Dear Andrea,
Regarding the ‘waste’ heat produced by the SKL, I assume it to be for this question as 20% :
1. You said it can still be used. This means to me that it can be higher quality heat of considerable temperatures. Is that a right assumption?
2. When you are happy with the performance of the E-cat SK Leonardo, will the same SKL also be tested by the company that will certify it or will you provide them another one?
3. How long is anticipated that the independent test will take? A. 1 week, B. 2 weeks, C. 3 weeks?
Now things seem to go well, tension will rise, especially if you put your baby in the hands of the testing company.
I wish you and your team, great success and marvelous results!
Kind regards, Gerard
1. Both should be reliable
2. Yes, because the entropy is minor
3. No, also because it will be not much
4. Depends on the situation, but it is very difficult to find situations in which the Client will not have use of it
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Is the E-Cat SKL a more reliable product than the E-Cat SK?
2. Would it be correct to say that you are now looking at the E-Cat primarily as a technology that produces electricity.
3. Is waste heat a problem with the E-Cat SKL (when heat is not needed by the customer), since it is designed to generate electricity? 4. If so, what do you think is the best way to deal with it?
Anonymous:
Because Italy is the European Country that has made by orders of magnitude more controls respect all the other European Countries and, probably, respect all the Countries of the world.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daren Rednour:
1- go to http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
2- click “recent posts”
3- click “United States Patent…”
4- click in the bottom “leave a reply” and write your name or nickname and, if you want, email address, then write the text of your comment
5- click “post comment”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kranz:
A- yes
B- of what ?
C- probably yes, because with the electricity you can make heat with a COP approx = 1
D- depends on the situations
E- if requested, yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I’m very curious about the presentation of the ECAT SKL.
Good luck for you and your team!
But I’m interested als in heat production like with the ECAT SK.
Could you please answer some questions
A – will the ECAT SK further developed?
B – what is the timeframe for certification?
C – will the ECAT SK replaced by the ECAT SKL?
D – will the ECAT SKL equipped with a heat exchanger?
E – will the ECAT SKL combined in larger groups for producing more heat?
Previously you mentioned that you will be applying for a patent for presumably some part or all the technology of the E-Cat SKL. Does the timing of a commercial roll out of the E-Cat SKL depend on the eventual awarding of this patent, or is the E-Cat SKL still commercially covered by some aspect of the existing patents to allow placing on the market earlier.
If I may ask:
1. Do you think the Ecat SKL is now ready for third party testing?
2. Have you fixed a date for the beginning of third party tests?
3. Are the third party test already running?
1- we are working on it with good results so far
2- obviously you can publish whatever you want wherever you want: Frank Acland proposed to you to publish it on his blog: I think it is a good idea.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My questions are:
1. Do you have the required technology to put your E CatSKL into a
permanent self sustain mode?. No technical information required.
2. If not would you allow me to explain on the JONP a technology that
would be able to put your E CatSKL into a permanent self sustain
mode?.
If you have the required technology then my questions are irrelevant but without asking I do not know one way or the other but whatever the outcome I wish you all the best as I know, as also your readers, that you have put a tremendous amount of time and money into this most important project that will as you have said will be of immense benefit to mankind.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
As you are aware I have consistently mentioned the strength of the JONP i.e. a voice able to allow transmission of information and thereby inform yourself and its readers of information regardless of whether a subject is considered by some people controversial.
My questions: 1. Are you still able to publish papers in ‘Recent Posts’ as those published by Ch Stremmenos and many others, to your readers of the JONP?. By able I mean technical information of a controversial nature without consideration of any prior NDA you may have signed and
2. Are there any limiting factors whereby publication is denied such as information regarding ‘How to put your E Cat into a self sustaining mode?. – ‘How to achieve an Electro Magnetic Drive (EM Drive). – How to pull cancerous cells apart using a ‘Super Neutral’?.
My paper, if published would be under the title ‘Much Ado About ‘Super Neutrals’ (the yin and yang effect regarding structure).
These topics as you are aware are highly controversial because they all require the same technology to overcome a modern day problem. A problem not because they cannot be solved but because a world wide organization deems the required technology before its time has yet to come.
However, the good news is that by me being an independent researcher and free to operate outside of any NDA I am in a position to disclose any information that I feel will overcome these present day problems. Of course I am banned from universities and government research establishments but as I now realize the JONP could be just the ticket to get things moving.
Also Andrea what do you think my chances are of getting a paper published on ResearchGate. I presume there is a protocol and hurdles to overcome. I have no idea but with previous experience I would say my chances are none whatsoever. Anyway after having read my paper you will no doubt have a better idea because of your success regarding your published paper.
This question is for Frank Ackland publisher of E Cat News who I am aware has a very deep interest in developing technologies. Question 1. Have you signed any NDAs?. Question 2. Would you be able to publish a paper presented by myself as that just mentioned to Andrea in your E Cat News?.
As a footnote and I feel this is an important consideration because I know there are some people who are misinformed, believe that people involved in this controversial subject put themselves at risk of foul play. Let me assure anyone that the only risk occurs should a person probe this world organization and attempt to expose individuals who are only doing necessary work. As I have stated previously this planet is involved in a game of intelligence. The game is not that important but it does have rules according to the GOD concept and almost resembles that of a game of chess. Thereby you have to know the rules to overcome any anxiety of harmful actions occurring towards oneself. It must be realized that those who are in control are themselves being controlled within a systemic system of human evolution by highly intelligent individuals This subject as you can imagine is too technical to explain in a few words but suffice it to say, they are sufficient.
Looking forward to a positive response, I remain Eric Ashworth.
Raffaele Bongo:
We are trying to get as much electricity as possible. I prefer to give this datum during the presentation, it is a core point.
Thank you for your kind interest to what we are doing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
I am always with curiosity your fascinating SKL R&D.
To the question of Chuck Davis (Does your theory identify a theoretical maximum percentage of electricity?) You answered “yes”
Can you specify the theoretical maximum percentage of electricity?
Thank you if you can respond without compromising confidentiality.
All my best wishes for success with your project.
Best regards
Raffaele
The new device which your team created to solve SKL reliability problems:
1. Was the change only in software or firmware?
2. Was a new hardware unit developed?
3. Was the reliability issue a thermal problem, a performance/execution problem, or something else?
Dear Andrea, Thank you for your reply regarding my offer and I understand your position regarding existing circumstances involving a controversial subject. I also believe that the reply by Prof to Physics Fan February 22 makes an equally important point regarding NDA’s, disruptive technologies and how they can themselves be disruptive. However, I have more thoughts on this subject and will post them shortly.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Dear Andrea:
The rapid progress with the development of the SKL is exciting !
Does your theory identify a theoretical maximum percentage of electricity ?
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Do you have plans for a domestic E-Cat, following the successful outcome of your latest version of the e-Cat?
I hope and pray that you have a great success in the industrial and commercial applications of the e-Cat, but please make our dream, the domesticated tiger, come true.
Dr Rossi,
Just a curiosity: when you make the soldering of the electronic components do you make use of an electronic microscope ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I read your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_interactions
and I have one question: which was the fluid used in paragraph 5 ? Was it additivated with something different from the main component?
Thank you if you can answer
A.P.
Hello DR Rossi
Can you say why the SKL testing
could possibly take several months.
Regards
Sam
Kranz:
It is already certified.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
1- no
2- another one
3- from several weeks to several months
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the ‘waste’ heat produced by the SKL, I assume it to be for this question as 20% :
1. You said it can still be used. This means to me that it can be higher quality heat of considerable temperatures. Is that a right assumption?
2. When you are happy with the performance of the E-cat SK Leonardo, will the same SKL also be tested by the company that will certify it or will you provide them another one?
3. How long is anticipated that the independent test will take? A. 1 week, B. 2 weeks, C. 3 weeks?
Now things seem to go well, tension will rise, especially if you put your baby in the hands of the testing company.
I wish you and your team, great success and marvelous results!
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
you told us the Ecat SK will be further developed, when will the Ecat SK certified?
Best regardsUlrich Kranz
Sarah Waldhof:
The noise inside gives important information. This issue is confidential.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Both should be reliable
2. Yes, because the entropy is minor
3. No, also because it will be not much
4. Depends on the situation, but it is very difficult to find situations in which the Client will not have use of it
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Is the E-Cat SKL a more reliable product than the E-Cat SK?
2. Would it be correct to say that you are now looking at the E-Cat primarily as a technology that produces electricity.
3. Is waste heat a problem with the E-Cat SKL (when heat is not needed by the customer), since it is designed to generate electricity? 4. If so, what do you think is the best way to deal with it?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
What exactly do You try to listen at with the stethoscope ?
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Because Italy is the European Country that has made by orders of magnitude more controls respect all the other European Countries and, probably, respect all the Countries of the world.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daren Rednour:
1- go to http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
2- click “recent posts”
3- click “United States Patent…”
4- click in the bottom “leave a reply” and write your name or nickname and, if you want, email address, then write the text of your comment
5- click “post comment”
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sarah Waldhof:
1- what do you mean ?
2- never
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kranz:
A- yes
B- of what ?
C- probably yes, because with the electricity you can make heat with a COP approx = 1
D- depends on the situations
E- if requested, yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Using the Ecat SK Leonardo to generate electric power. I am thinking to nothing else.
By the way: the more I work, the more I convince myself of the validity of the theoretical system published on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What is the focus of your activity in this current period?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
I’m very curious about the presentation of the ECAT SKL.
Good luck for you and your team!
But I’m interested als in heat production like with the ECAT SK.
Could you please answer some questions
A – will the ECAT SK further developed?
B – what is the timeframe for certification?
C – will the ECAT SK replaced by the ECAT SKL?
D – will the ECAT SKL equipped with a heat exchanger?
E – will the ECAT SKL combined in larger groups for producing more heat?
With my best regards
Ulrich
Hi,Mr.Rossi.
Why Do you still use a stethoscope in our modern times?
1) Can’t you afford a proper tool ?
2) Since when makes plasma any noise ?
Regards
Sarah
Dear Andrea,
Can you be so patient to instruct us how to send comments to this useful blog ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Why do you tink Italy is the European Country with more persons positive to the infamous Corona virus ?
On Power Engineering issue of February 25 2020:
“FERC ruling can impact energy storage and renewables in New York ISO”
Rod Walton
KeithT:
Not necessary, our IP is well protected.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Previously you mentioned that you will be applying for a patent for presumably some part or all the technology of the E-Cat SKL. Does the timing of a commercial roll out of the E-Cat SKL depend on the eventual awarding of this patent, or is the E-Cat SKL still commercially covered by some aspect of the existing patents to allow placing on the market earlier.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Bob Clam:
Yes, now and again.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Milan:
1- almost
2- yes
3- no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi!
Good that you returned optimist.
If I may ask:
1. Do you think the Ecat SKL is now ready for third party testing?
2. Have you fixed a date for the beginning of third party tests?
3. Are the third party test already running?
Best,
Milan
Good morning Mr Rossi,
are you always using a stetoscope to “hear” if
an E-catSK or e-catSKL is runnig well, like you were
using one in the container.
Best regards, Bob Clam
1- we are working on it with good results so far
2- obviously you can publish whatever you want wherever you want: Frank Acland proposed to you to publish it on his blog: I think it is a good idea.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
My questions are:
1. Do you have the required technology to put your E CatSKL into a
permanent self sustain mode?. No technical information required.
2. If not would you allow me to explain on the JONP a technology that
would be able to put your E CatSKL into a permanent self sustain
mode?.
If you have the required technology then my questions are irrelevant but without asking I do not know one way or the other but whatever the outcome I wish you all the best as I know, as also your readers, that you have put a tremendous amount of time and money into this most important project that will as you have said will be of immense benefit to mankind.
Regards Eric Ashworth.
@Eric Ashworth,
Yes I would consider publication of your paper. Feel free to email a submission to ecatworld@gmail.com.
Sincerely,
Frank Acland
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your insight. Please make your questions short, straight and clear.
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
As you are aware I have consistently mentioned the strength of the JONP i.e. a voice able to allow transmission of information and thereby inform yourself and its readers of information regardless of whether a subject is considered by some people controversial.
My questions: 1. Are you still able to publish papers in ‘Recent Posts’ as those published by Ch Stremmenos and many others, to your readers of the JONP?. By able I mean technical information of a controversial nature without consideration of any prior NDA you may have signed and
2. Are there any limiting factors whereby publication is denied such as information regarding ‘How to put your E Cat into a self sustaining mode?. – ‘How to achieve an Electro Magnetic Drive (EM Drive). – How to pull cancerous cells apart using a ‘Super Neutral’?.
My paper, if published would be under the title ‘Much Ado About ‘Super Neutrals’ (the yin and yang effect regarding structure).
These topics as you are aware are highly controversial because they all require the same technology to overcome a modern day problem. A problem not because they cannot be solved but because a world wide organization deems the required technology before its time has yet to come.
However, the good news is that by me being an independent researcher and free to operate outside of any NDA I am in a position to disclose any information that I feel will overcome these present day problems. Of course I am banned from universities and government research establishments but as I now realize the JONP could be just the ticket to get things moving.
Also Andrea what do you think my chances are of getting a paper published on ResearchGate. I presume there is a protocol and hurdles to overcome. I have no idea but with previous experience I would say my chances are none whatsoever. Anyway after having read my paper you will no doubt have a better idea because of your success regarding your published paper.
This question is for Frank Ackland publisher of E Cat News who I am aware has a very deep interest in developing technologies. Question 1. Have you signed any NDAs?. Question 2. Would you be able to publish a paper presented by myself as that just mentioned to Andrea in your E Cat News?.
As a footnote and I feel this is an important consideration because I know there are some people who are misinformed, believe that people involved in this controversial subject put themselves at risk of foul play. Let me assure anyone that the only risk occurs should a person probe this world organization and attempt to expose individuals who are only doing necessary work. As I have stated previously this planet is involved in a game of intelligence. The game is not that important but it does have rules according to the GOD concept and almost resembles that of a game of chess. Thereby you have to know the rules to overcome any anxiety of harmful actions occurring towards oneself. It must be realized that those who are in control are themselves being controlled within a systemic system of human evolution by highly intelligent individuals This subject as you can imagine is too technical to explain in a few words but suffice it to say, they are sufficient.
Looking forward to a positive response, I remain Eric Ashworth.
Steven N. Karels:
1- yes
2- no
3- something else
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
We are trying to get as much electricity as possible. I prefer to give this datum during the presentation, it is a core point.
Thank you for your kind interest to what we are doing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
I am always with curiosity your fascinating SKL R&D.
To the question of Chuck Davis (Does your theory identify a theoretical maximum percentage of electricity?) You answered “yes”
Can you specify the theoretical maximum percentage of electricity?
Thank you if you can respond without compromising confidentiality.
All my best wishes for success with your project.
Best regards
Raffaele
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The new device which your team created to solve SKL reliability problems:
1. Was the change only in software or firmware?
2. Was a new hardware unit developed?
3. Was the reliability issue a thermal problem, a performance/execution problem, or something else?
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for the suggestion ( he,he,he ).
Yes, I recovered my voice.
Thank you for your concern,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
I do not know what her job would be
but if you need a tough person for
your team.
https://www.unilad.co.uk/sport/scottish-footballer-dislocates-knee-during-match-and-smacks-it-back-into-place/
BTW have you got your normal voice
back since your operation?
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea, Thank you for your reply regarding my offer and I understand your position regarding existing circumstances involving a controversial subject. I also believe that the reply by Prof to Physics Fan February 22 makes an equally important point regarding NDA’s, disruptive technologies and how they can themselves be disruptive. However, I have more thoughts on this subject and will post them shortly.
Regards Eric Ashworth
Chuck Davis:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Scientist think they have the theory
for possible new material.
https://phys.org/news/2020-02-scientists-state-electricity-energy-perfectly.html
Regards
Sam
Dear Andrea:
The rapid progress with the development of the SKL is exciting !
Does your theory identify a theoretical maximum percentage of electricity ?
Warm Regards,
Chuck Davis
Gerard McEk:
1 premature, but I am sure we will make a presentation, soon
2 no
3 yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Watcher of the road:
Yes.
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you have plans for a domestic E-Cat, following the successful outcome of your latest version of the e-Cat?
I hope and pray that you have a great success in the industrial and commercial applications of the e-Cat, but please make our dream, the domesticated tiger, come true.