Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which are the factors that most likely could generate negative results before the end of the tests and R&D on course?
1- explosions
2- plant management difficulties
3- radiations
4- electric problems
5- others
Thank you for your answer,
Nils Fryklund
In many of your recent updates on the plant, you have mentioned it is ‘stable’ — but have not mentioned it is in self-sustain mode lately, like you frequently did in earlier updates. It ssm still used?
Gio:
I have not the right to speak for the Customer, as you correcly wrote, and express a feeling would not be correct. By the way, I have no idea about what the Customer will want to do. My duty in the Custemer’s factory is to make the plant work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Rossi
when the running 1 year long test will be completed, do you think that the Customer will reveal his identity in order to witness the results (F9)??? I know you cannot speak in place of the Customer, but do you have any feeling about?
James:
During the night we had a transitory loss of efficiency in a reactor and I was very worried, because that could mean a loss of efficiency of the charge, but the situation returned normal after some modifications I made in the regulation system. Now I can breath. The 1 MW E-Cat is stable and regular. The E-Cat X is in preparation, I confirm that probably will return to operate during the week that starts tomorrow.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the very interesting links to the work made in Russia to replicate the Lugano test. This is imporant, being a confirmation of the replication of Alexander Parkhomov.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello dr. Rossi, more Russian scientists have replicated the Rossi Effect.
IN Stepanov, YI Malakhov, Chi Nguyen Quoc. Experiment registration release excess thermal energy into the cell is loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride
Authors:.
1. Stepanov Igor, Moscow State University. MV University, stepanovigorn@gmail.com.
2. Malakhov Skuratov, National Research University MEI, yumalakhov@yandex.ru.
3. Chi Nguyen Quoc, National Research University MEI, nguyenquocshi@yahoo.com.
Title: Experiment registration release excess thermal energy into the cell is loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride.
annotation
In this paper we describe the experimental setup, methodology for assessing the energy in a small volume of the heat cell, loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride. Acknowledged the result obtained earlier by Andrea Rossi AG Parkhomov that under certain conditions in the cell takes excess energy, ie, the amount of heat release exceeds summed.
The work is published in the “report on the experiment.”
I am curious if you would answer the following questions.
1) If you allow any of your other licensees to manufacture future products, will they be the same designs as developed for Industrial Heat(IH) or is the existing work only for the use of IH, and your your licensees would purchase product from them (IH)?
2) Now that you are in a stunningly strong position relative to a few years ago, with conclusive proof (Proven isotopic shifts, and a patent, probable replication … etc.), some may wonder if your interests still align with your licensees do you still see a need for them do you have the ability to buy back these licenses if you so chose?
Anonymous:
As you know, I never comment the work of our real or virtual competitors. Obviously we will have competitors: this is the reason why I will put Leonardo’s products on the market only when our production will have the economy scale necessary to make close to impossible, if not totally impossible, compete with us. You have no idea what I am inventing (F9). It will be a revolution in the production system.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Paul:
I cannot answer for IH. As for Leonardo Corp, before talking of this issue we must wait the results of the tests on course; obviously I am coveting all the necessary contacts, but let me repeat that the results could also be negative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
All your friends hope that marketing of the one megawatt plant will be launched shortly after the current test is completed. However, there is a complication. So far, the reactors have been built in limited numbers. For mass production they have to to be redesigned to minimize the manufacturing cost. If not, competitors will make the adaptation and further development may be compromised. I know you will not let that happen.
By the way, if Karl Benz had applied your business idea, then we all drove Mercedes-Benz today. Not a bad idea.
Best regards
Gunnar Lindberg
Has IH/LC consulted or partnered with any well established boilermaker companies in order to insure the long term reliability of the industrial E-Cat plants?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The National Research Laboratory of the US Navy has published a report in which implies you are the leader of the LENR and cites a long list of potential future competitors of Leonardo Corp.
Which of the list you think is more likely to be able to compete with you in the future?
Thank you,
Anonymous
Frank Acland:
Yes, here is the update: the plant now is stable; the E-Cat X in preparation.
Time: 11.27 a.m., Saturday Oct 3, inside the computers container.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sven Johansson:
Thank you for your attention and trust: in Sweden we are preparing a strong action. Nevertheless, we must wait for the final results of the tests on course with our 1 MW plant in operation in the factory of our US Customer. The results, I must repeat, could be positive, but could be also negative. Nonetheless, our efforts are at the maximum of our possibilities. There is another reason for which I want to work in Sweden: I want to ski the Vasaloppet, sooner or later.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Winter is approaching: I hope my last winter without an E-Cat. In Sweden we have a great expectancy from you. Our winters are very cold, your technology is very hot, as I saw from your US patent.
Cheers,
Sven
Eernie1:
Yes, I agree with you; besides, as I said in a comment about this issue, resonances between fields of virtual particles could sum up to justify the Tau decay, even if to confirm this rigorous math is demanded. Anyway, you are right, 3 sigma are not enough to put in crisis the Standard Model. Not to talk about possible measurement errors: it is a little bit suspect the fact that this so much important item has not discussed further about after the first shot to the press…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I see that there are readers of this site that are interested in the meaning of the results reported by CERN considering the deviation from the standard particle theory of the decay products of the B(bottom)Meson decay. The theory states that the decay products(Tau and Muon) occur in a universal manner. This means that equal masses of the two are generated, not equal numbers of particles. Since the Tau is approx. 17 times as massive as the Muon, for each Tau there are approx. 17 Muons created. The deviation from this ratio as measured was 3sigma which amounts to a relatively small differential mass conversion number and is seen only at very high energy interaction levels. IMHO there must be much more data generated before I could accept the conclusion that the SP theory is overthrown.
Skeptical regards.
Maurice Bobet:
For the E-Cat X we are making it, next week will go in operation.
The 1 MW plant is giving some troubles we are working upon.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick Ellul:
That’s genial!
Should I be in your shoes, I would precipitate myself to apply for a patent!
You bet: I will pass it on to the Prof that will make the analysis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
For non Italians: Sandro Ciotti was a soccer anchor famous for his voice, kind of Louis Armstrong, but lower toned. To pitch it up you really needed to helium-stuff his throat.
I am no subject matter expert but allow me to recommend a way to test for the production of Helium.
When you open the reactor, have someone with a deep Sandro-Ciotti-like voice inhale the air close to the reactor. If their voice then goes high pitched, it means that the reactor must have produced Helium. 8-D
I too can be a coffee shop chatterbox and I have no physics Degrees.
Frank Acland:
The charges have been calculated by me to last at least 1 year yielding at least the COP granted. The charge substitution is possible, but very long and to recharge, for various reasons, all the plant needs to be stopped. I am confident the charges will last one year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
In this test, if you needed to recharge the reactors with new fuel in order to maintain the power output for the customer over the agreed period of time, would you do it?
Silvio Caggia:
Please read the paper Cook- Rossi.
So far I am not able to add other considerations and Prof. Cook and I are continuing our theoretical research. Obviously, he is much better than me, but integrating his theoretical background and my experimentalism we will arrive to write something useful, I think. We have also decided to write nothing else before we can say something conclusive.
He too, as me, is a warrior and he too, as me, hates the coffee shop chattering wherein elementary particles are treated like metal spheres of a pin-ball: “the proton goes here, smacks the Li target and makes a lot of heat, then an electron is captured and bla,bla,bla…”. We want to reach a solid reconciliation with a rigorous mathematical structure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yuri Lebedev:
We will give these data at the end of the test. Until the end of the test I cannot answer.
I am very sorry, because your comment has given to us a strong encouragement from your great Country. About Dr Parkhomov, I agree with you: he has been able to make a difficult work in the best possible way.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
A specific update: based on the measurements you are making today telll me: the efficiency of the charge is exactly the same as at the beginning of this test?
Thank you and also I want you know that in Russia you are popular, mainly after the replication made by Alexander Parkhomov:
from Russia, with big esteem,
Yuri
Dear Andrea Rossi,
About the supposed reaction of Lithium-7 and Hidrogen nuclei, I have read that the clean two Helium products are not the only possibile outcome: https://fusionefredda.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/reazioni.jpeg
Do you have control on the reaction outcame or you termalize unwanted gammas and neutrons?
Regards
Bernie Koppenhofer:
He,he,he…I settle for a pizza and beer!
Thank you very much: you all are helping me enough with all your encouragement and your comments, from which I am learning so much. You all are part of the Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: I respect and salute you efforts. After seven plus months of 16 hour days (and now 18 hour days) inside a shipping container has to be getting very, very old by now. It seems to me you are making all the sacrifices to bring your new fire to us. Is there nothing we can do to help? I just want to make sure you realize you and your team are not alone, if there is anything we can do to make your efforts easier, please do not hesitate to ask. Pizza, beer, comfortable chair, more nickel, lithium? (: Thanks.
Hortense Tieg:
Because this apparently anomalous decay, that violates the energy conservation, can be explained with an increase of mass during the interactions that can be understood by means of concatenations of Feynmann diagrams, wherein the fields of virtual massive e.p. can resonate with the fields of the B meson; remember that also the lepton Tau is a virtual particle and that we are talking of interactions that generate e.p. with a lifespan from 10^-23 to 10^-24 s, while the Tau has a lifespan of 3.4 x 10^-13 s.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No, I made a lab in Miami to make new materials. During the last 2 weeks I worked 18 hours per day instead of 16… But now the new material I needed is made, the situation returns to 16/day. Next week we’ll have the E-Cta X in operatin again. Fingers crossed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
It looks like another Cold Fusion method just popped out:
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/5/8/10.1063/1.4928572
The Professor Emeritus Leif Holmlid at Gothenburg University claims that his method might be used for direct electricity production.
Here is translated article about above paper, you are being mentioned here:
https://translate.google.pl/translate?sl=no&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=pl&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tu.no%2Fkraft%2F2015%2F10%2F04%2Fsvensk-professor-hevder-han-har-pavist-kjernefusjon-i-liten-skala&edit-text=
Best Regards,
Rafal Krych
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which are the factors that most likely could generate negative results before the end of the tests and R&D on course?
1- explosions
2- plant management difficulties
3- radiations
4- electric problems
5- others
Thank you for your answer,
Nils Fryklund
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In many of your recent updates on the plant, you have mentioned it is ‘stable’ — but have not mentioned it is in self-sustain mode lately, like you frequently did in earlier updates. It ssm still used?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dyane Irvin:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gio:
I have not the right to speak for the Customer, as you correcly wrote, and express a feeling would not be correct. By the way, I have no idea about what the Customer will want to do. My duty in the Custemer’s factory is to make the plant work.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Rossi
when the running 1 year long test will be completed, do you think that the Customer will reveal his identity in order to witness the results (F9)??? I know you cannot speak in place of the Customer, but do you have any feeling about?
My best regards
Gio
James:
During the night we had a transitory loss of efficiency in a reactor and I was very worried, because that could mean a loss of efficiency of the charge, but the situation returned normal after some modifications I made in the regulation system. Now I can breath. The 1 MW E-Cat is stable and regular. The E-Cat X is in preparation, I confirm that probably will return to operate during the week that starts tomorrow.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the very interesting links to the work made in Russia to replicate the Lugano test. This is imporant, being a confirmation of the replication of Alexander Parkhomov.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello dr. Rossi, more Russian scientists have replicated the Rossi Effect.
IN Stepanov, YI Malakhov, Chi Nguyen Quoc. Experiment registration release excess thermal energy into the cell is loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride
Authors:.
1. Stepanov Igor, Moscow State University. MV University, stepanovigorn@gmail.com.
2. Malakhov Skuratov, National Research University MEI, yumalakhov@yandex.ru.
3. Chi Nguyen Quoc, National Research University MEI, nguyenquocshi@yahoo.com.
Title: Experiment registration release excess thermal energy into the cell is loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride.
annotation
In this paper we describe the experimental setup, methodology for assessing the energy in a small volume of the heat cell, loaded with a mixture of nickel powder and lithium aluminum hydride. Acknowledged the result obtained earlier by Andrea Rossi AG Parkhomov that under certain conditions in the cell takes excess energy, ie, the amount of heat release exceeds summed.
The work is published in the “report on the experiment.”
http://www.unconv-science.org/n9/stepanov/
http://www.unconv-science.org/pdf/9/stepanov-ru.pdf
Dear Andrea Rossi:
In your Team are there also women?
Cheers,
Dyane
Bruce:
1- Leonardo Corp will not sell further licenses
2- The Team is working in harmony
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can we have an update for today Oct 4?
Thanks,
James
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I am curious if you would answer the following questions.
1) If you allow any of your other licensees to manufacture future products, will they be the same designs as developed for Industrial Heat(IH) or is the existing work only for the use of IH, and your your licensees would purchase product from them (IH)?
2) Now that you are in a stunningly strong position relative to a few years ago, with conclusive proof (Proven isotopic shifts, and a patent, probable replication … etc.), some may wonder if your interests still align with your licensees do you still see a need for them do you have the ability to buy back these licenses if you so chose?
Best Wishes to you,
Anonymous:
As you know, I never comment the work of our real or virtual competitors. Obviously we will have competitors: this is the reason why I will put Leonardo’s products on the market only when our production will have the economy scale necessary to make close to impossible, if not totally impossible, compete with us. You have no idea what I am inventing (F9). It will be a revolution in the production system.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gunnar Lindberg:
You are right and we are working on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Paul:
I cannot answer for IH. As for Leonardo Corp, before talking of this issue we must wait the results of the tests on course; obviously I am coveting all the necessary contacts, but let me repeat that the results could also be negative.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
All your friends hope that marketing of the one megawatt plant will be launched shortly after the current test is completed. However, there is a complication. So far, the reactors have been built in limited numbers. For mass production they have to to be redesigned to minimize the manufacturing cost. If not, competitors will make the adaptation and further development may be compromised. I know you will not let that happen.
By the way, if Karl Benz had applied your business idea, then we all drove Mercedes-Benz today. Not a bad idea.
Best regards
Gunnar Lindberg
Andrea,
Has IH/LC consulted or partnered with any well established boilermaker companies in order to insure the long term reliability of the industrial E-Cat plants?
Paul
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The National Research Laboratory of the US Navy has published a report in which implies you are the leader of the LENR and cites a long list of potential future competitors of Leonardo Corp.
Which of the list you think is more likely to be able to compete with you in the future?
Thank you,
Anonymous
Frank Acland:
Yes, here is the update: the plant now is stable; the E-Cat X in preparation.
Time: 11.27 a.m., Saturday Oct 3, inside the computers container.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You mentioned a problem with a leak in the 1 MW plant — have you had success with repair? Is the plant still running?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Sven Johansson:
Thank you for your attention and trust: in Sweden we are preparing a strong action. Nevertheless, we must wait for the final results of the tests on course with our 1 MW plant in operation in the factory of our US Customer. The results, I must repeat, could be positive, but could be also negative. Nonetheless, our efforts are at the maximum of our possibilities. There is another reason for which I want to work in Sweden: I want to ski the Vasaloppet, sooner or later.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Winter is approaching: I hope my last winter without an E-Cat. In Sweden we have a great expectancy from you. Our winters are very cold, your technology is very hot, as I saw from your US patent.
Cheers,
Sven
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://rossilivecat.com/all.html
to find the comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eernie1:
Yes, I agree with you; besides, as I said in a comment about this issue, resonances between fields of virtual particles could sum up to justify the Tau decay, even if to confirm this rigorous math is demanded. Anyway, you are right, 3 sigma are not enough to put in crisis the Standard Model. Not to talk about possible measurement errors: it is a little bit suspect the fact that this so much important item has not discussed further about after the first shot to the press…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I see that there are readers of this site that are interested in the meaning of the results reported by CERN considering the deviation from the standard particle theory of the decay products of the B(bottom)Meson decay. The theory states that the decay products(Tau and Muon) occur in a universal manner. This means that equal masses of the two are generated, not equal numbers of particles. Since the Tau is approx. 17 times as massive as the Muon, for each Tau there are approx. 17 Muons created. The deviation from this ratio as measured was 3sigma which amounts to a relatively small differential mass conversion number and is seen only at very high energy interaction levels. IMHO there must be much more data generated before I could accept the conclusion that the SP theory is overthrown.
Skeptical regards.
Silvio Caggia:
Thanks for your attention.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You are right, I re-read the Cook-Rossi paper and I found all answers!
Thanks
Silvio
Maurice Bobet:
For the E-Cat X we are making it, next week will go in operation.
The 1 MW plant is giving some troubles we are working upon.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eva Dobler:
The Team is always the same.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick Ellul:
That’s genial!
Should I be in your shoes, I would precipitate myself to apply for a patent!
You bet: I will pass it on to the Prof that will make the analysis.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
For non Italians: Sandro Ciotti was a soccer anchor famous for his voice, kind of Louis Armstrong, but lower toned. To pitch it up you really needed to helium-stuff his throat.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can we have an update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Is your team always the same, or has it been modified during these months of tests?
Thank you,
Eva
Dear Andrea,
I am no subject matter expert but allow me to recommend a way to test for the production of Helium.
When you open the reactor, have someone with a deep Sandro-Ciotti-like voice inhale the air close to the reactor. If their voice then goes high pitched, it means that the reactor must have produced Helium. 8-D
I too can be a coffee shop chatterbox and I have no physics Degrees.
Warm regards,
Patrick
Frank Acland:
The charges have been calculated by me to last at least 1 year yielding at least the COP granted. The charge substitution is possible, but very long and to recharge, for various reasons, all the plant needs to be stopped. I am confident the charges will last one year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just a question based on Yuri Lebedev’s question:
In this test, if you needed to recharge the reactors with new fuel in order to maintain the power output for the customer over the agreed period of time, would you do it?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Silvio Caggia:
Please read the paper Cook- Rossi.
So far I am not able to add other considerations and Prof. Cook and I are continuing our theoretical research. Obviously, he is much better than me, but integrating his theoretical background and my experimentalism we will arrive to write something useful, I think. We have also decided to write nothing else before we can say something conclusive.
He too, as me, is a warrior and he too, as me, hates the coffee shop chattering wherein elementary particles are treated like metal spheres of a pin-ball: “the proton goes here, smacks the Li target and makes a lot of heat, then an electron is captured and bla,bla,bla…”. We want to reach a solid reconciliation with a rigorous mathematical structure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yuri Lebedev:
We will give these data at the end of the test. Until the end of the test I cannot answer.
I am very sorry, because your comment has given to us a strong encouragement from your great Country. About Dr Parkhomov, I agree with you: he has been able to make a difficult work in the best possible way.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
A specific update: based on the measurements you are making today telll me: the efficiency of the charge is exactly the same as at the beginning of this test?
Thank you and also I want you know that in Russia you are popular, mainly after the replication made by Alexander Parkhomov:
from Russia, with big esteem,
Yuri
Dear Andrea Rossi,
About the supposed reaction of Lithium-7 and Hidrogen nuclei, I have read that the clean two Helium products are not the only possibile outcome:
https://fusionefredda.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/reazioni.jpeg
Do you have control on the reaction outcame or you termalize unwanted gammas and neutrons?
Regards
Bernie Koppenhofer:
He,he,he…I settle for a pizza and beer!
Thank you very much: you all are helping me enough with all your encouragement and your comments, from which I am learning so much. You all are part of the Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: I respect and salute you efforts. After seven plus months of 16 hour days (and now 18 hour days) inside a shipping container has to be getting very, very old by now. It seems to me you are making all the sacrifices to bring your new fire to us. Is there nothing we can do to help? I just want to make sure you realize you and your team are not alone, if there is anything we can do to make your efforts easier, please do not hesitate to ask. Pizza, beer, comfortable chair, more nickel, lithium? (: Thanks.
Hortense Tieg:
Because this apparently anomalous decay, that violates the energy conservation, can be explained with an increase of mass during the interactions that can be understood by means of concatenations of Feynmann diagrams, wherein the fields of virtual massive e.p. can resonate with the fields of the B meson; remember that also the lepton Tau is a virtual particle and that we are talking of interactions that generate e.p. with a lifespan from 10^-23 to 10^-24 s, while the Tau has a lifespan of 3.4 x 10^-13 s.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No, I made a lab in Miami to make new materials. During the last 2 weeks I worked 18 hours per day instead of 16… But now the new material I needed is made, the situation returns to 16/day. Next week we’ll have the E-Cta X in operatin again. Fingers crossed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you building your new lab for making materials that don’t exist inside your shipping container? If so, is it getting a little cramped there?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for the suggestion, I will pass it on to the Professors that will make the analisys of the “ashes”.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Why you insist that the Standard Model is untouchable after the discovery that the meson B decays into a Tau instead of a Muon?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
To state the obvious, when measuring helium one should also measure the isotope ratio (He3/He4).
regards, pekka
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://rossilivecat.com/all.html
to find comments published today in another post of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.