Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Zitterbewegung effect that is the core of the theoretical work in your paper on Researchgate consists in the vibrations made at the speed of light by electrons that move much slower, like a tennis ball that moves toward you slowly, but vibrates at a much higher speed, correct?
Watching http://www.ecatskdemo.com I noticed the neutron detectors: have you ever detected neutrons emitted from the Ecat SK?
Thanks if you can answer,
Noemi
Dear Readers:
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED NOW THAT THERE ARE AROUND PERSONS THAT SAY THEY CAN COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF TO FINANCE US OR TO BUY OUR PLANTS OR TO HAVE A PRIORITY IN THE WAITING LIST: ATTENTION! THIS IS A FRAUD ! WE HAVE AUTHORIZED NOBODY TO SELL OUR LICENCE OR TO COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF !!! IF SOMEBODY CONTACTS YOU IN THIS DIRECTION, PLEASE CONTACT US GIVING US HIS ADDRESS: WE WILL IMMEDIATELY INFORM YOU IF HE IS A REGULAR LICENSEE OR A FRAUDSTER,
WARM REGARDS,
A.R.
JPR:
I read now my stats on Researchgate:
full readings 26095
research interest index 565.6
recommendations 1658 ( !!!!! These are peer reviewings !!!)
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for the success wishes for the Ecat SK Leonardo: here are no mechanical parts also in the Ecat that should generate directly current and there is hope of success;
thank you also for your wishes of goods in tennis, but in this case there is no hope.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The thermal E-Cat has no moving mechanical parts.
Is it the same think for the electric Leonardo E-Cat?
All my wishes for the success of the E-Cat Leonardo R & D
Best regards and good tennis for Sunday
Raffaele
Steven N. Karels,
One could argue that a multi-billion dollar business would be crazy not to take out an “insurance policy” for any technology that had the potential to seriously disrupt their business– in other words invest in buying & understanding & researching LENR.
BUT, in strong agreement with your point, Clayton Christensen (“The Innovator’s Dilemma …” for those who haven’t read it, wikipedia has a nice summary) says that, by and large, dominant companies are often the least likely to have the interest or ability to investigate potential disruptive technology. Part of Clayton’s observations is that dominant industries are so intent on remaining dominant vs their peers (big-electricity, in this case), that’s where they focus all their R&D dollars. They are unlikely to take some of those dollars away from their big source of income and retarget it on something that’s seen to be, in the short term, a minor business.
As a point of interest– One of the examples that Clayton gives is horse drawn vehicles not feeling threatened by hand-made luxury cars, but later losing out to the Model-T, mass produced car.
Dana:
If we (our Team) will be able to make the Ecat SK Leonardo 100% self sustaining, able to feed itself without necessity of external power source, obtaining infinite COP, yes. But it is still a dream, we are close, but not cigar yet. We are working very hard to realize this dream.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
here are your stats today on Researchgate:
full readings 26000 (!!!)
research interest index: 555.5 (!!!)
recommendations: 1631 (!!!)
After 5 months (!!!)
I think you are the N.1 out of 15 millions. The average numbers for good publications are, respectively, 200, 10 and 10, after years.
BB
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
In the USA are on course the celebrations for the moon landing half century ago: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo could be an achievement of the same importance?
Dana
Why would a power company use an unproven and controversial new power source when nuclear, oil, coal, wind, solar and natural gas are available? Why would they take the risk to be the first power company to commit millions of dollars in a new installation based on an unproven technology? If eCat technology works and is adaptable to electric power generation, it will be through a small scale test project, where risk of lost dollars is minimal.
Considering Mizuno’s system with palladium coated nickel, everything else remaining the same, what general result would you expect if hydrogen (of the normal isotopic ratio) was utilized instead of deuterium?
Dear Andrea!
After all the demos you have done, has not any power companies been taking contact and wished to lease an E-catSK for test, before they start to build up new nuclear-, oil-, coal- or windpowerinstallations?
1. In that case, one or more?
2. Any wellknown big powercompany?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
How are the SK reactors installed with your early pioneer customers performing these days? Have you been able to solve the problems that you said you had been experiencing?
Steven N. Karels:
1- I cannot answer to this kind of questions in positive or in negative
2- see point 1
3- yes
4- premature to answer, we are still at an R&D stage
5- we should be able to decide either solution, depending on the demand of the Clients
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. In the eCat SK Electric, are you using magnets to cause charged particles to rotate in the magnetic field?
2. Are you using a coil or similar structure to extract the particle’s kinetic energy to convert it to electrical energy?
3. Do you need to convert the recovered electrical energy into a useful waveform (DC or AC voltsage and current)?
4. Considering the required conversions necessary to produce useable electricity, will you achieve efficiencies better than that of a more conventional Carnot cycle approach?
5. If successful with the eCsat SP Electric, will the major energy output of the eCat SK Electric be electricity or is the electricity a secondary product to heat generation?
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your consideration. As a matter of fact, I do not take seriously myself, but I fight to death for the seriousness of the work of my Team. We believe in what we are doing.
What counts is only the result of our work, all the rest is written in the sand. The attention in Researchgate toward my paper is not given from my name: I have published other papers on Researchgate, but those papers got an average attention. The incredible success has been achieved only by http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and this means that what counts is not my name, but what I wrote, that, obviously, has been considered useful. Nobody would read that paper, that is difficult to digest, unless he consider it useful. To read my paper is a work, not a leisure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the increased Researchgate publicity. Just some consideration. You are not yet world-famous, but in case you will be, since it is hard to predict how publicity develops. There are many examples of good people who have risen from neglicence to fame, and then fallen because they could not handle it. Being famous is a test of a person’s psychological strength, and it can be harder to withstand than being neglected. That said, honestly it seems to me that you have the strength of personality that is needed to handle fame, including that you do not take yourself too seriously and can laugh to yourself, although at the same time you take your duty& work very seriously. But one never knows. It can be a devilish thing & no one has infinite strength. I’m not suggesting to do anything differently, just giving my perspective of the situation…
Best regards, /pekka
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/researchgate
that Researchgate has 15 millions of papers. Your paper is in the 1st 1% of the most read, but with the numbers you reached today I think you are in the top 10:
full readings 25748
research interest index 543.6
Recommendations 1575
With these numbers you are in the top of the top and for a LENR based paper, with the general hostility toward this matter, you made cultural revolution. Actually, your paper is very difficult to read, so it is unbelievable that you collected these results, because means that you intercepted the strong interest of all the field of the scientists and researchers of this field. This success of yours is important in this period.
Strong congrats
A.Y.
New issue of Power Engineering June 25 2019: Peabody, Arch form joint venture to make coal competitive against gas and renewables,
Rod Walton
Dr Rossi,
It is extremely interesting the peak at 437.2 nm in the graph of the spectrometer in http://www.ecatskdemo.com
How is going the experiment with the Ect SK-Leonardo for direct generation of electricity?
Roberto Ridolfi:
You can say that,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
All the 4 theoretical lines explained on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
seem to be to be a logic concatenation wherein they are all linked in a synergy: am I correct?
All the best,
RR
Noemi Session:
We never detected ionizing radiations, nor neutrons.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roby:
That’s why I can’t get it !!! It is a false slow !!! ( Nice model, though ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reporter:
Stunning.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Short update about your stats on Researchgate:
full readings 26300, research interest index 572.9, recommendations 1685…and counting!
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The Zitterbewegung effect that is the core of the theoretical work in your paper on Researchgate consists in the vibrations made at the speed of light by electrons that move much slower, like a tennis ball that moves toward you slowly, but vibrates at a much higher speed, correct?
Watching http://www.ecatskdemo.com I noticed the neutron detectors: have you ever detected neutrons emitted from the Ecat SK?
Thanks if you can answer,
Noemi
Chuck Davis:
Not that I am aware of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Do you think that certifications depend on th power and the money is put on the stakes ?
Dear Readers:
I HAVE BEEN INFORMED NOW THAT THERE ARE AROUND PERSONS THAT SAY THEY CAN COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF TO FINANCE US OR TO BUY OUR PLANTS OR TO HAVE A PRIORITY IN THE WAITING LIST: ATTENTION! THIS IS A FRAUD ! WE HAVE AUTHORIZED NOBODY TO SELL OUR LICENCE OR TO COLLECT FUNDS ON OUR BEHALF !!! IF SOMEBODY CONTACTS YOU IN THIS DIRECTION, PLEASE CONTACT US GIVING US HIS ADDRESS: WE WILL IMMEDIATELY INFORM YOU IF HE IS A REGULAR LICENSEE OR A FRAUDSTER,
WARM REGARDS,
A.R.
JPR:
I read now my stats on Researchgate:
full readings 26095
research interest index 565.6
recommendations 1658 ( !!!!! These are peer reviewings !!!)
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
I read many times
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and watched in parallel
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
and the more times I read and watch, the more I understand the genial background and synergy of those two publications. I’m not surprised that your paper is the most read nuclear physics publication of the world.
Godspeed,
JPR
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jimmy Dewis:
51%
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Karl Poehlmann:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Maybe Tecogen can be a commercial partner of yours, see here:
httpa://finviz.com
How many probabilities you think are there that your quest for electricity can be obtained by the ecat enough to make it work with a surplus?
Viktor Shipachev:
You are right.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You do not need infinite COP for a commercial success, 50-60 COP is enough.
Kind Regards,
Viktor
Raffaele Bongo:
Thank you for the success wishes for the Ecat SK Leonardo: here are no mechanical parts also in the Ecat that should generate directly current and there is hope of success;
thank you also for your wishes of goods in tennis, but in this case there is no hope.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
The thermal E-Cat has no moving mechanical parts.
Is it the same think for the electric Leonardo E-Cat?
All my wishes for the success of the E-Cat Leonardo R & D
Best regards and good tennis for Sunday
Raffaele
Steven N. Karels,
One could argue that a multi-billion dollar business would be crazy not to take out an “insurance policy” for any technology that had the potential to seriously disrupt their business– in other words invest in buying & understanding & researching LENR.
BUT, in strong agreement with your point, Clayton Christensen (“The Innovator’s Dilemma …” for those who haven’t read it, wikipedia has a nice summary) says that, by and large, dominant companies are often the least likely to have the interest or ability to investigate potential disruptive technology. Part of Clayton’s observations is that dominant industries are so intent on remaining dominant vs their peers (big-electricity, in this case), that’s where they focus all their R&D dollars. They are unlikely to take some of those dollars away from their big source of income and retarget it on something that’s seen to be, in the short term, a minor business.
As a point of interest– One of the examples that Clayton gives is horse drawn vehicles not feeling threatened by hand-made luxury cars, but later losing out to the Model-T, mass produced car.
Beerus:
Sorry, I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dana:
If we (our Team) will be able to make the Ecat SK Leonardo 100% self sustaining, able to feed itself without necessity of external power source, obtaining infinite COP, yes. But it is still a dream, we are close, but not cigar yet. We are working very hard to realize this dream.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Berenice Beckham:
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
here are your stats today on Researchgate:
full readings 26000 (!!!)
research interest index: 555.5 (!!!)
recommendations: 1631 (!!!)
After 5 months (!!!)
I think you are the N.1 out of 15 millions. The average numbers for good publications are, respectively, 200, 10 and 10, after years.
BB
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
In the USA are on course the celebrations for the moon landing half century ago: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo could be an achievement of the same importance?
Dana
Nils Fryklund
Why would a power company use an unproven and controversial new power source when nuclear, oil, coal, wind, solar and natural gas are available? Why would they take the risk to be the first power company to commit millions of dollars in a new installation based on an unproven technology? If eCat technology works and is adaptable to electric power generation, it will be through a small scale test project, where risk of lost dollars is minimal.
Dear Andrea,
Considering Mizuno’s system with palladium coated nickel, everything else remaining the same, what general result would you expect if hydrogen (of the normal isotopic ratio) was utilized instead of deuterium?
Thank you!
Nils Fryklund:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes, we are working well with them so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea!
After all the demos you have done, has not any power companies been taking contact and wished to lease an E-catSK for test, before they start to build up new nuclear-, oil-, coal- or windpowerinstallations?
1. In that case, one or more?
2. Any wellknown big powercompany?
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea,
How are the SK reactors installed with your early pioneer customers performing these days? Have you been able to solve the problems that you said you had been experiencing?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Steven N. Karels:
1- I cannot answer to this kind of questions in positive or in negative
2- see point 1
3- yes
4- premature to answer, we are still at an R&D stage
5- we should be able to decide either solution, depending on the demand of the Clients
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
1. In the eCat SK Electric, are you using magnets to cause charged particles to rotate in the magnetic field?
2. Are you using a coil or similar structure to extract the particle’s kinetic energy to convert it to electrical energy?
3. Do you need to convert the recovered electrical energy into a useful waveform (DC or AC voltsage and current)?
4. Considering the required conversions necessary to produce useable electricity, will you achieve efficiencies better than that of a more conventional Carnot cycle approach?
5. If successful with the eCsat SP Electric, will the major energy output of the eCat SK Electric be electricity or is the electricity a secondary product to heat generation?
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your consideration. As a matter of fact, I do not take seriously myself, but I fight to death for the seriousness of the work of my Team. We believe in what we are doing.
What counts is only the result of our work, all the rest is written in the sand. The attention in Researchgate toward my paper is not given from my name: I have published other papers on Researchgate, but those papers got an average attention. The incredible success has been achieved only by http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and this means that what counts is not my name, but what I wrote, that, obviously, has been considered useful. Nobody would read that paper, that is difficult to digest, unless he consider it useful. To read my paper is a work, not a leisure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Emily Richel:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you making use of superconductors in the Ecat SK Leonardo to make electricity directly from the plasma?
Thanks if you can answer,
Emily
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the increased Researchgate publicity. Just some consideration. You are not yet world-famous, but in case you will be, since it is hard to predict how publicity develops. There are many examples of good people who have risen from neglicence to fame, and then fallen because they could not handle it. Being famous is a test of a person’s psychological strength, and it can be harder to withstand than being neglected. That said, honestly it seems to me that you have the strength of personality that is needed to handle fame, including that you do not take yourself too seriously and can laugh to yourself, although at the same time you take your duty& work very seriously. But one never knows. It can be a devilish thing & no one has infinite strength. I’m not suggesting to do anything differently, just giving my perspective of the situation…
Best regards, /pekka
DR Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the correction,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi, Modestino
The link to the paper by ‘Tadahiko Mizuno & Jed Rothwell’ does not work properly.
‘Increased Excess Heat from Palladium Deposited on Nickel’ – that was posted by Modestino doesn’t work.
The following link should work.
(tiny.url was used to shorten the url length to minimize errors.
https://preview.tinyurl.com/y2mm4v9f
Sustaining Regards,
Joseph Fine
Adella Yoshi:
Every day I read the stats on Researchgate and everyday I get stunned.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Modestino:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
After your publication http://www.researchgate.ner/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions the replication of your effect are multiplying:
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/mizunotincreasede.pdf
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I saw here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/researchgate
that Researchgate has 15 millions of papers. Your paper is in the 1st 1% of the most read, but with the numbers you reached today I think you are in the top 10:
full readings 25748
research interest index 543.6
Recommendations 1575
With these numbers you are in the top of the top and for a LENR based paper, with the general hostility toward this matter, you made cultural revolution. Actually, your paper is very difficult to read, so it is unbelievable that you collected these results, because means that you intercepted the strong interest of all the field of the scientists and researchers of this field. This success of yours is important in this period.
Strong congrats
A.Y.
Dear Readers,
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.