United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

20,098 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gian:
    Very nice reference of a prestigious French publication related to our January 31st presentation of the Ecat SK.
    Thank you for the reference!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • …. ma guarda un po’:

    http://roulezelectrique.com/de-lenergie-nucleaire-sans-dechets-radioactifs-pour-verdir-les-reseaux-electriques-et-les-ve/

    Con sempre viva stima e simpatia
    Gian

    P.S. Che Dio ti aiuti, ma tu rispetta la tua salute.

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    He,he,he
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • JPR

    Dear Andrea,
    It happened to me to read today this: http://www.classe.cornell.edu/research/CesrTA/ElectronCloud.html
    In particular I noted the incipit of the paper (page 1):
    “It wasn’t until the 1990’s that the BUILD UP OF HIGH DENSITIES OF LOW ENERGY ELECTRONS was identified as the reason behind performance limitations in many types of particles accelerators over the preceding decades…(OMISSIS)…THESE ELECTRONS CAUSE A WIDE VARIETY OF UNDESIRABLE EFFECTS”
    Now, comparing this paper to your paper published on Researchgate on January 24 2019
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    it comes up to me this consideration: SOMEBODY SEES IN THE MOULD ONLY A DIRT, SOMEBODY ELSE DISCOVERS THE PENICILLIN.
    Godspeed,
    JPR

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sven:
    The ads are for persons that don’t know about us. Persons that go to http://www.ecat.com already know us, they need information, not ads.
    In our website they can find all, also all the links to the menu of
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sven

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    1.You have advertising for E-Cat SK on E-Catworld but not on your official site ecat.com.
    2.The information about your offerings is not up to date on ecat.com.

    Could you explain why?

    Best regards
    Sven

  • Andrea Rossi

    O.S.:
    You are right. Yes, we will organize the best possible assistance, but our Clients must have a back up.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel De Caluwé:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Forsberg:
    Peter Forsberg! What a pleasure to hear from you again…thank you for the attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rebecca Newton:
    Quite remarkable, mainly after the editing made on
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    We raised artificially the tone of my bad voice, cut the useless parts and made a menu so that the Readers can go on the spot on the part they are interested to, if they want not to watch the whole 3 hours raw video.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rebecca Newton

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    How would you define the results of the Ecat SK presentation?
    I can see that most of the qualified attendance has reacted positively to it.
    Godspeed,
    Rebecca

  • Peter Forsberg

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Congratulations of going into the commercial phase of the ECat project.

    Godspeed and God Bless

    Peter Forsberg

    Jeremiah 33:3

  • Daniel De Caluwé

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    On February 1, 2019 at 3:43 PM, I wrote:

    ‘I was able to look at the whole presentation now, and I also agree with your calculations (except maybe with the ‘calorimetric comparision’, where I found another result for the Power needed to heat up the air from 0°C to 16°C: As the Cp of air is 1 J/(kg*K), I found: Power = 6700(kg/h)*1(J/(kg*K))*16K = 107200J/H = (107200/3600)Watt = 29.78 Watt, but I was quick, and maybe I’m wrong?)’

    As I was very busy, I only now found the time to recheck what I wrote above (in the quote), and I saw that I made a mistake because of a wrong table in my polytechnical thumb book, where the Cp of air was given as 1 J/(kg*K), where it is 1 kJ/(kg*K) (Baehr), but this means that I have to correct my result as 29.78 kWatt (and not 29.78 Watt). But of course that is more than the 20.5 kWatt that you calculated.

    But in the case of gases like air, the Cp and the Cv are not equal. The Cp (specific heat at constant pressure) always is bigger than the Cv (specific heat at constant volume), because in the first case (Cp) also work is delivered. (Imagine a closed bottle with air that has to be heated (Cv) and compare it with a bottle with a piston, where the pressure is held constant (at the other side of the piston = (for instance) atmospheric pressure), and some of the heat is used to move the piston, so work is done, and that means less energy to heat up the air, so the Cp of gases always is bigger than the Cv of gases.

    And although a room is never completely closed (there are always leaks and losses to the environment, especially when, from time to time, doors are opened ;-), we could consider a room (filled with air) as a recipient with constant volume, isn’t it?

    Well, lets calculate again with the Cv (at constant volume) of air instead of the Cp (at constant pressure) or air. This link gives the properties of air>:

    https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/air-properties-d_156.html

    And there we found: Cv of air = 0.7171 kJ/kgK (instead of the Cp that is 1 kJ/kgK)

    Calculating with Cv instead of the Cp, I find:

    Power = 6700(kg/h)*0.7171(kJ/(kg*K))*16K = 76873.12 kJ/h = (76873.12/3600) kJ/s = 21.35 kW, what is very close to your result…

    Kind Regards,
    Ir. Daniel De Caluwé

  • O. S.

    Dt. Rossi,

    for an industrial plant a highly reliable heat supply is usually more important than a bit of energy cost saving.
    You said that all e-catSK will be controlled from Leonardo’s headquater.
    Will this be done from a 24h/7d occupied control room?
    And in case that an e-catSK needs repair work, will you gurantee a maximum response time for one of your maintenance guys to be dispatched?

    Greetings
    O. S.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Aillas Toice:
    None of the two.
    No, we are not working anymore on the control panel, that we deem consolidated, albeit, as everything, subject to evolution. While the Ecat QX’s c.p. was not enough reliable to be delivered to a Client, the SK’s is.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Aillas Troice

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    Congratulations on the important milestone on January 31st. I’ve been following your work since the Lugano test, and it’s great to see the commercialization phase has finally begun.

    I was wondering if you can answer the following without disclosing anything confidential: You say the control panel consumes 380Wh/h, but only a small part of that energy is actually fed to the E-cat, the rest is lost as waste heat (that can be recuperated). Is there basically a powerful computer in the control panel, doing complex calculations to keep the reaction going and generating all that waste heat in the process, like all powerful computers do? Or is there some complex and inefficient energy transformation process going on in the control panel, a process that turns only a small part of the 380WH/h into a form the e-Cat can use, while the rest of the energy is “wasted”? Is reducing the control panel’s power consumption one of your current priorities? Thank you if you can answer and godspeed!

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    Work in progress.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • orsobubu

    People,

    Rodney is a great folk who is writing a deep study about capitalism, and you can see it from the knowledges he has. Now, his post looks to me as a realistic picture of a nightmare (!), a grim perspective for workers, for managers, for industrialists, for US economy, for LENR, for Rossi, in short, for everything we love.

    Rodney, I hope you’ll add a final chapter on possible future adoption of new, more advanced production systems getting rid of Capital and Money, possibly linking this revolution to the New Fire Age.

    And don’t forget to specify that all energy forms must be integrated.

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    Very exciting times now! I listen to the E-catSK song now and then.
    Has the large 40MW customer got his second 22KW E-catSK yet, or is it going to be installed?
    Best regards
    Nils Fryklund

  • Correction:

    In the fifth from last line in my February 7, 2019 at 2:24 PM message, the word ‘customers’ should instead have been ‘competitors’. Sorry about that.

    Rodney.

  • Hi folks:

    Regarding the prompt, or otherwise, adoption of E-Cat technology by businesses using large quantities of heat, there is a simple answer: The reality is that competition is fierce in the great majority of industries in North America. In consequence, profit margins are narrow enough that, among companies using large quantities of heat, the difference between one that achieves a 20% reduction in its costs of heat and one that does not, can mean the difference between being healthily profitable or bankrupt.

    So, if I owned a business in which one quarter of my expenses were the cost of heat, and I was able to reduce that cost from one quarter to 20% by renting my heat from Leonardo Corporation, the very last thing I would want to do is let my competitors know what I was doing. I would suddenly find myself, because I was more alert than they were, at a huge competitive advantage. So it does not surprise me at all that those who switch to E-Cat heat would be keen that there be an NDA, effectively delaying for as long as possible their competitors realizing what was happening.

    This would be simply another example of what has been going on for centuries: a highly alert company outwitting others that were just a little less alert. For example: during the course of the 20th Century, 1,637 american companies were in the business of manufacturing automobiles. As we all know, 1,634 of them went broke because only three remain in business today. The others had to close down either because they didn’t do quite as good a job of creating products that impressed customers, or because they didn’t do quite as good a job of keeping their costs down.

    In a highly competitive economy like that of the US, finding ways to cut costs just a couple of percent more effectively than your competitors is essential to remaining in business. So the E-Cat can make a huge difference to the economic viability of an alert company using large quantities of heat. And the management would be crazy to make their customers aware of it. Staying in business is difficult enough as it is.

    By the same token, once people become aware of E-Cat technology, if they do not immediately adopt it they will be competed out of business by those that do.

    Rodney.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DEAR READERS:
    AGAIN I HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT SOMEBODY IS OFFERING SERVICES RELATED TO THE ECAT QUALIFYING HIMSELF AS A LICENSEE. ATTENTION, WE SELL ONLY HEAT, WE DO NOT SELL PLANTS OR ECATS. IF YOU RECEIVE ANY OFFER OF ANY KIND RELATED TO THE ECAT, PLEASE SEND TO ME AN EMAIL TO ASK IF THE PERSON YOU ARE DEALING WITH IS AUTHORIZED. DO NOT PAY MONEY AND DO NOT SIGN AGREEMENTS IF YOU DID NOT HAVE CONFIRMATION FROM MYSELF THAT THE PERSON YOU ARE DEALING WITH IS AUTHORIZED !!!
    THERE ARE AROUND WEBSITES AND EMAIL ADDRESSES THAT CITE THE NAME ECAT THAT ARE FALSE. PLEASE SEND US COPIES OF THE EMAILS YOU RECEIVE, OFFERING OUR PRODUCTS, TO ALLOW US TO ACTIVATE OUR ATTORNEYS.
    PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO
    INFO@LEONARDOCORP1996.COM
    AND WITHIN 24 HOURS YOU WILL HAVE OUR RESPONSE.
    WARM REGARDS,
    DR ANDREA ROSSI – CEO OF LEONARDO CORPORATION

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lib:
    1- yes
    2- no
    3- no
    4- if it works, yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Patrick Ellul:
    Now we are going into a period during which we will have a commercial expansion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Greg Daigle:
    For now we do not serve houses, eventually, we’ll see.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Yes, we tried to make it easy to look at the highlights.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com after the editing is very beautiful.
    Thank you!

  • Greg Daigle

    Dr Rossi,
    do you think the diffusion of the Ecat can be spurred by the US House Resolution on the New Green Deal?
    Greg Daigle

  • Lib

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    Summarizing your answers:

    – Who is imposing the NDA, a) your company or b) the customers?
    > answer a+b
    – In case the answer [the above] is b). Can a customer disclose they are using your product if they decide so?
    > answer yes

    I wanted to ask you some additional questions:

    1. In case of an NDA imposed by both your company and your customers (the a+b case of your answer), could your customers still disclose they are using your product if they decided to do so?

    2. Don’t you think that sealing the outcome of the COP of the Ecat behind an NDA could hinder rather then promote the diffusion of the Ecat?

    3. Is there any entry fee that your customers need to pay to use your product?

    4. If a car brand advertised that a certain model could run for 20000 miles without refueling, due to a proprietary new and yet unknown and undisclosed phenomenon, but sealed the actual performances of such car behind a strong NDA, would you buy that car?

    Kind Regards,

    Lib

  • Patrick Ellul

    Dear Andrea,
    Throughout your journey, your followers have always had a milestone to look forward to.
    What is your next major milestone and when do you think it will happen?
    Best regards.
    Patrick

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Alessandro Coppi

    Hi Andrea,
    I see a great business, perhaps the bigger in the first phase of the spreading of the e-cat technology: introducing a bit more of COP in the range of appliances “heat generators”, in the simplest way possible.
    Pizza and bread ovens, stove both electrically supplied and methane, etc.
    Nobody would purchase an appliance without this plus that will make save for instance also only 20 percent of the bill like now make the condensation methane boilers that have made obsolete the non condensating technology.

    Best regards
    Alessandro Coppi

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, While viewing the plasma I can see what I understand as energy interaction. It is of three distinct parts within a magnetic flow from positive to negative. The positive being at the top but looking down as it is side ways on and the negative at the base with the manufactured neutral central position. The neutral being a free agent is able to escape, the negative forms the containment providing an ’economy flow’ i.e. an exterior feed back to the positive due to the internal flow from positive to negative. The colours are representative of the pressures. The yellow bands entering the positive represent the ‘economy flow’ re entering full pressure. The plasma is a manufactured three part structure with short life lifespans of its manufactured neutral i.e. virtual particles. What I can see is the same activity of the plasma as I have observed in the mechanical unifying field oscillator. I believe energy interaction whether on the atomic scale or the sub atomic produces similar effects with regards its interaction. The sub atomic being of course more intense, volatile and active but because hydrogen is the manipulated medium of the sk e-cat, the energy of the neutral is soft compared to the energy of a conventional nuclear power plant. I realize there is no technical value in this information but to inform you that from my observations and understanding your technology is providing visual confirmation of energy interaction and a resultant produced product being a manufactured neutral and it has to be remembered that the heat produced is from two dimensions, one of which being positive and the other being negative. Regards Eric Ashworth.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anders Rosnes:
    Your reservation is safe. When? Honestly, I do not know. Surely after a massive consolidated use in industries. Thank you for your sustain!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anders Rosnes

    Dear mr Rossi. My home from 1915 in south of Norway has a winter requirement of 10-15 kW. There is currently 3 generations of water heat equipment connected to the system: A coal furnace from 1960, an electrical element from about the same time and a recent low-priced air to water heat pump.

    With a degree in physics I am waiting to upgrade to an ecat device and I have been avoiding costly upgrades. So I am wondering how long it will take until such a product can be available for home use, and I would be honored to be an early customer.

    I have registered on your waiting list some years ago.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lib:
    1- a+b
    2- yes
    3- confidential
    4- confidential
    5- n.a.
    6- enough
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lib

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    I don’t understand your answers, probably because I don’t know which answer applies to you which question.
    I will rephrase them numbering the questions:

    1. Who is imposing the NDA, a) your company or b) the customers?
    2. In case the answer to 1. Is b). Can a customer disclose they are using your product if they decide so?
    3. What are the terms of the NDA? (In general)
    4. Is the total COP of the apparatus part of the NDA?
    5. If the answer to 4. Is yes, why has this inclosed in the NDA? (not being the COP intellectual property)
    6. From your statement I understand that you have been contacted from America, EUrope, Cina, Russia and Africa after the presentation. Can you tell us how many contracts are currently being discussed?

    Kind Regards,

    Lib

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sven:
    Hydrofusion is and will remain our commercial Partner in Sweden.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    Yes, it is theoretically possible.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lib:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    3- will do in due time
    4- deals are on course, we do not sell ice creams
    5- America, Europe, Russia, China, Japan, Australia, Africa
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mario Menichella:
    Hi, Mario!
    Thank you for your empathy.
    The basics are always the same as described in my patent.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lib:
    I already explained.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
    The module is the one you saw on http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    They can be installed in any configuration, everywhere, depending on the specific situations.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nereo Miconi:
    Please watch http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    After watching it well, please compare.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    With the help of God, the march will continue…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    The introduction of the E-Cat in the market will soon allow you to supply heat and/or steam at prices much lower than those of the market.
    Although at the beginning there will be relatively few plants that hopefully will grow in number, this will not significantly change the current economic and political balance in the world.
    But the disruptive capacity of the E-Cat is immense, and sooner or later it could bother someone.
    I know you’ve said many times that all energy can work together, but others may not agree.
    If I have a pebble in the shoe that bothers me to walk, I remove the pebble in order to continue doing my business.
    I’m a little worried …

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Nereo Miconi

    Dr Rossi,
    Why the COP of the Ecat SK is minor than the COP of past models of Ecat?
    Thanks if you can answer,
    Nereo Miconi

  • Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Dear Andrea,
    Are you working on standardized container solutions containing a specific number of E-CatSKs, or will the heating solutions be costum made for each specific costumer in this initial phase of commersializing?
    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik

  • Lib

    Dear Dr Rossi,

    From the question of Michel of Feb 5th, it seems that your customers will be subject to an NDA. Then you answered that this is because customers don’t want to be harassed.
    Who is imposing the NDA? Your company or the customers?
    What happens in the case a customer actually wants to be arassed?
    What are the terms of the NDA?
    Is the apparatus total energy input/output part of the NDA?

    If your company has imposed the NDA over energy input/output , not being that info intellectual property can you then explain us why?

    Kind Regards,

    Lib

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>