Dear Andrea,
This is a meta question.
Why do you think that you are encountering some issues with your production ready E-Cat SK? Do you think there wasn’t enough testing before launch? Or are the issues specific to the environment of the clients?
Regards
Patrick
Buongiorno Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for your achievements with the Ecta SK ( http://www.ecatskdemo.com ).
Your business model is similar to the agreement Microsoft-IBM.
Best success wishes,
Sergio Poletti
Dear Andrea,
Just a very personal question, I hope you are willing to answer:
Do you share all your E-Cat secrets and know-how with your core team members?
Thank you, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea, I have found the article written by Ch.Sremmenos very interesting and thought provoking. This is where your JONP is of immeasurable value in the modern age of investigative physics i.e. a platform where people can put forward views without being over ruled by those in positions of authority. I will be the first to say that physics is a subject that requires many minds to come together in order to solve what is probably the greatest mystery in the world i.e. energy, the origin of it and its destiny assuming that energy requires a container to be produced and by which to exist. Thereby the production is the input, the container is the energy and the total output/dissolution is equal to the input. A very simple none technical explanation upon which many questions can be asked, such as what is the container made from, can the container gain energy or is it able to lose energy? and thereby a multitude of questions and theories are able to be put forward. I have a few theories of my own, some from observations from an embodiment of ideas and some that I claim to be intuitive and thereby speculative but nevertheless I consider valuable towards this elusive activity that we call energy. Also gravity I believe to be a major player in this activity. In the meantime I will study the article and provide some thoughts on the subject in the near future. Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. With regards to the mention of iter it is using common sense, not possible to push from a 360 degree angle to achieve fusion. It has to come from a pull, from a point but you have to understand gravity, unfortunately tax payers pay for this persistent distractive nonsense.
You have been facing problems with your commercial E-Cats.
1 – Can you specify if you understood these malfunctions?
2 – Have you found the appropriate solutions to remedy these problems?
My support for your team
cordially
Raffaele
Based on your answer bounding the thermal to electric conversion efficiency of the eCat-SK Leonardo to between 45% and 95% we can note some projections. Assuming a 50% conversion efficiency, the 22kW eCat would produce 11kW of electrical power. For a 240 VAC output voltage, the current would be about 45 Amps. This would require 6 AWG copper wire, or the equivalent. I made this calculation to show how much power you are dealing with and the difficulty of your effort. Best wishes on your endeavor.
Dear Andrea,
Iter has celebrated because their reactor reached a COP of 1.1 for few seconds. After 10 billions of funding and 30 years of work.
And we have persons that accuse you to belate…
Silent Majority Guy
1. Have you observed the presence of helium in long term operation of eCats? I know helium diffusion is a problem but it might help understand the nuclear reactions that are occurring?
2. Are you seeing isotope changes in the long term operation of eCats?
a. specifically in lithium?
b. or nickel?
3. Can we safely assume that for the eCat-SK Electric to be commercially viable, the conversion efficiency from thermal to electric must be greater than the typical Carnot efficiency (e.g., 45%) and limited to about 95% (due to electrical conversion efficiency to a standard (AC or DC) output)?
Gerard McEk:
Sorry, these arguments are confidential.
It is impossible to help us without a full knowledge of the technology, but I am moved by your kind will to help.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
1. Can E-catSK, which have been running since 19/11 -18, still give
full effect?
2. Are you installing E-catSK in secret in companys, without the
subordinated staffs knowledge?
3. Have you in person been flying to customers and fixed unexpected
problems (that appears in all new installations)?
4. You mentioned earlier that E-cat should be manufactured in
southern Sweden, is that still the plan?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea,
I understand that you are not fully satisfied by the performance of the plant(s) in operation.
Where do you believe lies the main cause of this:
1. Automatic production of the ECats SK
2. Integration of the ECats in the Ecat plant
3. Reliability of the control of the plant
4. Connection from Ecat plant to the customer (including control of heat needed by the customer).
I am asking this because there are many, many readers willing to help you and make this a success, including me. I hope these problems (or challenges?) will be solved soon.
Good luck to you and your team!
Kind regards, Gerard McEk
PS
At this moment there is only one winner, it seems and that is your wife, but if you can get your plant(s) work at 100% of your satisfaction, you are the winner, once and for all!
In the last few years you have focused, it appears, on stable energy output, always under linear control.
1. Have you looked at rapid energy output conditions?
2. Does it make commercial sense to have an eCat that can rapidly change output levels, such as the equivalent of an internal combustion engine?
3. If you operated an eCat not in the self sustaining mode (SSM), could you achieve output change time periods in the value of seconds or sub-seconds, ignoring heat exchanger issues?
Dear Andrea
A) Can you tell us how many plants are already operating with your customers?
B) Can you tell us your personal degree of satisfaction with the current operation of the plants with a value from 1 to 10?
C) Have any of your customers shown any degree of satisfaction with the choice to have accepted to test your plants in their companies? Also here you can give us a numerical index
(for 1-: -10) of the level of appreciation perceived?
I apologize for my bad English: mine is mediocre and google translate does what it can
to improve it.
Warm Regards,
Gian
First of all I want to congratulate you & your team concerning the latest achievements concerning the e-cat developments/improvements.
Just a few weeks ago, after the successfull demo of the commercial e-cat SK, what would have looked like something belonging to science fiction (an electric e-cat), now sounds like something relatively likely to become a reality.
I know that (F9) “The results of the test can be positive or negative” most certainly still applies again here but reading your comment “We celebrated it here with a substantial step forward toward the electric Ecat that generates also the electric power to fuel itself” leads me to believe that you witnessed another major milestone/improvement of the e-cat.
You must understand that for all of us, that just saw the e-cat SK in video but couldn’t feel its real heat yet, even the e-cat SK still somehow relates to science fiction. With the latest electrical developments, you are two realities ahead of us Andrea 😉 .
The kind of exiting working environment that you live in is probably the fuel that powers you & your team to achieve all of those successes. So please continue this amazing work you are doing, but also, as powerfull as this fuel may be and as much as you proved being able to control other kind of reactions, please also very carefully control the burning rate of this one…
Now concerning the possible name of the electrical version of the e-cat, I’m just wondering, if you name it after one of the greatest inventor of the latest 5 centuries (Leonardo), 500 years from now, what kind of device will bear your name (Rossi) ? 🙂
I bet on something related to teleportation, [faster than light (FTL) or time] travel…
Who knows, only time will tell, perhaps we will be able to witness it ourselves if one those 3 “Rossi” devices becomes reality.
Hello A. Rossi
Does the total energy produced from the E-Cat increase when you extract electrical energy?
All my support for R & D and your tennis
cordially
Raffaele
Italo R.:
We cannot publish without authorization of the other party anything covered by NDA. We are still in a pioneer market phase, with many issues to assess. Surely sooner or later publications will follow.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
you have written, “When we will be allowed to.”
May I ask who doesn’t yet allow you to show your installations?
Does it depend on yourself, your customers, your partner or…?
I understand if you cannot reveal those details, because they obviously are connected with your secret commercial and technical projects.
But it really is a pity, because such an immense invention would deserve to be shown publicly to the world immediately, even though it may still have some operating problems.
The world needs desperately your installations immediately, applied in millions and millions of applications.
It is such an immense revolution that it seems impossible that it is still hidden behind NDA.
When can we see a photo of installed E-cat-SKs? It would be an inspiration to your loyal followers to see multiple installed units without giving the location or name of the customer(s). Hardware trumps vaporware every time. A reply would be greatly appreciated.
@Chuck Davis,
Interesting technology. I knew that it was only a matter of time and a better battery than lithium would be invented.
Since we are still talking of 10+ years for an ECat powered car, because of certifications, these batteries should be widespread for sure at that time.
Dear Andrea,
This is a meta question.
Why do you think that you are encountering some issues with your production ready E-Cat SK? Do you think there wasn’t enough testing before launch? Or are the issues specific to the environment of the clients?
Regards
Patrick
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sergio Poletti:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buongiorno Dr Rossi,
Congratulations for your achievements with the Ecta SK ( http://www.ecatskdemo.com ).
Your business model is similar to the agreement Microsoft-IBM.
Best success wishes,
Sergio Poletti
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
I shared them with due persons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jazmine:
Oh, yes ( damn )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you still working with the solder?
Dear Andrea,
Just a very personal question, I hope you are willing to answer:
Do you share all your E-Cat secrets and know-how with your core team members?
Thank you, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea, I have found the article written by Ch.Sremmenos very interesting and thought provoking. This is where your JONP is of immeasurable value in the modern age of investigative physics i.e. a platform where people can put forward views without being over ruled by those in positions of authority. I will be the first to say that physics is a subject that requires many minds to come together in order to solve what is probably the greatest mystery in the world i.e. energy, the origin of it and its destiny assuming that energy requires a container to be produced and by which to exist. Thereby the production is the input, the container is the energy and the total output/dissolution is equal to the input. A very simple none technical explanation upon which many questions can be asked, such as what is the container made from, can the container gain energy or is it able to lose energy? and thereby a multitude of questions and theories are able to be put forward. I have a few theories of my own, some from observations from an embodiment of ideas and some that I claim to be intuitive and thereby speculative but nevertheless I consider valuable towards this elusive activity that we call energy. Also gravity I believe to be a major player in this activity. In the meantime I will study the article and provide some thoughts on the subject in the near future. Regards, Eric Ashworth
P.S. With regards to the mention of iter it is using common sense, not possible to push from a 360 degree angle to achieve fusion. It has to come from a pull, from a point but you have to understand gravity, unfortunately tax payers pay for this persistent distractive nonsense.
Raffaele Bongo:
1- yes
2- yes: problems come, problems are resolved.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
You have been facing problems with your commercial E-Cats.
1 – Can you specify if you understood these malfunctions?
2 – Have you found the appropriate solutions to remedy these problems?
My support for your team
cordially
Raffaele
Deanne Choudary:
Thank you for your opinion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
D.:
Thank you !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to read comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your attention to the work od our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Based on your answer bounding the thermal to electric conversion efficiency of the eCat-SK Leonardo to between 45% and 95% we can note some projections. Assuming a 50% conversion efficiency, the 22kW eCat would produce 11kW of electrical power. For a 240 VAC output voltage, the current would be about 45 Amps. This would require 6 AWG copper wire, or the equivalent. I made this calculation to show how much power you are dealing with and the difficulty of your effort. Best wishes on your endeavor.
Hi Dr Rossi!
I watched the whole video http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Fantastic.
Godspeed,
D.
Dear Andrea,
Iter has celebrated because their reactor reached a COP of 1.1 for few seconds. After 10 billions of funding and 30 years of work.
And we have persons that accuse you to belate…
Silent Majority Guy
Steven N. Karels:
1- confidential
2- confidential
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. Have you observed the presence of helium in long term operation of eCats? I know helium diffusion is a problem but it might help understand the nuclear reactions that are occurring?
2. Are you seeing isotope changes in the long term operation of eCats?
a. specifically in lithium?
b. or nickel?
3. Can we safely assume that for the eCat-SK Electric to be commercially viable, the conversion efficiency from thermal to electric must be greater than the typical Carnot efficiency (e.g., 45%) and limited to about 95% (due to electrical conversion efficiency to a standard (AC or DC) output)?
Gerard McEk:
Sorry, these arguments are confidential.
It is impossible to help us without a full knowledge of the technology, but I am moved by your kind will to help.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John Maccini:
Thank you for the information, I will study what it is.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund:
1- yes
2- n.a.
3- yes
4- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
1. Can E-catSK, which have been running since 19/11 -18, still give
full effect?
2. Are you installing E-catSK in secret in companys, without the
subordinated staffs knowledge?
3. Have you in person been flying to customers and fixed unexpected
problems (that appears in all new installations)?
4. You mentioned earlier that E-cat should be manufactured in
southern Sweden, is that still the plan?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Hello Dr Rossi:
Can this be useful to the E-Cat ?
US patent application filed Jan 26 2017 No. US2017/0025935
Best regards,
John Maccini
Dear Andrea,
I understand that you are not fully satisfied by the performance of the plant(s) in operation.
Where do you believe lies the main cause of this:
1. Automatic production of the ECats SK
2. Integration of the ECats in the Ecat plant
3. Reliability of the control of the plant
4. Connection from Ecat plant to the customer (including control of heat needed by the customer).
I am asking this because there are many, many readers willing to help you and make this a success, including me. I hope these problems (or challenges?) will be solved soon.
Good luck to you and your team!
Kind regards, Gerard McEk
PS
At this moment there is only one winner, it seems and that is your wife, but if you can get your plant(s) work at 100% of your satisfaction, you are the winner, once and for all!
Steven N. Karels:
1- yes
2-yes
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In the last few years you have focused, it appears, on stable energy output, always under linear control.
1. Have you looked at rapid energy output conditions?
2. Does it make commercial sense to have an eCat that can rapidly change output levels, such as the equivalent of an internal combustion engine?
3. If you operated an eCat not in the self sustaining mode (SSM), could you achieve output change time periods in the value of seconds or sub-seconds, ignoring heat exchanger issues?
Gian:
A- in due time
B- 6/10
C- yes, I.d say 7/10
Warm regards,
A.R.
Jim Rosenbur:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is your main partner the same that has agreed upon the supply of 40 MW ?I wish well with your electricity direct conversion work,
Jimr
Dear Andrea
A) Can you tell us how many plants are already operating with your customers?
B) Can you tell us your personal degree of satisfaction with the current operation of the plants with a value from 1 to 10?
C) Have any of your customers shown any degree of satisfaction with the choice to have accepted to test your plants in their companies? Also here you can give us a numerical index
(for 1-: -10) of the level of appreciation perceived?
I apologize for my bad English: mine is mediocre and google translate does what it can
to improve it.
Warm Regards,
Gian
Xavier:
He,he,he..
Let alone inspiration, so far prevails perspiration.
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
First of all I want to congratulate you & your team concerning the latest achievements concerning the e-cat developments/improvements.
Just a few weeks ago, after the successfull demo of the commercial e-cat SK, what would have looked like something belonging to science fiction (an electric e-cat), now sounds like something relatively likely to become a reality.
I know that (F9) “The results of the test can be positive or negative” most certainly still applies again here but reading your comment “We celebrated it here with a substantial step forward toward the electric Ecat that generates also the electric power to fuel itself” leads me to believe that you witnessed another major milestone/improvement of the e-cat.
You must understand that for all of us, that just saw the e-cat SK in video but couldn’t feel its real heat yet, even the e-cat SK still somehow relates to science fiction. With the latest electrical developments, you are two realities ahead of us Andrea 😉 .
The kind of exiting working environment that you live in is probably the fuel that powers you & your team to achieve all of those successes. So please continue this amazing work you are doing, but also, as powerfull as this fuel may be and as much as you proved being able to control other kind of reactions, please also very carefully control the burning rate of this one…
Now concerning the possible name of the electrical version of the e-cat, I’m just wondering, if you name it after one of the greatest inventor of the latest 5 centuries (Leonardo), 500 years from now, what kind of device will bear your name (Rossi) ? 🙂
I bet on something related to teleportation, [faster than light (FTL) or time] travel…
Who knows, only time will tell, perhaps we will be able to witness it ourselves if one those 3 “Rossi” devices becomes reality.
Non-fictional regards 🙂
Xavier
Raffaele Bongo:
No.
Thank you for the R&D. For tennis there is no hope…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Luca,
Please see this link about the status of the production of these batteries:
https://graphenano.com/en-una-empresa-espanola-desarrolla-una-bateria-con-autonomia-para-800=kilometros
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Hello A. Rossi
Does the total energy produced from the E-Cat increase when you extract electrical energy?
All my support for R & D and your tennis
cordially
Raffaele
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
We’ll do it as soon as possible. See also the answer I just gave to Italo R.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
We cannot publish without authorization of the other party anything covered by NDA. We are still in a pioneer market phase, with many issues to assess. Surely sooner or later publications will follow.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
you have written, “When we will be allowed to.”
May I ask who doesn’t yet allow you to show your installations?
Does it depend on yourself, your customers, your partner or…?
I understand if you cannot reveal those details, because they obviously are connected with your secret commercial and technical projects.
But it really is a pity, because such an immense invention would deserve to be shown publicly to the world immediately, even though it may still have some operating problems.
The world needs desperately your installations immediately, applied in millions and millions of applications.
It is such an immense revolution that it seems impossible that it is still hidden behind NDA.
Sincerely,
Italo R.
@Chuck Davis
grabat in production ? link please
On Power Engineering of May 7 2019:
Updates to the Clean Air Requirements and implications for power plants
Rod Walton
Drew G.:
When we will be allowed to.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
When can we see a photo of installed E-cat-SKs? It would be an inspiration to your loyal followers to see multiple installed units without giving the location or name of the customer(s). Hardware trumps vaporware every time. A reply would be greatly appreciated.
Drew G.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Chuck Davis,
Interesting technology. I knew that it was only a matter of time and a better battery than lithium would be invented.
Since we are still talking of 10+ years for an ECat powered car, because of certifications, these batteries should be widespread for sure at that time.
Regards,
Marco.