United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

26,085 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • domenico canino

    Dear Andrea,
    a new low energy plasma tech:
    https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/dm/atclen/news_en/15mk/120702539/
    maybe can help you,
    plasma regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    I agree.
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • JPR

    I noticed that the readings of your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    are continuing to raise ( stunning numbers, it’s a world record ) proportionally to the hits on
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    This gives evidence of the fact that the importance of that paper is its coherence with the experiment, besides its theoretical value, that is very high.
    Good luck for your test toward the permanent ssm: what a revolution !
    JPR

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today on other posts,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    Your insight is intelligent.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Buck

    Andrea,

    Thank you for sharing your impression of the current level of success for the extended testing. For me, a sigma of 2 is a great success. It suggests that you are about 2/3’s of the way towards “full control” of attaining & maintaining SSM, and/or possibly approaching somewhere near 69% of an expected limit.

    I am trying to understand your approach. Strictly guessing, is intuition pointing in the right direction where you/your team are aiming for attaining and maintaining SSM as a first step, say to a level of 5-6 Sigma. Then, once SSM control is mastered, the R&D manipulation of the control parameters will begin with the goal of increasing the extraction of electricity while staying within the “box” defined by the different (2 – 5 – 10?) SSM control parameters? And, of course, all the while assessing the suitability and durability of the hardware encasing the SK Leonardo plasma?

    Respectfully,

    Buck

    ps. Of course my best to you and your team

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your kind concern.
    The tests will not be affected.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I trust you and your family will be safe when the hurricane comes. Will this affect your ongoing testing?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- yes
    2- premature
    3- should be
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Regarding the tests you are currently performing:

    1. Are you generating electricity directly from the E-Cat?
    2. If so, have you been able to charge a battery from the E-Cat yet?
    3. Can you run the E-Cat from a battery (not the grid) yet?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Toussaint Francois:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea,
    it gives me a great satisfaction knowing that you, with your limited means, have accomplished what no else in the planet has achievedwith unlimited funds and what you’re achieving is the greatest discovery ever !
    Warm Regards,
    Chuck Davis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steve_saves_the_climate:
    Two.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Domenico Canino:
    Wow!
    Can you supply the source of this information ?
    It looks historically inconsistent.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein henrik:
    Thank you.
    We are here working very, very hard to succeed.
    I am optimist, but no cigar yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andea
    From your reply to Karl-Henrik Malmkvist from August 2019 at 8:16 AM, it appears that the direct electricity production in SK Leonardo may be: far, far more than just making sure that enough electricity is generated to satisfy SSM.
    If you succeed here, E-Cat becomes not just one energy revolution, but two, through the same product.
    I hope you and your team succeed!
    Sincerely: Svein Henrik

  • domenico canino

    Dear Andrea,
    Thousands of years ago the Phoenician in the old town of Amrit used the Nou.ra,shams, an electro-plasma substance that appears like “liquid light”. to heal people and to make energy. Just for information…

  • Steve_saves_the_climate

    Hi again.

    Regarding the tests… Do You still measure using the sigma scale ?

    If so, where on that scale Do You consider the testresults since the start of the current tests ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    William Mathias:
    OK
    Thank you for the intervention,
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • William Mathias

    Dear Andrea,

    Now it works, thanks. I believe that a very minor change to the references in the paper might have caused a momentary access problem for people not logged to ResearchGate.

    Best regards -WM

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gian:
    Thank you for your attention to our work.
    As a matter of fact, the Ecat SK Leonardo is conposed by hundreds of parts, due to the complexity of the control of the plasma and to many other factors. Globally, due to the good tests on course I am satisfies for the 80%, but one of my best collaborators repeats “Andrea, be humble”, so I am 51% satisfied.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    William Mathias:
    Not true.
    Just type the link you correctly wrote and you will read the paper. Just click on “Public File” under “Description and Figures”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • William Mathias

    Dear Andrea,

    Your paper on https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long-range_particle_interactions appears to be currently only available on a request basis.

    Best Regards -WM

  • Dear Andrea,
    Your Ecat can essentially be said to consist of 2 parts: A) a power supply and B) an energy generator.

    You are the best judge of the functioning of these two components.
    What satisfaction rating do you think it is NOW correct to assign to A) and B) on a scale of 1 to 10?

    For years I have been following your R&D work with great interest and today I am more than satisfied with the results achieved.
    God bless your efforts.

    Warm regards
    Gian

  • Andrea Rossi

    Arjen:
    Now we are working to get the permanent ssm. If we will succeed, we will think to the consequent issues.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    We are proceeding very well and I am optimist about what is going on, but a lot of work remains to be done.
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Can you give us an update about the tests on the E-cat Leonardo?
    Thanks.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • arjen

    Dear Andrea

    As the current Ecat is operated remotely by internet access , but the new development of a ECAT with SSM mode is planned to be off grid, do you also hope to have this new development to be operated independently of a internet connection?

    in my view this will be of a huge benefit for developing countries where no internet is available.

    take care of your health :)

    kind regards Arjen

  • Rod Walton

    Power Engineering August 27 2019:
    The digital transformation of the power plantt: it’s a twin-twin situation
    Rod Walton

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Maybe you are not wrong at all,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stephen

    Dear Andrea

    Yes I realize it that after reading it this time round it some have already that its information rich , it is that but it’s also a lot to digest and understand. I need to put a side my pre concepts and really think about what that information is conveying and what it really means..it’s a very good paper for those well versed in the fields and concepts it is covering. I can see that you have put great amount of work into i orb in in study, understanding and how to present iit deserves respect.

    Regarding the link to your paper in the initial response to me it says it’s to you paper but it actually it seems to go a different location on reseach gate than your paper

    Best Regards
    Stephen

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Your reply to Lots Mileykowsky is a very good answer but it could also be said, who can understand has understood. This subject is highly technical and spectrums exist throughout nature, even with regards human development which provides for levels of varying intelligence/understanding. Anyway I thought I would put this forward even though it is not important to the technology. It is simply something that is unavoidable at this particular time but can if dwelt upon create a waste of time. Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    My paper responds to your questions, but it is difficult to read, you must read it carefully. A superficial reading of it is a loss of time.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stephen

    Hello Andrea Rossi.

    I notice the link you included in your reply doesn’t go to the expected one although it’s interesting in its own way.

    That said your paper which I have the link to is definitely worth a re read as my understanding starts to improve.

    Always something new to learn with something like this.

    I’m now thinking of light cones in ways I never thought of them before.

    Thanks

    Stephen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    1- I do not think so
    2- no, as explained on
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330603654_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    3- the conservation energy is accountable for the system, as it has always to be
    4- I think the resonance is fundamental
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stephen

    Dear Andrea Rossi

    In an earlier response to a question raised by Gerard you answered Yes to his question regarding the energy not being of nuclear and of e=mc2 origin. (I hope I got that right)

    I wonder if I can ask a question to clarify that point (I hope they are not too naive)?

    Is the amount of energy generated
    1) accountable by changes in the overall binding energy per nucleon in the nucleus?
    2) fully independent of the nucleus
    3) is the conservation of energy etc accountable at atomic mass level or by some external aspect within the over all system.

    On a separate point does all the generated energy pass through the resonance you mention or is that resonance an independent signature.

    I hope those questions weren’t too far off track 😉

    Best Regards good luck for success with the current testing .

    Stephen

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Prof

    The difference between an Ecat that does not need any external power source and an Ecat that needs an external power source is obvious.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
    Yes, we should be able to make this balancing.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lotr Mileykowsky:
    I think that who wants to understand has understood.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lotr Mileikowsky

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    one query wrote here by “Martin” about “why self-sustain is needed, if CoP=100” need slightly more sophisticated answer, than “do math”.

    “Martin” is probably Martin Tůma – an author of smearing articles about E-Cat in magazine VTM (Science and Technics for Youths).

    With Your eventual more precise answer, there is hope that youths in our country will have chance to read and know some real info about E-Cat.

  • Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Hello Andrea,
    Maybe this is premature, but is your aim to control the electrical and thermal outputs of the E-CatSK Leonardo independently of each other or will there always be a fixed ratio? I mean if you manage get x Watt electrical power do you think it is possible to decrease the thermal output and maintain the electrical output? Maybe your coming tests will answer that question?
    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist, Sweden

  • Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    Thank you for your suggestion and your attention to our work.
    As a matter of fact, the issue of the Coulombian force is talked about in par 1, 2 and 3 as per its relation to my technology, that is not related to cold fusion. To understand my paper is necessary forget the concept of cold fusion. The mechanism is totally different from a cold fusion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Steven N. Karels, Thank you for your response to my posting. I understand what you are saying and agree with your suggestion of paragraphs which in future I shall keep in mind. However, I cannot emphasize enough that I am not out to persuade anyone that I am right with the information that I present. The information is put forward for consideration of a subject that is far reaching and wide ranging. I realize Andrea’s technology is at issue and his quest for a self sustaining mode is now his main objective. The way I present is no doubt novel and difficult to understand but this is the nature of the subject. Should a person wish to correct me I am available or should they ask a question, I will answer it, if I can, if not I shall explain why. At the end of the day i.e. to finalize I will put forward by description two mechanisms. One that provides a unified field of circulating air constructed by an understanding of geometry i.e. theory relating to structure. The other is a mechanism relating to structure but that of magnetic fields. Both mechanisms require an adequate source of power from clean energy. This subject is not to be argued about, it is simply take it or leave it for the time being because the future is inevitable. Regards, Eric Ashworth

  • WaltC

    Dr. Rossi,

    If you do update your paper,
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions , I believe it could also be improved if you explicitly mention the Coulomb Barrier and how it does or does not apply to your situation.

    I acknowledge that you address the issue implicitly through your references, but it would help to convey your theory if you address and reinforce the subject directly within your paper. And while the paper does talk about the Coulomb Force, it doesn’t talk about how “things” pass into and out of an atom’s nucleus and thus achieves nuclear transmutations.

    For many readers the coulomb barrier is the “900 lb gorilla” in the room: clarity is hampered when there’s the appearance of ignoring its presence.

    Just one person’s opinion based on his own experience reading (and re-reading) what is clearly a very important and fundamental paper.

    WaltC

  • Andrea Rossi

    Clay:
    Thank you for your kind attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Clay

    Your publication on Researchgate is still by far the most read on Researchgate. It is impressive.
    Congratulations
    Clay

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>