Within the theorized proton-electron aggregates described in your paper, is it a possibility, that a proton-electron structure can transition into a state, that when then coupled with a long range force, would allow it to pass the coulomb barrier of an adjacent proton-electron or multiple protons-electrons structure that is also within the aggregate, to then merge with a release of energy.
Sorry for the probably unanswerable questions, but it’s in my nature to be permanently incurably curious, I’m an engineer, and this Looks like the beginning of complete new fields of multidisciplinary Engineering.
Mats Lewan and Paul laViolette:
It is quite interesting what I found yesterday in te Atlantic Codex of Leonardo da Vinci, folio 1062 retro, Vol 19, about the superunity…obviously it was wrong, but still very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels
I fully understand your reference to mirrors with respect to Andrea’s device. The first lasers(Ruby crystals) employed some sort of mirror to reflect and grow in intensity a primary laser beam which contained the energy frequency by stimulating the emission of photons from an inverted energy level contained in the laser material. Not only did this amplify the beam but kept the energy in a non divergent form. Hope this clarifies what you were trying to present.
Resonance regards.
Dear Breakthrough Energy Movement and Andrea,
I might add that I will also do a presentation at the Global IBEM Conference 2019, focusing on the opportunities with LENR technology as a new clean, cheap, and abundant energy source. https://globalbem.com/mats-lewan-2/
Kind Regards,
Mats
Dear Andrea!
Do you and your team have time to install new E-catSK with 40MW-customer, manage the first delivered E-catSK and now even try to build an E-catSK that will work in SSM?
Take care.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Dr Rossi,
I like to inform your readers about the
Global IBEM Conference 2019, The Netherlands, Europe November 9 and 10.
Paul LaViolette will present his lecture “Through the looking glass: our open system Universe and overunity galaxy”
Breakthrough Energy Movement
Dear Andrea:
A very interesting exhibition is on course in Milan dedicated to Nikola Tesla: https://www.mostratesla.it
I think this can be of interest also for the readers,
Best Regards,
Roberto
Dear Fabrizio, Not unlike many people you are puzzled over the E-Cat technology and the blatant disregard by academic research institutions, government organizations and the the media etc.. Your two sons, being skeptics, I presume are involved in academia and no doubt you yourself were or still are. This I agree is a puzzling situation especially with the present emphasis in the media and by politicians, of the need to address climate change due to the need to reduce pollution. These concerns on the one hand are justifiable and understandable but on the other hand it’s not such the catastrophe as deemed to be. It is blown out of proportion for a purpose and the none involvement aspect is with regards a development of a necessary independent nature, a requirement of human evolution, after which becomes an important understanding with regards. Eric Ashworth
I’m getting too slow.
Andrea Rossi usually responds quickly and briefly to questions, but in such a way that he never discloses information. For example, deleting the question would be a clear answer. But in this case he was – again – too fast, and he reflected the question.
Within the foreseeable future we hope to know whether mirrors or other reflectors or concentrators are being used. And if not, the processes you describe are also possibilities that can still be studied by the team around Andrea Rossi, in whose hands I prefer to see this technology developed. I may be an idiot or naive, but that is a consequence of other interactions and reflections of waves.
I found this tremendously interesting. It needs better translation from Russian. If this video is not a fake, it has tremendous potential for entrepreneurs. I do not see any signs of CGI work, bit it is difficult to tell for sure. It looks like a low cost device.
I would understand the “mirrors” question to be one regarding population inversion and resonance within the plasma and whether a laser output might be possible?
Frank Acland:
We have still many problems to resolve, but we are progressing. I continue to believe that we will reach the cigar within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Fabrizio:
I agree with your considerations:there are such hypocrites, claiming to be concerned about environment, while simultaneously making profits with fossil fuels.
Best Regards,
Chuck Davis
Until a new energy source is actually available, we have to continue using the old. That includes replenishing the old.
Even when a new source is available, it will require energy from fossil sources to make it happen.
One can’t focus all his resources on the transition so it will be a gradual process. We still require resources to provide all the other necessities of life during this period.
First of all I apologize for not responding for a long time. It is a bit difficult for me to see the same questions and answers repeated on this blog.
Today, however, something came to my mind that I had not seen before, unless I did not pay attention:
Most ballerinas use mirrors to visually control their movements.
Do your ballerinas also use mirrors?
Given the developments and evolution of your work, I get the impression that very few people really understand what effects are taking place in your device. It is gradually becoming an incomprehensible alien technology.
I also have the same feeling as Fabrizio. I see a lot of young people who are either starting to panic or – which is much worse – rather let themselves sink into the distractions of the moment.
Fabrizio:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team. Here is the situation: if the work I am doing will reach, as I think and hope, the target of the permanent SSM, we will make a move that will unleash against the brakes a force proportional to the force that the Niagara Falls would unleash upon an umbrella.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think that the Rossi-Effect is true, and consequently all of the work you and your team are doing now is true. I think, not believe. I shaked your hand in October 2011 in Bologna, and sometime I meet Prof. Levi strolling with sons in the same city. I know the names of Focardi and Ferrari since 80’s.
So, as you can guess, I wake every morning saying to myself and to you: “Please, Andrea, hurry up! We all need that!”. Also because I would like my sons to stop thinking of me being fool… 🙂
But the question is: if I know it’s true, mister Trump knows it is true. Mister Conte knows, and Mrs. Merkel and Macron and Johnson and so on know it is true. So, why build new nuclear plants? Why new oil explorations, huge investments in old technologies? Why ITER? And middle-east wars? I can, partially, understand solar or wind or tide. But the big money is going always there…
The only thing I can imagine is: economy is a thin wire we are all hanging on, and it can’t stop even for a moment.
No need for an answer. To publish this and give no answer at all would be a great answer.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I have read your paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Apart the importance of this publication under a theoretical point of view, what stunned me is not only the number of the full readings ( almost 30 000 ! ), but the 200 recommendations: all the persons that recommended your paper are professors that have put their face on the recommendation and among them there are many world class well known nuclear physicists and professors from universities of the whole world. This is a tremendous peer reviewing: probably your paper is the most peer reviewed scientific publication of the recent years, much more than CERN’s publications !
Ad majora,
JPR
KeithT:
The balancing of the Coulomb barriers along our theoretical hypothesis is described in paragraohs 1 and 2 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
I am not able to understand your model.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Within the theorized proton-electron aggregates described in your paper, is it a possibility, that a proton-electron structure can transition into a state, that when then coupled with a long range force, would allow it to pass the coulomb barrier of an adjacent proton-electron or multiple protons-electrons structure that is also within the aggregate, to then merge with a release of energy.
Sorry for the probably unanswerable questions, but it’s in my nature to be permanently incurably curious, I’m an engineer, and this Looks like the beginning of complete new fields of multidisciplinary Engineering.
Regards,
Keith Thomson
Bruce:
The work is proceeding very well and upon solid bases for a cigar in short term.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of October 8th 2019: Cyberattacks on power utilities growing in numbers,complexity
Rod Walton
Dr Rossi,
How is going on the R&D with the permanent SSM Ecat SK Leonardo?
Mats Lewan and Paul laViolette:
It is quite interesting what I found yesterday in te Atlantic Codex of Leonardo da Vinci, folio 1062 retro, Vol 19, about the superunity…obviously it was wrong, but still very interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eernie1:
If this was it was meaning, I do not use mirrors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nils Fryklund:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mats Lewan:
Welcome to this blog and thank you for the information !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sven B:
1
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
No
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Have any of the E-Cat charges produced on your automated production line completed their full lifespans yet.
Regards,
Keith Thomson
Steven N. Karels
I fully understand your reference to mirrors with respect to Andrea’s device. The first lasers(Ruby crystals) employed some sort of mirror to reflect and grow in intensity a primary laser beam which contained the energy frequency by stimulating the emission of photons from an inverted energy level contained in the laser material. Not only did this amplify the beam but kept the energy in a non divergent form. Hope this clarifies what you were trying to present.
Resonance regards.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How many E-CatSK are now installed?
1. >5
2. >25
3. >125
Kind regards
Sven B
Dear Breakthrough Energy Movement and Andrea,
I might add that I will also do a presentation at the Global IBEM Conference 2019, focusing on the opportunities with LENR technology as a new clean, cheap, and abundant energy source.
https://globalbem.com/mats-lewan-2/
Kind Regards,
Mats
Dear Andrea!
Do you and your team have time to install new E-catSK with 40MW-customer, manage the first delivered E-catSK and now even try to build an E-catSK that will work in SSM?
Take care.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Does Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) play a role in your eCat technologies?
Breakthrough Energy Movement:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
I like to inform your readers about the
Global IBEM Conference 2019, The Netherlands, Europe November 9 and 10.
Paul LaViolette will present his lecture “Through the looking glass: our open system Universe and overunity galaxy”
Breakthrough Energy Movement
Koen Vandewalle:
I am sorry, but, sincerely, I still did not understand your question. You are very welcome to rephrase it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
A very interesting exhibition is on course in Milan dedicated to Nikola Tesla:
https://www.mostratesla.it
I think this can be of interest also for the readers,
Best Regards,
Roberto
Dear Fabrizio, Not unlike many people you are puzzled over the E-Cat technology and the blatant disregard by academic research institutions, government organizations and the the media etc.. Your two sons, being skeptics, I presume are involved in academia and no doubt you yourself were or still are. This I agree is a puzzling situation especially with the present emphasis in the media and by politicians, of the need to address climate change due to the need to reduce pollution. These concerns on the one hand are justifiable and understandable but on the other hand it’s not such the catastrophe as deemed to be. It is blown out of proportion for a purpose and the none involvement aspect is with regards a development of a necessary independent nature, a requirement of human evolution, after which becomes an important understanding with regards. Eric Ashworth
Dear Steven N. Karels
Dear Andrea Rossi
I’m getting too slow.
Andrea Rossi usually responds quickly and briefly to questions, but in such a way that he never discloses information. For example, deleting the question would be a clear answer. But in this case he was – again – too fast, and he reflected the question.
Within the foreseeable future we hope to know whether mirrors or other reflectors or concentrators are being used. And if not, the processes you describe are also possibilities that can still be studied by the team around Andrea Rossi, in whose hands I prefer to see this technology developed. I may be an idiot or naive, but that is a consequence of other interactions and reflections of waves.
Kind regards,
Koen
Sam:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R
Another interesting video
about Niagara Falls.
https://youtu.be/gIbJ5zoQxJw
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to a video
about Niagara Falls.
https://youtu.be/uCiaCmODSO8
Regards
Sam
Christopher Calder:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
I found this tremendously interesting. It needs better translation from Russian. If this video is not a fake, it has tremendous potential for entrepreneurs. I do not see any signs of CGI work, bit it is difficult to tell for sure. It looks like a low cost device.
Anti-gravity device by Alexey Chekurkov (7 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1JeeaZlYonc
YouTube home page of Alexey Chekurkov
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzZxKT3BzBZOVVy8_YzP6Yw
Also see this brief video history of anti-gravity devices (28 minutes)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OrPdLNlIEA
Christopher
Steven N. Karels:
This would be a kind of information I cannot answer about in positive or in negative way.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I would understand the “mirrors” question to be one regarding population inversion and resonance within the plasma and whether a laser output might be possible?
Koen Vandewalle:
I do not understand your question about the mirrors: can you specify what do you mean ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
We have still many problems to resolve, but we are progressing. I continue to believe that we will reach the cigar within this year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Fabrizio:
I agree with your considerations:there are such hypocrites, claiming to be concerned about environment, while simultaneously making profits with fossil fuels.
Best Regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
At present are you getting periods of SSM with the the E-Cat (even if not permanent), and if so, for how long?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
@Fabrizio
Until a new energy source is actually available, we have to continue using the old. That includes replenishing the old.
Even when a new source is available, it will require energy from fossil sources to make it happen.
One can’t focus all his resources on the transition so it will be a gradual process. We still require resources to provide all the other necessities of life during this period.
Warm regards
Dan C.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
First of all I apologize for not responding for a long time. It is a bit difficult for me to see the same questions and answers repeated on this blog.
Today, however, something came to my mind that I had not seen before, unless I did not pay attention:
Most ballerinas use mirrors to visually control their movements.
Do your ballerinas also use mirrors?
Given the developments and evolution of your work, I get the impression that very few people really understand what effects are taking place in your device. It is gradually becoming an incomprehensible alien technology.
I also have the same feeling as Fabrizio. I see a lot of young people who are either starting to panic or – which is much worse – rather let themselves sink into the distractions of the moment.
Reflective Regards,
Koen
Fabrizio:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team. Here is the situation: if the work I am doing will reach, as I think and hope, the target of the permanent SSM, we will make a move that will unleash against the brakes a force proportional to the force that the Niagara Falls would unleash upon an umbrella.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I think that the Rossi-Effect is true, and consequently all of the work you and your team are doing now is true. I think, not believe. I shaked your hand in October 2011 in Bologna, and sometime I meet Prof. Levi strolling with sons in the same city. I know the names of Focardi and Ferrari since 80’s.
So, as you can guess, I wake every morning saying to myself and to you: “Please, Andrea, hurry up! We all need that!”. Also because I would like my sons to stop thinking of me being fool… 🙂
But the question is: if I know it’s true, mister Trump knows it is true. Mister Conte knows, and Mrs. Merkel and Macron and Johnson and so on know it is true. So, why build new nuclear plants? Why new oil explorations, huge investments in old technologies? Why ITER? And middle-east wars? I can, partially, understand solar or wind or tide. But the big money is going always there…
The only thing I can imagine is: economy is a thin wire we are all hanging on, and it can’t stop even for a moment.
No need for an answer. To publish this and give no answer at all would be a great answer.
Fabrizio
Roberta:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
Thank you for your kind support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you have women in your team , with high responsibility roles?
Thanks,
Roberta
I totally agree with your answer about the entropy !
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I have read your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Apart the importance of this publication under a theoretical point of view, what stunned me is not only the number of the full readings ( almost 30 000 ! ), but the 200 recommendations: all the persons that recommended your paper are professors that have put their face on the recommendation and among them there are many world class well known nuclear physicists and professors from universities of the whole world. This is a tremendous peer reviewing: probably your paper is the most peer reviewed scientific publication of the recent years, much more than CERN’s publications !
Ad majora,
JPR
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.