Dear Dr. Rossi,
how much time do you think will pass before some of your customers will be publicly known?
Can’t you solicit at least one of them?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Readers:
I read today on Researchgate ( http://www.researchgate.net ) this very interesting publication of Dr Hossein Javedi, added to the project “Creative Particles of Higgs, or CPH Theory”.
This publication is very interesting, also because it shows the first ever image of a Black Hole, that you can also see in this link, published by Dr Javedi: https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/320/cpsprodpb/540D/production/_106371512_small.jpg
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I am sending you a link to my report on the 30th anniversary of the Fleischman-Pons press conference. There’s a little place about you. https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2606951.html
My best regards,
Sergei Tcvetkov.
Giorgio:
1- the Ecat technology has nothing to do with the control system of an aeroplane
2- they who do not errors can throw the first stone. Technologies are born and developed by means of errors. Unfortunately, as they say, the air and space technology history is written with blood, but the percentage of victims of aircraft incidents are statistically by an order of magnitude minor that the victims of car and motorcycles crashes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the enormous body of information that you and your readers publish on this excellent blog about the LENR: combining the comments and the links on them this blog is a LENR constantly updeted encyclopedia. The video http://www.ecatskdemo.com is a masterpiece.
Best Regards,
Michael
What do you think of the error made by Boeing that caused the death of over 300 persons, just because they did not install a double control system of the device that calculated the inclination of the aeroplane? Could in future the Ecat have a role to correct these errors?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I noticed that the Ecat SK shown in http://www.ecatskdemo.com has on the top a Sievert detector and a neutron bubble column: did you measure ionizing radiations in the 10 years of operation emitted from all the Ecats ?
Thank if you can answer,
Ada
2) Can you say: is the Direct Electricity Effect a “DC” effect (fixed polarity, like a photo-voltaic cell) or an “AC” effect (alternating polarity, like an engine-generator)?
Alessandro Coppi:
If I have understood, you are asking how can we measure something that does not exist in our knowledge: well, in this case we will have to study the effect, if any, to learn how to measure it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I refer to http://www.ecatskdemo.com and to the video of the November 24th Stockholm Ecat QX presentation: which is the difference between the QX and the SK: is it also in the charge?
Dr Rossi,
here is an update of Power Engineering, April 9 2019:
Elizabeth Ingram presents the latest stories on power generation, renewable energy and smart grid,
Rod Walton
Hi Andrea,
…and what would happen if a new phenomenon never observed before instead of electricity was involved in the production of Lenr plasma? We would not have tools to measure it.
You say you are working with a global partner. May I ask:
a) Does your global partner have experience bringing industrial and domestic products to market?
a) Will your global partner be able to help you with the authorizations and safety certifications for E-Cats?
b) Do you think the partner will be able to help with faster approval for domestic E-Cats?
You answered Frank Eckland about the terms of the domestic E-Cats:
“… I would say at the most a few years.”
Earlier you wrote (I mean domestic E-Cats) that you are not afraid of competitors, because Leonardo has proven technology, low prices and will sell a large amount, so reverse engineering is not terrible, competitors simply will not catch up.
Perhaps in “a few years”, competitors will be able to equalize these advantages. Or do you rely on patent protection? But China will not stop the patent.
Maybe you need to sell technology? This is also commercialization.
“Dog in the hay” – not the best type of business.
Sorry for the sharpness.
Tired of waiting for the long-promised domestic E-Cats.
Dear Andrea, Maybe your readers will find this interesting. For me LENR technology not only provides a cheap, clean source of energy but holds a fascination because it demonstrates a level of physics that I believe is able to disprove flawed theories put forward by the accepted regime that dictates what is true and what is false within the study of physics. This I know also confuses a lot of people, especially those not involved in the study of academic physics i.e. those who are able to free think outside of dogma without persecution. Thereby I can inform readers that my views are based upon a limited none academic career but one of free thought, experimentation and patented embodied theory regarding a generalized understanding of energy. Fortunately the JONP exists providing a much needed place whereby a sharing of information is able to take place without censorship being imposed. Albeit, physics being a sensitive, highly censored subject, within academia, due to its ability to reveal a closely guarded secret, becomes self evident to those involved in specific fields of study. I feel fortunate to be able to put my views forward for consideration without undue animosity.
To recap a unified field can be demonstrated by a mechanical mechanism that produces binary spinning flows of air whereby each oscillate within their inner and their outer chamber (one flow per chamber) and that upon eventual contact they transition from curvature flow forces to a linear flow force and because this activity generates a super negative at the pole potentials i.e. the origin of the flows, an interior back flow is set in motion at the super positive pole potential that is contrary to the combined linear down flow and that is labeled an ‘economy flow’ of a binding force that has to transition itself from that of a positive condensed flow force to that of a rarefied negative flow force i.e. the same flow but of a different force in space and time. I could give this single back flow two names but to overcome confusion and keep things true I give it one name because its the same flow but simply transitioned due to its environments that it encounters (a flow force that glues). I also believe the atom contains a binary flow having an internal circulation and an external circulation. The external circulation when at the atomic level is the electro magnetic field and represents the external mass of the product. This external flow is identical to the internal flow direction and represents the negative field with its positive and negative potentials of its flow in accordance to its position of its flow potentials in space and time. When a single rotor rotates, its propellers draw in any exterior material by the force of the inputted flow but should the exterior material such as a solid wall be unable to be drawn in then the spinning rotor is drawn towards it, because an increase in negativity is created between the flow and the exterior material, not difficult to understand. Therefore the mechanism had to be designed specifically to overcome this negative zone of attraction, a problem instigated by the creation of its super negative potential spilling into its immediate exterior environment caused by its required integral multi propeller assembly and by which was overcome by inducing oscillations onto the surrounding outer environment of the downward flow force potentials, creating a necessary insulation. The method is simple but ingenious. The propulsion unit has to have a specially designed fuselage around the exterior that accommodates complimentary chambers designed specifically to induce exterior oscillations around the downward propelling exterior linear flow force at the time, when the curvature forces become linear. These vibrational induction chambers produce what is referred to as the ‘static barrier layer’ that insulates the exterior flow of the mechanism from exterior objects and thereby provides the mechanism with a necessary system of identity, in the same way as an atom. The exterior linear flow carries the vibration within and without its field as it encompasses the craft. Consequently, the mechanism is able to demonstrate the ‘static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’. A technology that has been acknowledged as one before its time and denied its demonstration and its explanation. How I described the mechanism, being somewhat of a layman, was as a compressed atom, being unfamiliar with the term mass defect with regards its integral propeller assembly.
The static and mobile aspects of the energy refers to both structure and flows i.e. mobile propellers/static frame, mobile flow/static boundary. The system is binary in all aspects so as to create a unified field. Because energy is a binary system of opposing states it can involve varying degrees of mobility and inactivity on the two dimensions of its being i.e. in the embodied atomic state and its none embodied state. Mass defect comes in varying degrees of energy, from being totally defective to totally effective with regards these states. Mass is in reference to the two states. Defect is in reference to the space/distance between its two dimensions of charge. Energy must posses a distance and therefore a time dimension of interaction. Neutrons have total mass defect i.e. totally defective energy being devoid of distance and thereby time, rendering them unable to provide a source of energy. Electrons have minimal mass defect making them highly effective providers of energy (an interesting thought: if a neutron represents the most dense state of material substance what would be its absolute opposite if the whole state of being relies upon the something and the nothing i.e. a binary unchangeable situation whereby opposites attract and the planck length could maintains order by necessity). The mechanism is able to demonstrate these two states in both dimensions i.e. the static embodied solid mechanism and the none solid mobile flows allowing these basic interactions to be observed, measured and used as a springboard from which a greater understanding of energy can be realized by those involved in physics and thereby, I believe, able to project the understanding into the none physical aspect between which the physical exists being between both the point and the periphery i.e. a binary state of none existence with regards to energy but one not without influence within the material world. So here is just one such embodied technology described as ‘before its time’, able to help explain energy, be able to efficiently lift a huge amount of weight and yet we read of a company that seeks greater efficiency with regards an aircraft design that requires artificial intelligence to overcome a known problem. Time to embrace these new technologies or are we not quite there yet?. And as a footnote I believe that Richard Feynman provided a clue to potentiality when he described that a positron moving backwards in time and space would be annihilated by an electron but visa versa an electron moving forward would become a positron. To move forward is to become more restricted i.e. condensed and positive thereby eventually turning outside in. To move backwards is to become more rarefied and negative and thereby turning inside out, this also,I believe, applies to the proton/neutron but requires detailed explanation. Atoms contain mini environments. Without understanding volume and size environments and relationships with regards charge potentials I think it difficult to understand energy. Interacting electro magnetic fields can, I believe, be considered as time zones that create flux tubes and that involve chirality. A complex situation indeed that requires a greater explanation and one which I shall attempt to provide. Regards Eric Ashworth
Italo R.:
It does not depend on us, as I explained. Of course we will make it happen as soon as possible.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
how much time do you think will pass before some of your customers will be publicly known?
Can’t you solicit at least one of them?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Readers:
I read today on Researchgate ( http://www.researchgate.net ) this very interesting publication of Dr Hossein Javedi, added to the project “Creative Particles of Higgs, or CPH Theory”.
This publication is very interesting, also because it shows the first ever image of a Black Hole, that you can also see in this link, published by Dr Javedi:
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/320/cpsprodpb/540D/production/_106371512_small.jpg
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tcvetkov:
Thank you for the information and the link!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, I am sending you a link to my report on the 30th anniversary of the Fleischman-Pons press conference. There’s a little place about you. https://regnum.ru/news/innovatio/2606951.html
My best regards,
Sergei Tcvetkov.
Giorgio:
1- the Ecat technology has nothing to do with the control system of an aeroplane
2- they who do not errors can throw the first stone. Technologies are born and developed by means of errors. Unfortunately, as they say, the air and space technology history is written with blood, but the percentage of victims of aircraft incidents are statistically by an order of magnitude minor that the victims of car and motorcycles crashes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Michael Waterhouse:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to read comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ada:
I am not a ghostbuster. I react to things I can measure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
and what about the unknown radiations, also called dark radiations?
Ada
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the enormous body of information that you and your readers publish on this excellent blog about the LENR: combining the comments and the links on them this blog is a LENR constantly updeted encyclopedia. The video http://www.ecatskdemo.com is a masterpiece.
Best Regards,
Michael
What do you think of the error made by Boeing that caused the death of over 300 persons, just because they did not install a double control system of the device that calculated the inclination of the aeroplane? Could in future the Ecat have a role to correct these errors?
Ada:
No, neither during the many measurements ( hundreds ) made by specialists independent from us.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I noticed that the Ecat SK shown in http://www.ecatskdemo.com has on the top a Sievert detector and a neutron bubble column: did you measure ionizing radiations in the 10 years of operation emitted from all the Ecats ?
Thank if you can answer,
Ada
WaltC:
1- it will be expanded
2- no, at this point I can’t disclose this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1) You said that your Direct Electricity Effect will, in part, be explained by current and future LENR theories. Do you believe that your current theory (http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interaction) explains that effect already, or will it need to be expanded?
2) Can you say: is the Direct Electricity Effect a “DC” effect (fixed polarity, like a photo-voltaic cell) or an “AC” effect (alternating polarity, like an engine-generator)?
Thanks, WaltC
Alessandro Coppi:
If I have understood, you are asking how can we measure something that does not exist in our knowledge: well, in this case we will have to study the effect, if any, to learn how to measure it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Shannon Kunich:
Only if the duty of the Ecat is to make electricity, because to make 1 eWh you need about 3 tWh
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Erasmo:
No, it is not;the difference is in the control system.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ressie Knouse:
In general yes, but their force can become relevant in some specific situations I have described in par. 1 and 2,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
your paper on http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions cites the Wan Der Waals and the casimir forces as a possible source for LENR: aren’t they too weak for this?
I refer to http://www.ecatskdemo.com and to the video of the November 24th Stockholm Ecat QX presentation: which is the difference between the QX and the SK: is it also in the charge?
Dr Rossi,
I understand that every electric Wh you get directly from the plasma of the Ecat SK is worth 3 times a thermal Wh, correct?
Cheers
Shannon
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
here is an update of Power Engineering, April 9 2019:
Elizabeth Ingram presents the latest stories on power generation, renewable energy and smart grid,
Rod Walton
Alessandro Coppi:
I do not understand what you mean.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is your eCat-SK Electric model based on Magnetohydrodynamic generation?
Hi Andrea,
…and what would happen if a new phenomenon never observed before instead of electricity was involved in the production of Lenr plasma? We would not have tools to measure it.
Best regards
Alessandro Coppi
Szymon Blachuta:
1- yes
2- not yet
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
1- do your customer reccommend you to other?
2- is the progress in selling heat spurred by such reccommendations?
Szymon Blachuta
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I apologize — I had two questions marked “a)” in my previous post. Was your answer “yes” to both of them?
Thank you!
Frank
Frank Acland:
a) yes
b) yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eusebia Lilburn:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interaction
It is in point of fact a nice and useful piece of information. I’m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us informed like this. Thank you for sharing.
Dear Andrea,
You say you are working with a global partner. May I ask:
a) Does your global partner have experience bringing industrial and domestic products to market?
a) Will your global partner be able to help you with the authorizations and safety certifications for E-Cats?
b) Do you think the partner will be able to help with faster approval for domestic E-Cats?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight, offered to our Readers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yrka:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sohl:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A.B.:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do you use a cold cathod in the Ecat SK we saw in http://www.ecatskdemo.com ?
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is the most interesting paper treating of LENR I ever have read.
Thank you for publishing all that information.
Regards,
Sohl
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
You answered Frank Eckland about the terms of the domestic E-Cats:
“… I would say at the most a few years.”
Earlier you wrote (I mean domestic E-Cats) that you are not afraid of competitors, because Leonardo has proven technology, low prices and will sell a large amount, so reverse engineering is not terrible, competitors simply will not catch up.
Perhaps in “a few years”, competitors will be able to equalize these advantages. Or do you rely on patent protection? But China will not stop the patent.
Maybe you need to sell technology? This is also commercialization.
“Dog in the hay” – not the best type of business.
Sorry for the sharpness.
Tired of waiting for the long-promised domestic E-Cats.
Regards and hopefully.
Yury Isaev
Engineer.
Dear Andrea, Maybe your readers will find this interesting. For me LENR technology not only provides a cheap, clean source of energy but holds a fascination because it demonstrates a level of physics that I believe is able to disprove flawed theories put forward by the accepted regime that dictates what is true and what is false within the study of physics. This I know also confuses a lot of people, especially those not involved in the study of academic physics i.e. those who are able to free think outside of dogma without persecution. Thereby I can inform readers that my views are based upon a limited none academic career but one of free thought, experimentation and patented embodied theory regarding a generalized understanding of energy. Fortunately the JONP exists providing a much needed place whereby a sharing of information is able to take place without censorship being imposed. Albeit, physics being a sensitive, highly censored subject, within academia, due to its ability to reveal a closely guarded secret, becomes self evident to those involved in specific fields of study. I feel fortunate to be able to put my views forward for consideration without undue animosity.
To recap a unified field can be demonstrated by a mechanical mechanism that produces binary spinning flows of air whereby each oscillate within their inner and their outer chamber (one flow per chamber) and that upon eventual contact they transition from curvature flow forces to a linear flow force and because this activity generates a super negative at the pole potentials i.e. the origin of the flows, an interior back flow is set in motion at the super positive pole potential that is contrary to the combined linear down flow and that is labeled an ‘economy flow’ of a binding force that has to transition itself from that of a positive condensed flow force to that of a rarefied negative flow force i.e. the same flow but of a different force in space and time. I could give this single back flow two names but to overcome confusion and keep things true I give it one name because its the same flow but simply transitioned due to its environments that it encounters (a flow force that glues). I also believe the atom contains a binary flow having an internal circulation and an external circulation. The external circulation when at the atomic level is the electro magnetic field and represents the external mass of the product. This external flow is identical to the internal flow direction and represents the negative field with its positive and negative potentials of its flow in accordance to its position of its flow potentials in space and time. When a single rotor rotates, its propellers draw in any exterior material by the force of the inputted flow but should the exterior material such as a solid wall be unable to be drawn in then the spinning rotor is drawn towards it, because an increase in negativity is created between the flow and the exterior material, not difficult to understand. Therefore the mechanism had to be designed specifically to overcome this negative zone of attraction, a problem instigated by the creation of its super negative potential spilling into its immediate exterior environment caused by its required integral multi propeller assembly and by which was overcome by inducing oscillations onto the surrounding outer environment of the downward flow force potentials, creating a necessary insulation. The method is simple but ingenious. The propulsion unit has to have a specially designed fuselage around the exterior that accommodates complimentary chambers designed specifically to induce exterior oscillations around the downward propelling exterior linear flow force at the time, when the curvature forces become linear. These vibrational induction chambers produce what is referred to as the ‘static barrier layer’ that insulates the exterior flow of the mechanism from exterior objects and thereby provides the mechanism with a necessary system of identity, in the same way as an atom. The exterior linear flow carries the vibration within and without its field as it encompasses the craft. Consequently, the mechanism is able to demonstrate the ‘static and mobile mechanics of energy interaction’. A technology that has been acknowledged as one before its time and denied its demonstration and its explanation. How I described the mechanism, being somewhat of a layman, was as a compressed atom, being unfamiliar with the term mass defect with regards its integral propeller assembly.
The static and mobile aspects of the energy refers to both structure and flows i.e. mobile propellers/static frame, mobile flow/static boundary. The system is binary in all aspects so as to create a unified field. Because energy is a binary system of opposing states it can involve varying degrees of mobility and inactivity on the two dimensions of its being i.e. in the embodied atomic state and its none embodied state. Mass defect comes in varying degrees of energy, from being totally defective to totally effective with regards these states. Mass is in reference to the two states. Defect is in reference to the space/distance between its two dimensions of charge. Energy must posses a distance and therefore a time dimension of interaction. Neutrons have total mass defect i.e. totally defective energy being devoid of distance and thereby time, rendering them unable to provide a source of energy. Electrons have minimal mass defect making them highly effective providers of energy (an interesting thought: if a neutron represents the most dense state of material substance what would be its absolute opposite if the whole state of being relies upon the something and the nothing i.e. a binary unchangeable situation whereby opposites attract and the planck length could maintains order by necessity). The mechanism is able to demonstrate these two states in both dimensions i.e. the static embodied solid mechanism and the none solid mobile flows allowing these basic interactions to be observed, measured and used as a springboard from which a greater understanding of energy can be realized by those involved in physics and thereby, I believe, able to project the understanding into the none physical aspect between which the physical exists being between both the point and the periphery i.e. a binary state of none existence with regards to energy but one not without influence within the material world. So here is just one such embodied technology described as ‘before its time’, able to help explain energy, be able to efficiently lift a huge amount of weight and yet we read of a company that seeks greater efficiency with regards an aircraft design that requires artificial intelligence to overcome a known problem. Time to embrace these new technologies or are we not quite there yet?. And as a footnote I believe that Richard Feynman provided a clue to potentiality when he described that a positron moving backwards in time and space would be annihilated by an electron but visa versa an electron moving forward would become a positron. To move forward is to become more restricted i.e. condensed and positive thereby eventually turning outside in. To move backwards is to become more rarefied and negative and thereby turning inside out, this also,I believe, applies to the proton/neutron but requires detailed explanation. Atoms contain mini environments. Without understanding volume and size environments and relationships with regards charge potentials I think it difficult to understand energy. Interacting electro magnetic fields can, I believe, be considered as time zones that create flux tubes and that involve chirality. A complex situation indeed that requires a greater explanation and one which I shall attempt to provide. Regards Eric Ashworth
Frank Acland:
No, I’d not say many years, I’d say several years at the most.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you still convinced that it will be many years after industrial E-Cats are deployed, that you will be able to produce domestic E-Cats?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dear Readers:
Please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com
to read comments published today on other posts of this blog
Warm Regards
A.R.