United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

22,139 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • John

    Thank you for the spectacular http://www.ecatskdemo.com

  • G

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Happy Birthday!
    G

  • Leonardo

    Dr Rossi
    About your experiments: do you usually carry on more experiments at a time?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    The theoretical work is proceeding in parallel with the R&D on the direct production of electricity. Both are not done, yet.
    Thank you for your supports ( both of them, he he he )
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fred:
    Thank you!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Fred

    Dr Rossi:
    Your paper on Researchgate is important: Researchgate is the sole scientific publication whose peer reviewing is made democratically, in open source and this is the reason why the New York Times considers it one of the most important scientific carriers. As a matter of fact, a publication on Reseachgate is peer reviewed from all the scientists, professors, researchers that read it and they express their opinion on the publication freely. Your publication is very difficult to understand and it is restricted to nuclear physicists, so a full reading is very heavy. The statistics are rigidly controlled from the moderators, so that the result of the peer reviewing is there, clear and undisputable. Hundreds of full readings for one nuclear physics publication in one year are considered a successful peer reviewing. You got 22 300 and counting in less than 5 months.
    Congratulations, this is not a success, this is a revolution in the making.
    All the best,
    Fred

  • Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi
    Your publication is likely to mark the history of nuclear physics.
    Have you done the most comprehensive publication on the subject or have you kept some things that are still confidential to you?

    PS: Right now this is the Roland Garros tennis tournament and your wife has passed the round of 16. I wish him good luck for the rest … ..Hi, hi, hi.
    All my support for your work and your tennis
    Best regards
    Raffaele Bongo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Palomino:
    …and you have no idea of the emails I am receiving from researchers and teachers from universities and independent laboratories og all the Continents. I am really stunned. When I sent the publication I was hoping to have at least 200 readings, to be in the average…
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Palomino

    Dear Andrea,
    I am a Researchgateholic, because it is a gold mine for the research in general. Your incredible numbers, after 4 months and 10 days are as of right now these:
    Full readings 22375, Research interest index 342.5, Recommendations 935 and they come from all the world, mainly universities.
    And counting.
    These are not numbers that an average professor achieves in a career lifespan, these are numbers that few professors achieve in all the world.
    This speaks loud about your recognition. Your paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions is one of the most interesting papers of nuclear physics published in the world in the last year. This is the fact.
    Godspeed,
    Palomino

  • Steven N. Karels

    Antonio Martucci,

    I cannot speak for what Andrea Rossi thinks. I suspect you cannot read his mind either. The suggestion was not to satisfy or disprove his skeptics. They are what they are and they are unlikely to change their minds. The battle is for the minds of the general public and the business community.

    Would you, as a private citizen, buy a “nuclear” powered automobile, paying $40,000 or more of your own money, if you merely had the promise that you would only have to refuel it once a year without anyone understanding of how the engine works? May be Yes, if you were aware of the benefits and it was certified?

    The “first adapters” that are moving forward with eCat technology are a small portion of his target community. Andrea’s approach is not a sure methodology to achieve financial success. He does take tis approach with some risk of failure. But that is his choice and he should be commended for having the courage in doing so. But we, his friends, need to point to alternative approaches for his consideration, which he can accept or reject. Unlike the Trolls, we wish him success and joy in his work and his life. And maybe, just maybe,an improvement in his tennis game too!

  • Steven N. Karels

    Iggy Dalrymple,

    LENR, more specifically “Cold Fusion” has negative connotations associated with the name. When I discuss Andrea’s work and they say “Well, that is Cold Fusion and that doesn’t work”, it stops the discussion. If Andrea Rossi has actually developed a successful LENR methodology, we remain skeptics until we see it or it is scientifically verified by independent qualified researchers, it will not be widely accepted until the general public (specifically business people) believe it to be true and an accepted technology. There is a saying in the software business “No one ever got fired for buying Microsoft.” The person in a corporate world risks his position when he takes a chance.

    Eventually, if Andrea Rossi is successful in selling “heat”, government personnel will want certifications that this “nuclear” technology is safe, secure, etc. What happens when the average person learns the business next door is running a “nuclear reactor” in their plant? Running a business includes managing expectations and other people’s perceptions.

    Notice, I did not say that Andrea Rossi had to reveal his technology. But a year long, self-sustaining (no external input) operation producing a significant output would go a long way in introducing the general public and the business community to LENR, and specifically, the eCat technology.

    Imaging if the “New Green Deal” were to embrace eCat. Maybe they wouldn’t need to get rid of airplanes, cars and cows?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Joseph Fine:
    Thank you very much for your kind wishes !
    Yes, I think we are reaching the 1 year lifespan of the charge.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joseph Fine

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Best wishes for a very happy birthday and for a happy and healthy every day.

    Even if you are not successful in Tennis, do you think it is possible to increase fuel charge operating time beyond 12 months or are there operational reasons why this may not be desirable? (e.g. safety, refuel/recharging complexity etc.)

    Birthday Regards,

    Joseph Fine

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Steven N. Karels,
    Why should Andrea bother to prove his product?
    “The proof of the pudding is in the taste thereof.”
    If the customer likes his purchase,
    then why must he quibble about its underlying science?
    Do American electrical utility customers demand
    to understand the science of electricity?
    Iggy

  • Antonio Martucci

    @Steven N. Karels
    Andrea Rossi is selling energy, not plants. He has no interest at all, along his business model, to explain exactly how his technology works.
    I do not think that he cares too much about the skeptics either. He never did.
    All the best,
    Antonio

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    yes, our Team has set up a software to simulate the behavior of a control system that allows us to make the drawing of a schematic of all the components of a board , with all the specifications of every component, and then read in a virtual measuring system, for example an oscilloscope, the results of its operation in certain conditions. It allows us to test the boards before making them and reduces the probability of errors.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    Dear Andrea,
    Very interesting indeed the article on Nature.
    Are you too using simulation systems?
    Cheers
    Prof

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your opinion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Trinity Wosher:
    Maybe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gloria:
    I read yesterday a very interesting article published on Nature,2019.1038/s41586-019-1241-0 (about DOIs)It is the publication of an experiment made by the Israeli scientist Jeff Steinhauer and colleagues at the Israel Institute of Technology (Technion), by which has been realized a simulation of a “black hole” creating a sonic equivalent of it: a sonic black hole produced sonic waves that can be used as models of Hawking Radiations, confirming the Hawkings theory of the radiations residual from a black hole that in time will make the same black hole dissolve. What really fascinated me is the schematic of the simulator and its parallel with the schematic of a black hole. Genial.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gloria

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Is there any article in scientific publications you can suggest?

  • Trinity Wosher

    Dr Rossi:
    Do you think that the “impossible success” of your paper published on Researchgate
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is the signal of a modified, less biased, interest of the scientific community for your effect ?
    Cheers
    Trinity

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    It seems that you are pursuing a commercial path that provides a service, the generation of heat and possibly electricity, without clearly demonstrating the technology behind the service. You have done demonstrations that show the effect but these are subject to criticisms.
    Can you clearly tell us why the following could or should not be done? Using one of your mature technologies, run an eCat reactor that produces enough thermal energy to heat low efficiency electrical power converters to produce electricity, conduct the electricity to a battery, invert the battery power to AC power and use the AC power to run your controller unit. Suspend this on non-conducting cables (so it is not sitting on anything and cannot be secretly powered) and power a light and let it run for some long period of time with free inspections by independent observers – look but do not disassemble/touch. Perhaps boil water with the waste (unused) heat. If it continues a sufficiently long period of time to exclude a chemical means of energy generation, you would prove the technology to the public. The scientific community would take notice but would remain skeptical until they did replications/independent testing. But business people are not scientists.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Yes of course, but it improved in inversally proportional mode. It has got the wrong way.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    You are right: I had answered “yes” mistaking the number of the question. The correct answer would have been “no”.
    Sorry for the misunderstanding, my fault.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    It seems we have some misunderstanding.

    In question 2 I asked the following:
    “You also said that one customer or your partner wants 40MW.
    2: Have you reached that level of delivered power already?”
    And you replied “Yes”.

    I guess that should have been “No”?

    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    We all have observed you making great strides in your activities. Has your tennis game proportionately improved? Best Regards.

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Back to your first asparagus response….
    Innuendo,out the other.
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    That’s counter-intuitive !
    Ask Popeye.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    I did not say that.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Can I ask another question on your reply on my question 2?:
    You said that you delivered your partner already 40MW of Ecat SK heating installation.
    Is that already in operation?
    Thanks for your continuous replies to our questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Ancient alchemists believed that asparagus induced the coulomb barrier to relax its vigilance.
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrimple:
    Is your innuendo aiming to disclose if there is presence of asparagus in the charge ? I cannot give such information, in positive or in negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1. A
    2. yes
    3. C
    4. We are working like horses to deliver B
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Willi Meinders:
    Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team and for your suggestions:
    1- more information about Clients and Partners: I am under NDA
    2- more information about safety issues: we made and published, as you surely observed, daily controls to detect emissions of ionizing radiations, but all the measurements made either by us every day or by independent specialists have never detected ionizing radiations coming out from the Ecat reactors. Safety certifications have been made by major certification companies, as you can see on
    http://www.leonardocorporation.com
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Willi Meinders

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    if one observes your work over many years, he can understand every single step and the inherent logic.
    Your successful work is rewarded by rapidly decreasing contradiction and increasing scientific recognition.
    I think, though, that you must give more informtion about your partners and clients and more detailed information about the safety issues.
    Regards
    Willi Meinders

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    You have said that you are delivering heat to more than 1 customer/location.
    Can you tell if the amount of heat to these customers/locations is:
    1. A: Less than 1MW; B: About 1MW; C: More than 1 MW?
    You also said that one customer or you partner wants 40MW.
    2. Have you reached that level of delivered output power already?
    On what do you spend most of your time:
    3. A: Improving Ecat SK production/reliability; B: Research/development on Ecat Electric; C: Playing tennis with your wife ;)?
    I hope things are improving and that the Ecat will soon comfort the world with clean affordable heat and energy. Good luck to you and your team.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Asparagus was originally an Italian veggie known as “Gus”. The Roman Emperor hated veggies and sought to humiliate the humble plant by scattering it about the arena floor of the Coliseum. The brave gladiator Spartacus, a veggie lover, took pity and pleaded to the crowd, “Please, I implore you, please asparaGUS!”
    Regards,
    Iggy

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giovanni:
    Thank you for the link. I am not an expert of the matter, therefore I cannot comment. Maybe some among our Readers can.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giovanni

    Egregio Dott. Rossi,

    cosa pensa della seguente pubblicazione?

    http://www.aracneeditrice.it/index.php/pubblicazione.html?item=9788825523966

    L’energia di interazione gravitazionale viene pensata come originariamente energia liberata nelle reazioni di fusione nucleare che avvengono nel sole. Si tratta di una lettura energetica dell’interazione gravitazionale, che ricondurrebbe l’interazione gravitazionale alla natura elettrodinamica.
    Se così è realmente capirei finalmente perché le onde gravitazionali si propagano con la stessa velocità della luce.
    ENGLISH:
    This link is about the concept of gravitational interactions as photons freed during nuclear reactions in the sun.

    Grazie e i migliori auguri all’Ecat!

    Giovanni

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    I know nothing about all this and, frankly, I have too much work to do with the E-Cat to spare any of my time for these respectable guys. Therefore I have no further comment.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    I just read the Google report on cold fusion. What kind of department is MIT using for their research? 10 million dollars, two years of time and 30 so called researchers and they could not achieve .90 hydrogen loading and only conduct 400 tests. Also failed to interview the top workers in the LENR field. Google was, in my opinion taken for a scientific ride.
    Questionable regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nils Fryklund:
    We don’t stop our work, kust adjust it now and again, treasuring the manifestation of the errors: this is normal procedure in industries.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of our blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nek:
    Thanks,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Nek

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    I love your answer to Colin Watters,
    Cheers
    Nek

  • Nils Fryklund

    Dear Andrea!
    1. Is it still stop in the production of E-catSK or have you solved the problems which, so far, has occured at the customers?
    2. Will E-catSK in the future be like the blue box with 22KW or has any larger part of the construction been changed?
    Best regards and good luck.
    Nils Fryklund

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>