United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

31,896 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    1- can’t see without a crystaòl ball
    2- the production system is in preparation, that’s what I said
    3- n.a.
    4- yes: I am sure the political issues will be resolved with good sense
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joe

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Can we have another Update?
    Cheers,
    Joe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peyton Butler:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dan C.:
    Thank you for your insight and for the interesting links.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oeystein Lande:
    The questions put by your comment are treated in patents in preparation. I cannot make pre-disclosure.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Øystein Lande

    Dear mr Rossi,

    If Helium is a byproduct of LENR, it would create some pressure in the reactor core.

    1. Do you have a pressure release system that avoid to high pressure in the core?

    2. Have you detected any gas release from your core?

    3. If yes on 2; Any analysis done of this gas?

  • Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    I’ve speculated on likely advantages of the E-cat X that make Jet engines feasible.

    1) It’s Able to maintain extreme temps(1400`C) continuously
    2) The singular 1KW reactors can be brought to temperature measured in minutes instead of hours.
    3) Noting that heat dispersal is critical to create thrust, 10 pencil sized 1KW reactors in a matrix would disperse the heat to compressed air much faster and efficiently then a single 3 inch diameter 10KW reactor.
    4) E-cat X ability to respond quickly, power output could be ramped up/down quickly or incrementally.

    Number 4 is important. You don’t want an E-cat Jet engine at full power while idling at the airport. Among other issues, after about 20 seconds at full power, it can start ripping up the runway.

    JET BLAST RIPS UP RUNWAY
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsJajrzIDEY

    The Among other isues-
    Car vs Boeing 747 Engine
    https://youtu.be/ZJ9uWsvR1l0?t=146

    Regards,
    Dan C.

  • Peyton Butler

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    I understand that the ownership of Leonardo Corporation is backing you with full trust and strong finance, is that correct?
    Peyton

  • Yrka

    Dear Andre Rossi.

    I apologize if tactless questions.

    I understand that F9.

    1. If test results are positive when the wait for the sale of E-Cat 10 kW. Spring? Summer? Autumn? Next year?

    2. You wrote that the production is prepared. Am I wrong?

    3. In which regions is a priority delivery?

    4. There is hope for the delivery to Russia

    Thank you.

    Yuri Isaev
    Egineer

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oeystein Lande:
    I am not able to answer because I am not an expert of the matter and did not make the measurements, but the Professors of the Independent Third Party are expert of the matter.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Glen

    Dr Rossi,
    Great US Patent, stelllar strategy. The website http://www.leonardocorporation.com is worth all the 2 hours it needs to be read completely.
    Godspeed,
    Glen

  • WG

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    LiAlH4 is expensive to buy: to you think you will produce it by Leonardo Corporation instead of buying the molecule?
    Regards,
    WG

  • Øystein Lande

    Dear Mr Rossi,

    Could you comment on my thoughts Below?

    One would Expect that LENR have a different energy emission spectrum than electrical heated alumina.

    Alumina transmittance and LENR energy spectrum is unkown parameters in the Lugano test.

    The alumina is transparent for certain part of the electromagnetic spectrum, which will not be absorbed by alumina and next the IR camera.

    The IR camera was detecting in the 7-13 um spectrum, and the assumption would be that the energy spectrum from El.heating, and LENR are somewhat equal…

    We don’t know the LENR energy emission spectrum, since it has not been quantified.

    If there are high energy emission in a part of the spectrum of high alumina transmittance, then this would not be picked up as heat signal, and energy production may actually be underestimated by the Lugano report.

  • Ahmed

    Dear Andrea
    Is your system to produce directly electricity similar to the ones described in the last month around in the blogs dealing with LENR?
    Ahmed

  • Andrea Rossi

    Christian:
    F9
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Christian

    Hi Andrea,

    how confident is the customer of your 1MW Ecat into your technology?

    1. 25%
    2. 50%
    3. 75%
    4. 99%
    or
    5. “Shut up and take my money!”

    Thanks for answering and with best regards,

    Christian

  • Andrea Rossi

    Margaret Seymour:
    Good question, I use proper filtered all face masks, gloves in clean rooms.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Maurizio Verini:
    moreless like a pencil.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Pekka Janhunen:
    No, and this is very promising.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Maurizio Verini

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    About the E-Cat X, can you say this: how big can be a 500 W module?
    I do not think this is pre-disclosure and also tha answer can be a ballpark definition one.
    Regards,
    Maurizio Verini

  • Margaret Seymour

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    If you are allergic to powders, how can you handle the powders of the E-Cat charge?
    Margaret

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi, I have read a message by Mats Lewan on ECW about his witness on E-Cat, and I think it is interesting for all, and for the skeptics in particular:

    “…The experiment by Rossi that convinced me most (one of the four where I made the measurements) was on October 6, 2011, when the E-Cat, after a few hours of start-up, was put in ‘self-sustained mode’ meaning that all electric input, except for the control system, was detached, and the water inside the E-Cat continued to boil for almost four hours, even though fresh water was continuously added by a pump. You could feel the boiling inside, output temp was 114 degrees centigrade, and the temperature on the surface of the well insulated E-Cat remain around 60 to 85 degrees centigrade. Try to repeat that without adding heat! Only possible if you had heat stored in melted salt inside, but Rossi opened the E-Cat after the test and there was no such thing inside. See also: http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter…”

    Taken from:
    http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/01/16/video-of-mats-lewan-lenr-webinar-jan-16-2016-richard-b-fox/

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Dear Andrea,
    Does the E-cat X have any known problems, apart from not having been endurance tested over 2 months yet?
    regards, pekka

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- he,he,he
    2- obviously
    3- no
    4- other reasons
    5- no
    6- the E-Cat X has been born in November; before it becomes enough developed to allow the publication of technical data I need at least one year; also consider that any publication, even here, is a disclosure and we must complete the patent application of some new particulars before giving data, otherwise we make pre-disclosure that can jeopardize the patentability.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    This depends on how the R&D upon the E-Cat X will go.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Randall:
    Very difficult to answer now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    1- the 10 kW module is the most requested
    2- the Carnot cycle is the best application if electricity has to be made by steam
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hergen:
    Must put a distinction between consolidated products, like the heat producing 1MW E-Cat (F9) and the E-Cat X that is still in preliminar R&D.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hergen

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    will the next 1 MW reactor you are already designing have e-catx capabilities? I mean will the reactor be able to produce at least enough electricity it needs for its own operations?

    Thank you.

  • Yrka

    Caro signor Rossi.

    Tanti eventi meravigliosi nel corso dell’ultimo anno:
    – US Patent!!!
    – E-Cat X,
    – Generazione di energia elettrica,
    – Motore Jet.

    Non vediamo l’ora alla fine del test un impianto di 1 MW.

    Sarei molto grato per le brevi risposte a due domande:

    1. L’impressione che viene in primo piano E-Cat X, la domanda preliminare per 10kW più accettato?
    2. Сiclo di Carnot rilevante come prima? O solo in parte?

    Grazie.
    Capisco, F9, ma sono sicuro che nel vostro successo!

    Yuri Isaev
    ingegnere
    Tyumen, Russia

  • Frank Randall

    Andrea,

    Congratulations on your progress so far. You’ve mentioned changes to the plant that will be required – F9 – but will that mean another year or so before you go into production? I hope that during this last year, your team has also been preparing for the manufacturing plant as well.

    Thanks,

    Frank Randall

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Do you expect that the next version of your industrial plants will include E-Cat X reactors, as opposed to the current versions of the reactors you are using?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    I read you are going to drive the E-cat X into destruction.
    1. I guess you will not do that while sitting next to it and watching this happening while wearing your sunglasses, I am sure? 😉
    2. You must have done this before, are you able to elaborate about the dangers that may be involved?
    3. Will you do that with all three?
    4. Is it right to assume that you do this to determine the safety limits or are also other reasons?
    5. When this is finished, will that be the end of the test phase?
    6. When will you be able to present additional details of the E-cat X?
    Thanks for always answering all our curious questions.
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Andrea Rossi

    Barty:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • barty

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    thank you for your reply!

    That the current plant design isn’t ready for mass production was foreseeable by everyone who knows how hard it is to bring a product prototype to mass production market quality.

    The most important point for many of your followers (and I guess also for a part of the silently watching scientific community) is not the immediate market readyness at the end of this test.
    It’s the hope for a 100% bullet-proof safety that LENR phenomenon itself exists, works, gives usable energy and is not just a dream or scam, like the pathosecptics predict.

    If you (especially the independent referee or customer) can deliver and witness this, you will already be the winner in this game, even if you and your team need a few months more to fix engineering problems 🙂

    barty
    Admin of LENR Forum

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tonia Naylor:
    Windows are amenities we cannot condone to us…the place reserved to the plant is completely closed and blind; the circulation of air is made by a fan system from the roof. The warm air is extracted from the roof. Obviously we have conditioned air inside the container of the computers.
    We cannot see outside if not with the cameras installed by the security staff.
    The place is maintained pretty clean, though. It couldn’t be otherwise, since I am strongly allergic to powder: a small bunch of powder can unleash an asthma attack, so I need to stay always in the clean.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Bradley Fetrow

    Alexvs:
    The response of Andrea to Gian Luca was humoristic, as many times Andrea does and Gian Luca is too intelligent not to have understood it; I suspect that when you accuse Andrea of arrogance and lack of sense of humour you introject yourself in the answer Andrea gave to the comment of Gian Luca.
    Cheers,
    Bradley

  • Tonia Naylor

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The place in the factory where the 1 MW plant is in operation has windows? Can you describe it?
    Tonia

  • Andrea Rossi

    Swedo:
    Good point. Leakages have been an issue during this test. The hydraulic system too has to be improved.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    David Crumedy:
    At 08.20 a.m. of Saturday January 23 2016:
    1 MW E-Cat: stable
    E-Cat X: in operation, in good standing too. Now, after 2 months of normal operation, we go into destructive tests and see what happens.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Christopher Maston:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mel Guinto:
    Well said.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Barty:
    Your assumption has right of citizenship in the kingdom of logic, but we must be conservative.
    There are many parts of the plant that need upgrading and the next generation of industrial plants (F9) will be different. I cannot give the details of the parts to be modified, for obvious reasons, but we are talking not just of plumbing and wiring, we are talking of internal structure of the reactors.
    This plant belongs to the first generation, substantially it is equal to the plant tested in Bologna in the Winter of 2011; the next one will be different and I am already designing it (again: F9).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Swedo

    Dear A.R

    I was wondering, the 1-MW plant frequently have problems with leakages. How will you address this problem once you begin to manufacture and sell these plants (F9).

    Kind regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alexvs (and Gian Luca):
    Our friend Gian Luca was making a joke with his comment: I answered with a joke. If my joke could have been interpreted seriously, I apologize, it was surely not my intention.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Manuel Cilia:
    It comes from a joke: since I repeated many times the phrase ” the final results of the test on course can be either positive or negative”, a Reader proposed to save time and substitute this phrase with a computer function pressing, for example “F9″. I followed suit. Therefore F9 = ” remember that the final results could be either positive or negative”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • David Crumedy

    Dr Rossi
    Can we have an update also today?
    Regards,
    David

  • Christopher Maston

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Did you already make a drawing of a jet engine fueled by the E-Cat?
    Congratulations for your US Patent.
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Christopher

  • Mel Guinto

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    about peer reviewed publications:
    I agree with you, an allowed USPTO Patent is the best and most difficult peer reviewed publication that an invention can have. It is a years long reviewing made by specialists of the matter that, as you correctly say, has implication in the industrial world that no other publication can have, not even nature, Science etc.
    Cheers,
    Mel Guinto

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>