United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

26,852 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Steven N. Karels,
    Why should Andrea bother to prove his product?
    “The proof of the pudding is in the taste thereof.”
    If the customer likes his purchase,
    then why must he quibble about its underlying science?
    Do American electrical utility customers demand
    to understand the science of electricity?
    Iggy

  • Antonio Martucci

    @Steven N. Karels
    Andrea Rossi is selling energy, not plants. He has no interest at all, along his business model, to explain exactly how his technology works.
    I do not think that he cares too much about the skeptics either. He never did.
    All the best,
    Antonio

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    yes, our Team has set up a software to simulate the behavior of a control system that allows us to make the drawing of a schematic of all the components of a board , with all the specifications of every component, and then read in a virtual measuring system, for example an oscilloscope, the results of its operation in certain conditions. It allows us to test the boards before making them and reduces the probability of errors.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    Dear Andrea,
    Very interesting indeed the article on Nature.
    Are you too using simulation systems?
    Cheers
    Prof

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Trinity Wosher:
    Maybe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gloria:
    I read yesterday a very interesting article published on Nature,2019.1038/s41586-019-1241-0 (about DOIs)It is the publication of an experiment made by the Israeli scientist Jeff Steinhauer and colleagues at the Israel Institute of Technology (Technion), by which has been realized a simulation of a “black hole” creating a sonic equivalent of it: a sonic black hole produced sonic waves that can be used as models of Hawking Radiations, confirming the Hawkings theory of the radiations residual from a black hole that in time will make the same black hole dissolve. What really fascinated me is the schematic of the simulator and its parallel with the schematic of a black hole. Genial.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gloria

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is there any article in scientific publications you can suggest?

  • Trinity Wosher

    Dr Rossi:
    Do you think that the “impossible success” of your paper published on Researchgate
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is the signal of a modified, less biased, interest of the scientific community for your effect ?
    Cheers
    Trinity

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    It seems that you are pursuing a commercial path that provides a service, the generation of heat and possibly electricity, without clearly demonstrating the technology behind the service. You have done demonstrations that show the effect but these are subject to criticisms.
    Can you clearly tell us why the following could or should not be done? Using one of your mature technologies, run an eCat reactor that produces enough thermal energy to heat low efficiency electrical power converters to produce electricity, conduct the electricity to a battery, invert the battery power to AC power and use the AC power to run your controller unit. Suspend this on non-conducting cables (so it is not sitting on anything and cannot be secretly powered) and power a light and let it run for some long period of time with free inspections by independent observers – look but do not disassemble/touch. Perhaps boil water with the waste (unused) heat. If it continues a sufficiently long period of time to exclude a chemical means of energy generation, you would prove the technology to the public. The scientific community would take notice but would remain skeptical until they did replications/independent testing. But business people are not scientists.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Yes of course, but it improved in inversally proportional mode. It has got the wrong way.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    You are right: I had answered “yes” mistaking the number of the question. The correct answer would have been “no”.
    Sorry for the misunderstanding, my fault.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    It seems we have some misunderstanding.

    In question 2 I asked the following:
    “You also said that one customer or your partner wants 40MW.
    2: Have you reached that level of delivered power already?”
    And you replied “Yes”.

    I guess that should have been “No”?

    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    We all have observed you making great strides in your activities. Has your tennis game proportionately improved? Best Regards.

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Back to your first asparagus response….
    Innuendo,out the other.
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    That’s counter-intuitive !
    Ask Popeye.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    I did not say that.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Can I ask another question on your reply on my question 2?:
    You said that you delivered your partner already 40MW of Ecat SK heating installation.
    Is that already in operation?
    Thanks for your continuous replies to our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Ancient alchemists believed that asparagus induced the coulomb barrier to relax its vigilance.
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrimple:
    Is your innuendo aiming to disclose if there is presence of asparagus in the charge ? I cannot give such information, in positive or in negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1. A
    2. yes
    3. C
    4. We are working like horses to deliver B
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Willi Meinders:
    Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team and for your suggestions:
    1- more information about Clients and Partners: I am under NDA
    2- more information about safety issues: we made and published, as you surely observed, daily controls to detect emissions of ionizing radiations, but all the measurements made either by us every day or by independent specialists have never detected ionizing radiations coming out from the Ecat reactors. Safety certifications have been made by major certification companies, as you can see on
    http://www.leonardocorporation.com
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Willi Meinders

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    if one observes your work over many years, he can understand every single step and the inherent logic.
    Your successful work is rewarded by rapidly decreasing contradiction and increasing scientific recognition.
    I think, though, that you must give more informtion about your partners and clients and more detailed information about the safety issues.
    Regards
    Willi Meinders

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    You have said that you are delivering heat to more than 1 customer/location.
    Can you tell if the amount of heat to these customers/locations is:
    1. A: Less than 1MW; B: About 1MW; C: More than 1 MW?
    You also said that one customer or you partner wants 40MW.
    2. Have you reached that level of delivered output power already?
    On what do you spend most of your time:
    3. A: Improving Ecat SK production/reliability; B: Research/development on Ecat Electric; C: Playing tennis with your wife ;)?
    I hope things are improving and that the Ecat will soon comfort the world with clean affordable heat and energy. Good luck to you and your team.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Asparagus was originally an Italian veggie known as “Gus”. The Roman Emperor hated veggies and sought to humiliate the humble plant by scattering it about the arena floor of the Coliseum. The brave gladiator Spartacus, a veggie lover, took pity and pleaded to the crowd, “Please, I implore you, please asparaGUS!”
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    Thank you for the link. I am not an expert of the matter, therefore I cannot comment. Maybe some among our Readers can.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giovanni

    Egregio Dott. Rossi,

    cosa pensa della seguente pubblicazione?

    http://www.aracneeditrice.it/index.php/pubblicazione.html?item=9788825523966

    L’energia di interazione gravitazionale viene pensata come originariamente energia liberata nelle reazioni di fusione nucleare che avvengono nel sole. Si tratta di una lettura energetica dell’interazione gravitazionale, che ricondurrebbe l’interazione gravitazionale alla natura elettrodinamica.
    Se così è realmente capirei finalmente perché le onde gravitazionali si propagano con la stessa velocità della luce.
    ENGLISH:
    This link is about the concept of gravitational interactions as photons freed during nuclear reactions in the sun.

    Grazie e i migliori auguri all’Ecat!

    Giovanni

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    I know nothing about all this and, frankly, I have too much work to do with the E-Cat to spare any of my time for these respectable guys. Therefore I have no further comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    I just read the Google report on cold fusion. What kind of department is MIT using for their research? 10 million dollars, two years of time and 30 so called researchers and they could not achieve .90 hydrogen loading and only conduct 400 tests. Also failed to interview the top workers in the LENR field. Google was, in my opinion taken for a scientific ride.
    Questionable regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    We don’t stop our work, kust adjust it now and again, treasuring the manifestation of the errors: this is normal procedure in industries.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of our blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nek:
    Thanks,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Nek

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    I love your answer to Colin Watters,
    Cheers
    Nek

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    1. Is it still stop in the production of E-catSK or have you solved the problems which, so far, has occured at the customers?
    2. Will E-catSK in the future be like the blue box with 22KW or has any larger part of the construction been changed?
    Best regards and good luck.
    Nils Fryklund

  • Andrea Rossi

    Moshe:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Moshe

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The stunning number of full readings of
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    arrived today to 21827 and counting. I looked inside the stats published by Researchgate and what is interesting is that they come from hundreds of universities of the whole world. This means that the highest scientific echelons of the whole world are looking at your work.
    This is great also for the LENR in general.
    Godspeed,
    Moshe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric A. Woudenberg:
    Thank you for your help !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hello Rossi-World:

    Just a note to say we’ve moved rossilivecat,com to a new server. Let us know if you experience any difficulties.

    Best wishes,
    Eric
    webmaster@rossilivecat.com

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    I always said that Dr Parkhomov is making an excellent work.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lib:
    Very intelligent insight.
    I agree with you. Besides: the consensus is biased by the financing programs.
    We have a paradigma that helps us: ITER ( or Eater, as somebidy dubbed it ).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Colin Watters:
    I am not aware of the work described and never had anything to do with it. By the way: 400 experiments is a ridiculous number. I alone made more than 10 thousands. I supposed that all those big guns made at least ten times the experiments I made: I am alone, albeit with a magnificent Team, they are so many and prestigious…
    Warm Regards,
    A.R

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roberto:
    As I always said, Dr Parkhomov is making an excellent work.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Roberto

    Dr Rossi,
    What do you think of the replications of your “New Fire” made by Dr Alexander Parkhomov in Moscow?

  • Colin Watters

    Dear Mr Rossi, I refer readers to an article in Nature that reports on a two year research program into cold fusion and LENR financed by Google…

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01675-9

    It seems they found no evidence it exists, no excess heat despite over 400 experiments. Perhaps you could show them how to do it? It seems your patents, videos and theory articles aren’t sufficient.

  • lib

    (in Italiano sotto)

    Good morning Dr. Rossi,

    In the history of science there are several examples of theories that get abandoned in time (or that anyway are reduced scope of applicability). In other instances, edisonian attempts walk the talk of what the vast majority of their contemporary academics denied could be ever possible in theory (https://www.xaprb.com/blog/flight-is-impossible/).

    Closer to our days, astonishing researches the like Professors Benveniste/Montagnier realized (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8VyUsVOic0) appear extremely uneasy for the gamut of implications contained and are received with a degree of aversion or apathy from the scientific community.

    In brief, the train of though of my long introduction is that the scientific world seem to have lost focus to the experimental facts as the only source of data really useful to validate a (falsifiable) theory and rather appears concentrically focused on consensus, as opposed to independent research and critical thinking.

    My question is perhaps more to the philosopher than to the scientist.

    Do you think that the scientific world has an epistemological issue? When science creates a diversion from experimental data and focuses on consensus, is not science betraying itself and the very same method on which its foundation is based?

    Greetings and best wishes to you and to your team,

    Lib


    (English above)

    Buongiorno dott. Rossi,

    nella storia della scienza ci sono diversi esempi di teorie che vengono abbandonate (o comunque limitate nel loro àmbito di validità). Altre volte tentativi ingegneristici dimostrano nei fatti, quello che la massima parte degli accademici loro contemporanei negavano potesse essere possibile nella teoria (https://www.xaprb.com/blog/flight-is-impossible/).

    Più prossime ai nostri giorni, mi vengono in mente ricerche realmente sbalorditive come quelle dei proff. Benveniste/Montagnier (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8VyUsVOic0) che appaiono estremamente scomode per il ventaglio di implicazioni che contengono e che generano una certa avversione o un generale disinteresse da parte della comunità scientifica.

    Sinteticamente, il filo generale della mia lunga introduzione alla domanda è che il mondo scientifico appare aver perduto attenzione al dato sperimentale come unico elemento utile per la validazione di una teoria (falsificabile) e che sembra concentrato maggiormente sul consenso, piuttosto che sul pensiero critico e sulla ricerca indipendente.

    La mia domanda è direttamente collegata a lei e al suo lavoro, ma è forse rivolta più al filosofo che allo scienziato.

    Esiste a suo parere nel mondo scientifico un problema epistemologico? Nel momento in cui la scienza si distrae dal dato sperimentale e si concentra sul consenso, non sta tradendo se stessa e il metodo su cui si basa?

    Saluti e buon lavoro a lei e il suo team,

    Lib

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jai Falzon:
    We are selling energy, not Ecats.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jai Falzon

    Dear Andrea, I’m an entrepreneur and am very interested in the E-cat sk for large scale power production. I would like to know if you are considering selling E-cats in the near future and how much an E-cat would roughly cost.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>