United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

23,092 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • George N

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    It was mentioned in the past to fit e-cats to power turbine generators (such as ABB) in order to generate electricity using existing infrastructure. Is this still a priority?

    Thanks,
    George N

  • Veronica Naggia

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi

    I just read you are developing a new P.V. cell system. Alternatively, would it be possible to apply your thermoelectrical devices to the E-cat in order to convert the waste heat into additional electricity? I’m talking about the thermoelectrical devices you developed for the U.S. army more than 15 years ago ( https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a432046.pdf ). In such case, how much would the COP increase?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Sorry, I do not understand what you wrote.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, I have just been reading a paper titled Zitterbewegung and the Electron by retired professor Arend Niehaus of physics of Ultrecht University, the Netherlands. The paper contains diagrams and explains in easy to read format technical details. This material to me implies that an entity as stated being an electron is dependent upon a time and space to be either a positive or negative i.e. the product of a contradiction by being able to transition between being that of a volume or that of a size. This paper for me represents an in depth explanation of an electrons ability to hide itself within an enigma and is, I believe, worth taking notice of. Also to add my own none technical thoughts, I believe the electron is not only responding to the positive proton charge alone but catering to both energy states, one being comprised of the inner positive state of something and the other being that outer state of nothing with regards to materiality and thereby the electron is sandwiched between what I refer to as the Absolutes of contradiction and which I believe is responsible for all of nature and that which exists within. Could EVOs be classified as none material neutrals?. Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Rodney Nicholson

    @K.
    = = = = = = = =
    K.
    March 3, 2019 at 10:05 AM

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Can the Ecat give heat so cheaply to allow the production of hydrogen competitive and therefore boost the hydrogen economy?
    K.
    = = = = = = =
    Hi K.

    Please correct me if I am wrong, but are not the principal problems with hydrogen: A) that it is massively explosive (it was the fuel for the main engines of the Space Shuttle!) and, B) that it would need an entirely new, nationwide, safety-oriented infrastructure to transport and store it, which in practical terms goes a long way to rendering it economically non-viable?

    Rodney.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your suggestion and your kind sustain to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    I am inventing a new cell.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    Thank you for your insight.
    What I can say is that we are working very seriously on the direct production of electricity.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    K.:
    I am not expert of hydrogen production, therefore I cannot know if cheaper heat can boost the hydrogen economy. Only after a specific and detailed analysis I could give a consistent answer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • K.

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Can the Ecat give heat so cheaply to allow the production of hydrogen competitive and therefore boost the hydrogen economy?
    K.

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea,
    regarding your answer to Pekka Janhunen.
    Also to me 10% of efficiency seems reasonable, and just right for future house applications: a 22Kw ECat has similar power to current boilers (my boiler is the baseline, with 21Kw, that heat a 150mq house and produces hot water, but there exist also a higher range model that is 25Kw). With about 2kwh of continuos electric power, one can charge one or more battery packs (there exist commercial Tesla battery packs of 400V 7-10KWh, that can be put in parallel to increase capacity, since some years, you only need an inverter) and power the ECat itself and the house. The “waste” heat can then be used for sanitary water, heat and air conditioning. If you use the heat for all this things, you need few electric power, just for appliances and to cook. 2kwh backed up by batteries should be enough… The only higher electric need could be to recharge electric cars. But if you have an electric car, you could increase the battery pack capacity at the house and run the Ecat moreless continuously to recharge the car when needed: an electric car can do at least 5km with a kwh, so if you use your car, let’s say for 100km/day, maybe total among your electric cars (your wife, your childrens), you need 20kwh/day, that is half of the ECat production. Maybe if you have electric cars, you may consider a bigger ECat, or solar panels, or maybe you manage to obtain more than 10% efficiency. Anyway the future is bright: an household ECat should solve all your energy problems, even if you have electric cars…

    Electric regards,
    Marco.

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    are you inventing a new type of P.V. cell, or are you using an existing type adapted for your needs?
    Kind regards,
    Italo R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Some of the newer multi-junction photovoltaic cells claim efficiencies approaching 50%. If you can engineer the heat dissipation problems, you would have a system approaching that of industrial electric production for a more smaller, distributed technology. eCat + solar cells – sound like a dream come true, if it works.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    We are a high technology company. R&D can never stop. When a company like Leonardo Corporation stops R&D its death starts its course. We are making important inventions that are the future of us, while we are focusing on the diffusion of our Ecats. When our competitors will reach what we are doing now ( it will take 3-5 years at the least ), we will be again years ahead of them with our new “divisions”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    We are studying a new kind of P.V. system.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    >ugust Harnett:
    I’d say yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • August Harnett

    I read carefully http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    and http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    Making an analysis of all the parts of them I reached the conclusion that the very core of your technology and its theory is in the paragraph 4 of your paper.
    Am I correct?

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Are photovoltaic cells (or equivalent) used in the direct electricity production or some other technique?

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    I’m a bit surprised that you are still further researching the E-cat as I understood from a previous question that you would be putting all your energy in getting the E-cat into full production and acquiring more orders in this period.
    Is there a special reason that you continued researching the E-Cat on its direct electrical output capabilities?
    Thanks and kind regards, Gerard

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes: first principle of thermodynamics.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Is there a heat v. electricity trade off with the E-Cat? In other words, the more heat you produce, the less electricity, and vice versa?

    Kind regards,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    How large conversion efficiency do you want for direct electricity production, in order to consider it worthwhile? Is ten percent enough?
    best regards, /pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    Yes, it has improved. We are working on it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • CC

    Dr Rossi:
    I understood from your comment of yesterday that the chance to produce electricity directly by the Ecat has improved: am I correct?
    CC

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    B:
    Yes, I applied in many experiments magnetic fields. The effects are confidential.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Boris:
    Paragraphs 3,4.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Boris

    In the paper of Andrea Rossi published on Researchgate are proposed different theoretical hypothesis .
    Which one is considered more likely to be the right one?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Boris

  • B

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Did you apply in your experiments magnetic fields interacting with the plasma? If yes, did you observe effects from such interaction?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eureka:
    Thank you for the suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eureka

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I watched on youtube the Ecat SK presentation of January 31st and I saw the blue Ecat SK: why blue? I’d suggest to paint it gold, to put in evidence its preciousness.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    The base is the same, the setup in laboratory is more complex, to allow extra experiments and measurements. You can see a sketch of it in the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    We are seeing some light.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • CC

    Dear Andrea,
    About the production of electricity directly from the Ecat: did you mean that progresses have been made?

  • Anonymous

    Again about the video http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    you said that the setup described in paragraph 5 of http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is not the same of the presentation of the SK on January 31st, but I have a question: is the setup described in your paper equal to the Ecat SK, or is a different thing?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com to find other comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    Thank you for your kind sustain; you have not to apologize, I understand your curiosity. We will give these data when they will be important.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi
    Based on your feedback, the commercial impact of your January 31st presentation is greater than your expectations.
    After one month, can you publish the total power you have on order or more traditionally the number of months of activity corresponding to your order book?
    I apologize if you consider this information confidential.
    All my support for your amazing invention
    Best regards
    Raffaele

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    One last statement about global\heating\cooling. It seems to me that the effects of plant absorption of co2 on planet carbon content is glossed over by global heating advocates. Plants make up 75% of global organic material. The amount of co2 they absorb is estimated to be 25 to 40% of atmospheric content. Since all our human food consumption is derived one way or another through the use of their mass, the increase in atmospheric content of co2 directly provides humans with more of their sustenance. Studies have shown that the higher the concentration of co2 the higher the increase of plant growth. Empirical evidence for me that this is correct is my observation that my grass and trees on my property seem to be getting more growth than in previous years without any increase on my part of applied fertilizer or other plant food. I think that perhaps we should encourage co2 production rather than discourage it(tongue in cheek). Our efforts should be in decreasing other atmospheric gas components such as Nitrogen and ozone.
    Nourishing regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    George Dvorak:
    I never used MHD generators, because too expensive respect the relatively low efficiency.
    As for your glorious name: he,he,he…true, when in Piazza del Duomo ( the central place of Milan where is the Duomo, the most beautiful Gothic cathedral of Europe ) you call “Rossi!” at least several persons turn to you.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers,
    Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • George Dvorak

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Did you ever use a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) generator to turn into electricity the kinetic and thermal energy?
    As for my surname, I am not a relative of the great musicist: you know, Dvorak, among Czechs, is a very common name, as the name of the great inventor Rossi among Italians…

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    I cannot answer to this question in positive or in negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    Home installations are in our strategy.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    orsobubu,

    I take no position on the impact of carbon emissions on global warming. That is not my field of expertise. But I do recognize a political trend to suppress carbon footprint emissions. With the talk of banning commercial aircraft because of fossil fuel use and emissions, it seems this could facilitate the conversion of energy generation to eCat technology. As has been pointed out in other posts, the integration of a new energy technology is a long and slow process. If eCat works (a big if), then seizing every advantage to facilitate the conversion should be used. If inexpensive, pollution free energy becomes readily available across our planet, the quality of life can drastically improve. Andrea Rossi appears to be using the economic approach to the integration of eCat technology into our society — it is cheaper than alternative methods. I am merely pointing out an additional benefit.

  • Yrka

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi
    DO YOU WORK OVER HOME INSTALLATIONS OR NOW YOU ARE NOT INTERESTING?
    Yury Isaev
    Engineer
    Tyumen, Russia

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>