United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

28,300 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis and All:
    I am still working with the test. Going well. We are in SSM, closing the loop: the Ecat SKL feeds itself.
    I will give information about the first numbers later today.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea, Congratulations on completing your marathon soldering endeavor! It reminded me of a dyslexic technician that worked for me back in my working life. 90% of the time we had trouble with a measurement was due to his reversing the + and – conductors so that was the first thing we checked. But in your case I don’t think that is a problem since there are no wire pairs, just single conductors.

    Warm regards,
    Chuck Davis

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drachenlord:
    Ohh, now I understand what you mean.
    No, I did not use lithography.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Drachenlord

    Have You used lithography for that 10K connections or are that 10.000 thin wires ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    George Roberts:
    A more detailed and realistic electron model is necessary . In partucular, see the ref 19 of my paper, where J. maruani consider a Zitterbewegung electron model where the reduced Compton wavelength is the electron “diameter”.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drew G:
    Later I will publish here the surprising results.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drachenlord:
    Obviously I know what “lithography” does mean, but I do not understand your point. Can you rephrase ?
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Later ( goinf well)
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    I will replay later to all the comments asking for the result of the test.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    Good luck with this important test today!
    No doubt a good outcome has great influence on the applications of the Ecat.
    You seem very methodical, can you tell how many tests you did with Ecats?
    Kind regards, Gerard

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    When can you tell us
    the results of SKL test?

    https://sites.psu.edu/siowfa15/2015/10/19/coin-flips-arent-5050/

    Regards
    Sam

  • Drachenlord

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    Do You know about the word lithography ?

    RAIner Winkler

  • George Roberts

    Dr Rossi:
    Can your theoretical system explained in
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    in particular in the paragraph 1 ( Casimir Force ) be compatible with the standard model of electrons ?

  • Drew G

    Dr Rossi:

    Looking forward to videos of the test. Best of luck tomorrow AM.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Yes, I am finishing the connections now, then go to sleep. The test will start in 5 hours and 17 minutes from now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    Is the ECat-SKL test still on
    schedule?

    Regards
    Sam

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    The answer is: yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I did not understand exactly, reading
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    if the electron distance that minimizes the electrostatic potential is a function of the number of electrons.
    Can you answer ?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Victor:
    I do not think it can be considered a dimension per se, after the relativistic 4 dimensions,but thank you for your kind sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Harlow White:
    I think so.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Harlow White

    Dr Rossi,
    is your 1000+ connections system something that could be dubbed an artificial intelligence apparatus ?

  • victor

    Dear dottore Andrea Rossi,

    I‘m following for many-many years now passionately your development (and truly admiring your constant dedication and devotion) of the e-cat and what it all brings with it and now I have a curious question regarding the theoretical construct, if you find the time to deal with this sort of surely less important questions (keeping ockhams razor in mind).

    On July 26, 2020 at 3:55 AM you wrote to Anonymous:

    „The core of my paper is that at a distance intermediate between the atomic and the nuclear scale, in the order of magnitude of the electron Compton wavelength, the effects of magnetic force, Casimir force and quantum vacuum/virtual particles play a fundamental role. Warm Regards, A.R.“

    My question: Did you ever ponder around that you might have found in this very small (measured in meter) intermediate distance between the atomic and the nuclear scale one (or more) new dimension (s) as theoretical physicists already postulated that there must be more dimensions than the three we know (x.y,z axis; unit meter) and the time (unit second), but those „new“ dimensions postulated by them should be very small ones.

    And what you have found would fit into this and the Casimir force, magnetic potential and quantum vacuum/virtual particles could be part of the unit (s) to measure/calculate this (these) dimension(s).

    At the moment it might be a more philosophical question, but in the future I would love to see a new dimension called the Rossi dimension. You surely deserve it!

    Kind regards and all the best for you and your whole great team and fingers crossed for your new and early Friday morning endeavor and please stay save, the world needs you : )

    victor

  • Andrea Rossi

    Aleksei Savchenko:
    I think that Napoleon has been the greatest tactic ever, but his strategy was a loser, because instead of expanding the principles of the French Revolution, that could have given to him a worldwide sustain, has used the energies from the revolution to make a harsh colonization through the continental bloc, which has put all the world, included the forces raised from the revolution, potentially favourable to him, against him; Waterloo has been just the place where happened a fall that was going to happen anyway, somewhere.
    When I was a student, in 1971 I made a thesis for the examen of History on Napoleon, and, with the permission of my teacher-Prof Decleva- I studied it on the books of a Russian Prof of History, Eugeny Tarlé, who published around the year 1930 a monumental analysis of the continental bloc, still the best analysis of this period ever published.
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gianvico Pirazzini:
    Better avoid to repeat my mistake as Prof Savchenko made me understand.
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Gianvico Pirazzini

    God luck
    Gianvico
    PS: taking of battle: ALESIA? The legions of Cesare defeated their enemies making a siege being under siege: like your E-Cat
    God luck another time

  • Aleksei Savchenko

    Dear Andrea,
    Thank you very much for your extensive and sincere comment. I completely agree with you and understand your point of view. There are also more people in Russia who understand the dead-end direction of ITER development and face difficulties in promoting everything novel and progressive.
    In my commentary, I made another attempt to support you, so that the emotions from the attacks of ill-wishers do not lead you off your right course and that you remain calm, confident and even love for ill-wishers. In such a mood, success or Victory, no matter what you call it, will be guaranteed.
    As for the relationship between the victory of one side and the defeat of the other, it does not matter which country I belong to. Any war is a terrible evil that must be prevented. Millions of young men killed through Napoleon’s fault brought a lot of grief and the weakening of the nation.
    Best regards,
    Aleksei

  • Andrea Rossi

    Aleksei Savchenko:
    Thank you for your insight.
    I think we must make a distinction between the R&D funded by the taxpayer for objectives purely scientific, whose projection in the timeframe for an industrial and profitable application is vague and undefined, and the R&D funded with private funds that for obvious reasons must reach a profitable product within a timeframe limited by financial issues. In the first case your insight is correct. In the second case, which is the one I am fighting through, your insight is not applicable. In fact:
    1- the possibility of collaboration are limited by IP protection issues
    2- the cash flow must necessary recover the expenses before the lack of money forbids to proceed
    3- if you seat peacefully while your enemies try to destroy your work, you will be eliminated
    I am telling this to you based on my personal bloody experience of half century of very, very hard work ( and life ). Unfortunately this is a war, a succession of battles: I cited two typical battles from a paradigmatic point of view, but this was only an example: obviously Waterloo for Russia and their allies has been a victory, while Austerlitz has been a defeat, we can change the points of view, but under a phylosophical point of view the issue is the same: competition is war and we have competition, whatever we do. The Ecat has been fought against from many sides from the first day it has been presented .
    Here is another paradigmatic example of the first type, the type that fits with your insight: the ITER ( or Eater, if you want ): this concern has got billions and billions and billions of funds from the Taxpayer since the fifties and every 10 years they say that in the next 20 years or so we will have the nuclear fusion…everybody is happy, nobody fights against because everybody eats ( that’s why it has been dubbed Eater ), the Taxpayer has not the cultural preparation to understand that it will never work, the competition knows that it will never work, so everybody is happy, the IP is generously shared with everybody, because it will never make money, and the environment is perfect to be peaceful: why fight against a thing that will never work, but rains easy money from the Taxpayer on all the involved governments ? It is also the paradise of the managers there: no liabilities, no timeframes to show real results and a lot of publications that nobody reads, but are so intensely intelligent ! When they talk of it in the TV they say ludicrous things, like nuclear fusion is not dangerous because uses hydrogen and makes helium, both innocuous ( somebody could have thought that nuclear bombs are a bluff ). Nobody has the honesty to say that it is impossible to stabilize a magnetic field at a temperature over 100 millions K, and everybody is happy like an Easter.
    On one point I totally agree with you: my citation of Waterloo as an example of defeat and of Austerlitz as an example of victory is stupid, because I forgot that what is a victory for one side is a defeat for the other side: this remark is as much intelligent from you, as it has been stupid for me not to get this point. So I make a correction, rephrasing as follows: I HOPE NEXT FRIDAY WILL BE A VICTORY, NOT A DEFEAT FOR OUR GREAT TEAM.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Roberto Ridolfi:
    1- there is a quest on course: I will give this information when the Ecat SKL will be presented
    2- fifty-fifty, moreless
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    Can you rephrase your question ?
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    This is one of the difficulties we had to overcome.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea, I suspect that to get 5000 wires into the ecat they must be very thin and am amazed that they can exist in such a high temperature environment without melting!

    Warm regards,
    Chuck Davis

  • Raffaele Bongo

    Hello A. Rossi

    I wish you good success with your new version of the SKL generator.
    This Friday will hopefully be the founding stage of the commercial product that we all look forward to.

    I understand that the energy extracted from E-Cat originated in electrons.
    Can you tell us about the process of combustible depletion and depletion?

    Good luck on the 31st
    Best regards

    Raffaele

  • Aleksei Savchenko

    Dear Readers and colleagues.
    Don, t worry about 10000 connections, located in a small box as well as of methods of their bonding – welding or soldering. I guess Andrea artificially raised this problem and will solve it as many others more difficult. I believe in him and his Team. Most likely 10,000 connections are an abstract philosophical image that makes it clear that the transition to a new quality requires a lot of efforts. That’s all.
    I’m more worried about something else. This is Andrea’s phrase in response to one of the comments: “Let’s hope it will be Austerlitz, not Waterloo.” If research, instead of creativity and the ease of flight of ideas and imaginations transforms into the Battle, then from a philosophy point of view, this is the end. It needs to take a break or do something else.
    From my subjective point of view, this Great work needs breaking it down into stages, which should be presented to the scientific community, because each of them is unique and requires reflection. They are: the first experiments to generate excess electricity.
    Then the next stage is the closure of the cycle, operation of the device without external electric power supply.
    Then demonstration SKL stable operation throughout one day.
    And only then move on to the production of industrial designs. Such a traditional path is more familiar to everyone, does not cause unnecessary rumors.
    I really don’t know the terms of the contract under which Andrea works, which forces him to follow exactly this way.

    By the way, if we go back to Austerlitz or Waterloo, this is also an ambiguous interpretation, depending on the country. But in any case, the losers were ordinary soldiers of both armies, who were forced to die for the selfish goals of the rulers alien to them.
    Best regards,
    Aleksei

  • Roberto Ridolfi

    Dr Rossi:
    1- Can you tell us the dimensions of the Ecat SKL you will test Friday ?
    2- How much connections are inside the Ecat and how many out of it, in the comtrol system ?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Best Regards,
    Roberto

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sam:
    Same kind of.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Karl:
    Yes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Karl

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I suppose part of the 10 000 connections are made in the control system and part inside the Ecat SKL, am I correct ?
    Godspeed next Friday,
    Karl

  • Sam

    Hello DR Rossi

    Is this the type of
    microscope you use?

    https://youtu.be/iTKm8Pgm2dY

    Good luck with start up.
    Sam

  • Andrea Rossi

    vast_minority:
    The nineties were thirty years ago.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco:
    The efficiency of the Seebeck effect is very low: I have a great experience made in the nineties with it. In my case, it is not worth the while.
    Thank you anyway for the suggestion.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Stephen:
    He,he,he…thank you for your kind sustain,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Stephen

    Hi Andrea

    Regarding Rugs. They do say cats like to sit on Mats;)

    Your clearly doing a great work..

    My honest respect and best wishes to you for this. Endeavor.

    Your cat will deserve a good rest on that mat after all this.

    Although I hope she will be working and purring loudly.

    Stephen

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    if I had a very powerful heat source, i would isolate it to my best knowledge and then i would put as many as possible (let’s say 10000) double metal junctions, between the inner insulated chamber and the external ambient, to exploit the Seebek effect…
    What do you think?

    Regards, Marco.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rodney Nicholson:
    Thank you for your synapsis: if I will fail with this experiment, I will turn to make rugs.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mason:
    Your data have been recorded.
    Thank you for your kind wishes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • vast_minority

    Don’t get me wrong, several cousins of mine jumped on different trains and started electronic-studies in the univiersities in Bochum and Essen.

    They say, for example, that a typical motherbard from the 1990’s there are no 10.000 lose connections to solder.

    They are burned into tha platine with some acid-technique.

    Regards

    Mick

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drew G:
    Thank you for your opinion. Actually, failure is a possibility. I hope you are wrong and I am working very hard to succeed.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    vast_minority:
    Congratulations for your 4-generation-substantiated experience in welding. Obviously it has nothing to do with soldering of electronic components that is made with the help of microscopes. I use a digital microscope. It is like to compare surgery vs cows slaughtering art ( with an experience of 4 genetations though ! ).
    Thank you for your fascination,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Emily King:
    In reference 22 of my paper on Researchgate is proposed, as a possible cause of the high density charge clustering, the vacuum pressure hypothesyzed by Casimir and experimentally verified as you can see in reference 18 of my paper.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Emily King

    Dr Rossi,
    Again about the Casimir Effect, based on what I read on
    http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
    : does it have a cause effect with the zero point energy ?
    Emily

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>