of electricity.
    I was trying to do some simplified and approximate calculations.

    If the Ecat alone had for example a COP = 6 and the turbine + alternator had an efficiency of 30%, the electrical output energy would be about twice of the power supply.
    For a COP = 12, the output would be about 4 times the input. And so on.

    I do not know what the maximum operative COP value could be, but probably greater than 12.
    At the Stockholm test, a COP of more than 500 was measured, but I think that the real maximum operational COP value will not be too high for security and stability issues.
    However, yet with the roughly values ​​assumed in my calculations, we can see that the system can generate electricity at costs much lower than the current ones.

    If you could sell electricity as you sell now heat, the clients will certainly be happy saving on their money, you would be even happier earning all you want, and humanity would be the main beneficiary.
    What do you think about?

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    Now let us stay focused on our development target. For now I just can say that our business is too risky to allow small investors give us money.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    I appreciate your effort to withhold investment from small investors until the e-cat is a proven reliable product. Once your product is a proven solid value, do you plan to reward your long time supporters with special consideration in allowing them to move to the front of the line?
    Best regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jane:
    Thank you for your sustain.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jane

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    I read the whole content od http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    It is very inspiring.
    Godspeed,
    Jane

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Irina and Vitaly Uzikov:
    Thank you!
    This is an important recognition to the work of my team from one of the most prestigious scientific echelons of the world.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Moreless.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the information. By the way: I am a reader of Power Engineering since the year 1972, when I manufactured in my factory my first plant to make energy with wastes with my first patent related to the post-combustion of the smokes. In 1984 Power Engineering published in the section “cementator” an article about my plant to turn organic wastes into fuel oil. At those times P.E. was my “bible”. I still leaf through it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rod Walton

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Just google “power engineering December 4 2018 to see the last developments in the alternative energies.
    Rod Walton

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea
    I refer to the question from Seven N. Karels about the weight of one reactor.
    You have earlier confirmed the weight to be one kilo and the control unit to 10 kilos.
    Witch for the reactor is obviously within the window he presented.
    How many reactors are the 10 kilos control unit able to supply?
    Is the prior information of 100 still an actual number?
    Regards, Svein Henrik.

  • Irina and Vitaly Uzikov

    Dear Andrea!

    I published on the Russian Internet resource ProAtom for the nuclear industry specialists the article “Industrial energy devices for low-threshold nuclear reactions is a reality” about increasing recognition of the reality of the “Rossi effect” in scientific circles and about your latest achievements, in particular, materials about the upcoming commercial presentations ECat SK (January 31, 2019)
    http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=8330&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0

    With deepest respect and best wishes,

    Vitaly Uzikov

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>