United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

42,335 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Electricity, electricity, electricity. I am working on it with the Team. Today a very good day, important discovery.
    Warmest Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Now I understand, thank you !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    See following link

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    At the moment, are you working towards a SSM E-Cat with the primary goal of generating heat, or the primary goal of generating electricity?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Prof12:
    Did you study it ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Arjen:
    I did not study it and, honestly, I do not know about it.
    Can you be more precise about how can it be useful to the Ecat ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    I am not able to follow this insight of yours.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wilfried Babelotzky:
    Thank you for your attention to our work: whay you say is a derivate from
    http://www.researchnet.com/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rod Walton:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rod Walton

    On Power Engineering November 12th issue:
    Energy utilities must do more to hire veterans anf give them the tools to succeed.
    Rod Walton

  • Wilfried Babelotzky

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    As you answered that you are working also on reaching to yield an electric gain of 80-90%, besides the heat, I suppose you already reached the SSM.
    If you will reach a permanent SSM with electric gain (low entropy energy gain) you will make the most disruptive invention ever. This is close to the matter-antimatter of the science fictions.
    Kind Regards,
    Wilfried Babelotzky

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, You asked me to rephrase my question. I have tried twice but unsuccessfully. On my computer your site says Not Secure and I lose the information intended. So I am now typing direct. To be very brief, from my own experience academic institutions do not like independent researchers who fund their own projects and use their intuitive intelligence to solve important issues. This I have experienced first hand myself. The cancer cell has been described as, and I think it was said by Gaston Naessens who described it as like a spring running backwards but it could equally be described as a cell running too far forwards i.e. doing what its designed to do or like a marathon runner in a race whereby the finishing tape has become damaged or none existent and he likewise does what he is good at. The immune system is the regulator in the cycle of the cell. Camphor has been known for eons to be a ‘cure all’ but nobody seems to know how it works and it does work in certain cases of cancer. When you demonstrate your E-Cat SK in a self sustain mode you will be required to replenish the charge and the cancer researchers will know that what you have i.e. your technology is what they need.
    Regards, Eric Ashworth
    P.S. When my wifes breast cancer was cured by 714 the cancer specialist asked her where she had learned her black magic. I am not promoting 714X I have nothing to do with it but the subject of energy is a hot potato.

  • arjen

    Dear Andrea

    Now you and your team are still in the preparation for a world wide launch of your products.

    Did you study the enormous advantages of blockchain technology? For multiple uses security, control, data
    (not to be confused with cryptocurrency as this can but certainly does not have to be a part of it)

    and if you studied it, do you think this will be of a great advantage for the business model and if not why not?

    Kind regards

  • Prof12

    Mr. Andrea.

    Since You stated, that Your effect is neither fission nor fusion, how can Your scientific paper explain this ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Thank you for your comment, that allows me to remind that today in the USA is the “Veterans Day”: honour to all who served to defend the values of their Country, in many cases with the extreme sacrifice. Had not the USA intervene in the second world war, today Europe would not be a free community of Countries.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    By the way,
    I did not escape the clutches of the army since they drafted me for the next conflict, the Korean war, and I spent the next two years eating C rations.
    Nostalgic regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Thank you for your opinion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    I would like to add these points. Nuclear fission probably saved my life since I was about to be drafted into the army and would have participated in the invasion of Japan. Casualties of this conflict were estimated to be in the millions. Value to me and other participants, incalculable. Competition with standard energy suppliers decreased the cost of energy to users throughout the world. Value of this incalculable.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sven B:
    If we will succeed, yes.
    I’d add another point, though:
    – investment paid so far by the taxpayer for “classic noclear energy, fusion and fission combined: around 30 billion $, plus the damages caused by accidents like Chernobyl, Three Miles island, etc ( uncalculable )
    investments from the taxpayers for the work of my Team: zero
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven NJ. Karels:
    4
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Is the primary issue(s) you are experiencing with achieving SSM one of:

    1. Electronic control;
    2. Fuel combination (e.g., an additive to stabilize the SSM);
    3. thermal runaway; and/or
    4. something else?

  • Sven B

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Following your latest updates on this blog here is my interpretation
    of the 100+ last years of R&D in the area of nuclear energy extraction.

    Theoretically available energy:
    – presented 1905 by Einstein as E=mc2

    Practical processes with significant efficiency:

    Fission process:
    – first uncontrolled release: 1945
    – first controlled release: a few years later

    Fusion process:
    – first uncontrolled release: 1954
    – first controlled release: still works in progress

    Ecat-SK process:
    – first controlled release: 2018
    – Holy Grail of controlled release: Dec 2019

    Did I get things right?

    Kind regards
    Sven B

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Sorry, I do not understand what you mean: can you rephrase ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thank you !
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Correct,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Is a car with an internal combustion engine somewhat analogous to what you are trying to do with the E-Cat SK Leonardo?

    The car needs a battery to start it up, then once the engine is running part of the power produced from the car charges the battery (via the alternator), and the battery runs all the electronics in the car. To operate, the car engine requires a fuel source, as does the E-Cat (although in tiny amounts).

    Best wishes,

    Frank Acland

  • Sam

    For anyone interested in the EBR 1
    here are links to Ray Haroldsen
    Videos an Engineer that worked there.

    https://youtu.be/tNwX81SEJTU

    https://youtu.be/39cTW1AjxbA

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Would you say that the understanding and cure for cancer is directly related to the understanding of energy?, which you’re technology will be able to explain. In other words, would you share knowledge with outside academic researchers who would benefit from your understanding. Of course, I understand, that they would have to approach you because of protocol but the question is would you be willing to share such information?.
    Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Andrea Rossi

    Szymon Blachuta:
    The simmplest solution is by battery where there is no grid ( for example in cars ) or grid. Any sourse can be adaptable, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Szymon Blachuta

    How do you start up the ssm process of the Ecat SK Leonardo:
    a- by net supply
    b- by accumulator/battery
    c- by condensator
    Waiting for good news,
    Szymon Blachuta

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Thanks for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Neil Bockenstedt:
    Thank you for your attention to our work,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Neil Bockenstedt

    I watched
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    Superb!
    Cheers
    Neil

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    This is a link to a video about
    Walter Zinn and his team that
    where the first to make Electricity
    from Nuclear power.

    https://youtu.be/KncekYvqyWs

    Regards
    Sam

  • Andrea Rossi

    Angstrom:
    I agree. ( He,he,he )
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Angstrom

    Dear Maestro Rossi:
    You was born with a brilliant mind- but remember: “Roma uno die condita non est”
    Angstrom

  • Andrea Rossi

    H.P.:
    Yes, that is what we are fighting for.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • H.P.

    Dr Rossi,
    Did I understand correctly that you are making the Ecat SK Leonardo in permanent ssm, which means that it makes heat and electricity, being the electricity in quantity enough to supply to the Ecat itself the electric energy necessary to work, plus perhaps also more electricity than the amount necessary for the self sustaining mode?
    If so, if you will succeed the world will not be the same.
    Good luck,
    Humberto

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rodolfo:
    Yes, we are.
    We made a component that didn’t exist before, designed by us and that is crucial for the Ecat SK Leonardo to obtain the permanent ssm.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Rodolfo

    Are you using also the 3D technology in the R&D related to the Ecat SK Leonardo? Maybe to make some component not in commerce?
    Rodolfo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find commentds published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Wilfried Babelotzky:
    We are working to reach also that. We are working with all the force that God gives us.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Wilfried Babelotzky

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    I repeat my queswtion I put you in past: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo will be able sooner or later to yield 80-90% of its energy in electric energy gain ?
    Wilfried Babelotzky

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stuart:
    Maybe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stuart

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    European Union has issued a line of funds for the R&D in the field of energy obtained by nickel-hydrogen interactions: this is an important recognition of your work: when you first in the world made your Italian patent in 2008, in Europe the sole reaction had been a big laugh. Now they have understood the importance of your work.
    Probably in the next 10-20 years they will fund the R&D on what you are doing now…

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    A few years ago you ran a “destructive test” on an eCat. Since your underlying technology/implementation has evolved, will you or have you done a similar “destructive test”?

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea:
    I have noticed that the number readings of your paper published on Researchgate and of the views of the video of the presentation of the Ecat SK are in the same order of magnitude, in fact:
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    has obtained as of today 31198 full readings, and counting, while
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    has obtained more than 38000 views as of today and counting
    Probably the reason of the unbelievable success of the paper, by far the most read nuclear physics paper in the world of the last years, stays in the coherence between theory and experimental results.
    Do you agree?
    All the best,
    Marco

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Not yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>