United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

28,262 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    No, I prefer to wait the conclusion of this R&D and give the final result.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Can you describe, at this time, the longest SSM time for the eCat SK Leonardo achieved? Seconds, minutes, hours?

  • Prof

    @JPR,
    I agree with you. Also we must consider that the 230 recommendations have been made by researchers amd professors that have publicly signed them and all of them are listed on Researchgate as researchers and prof of scientific matters, many of them specialists in nuclear physics, so that it is the most peer reviewed paper of its specific field.
    Cheers
    Prof

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    I still am stunned about the attention dedicated to this theoretical-experimental publication.
    About the theoretical progress: yes, we are finding experimental confirmations of all the theoretical hypothesis made in the paper. Some theories have been confirmed experimentally for the first time in the world. Our Team is making an outstanding job.
    Our work is proceeding better than expected.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ralph

    @ Consciousness:

    If he would open his tech to the world, then the wildfire would start burning and anyone could continue to develop it in parallel to finally spolve the latest issues with the ecat’s.
    This would be a major improvement, and perhaps we already would have had a working machine.
    This is necessary to finally stop the climate change. But as long Rossi does not open his science to others, no one will ever believe in him and/or take him seriously.

  • JPR

    Dear Andrea.
    yout paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    is actually viral: ASs of today reached 32651 full readings and more than 230 recommendations, it is progressing at an average of over 100 full readings per day, from all the world. Unbelievable.
    Any progress about the publication derived from your experiment on course ?
    All the best,
    Jean Paul

  • Svein Henrik

    Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
    An e-car may be equipped with a minimal battery and in addition a Carnot cycle-based engine, able to continuously generate electricity of 12 to 15 kWh/h to support the battery. The engine will also produce at least 24 to 30 kWh/h, normally wasted or useless, heat.

    When parked at home, the generator will deliver power to the grid. (Money is earned instead of payed. The same may be done at your job.) No worry for grid overload!
    The double amount of free energy may also, by help of “Water-hose quick-couplings” be supplied to the owner’s house. Only an extra heat exchanger in the car is needed.

    This will supply the home with additional energy by hot water of 80 deg C to heat: the house, a swimming pool, a greenhouse or an absorption chiller to provide AC, when needed.

    If the Carnot cycle-based engine receives its energy from a steam producing E-Cat, this whole energy supply may happen without any known pollution or bothersome noise.
    Whether the E-Cat is operating in ssm or not, seems in this situation of minor importance. The extended use of an environmentally friendly energy source is of great importance.

    Obtainable thermal energy may also be environmentally stored at the mansion in a hot water tank and/or an ice-water tank, for use while the car is on the road.

    If an E-Cat, with a 36-kW capacity, in the future, may be able to produce 33 % of its energy directly as electricity and the rest as heat, the same will be possible without the Carnot cycle-based engine in this energy supply.

    The described advantageous property of the E-Cat to produce energy, on spot, independent of sun, wind, wires, pipes, heavy and large volumes hydrocarbons to be transported, makes it to a winner in addition to its directly environmentally friendly use, when or if it emerges on the marked.

    Regards: Svein Henrik.

  • Sven B

    @Eric Ashworth:
    You are right, language is a strange subject indeed.
    For instance myself I read “..specialist will take care of ..”
    as “..specialist in publicity will take care of ..”
    Regards
    Sven B

  • Steven N. Karels

    Conscience,

    Your condescending attitude is both rude and obnoxious. Your assumption is that if someone “opens up their technology”, the world will rush in to greet it. Experience paints a different picture. Monetary interests threatened by the improvement will rush to crush it. Government leaders will rush to control it. Military people will rush to weaponize it.

    If the eCat technology is a fraud, then it will never be commercially used. Since it appears to be commercially used, we can infer that it is unlikely a fraud.

    If all the “secrets” were released but the performance could not be independently duplicated (as in Cold Fusion), then the technology will be ridiculed and valid research stopped or stymied. Leave AR along to do his thing and wish him the best if you truly care about the world.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Svein Henrik,

    I now understand what you are saying. Giving the Carnot efficiency of less than 40% for Sterling or small turbine generators, you will need an eCat with the thermal output of about 30kW to meet the 12 kWhr/hr electrical demand. Yes, the battery size required on the car can be reduced but you still have a significant cooling issue. Not a problem if the vehicle is in motion (air convection). But it could be an issue if the vehicle is parked.

    Plus you will need to provide a unit that is crash-resistant. The more probable immediate application of current eCat technology will be in Carnot cycle electricity generation and normal distribution of the electrical energy to users.

    Perhaps that is why AR is so intent on the eCat SK Leonardo (direct electricity production)?

    In the US, the typical driving speed is around 75 mph. 130kph I believe? So your assumed electrical output capacity would need to support this energy demand rate.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrich W.A. Kranz:
    If we succeed to make a permanent SSM (electric), which means that the ratio electricity generated/electricity consumed has a zero at the denominator, the issue is over.
    We are at work.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    We’ll see.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ulrich W.A. Kranz

    Hello Andrea,
    In Germany there is the worry that the grid could be overloaded when should a massive amount of e-cars be charged, while there are discussions about the proposal from Elon Musk to build a bif e-car factory near berlin: do you think the Ecat SK Leonardo in permanent SSM will help?
    Ulrich

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Language is a strange subject, for instance Frank Ackland asked would you be willing to invite some reliable third parties to witness it in action and report their findings?. Your reply “Of course”. Buck asked, given the importance of s.s.m would you consider the Wall Street Journal etc. etc. as examples of reliable third parties worthy of an invitation?. Andrea, although your answer, is correct, I do not think that Buck or many academics will fully understand the message contained within your answer regarding a specialist or specialists rather than that of a witness. Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear readers,
    Please find on
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    the comments published today in other posts of this blog,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea:
    Find here a boat ready for the Ecat: google “Outboard-Deep Blue 25 RL Torqeedo”
    Warm Regards,
    Chuck Davis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    There will be a specialist that will take care of this aspect.
    Thank you for your suggeston,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Conscience:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Svein Henrik

    Steven N. Karels
    An ordinary electric car, today, has a battery of 55kWh. This gives a mileage of 400 km. At an average speed of 80km/h, the battery will be empty after 5 hours. This gives an average energy consumption of 11kWh/h. With a Sterling engine or other, given energy from a E-Cat, that delivers 12kWh or a little more to the electric engine, you after 5 hours of driving, will still have a full battery.
    The battery size, therefore may be reduced to 1/10th of today’s need. The battery should only provide acceleration periods and be able to absorb braking energy. This car will also be so much lighter that its energy consumption is reduced.
    This car also allows you to connect it to your home and supply it with energy, when the car is not on the road. When the car is in use, your home gets energy from the grid. There, possibly, your neighbor’s car is connected, so he can supply your house and vice versa. Similar condition otherwise in the energy use, you probably see yourself.

    Yours, Svein Henrik

  • Conscience

    Dear Andrea,

    Why are you so hell-bent on secrecy and not wanting to open up your science to the world?

    Your technology could be saving the world yesterday instead of tomorrow.

    Is that why you really work hard and long hours, because you feel guilty for this?

    Because you know, if you opened up your research and technology to the rest of the world, it would spread like wildfire fire. Other experts would optimise it and port it to other industries much quicker than you could ever by yourself with your team.

    If you open the technology to the world, you become an immortal hero, and then you become ultra rich any way. And the quicker your technology diffuses, the longer you can enjoy it grow throughout your lifetime.

    You could work 5am to 1am every day, but you will never be as fast as a whole scientific, engineering and business community.

    Your answer to my last question was “because it is not ready”. But you keep seeking perfection, and every time that you achieve it, you then move the goal posts to seek a different perfection. Your pattern is now clear. And I am sure that after you figure out the Leonardo, you will come up with the next thing you want to perfect.

    Why don’t you open up your research and technology now?

    Regards,
    Conscience

  • Buck

    Dear Andrea,

    you have previously shared your view on the pivotal nature of permanent SSM, and the evolution from just the Ecat SK to including the Ecat SK Leonardo as offered products/services.

    Now, you indicate to Frank Acland your willingness to invite and demonstrate the Ecat SK Leonardo in action to reliable third parties if SSM is achieved and you are satisfied with the reliability of device.

    Given the importance of permanent SSM, would you consider The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The International Herald Tribune as examples of reliable third parties worthy of an invitation?

    Sincerely and Respectfully,

    Buck

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Of course.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    If SSM is achieved and you are satisfied with the reliability of device, would you be willing to invite some reliable third parties to witness it in action and report their findings?

    Kind regards,

    Frank Acland

  • Steven N. Karels

    Svein Henrik,

    I am uncertain of your reasoning. Using eCat technology to generate heat and then electricity (through the Carnot cycle) will have no effect on the reduction of demand for battery materials. If adopted widely, it will likely increase the demand as electricity rates/costs drop. Electrical energy will still need to be stored (in batteries) for transportation purposes as a Carnot cycle-based transportation engine is less desirable than a high efficiency direct electricity variant because of the heat dissipation requirements. Please clarify your reasoning.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Svein Henrik:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Very well.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Correct.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    If you can achieve a very high SSM and a high efficiency energy conversion to electricity, the applications are many:

    a. aviation
    b. land vehicles (cars and trucks)
    c. marine propulsion
    d. space propulsion and providing energy

    all without dangerous radiation or by products.

  • Sam

    Chuck Davis and Andrea Rossi

    I had the same problem but
    needed a break from JONP.
    All good now.

    Regards
    Sam

  • Svein Henrik

    Steven N. Charles
      Through the production of electricity through the Carnot cycle, E-Cat will significantly reduce the need for batteries. This will prevent the global shortage of cobalt, lithium and nickel from occurring.
    Regards: Svein Henrik

  • Andrea Rossi

    Domenico Canino:
    Thank you for your concern and attention to the work of our Team,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • domenico canino

    Dear Andrea,
    If you will do ssm e cat sk, there will be no need for grid! ust a battery for the start.
    All energy companies distributing energy by the grid will non be happy. Be careful Andrea.
    Calabrian regards
    domenico canino

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    If you are selling the current technology, then you cannot reasonably be accused by Conscience of “refusing to let it out”. If the eCat SK Leonardo variant should never work, will you suddenly abandon the current product? I would think not.

    If you can achieve infinite SSM and directly produce electricity, that will be an amazing deed. But should you fail in that one product, the potential of the current product to change mankind for the better will not be diminished.

    The major environmental advantage I see for the eCat SK Leonardo is reduced thermal pollution by the elimination in the Carnot cycle in generating electricity. Are there other advantages to the eCat SK Leonardo that we are not aware of? If so, please educate us.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    We still are taking orders for the heat, but Conscience , I suppose, was referring to the Ecat SK Leonardo.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Thank you for your concern, but as far as I know today this blog has regularly published comments from the Readers !
    Maybe your server had some malfunction for some time today ? Did some other reader have difficulties ?
    Please let me know, because I had no feeling about malfunctions from our side.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea,
    I hope you are very busy in your lab and not sick, because it is not of you to miss an entire day in the blog of the JoNP !
    Warm Regards,
    Chuck davis

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Are you still taking orders for your older eCat systems – reference Conscience’s comment? If so, then you have placed your product in the “stream of commerce”. If not, can you explain why?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Claretha Kellow:
    I do not listen rock and troll. No time for it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Conscience:
    Because it is not ready.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Conscience

    Dear Mr Rossi.

    Your technology, if real, would start saving countless lives as soon as it is deployed.
    Pollution kills millions.
    Wars fought over energy resources kill millions too.
    And climate change has only just started its killing spree.
    You are a man of God. God would want you to give your invention to the world today before tomorrow so the world can use it, reproduce it and make it better.
    It’s extremely pretentious to think that only you and your small team are capable of making it better.

    1. What are you asking God and man in exchange for this? Because you would definitely get all the glory. And also all the money.

    2. Yet you refuse to let it out. Why?

    Regards,

    Conscience

  • Claretha Kellow

    Dear Dr Rossi
    A troll has written that many of the Prof and researchers that have recommended your paper on
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    are not physicists, but biologists etc. It seems to me that this idiot forgot that your paper has so far more than 230 recommendations, among which at least half of them work in matters related and the others are anyway engaged in scientific matters, and we talk of hundreds of researchers and Professors, while in any scientific magazine the peer reviewers are normally one, sometimes two !
    As you said, the mother of the imbeciles is always pregnant.
    All the best,
    Claretha

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anomymous:
    Much less than the ITER and without any fund from the taxpayers,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ron:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ron

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I understood from your paper
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    and watching
    http://www.ecatskdemo.com
    that you take advantage of the current that is added from the plasma to the current initially used to innext the arc.
    Cheers
    Ron

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    USA
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Here I go again but only because I have read your reply to Karl-Henrik Malmqvist Nov. 12th. I am not surprised at what you have done but I can assure you, you are making a huge mistake that should you pursue in this present activity, will result in disaster. I have no reason to derail your objective. I too am an independent researcher with an accepted embodied technology referred to as one before its time.

    The difficulties I have encountered are many due to what I have discovered as an active force with its sole purpose to suppress the understanding of energy. I am know writing direct onto your JONP because twice, information intended for the JONP has been removed from my computer. Frustrating but I realize it is because I have something that they do not want me to share. This is why your JONP is of such value in its philosophy regarding democracy that allows for uncensored published information. What you and myself are involved in is a game that every planet has to play and win, if it wants to break through the final frontier in physics, referred by me as the holy grail of physics.

    This for you and myself is an extremely serious subject with huge ramifications. What I suggest you do is say to yourself, if you were in another persons position who wanted to keep a secret (there again maybe nobody wants to) what would you do? i.e. how would you go about to ensure it remained a well kept secret. It’s really quite simple, think about the environment you would be operating within. The present environment operates within a peer reviewing protocol process so as to control and promote emerging ideas within research communities. Independent researchers are not peer reviewed. Basically we are considered renegades/wild cards and pose a serious problem, so what else would you do?. I would start a useless program such as ITER, funded of course by a money pit called the tax payer. This would fool most people but not everyone but what about the independent researcher. Well if you think of the money spent on the ITER project, all that you would need to spend so as to slow down the independent researcher would be the equivalent of thirty pieces of silver.

    What you have Andrea is what you set out to do and you have succeeded. I realize the importance of the SSM but why destroy that which is almost perfect?. I strongly advise you not to go down a blind alley. My Unifying Field Oscillation (UFO) aircraft requires energy but not that of oil – coal – gas or conventional nuclear power but that which you have developed so as to be independent when the independence is required. When I first stumbled upon your web site and technology I knew immediately that this was the energy required but before this I knew Pi=4 because it’s relevant to the 4th Aspect being that which connects Alpha energy to Omega energy i.e. the process you are seeking to obtain the SSM and the independence it will provide. I am not an academic and this I believe is why I know, what I know. I intend to keep the communication but should it fail it will not be because of me but by outside interference.

    It must also be realized that before a person does something he must first have a good idea of why he is doing it, especially when it is novel. In other words he must be able to understand the principle and the reason behind the principle so as not to waste time and money chasing effects rather than the understanding of the causes. In other words, if the principle could be explained and it made perfect sense would you pursue observed effects and speculate as to their causes.
    Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Andrea Rossi

    Koen Vandewalle:
    He,he,he…I passed it on to the ballerinas. They are sorry you felt insulted, but I said you are right: I know the feeling.
    The proportion between electricity and heat: let me reserve this for when we will be ready, presently I am not even roughly to answer.
    Warm regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>