Neri Accornero:
Thank you for your strong will to help us and for your suggestion. I agree with you. I think we are close. Consider that when we will land in the market a strong enemy power of fire will hit us: this is why we must be very careful. But you substantially are right.
Thank you again.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, as you know I have been a regular follower of yours for ten years and I renew my congratulations for this umpteenth very important progress of your invention, but allow me this observation, you know for sure that your name will be the most important in the evolution of mankind. But now, considering the exceptional current results, you have a great responsibility by continuing to postpone the opening to the world of ECAT and moreover, the more time passes, the more likely it is that others will achieve similar results, especially if supported by powerful multinationals. Keep in mind what happened to lone inventors like Meucci, Tesla, John Logie Baird (misunderstood TV inventor) along with many others who have failed to prove the authorship of their invention. There is never an end to the improvement of a new device, it is an evolutionary process very similar to the biological one, someone continually makes small or large modifications and, if these produce some improvement in the efficiency or in the manufacturing of the system, these survive and supplant the previous models. So, when something works “well enough” it is better to show it to the world by proving its paternity and not continue improvements indefinitely. This does not mean to stop the search but simply not to block the spread of something, that in your case will change the world, waiting for perfection. Excuse me but I can’t wait to see your SKL in factories, vehicles and homes all around the world.
Dear Andrea,
I made a statement that I believe all entities that we call particles consist only of an EM field. The primary particle I refer to is the photon. Everyone agrees it consists only of a field of energy hf. The faster it spins the more energetic it becomes. The energy manifests itself as a sine or cosine wave(depending on its phase)and it interacts with other particles in different ways dependent on how its phase coincides with other particles it encounters.
As an example I define the neutron as a complex field containing other particle fields(electrons, muons, quarks etc)interacting in a stable manner until disturbed by other external particles within its active sphere.
The mathematics we use to define these interactions use basically in the form of sine or cosine waves and are complex compilations of physical properties that are observed. Many are based on statistical equations in an attempt to describe observed behavior.
The solutions of these problems are complicated by the fact that they involve more than three interacting particles. However the development of the computer can alleviate some of the complexity when used to solve them. I remember spending a great deal of time calculating the distance between atoms in a crystal using a hand calculator during my post graduation studies.
Theoretical regards.
Mr Rossi,
Following your suggestion, I bought the book in ref 12 of your paper on Researchgate and I have a question: I saw the hexadecimal table of the (Cl3,1): where is the multivector representation ?
Dear Andrea,
you and your staff have a psychological help to deal with stress of these commitments you have with the world?
I want to say…..a supports that you can permit to work with serenity?
What many people are trying to say and ask here is that they do not understand your statement in the paper because it conflicts with the knowledge that was taught to them through education and the classical representation of elementary particles.
“Energy from nothing” does not exist, but the problem is of course defining or describing “something” (matter).
The answers in the sense of: “Everything consists of electromagnetic waves”, is a few steps too many at once to arrive at a new, overall better understanding. There are no horses in a 100 horsepower engine.
That insights and understanding will grow in you and your team as the experiments demonstrate their results. It also seems to me that there are insights that could have significant commercial or military value. Due to a general lack of civilization and striving for harmony in the world of the people, you choose to keep those things secret, or you are forced to hide those things from the people.
This is unfortunate. But just as unfortunate is that every year in education we saddle many young people with deficient or incomplete insights. Some very potentially wise people drop out because they do not find the harmony between science and everyday reality.
I try to phrase this carefully and politely, but despite the availability of technology, we still live in the Middle Ages when it comes to how people work together.
Personally, I had actually hoped that through some revelation of your revolutionary technique, there would also be a new example of how humanity could deal with science and knowledge, other than trade, struggle, and conquest.
Stephen:
1- it is a normal cycle of efficiency
2- yes
3- yes
4- cyclic
5- thermal
6. no
7- premature
8- no
9- yes
10- n.a.
11- no
12- not yet
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buongiorno, Forse potrebbe essere utile per le Vostre applicazioni:
Cordiali saluti.
Tesla annuncia tecnologia con nanofili ?
I nanofili sono strutture nanometriche di recente sviluppo quasi unidimensionali, realizzate con semiconduttori o metalli, e allo studio anche per le loro proprietà elettriche.
Nello specifico, i nanofili di silicio hanno interessato anche il CNR, che nel 2008 pubblicò sulla rivista Nano Letters uno studio su questi materiali, tra le cui caratteristiche c’era anche l’elevata conduttività dello loro strutture ordinate.
ENGLISH SYNOPSIS
Tesla announces a technology based on nanowires on which also the Italian CNR has made R&D about. Maybe this tech can be of interest for your Team.
About the waves in the output that you mentioned to Aleksei.
1. Do you know the cause of thus effect?
2. Is it due to the control?
3. Us it due to some feed back process in the energy generation it self?
4. Is it cyclic or more variable?
5. Is it coincident with any other effect or parameters that can be measured., thermal, weight etc.
6. Would a Fourier transform on the signal give useful data?
Any way it’s interesting and I hope it gives you a window for useful diagnostics or even improved control.
About the recent improvement that you are working on:
7. Is it correct for us to assume you are aiming for a 19kW electrical an 1kW thermal out put from this same (or similar sized) device?
8. Does this device require proportionally more fuel charge when operating In this new high power configuration compared to the previous 5kW configuration?
9. Or is the same fuel charge quantity sufficient in both cases?
10. If 9 Is this true also if the device can work over 6months or more?
11. Do you already have a planned date for the 3rd party testing?
12. Would you be able to give us some idea when we can hear if it has completed or not?
Thanks I hope they are general enough questions that you can answer but as always I understand if you prefer to not answer them for now.
Dear Andrea,
It must be exiting times for you while you are making so many huge steps forward.
I guess you are still testing the newest development: The Ecat SKL 95% .
I have some questions that are also bothering some readers on ECW:
1. Were you already able to generate 19 kWe or more?
2. When generating these kind of powers, does that require a more frequent recharge of the Ecat than running at 5 kW?
2b. If so do you think the frequency of recharging is linear with the total developed energy in the Ecat SKL?
3. You mentioned that the output shows ‘waves’. Are these low frequency (~ 1 Hz or lower)?
4. I guess you prefer these waves not to happen?
4b. Are you already successful in suppressing these?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
I think, You can exclude this suspicious assumption.
At least three rare combinations of prerequisites must coexist to allow virtual particles to pop in and out of existence, and as we saw in the paper
how can you explain to a layman where the energy of the E-Cat SKL comes from?
It’s not a chemical reaction, it’s not a fission and it’s not a fusion, what is it?
Could one say that the properties of electrons are used to withdraw energy from atoms? Then the “used” atoms would have to have a lower energy level and thus also changed properties, right?
I believe that for the theory and the results to be widely recognized there must be a simplified model in order to explain it “not entirely wrong”, for example like Bohr’s atomic model.
Dear Andrea!
Will E-catSK, which only gives heat energy, still exist?
It would be much easier than E-catSKL if one only need heat energy.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
It was wonderful to see the confidence expressed in your response to CC about SKL photos and descriptions being made available later this year. A couple of questions about that:
1) When do you anticipate the SKL information will become available?
a) Before 3rd party tests
b) During 3rd party tests
c) After 3rd party tests
d) At the presentation
e) After the presentation
2) What SKL information do you think we will see:
a) SKL photos (reactor, cooling system, controller)?
b) Videos of SKL in operation (during testing)?
c) High-level schematics (e.g. drawings w/ dimensions, etc. not to include IP data)?
d) Specifications (including electrical specs and thermal output)?
e) Test results?
Thanks as always for your answers. This is getting exciting.
Dear Andrea,
As you know, much of scientific theory depended upon the interpretation of analogues assembled by the scientists in their field of expertise. An example of this is the Bohr atom described as a model in a planetary configuration(balls of mass revolving about a central mass).The actions of the model were governed by the mathematics of Quantum mechanics.
When I first entered the scientific field in 1950 this was taken as gospel and believed by the majority of investigators. As I matured and experienced experimental results, I began to have my doubts about the accuracy of this model for a number of reasons including the doubts that arose from other investigators in their examinations.
To make a short explanation of what I conceived as an analogue of atomic configuration, my first premise was that every particle(electron, proton, photon etc.)was a separate EM field spinning at a prescribed rate(frequency) and orientation(clockwise or counterclockwise, up or down) and these orientations determined the properties of the particles as they interacted with each other. An electron and a positron together spinning in phase created an EPO of approximately 1 Mev. Other particle interactions create other configurations.
May I ask if you have an analogue you use, other than the commonly accepted form, in your theories?
Investigating regards.
Dr Rossi:
The comment of Aleksei Savchenko suggests me a further question: in this new version of the Ecat SKL does the plasma look like we can see in the video on http://www.ecatskdemo.com
?
Thanks
Aleksei Savchenko:
Thank you for explaining.
The answer is yes, the total efficiency combined is the same.
Other answers:
The electricity output is rather stable, with smooth waves +/- 10%
The efficiency has variations contingent with these waves.
Thank you for your attention and your kind wishes,
Warm Regards
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of August 25 2020:
Coal-fired plant stockpiles rise to three years high while while US power generation at 40 year low.
Rod Walton
Dear Andrea,
I would like to precise Stephen’s questions of 24 August 11.05 AM, concerning the correlation between heat and electricity, produced by SKL.
I guess he meant also that if in the range of electricity to heat ratio (you reached 95%, it is fantastic, nevertheless, I believe you) the total SKL efficiency remains the same (excess of heat and electricity)?
The matter is that many devices produce heat as well as electricity but they need energy for this. In your case you closed the cycle and some of your output electricity returns to SKL as input. Is it changed when you move from heat to electricity? What is the average transformation coefficient (output to input) in your latest SKL before your vacations?
The other question – in your last testings the 4 kW of average electricity extracted continuously or in a large range like sawtooth? And what is the range, their changes vs time and does these jumps influence on input electricity as well as on SKL efficiency?
I do not trouble you with questions during your vacations and I am glad that you make a right decision to make a break, which can permit you to rise on the next upper level in scientific developments (as usual in these cases following not only my experience).
I wish you and your great and secret Team huge successes.
Best regards,
Aleksei
Dear Andrea,
Considering the future and the evolution of energy production caused after the introduction of the e-cat. If I were a young high school student or just beginning college or contemplating a technical school what should be my main field of study be. The job market growth required to support the e-cat directly by it self ,seems to me, would be enormous. Thank you for your time and knowledge.
Gerard McEk:
Not necessary apologies.
Answers:
1. if the total of energy is 100, the consequence is that the higher is the percentage of electricity, the lower is the percentage of heat
2. that is the target
3. I think so
Thank you for your kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
1. 1,2,3. adesrease of thermal output with an increase of electric output
4. no
5. premature
6. maybe
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
The high degree of efficiency enables passive cooling, at least for small outputs. Could it be that the new concept of the E-Cat SKL makes it easier to reduce the size to the size of a battery for smartphones?
May I ask is the recent improvement in efficiency.
1. An increase of electrical power with the similar thermal output?
2. A decrease in thermal output with similar electrical out put?
3 . A combination of both ie a large decrease in thermal out put along with a large electric power gain.
4. could this improvement allow a similar 20cm side cubed sized cooler to passively cool the device with out fans?
5.I understand that you were Considering a theoretical improvement in efficiency to in excess of 95% are you already observing this kind of performance or is this something for the future as tuning improves .
6 Will it Be this version that is to be tested in September?
I wonder what you would come up with if you had regular holidays 😉
Have you documented/filmed parts of your work in recent years? It would be great to see a documentary “An Impossible Invention” on National Geographic in a few years that shows the world your and your team’s hard work with both setbacks and progress.
Looking forward to the upcoming presentation in Stockholm
Regards
/ P
Neri Accornero:
Thank you for your strong will to help us and for your suggestion. I agree with you. I think we are close. Consider that when we will land in the market a strong enemy power of fire will hit us: this is why we must be very careful. But you substantially are right.
Thank you again.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, as you know I have been a regular follower of yours for ten years and I renew my congratulations for this umpteenth very important progress of your invention, but allow me this observation, you know for sure that your name will be the most important in the evolution of mankind. But now, considering the exceptional current results, you have a great responsibility by continuing to postpone the opening to the world of ECAT and moreover, the more time passes, the more likely it is that others will achieve similar results, especially if supported by powerful multinationals. Keep in mind what happened to lone inventors like Meucci, Tesla, John Logie Baird (misunderstood TV inventor) along with many others who have failed to prove the authorship of their invention. There is never an end to the improvement of a new device, it is an evolutionary process very similar to the biological one, someone continually makes small or large modifications and, if these produce some improvement in the efficiency or in the manufacturing of the system, these survive and supplant the previous models. So, when something works “well enough” it is better to show it to the world by proving its paternity and not continue improvements indefinitely. This does not mean to stop the search but simply not to block the spread of something, that in your case will change the world, waiting for perfection. Excuse me but I can’t wait to see your SKL in factories, vehicles and homes all around the world.
Dear Andrea,
I made a statement that I believe all entities that we call particles consist only of an EM field. The primary particle I refer to is the photon. Everyone agrees it consists only of a field of energy hf. The faster it spins the more energetic it becomes. The energy manifests itself as a sine or cosine wave(depending on its phase)and it interacts with other particles in different ways dependent on how its phase coincides with other particles it encounters.
As an example I define the neutron as a complex field containing other particle fields(electrons, muons, quarks etc)interacting in a stable manner until disturbed by other external particles within its active sphere.
The mathematics we use to define these interactions use basically in the form of sine or cosine waves and are complex compilations of physical properties that are observed. Many are based on statistical equations in an attempt to describe observed behavior.
The solutions of these problems are complicated by the fact that they involve more than three interacting particles. However the development of the computer can alleviate some of the complexity when used to solve them. I remember spending a great deal of time calculating the distance between atoms in a crystal using a hand calculator during my post graduation studies.
Theoretical regards.
Jack:
A multi-vector is a generic composition of one or more of the blades you find in the hexadecimal Table 1
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
Also,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Is it also for the Casimir force, as I think from par 1 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
that the Ecat can exploit the point-zero-energy ?
Cheers
CC
Mr Rossi,
Following your suggestion, I bought the book in ref 12 of your paper on Researchgate and I have a question: I saw the hexadecimal table of the (Cl3,1): where is the multivector representation ?
Dear Andrea,
you and your staff have a psychological help to deal with stress of these commitments you have with the world?
I want to say…..a supports that you can permit to work with serenity?
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
What many people are trying to say and ask here is that they do not understand your statement in the paper because it conflicts with the knowledge that was taught to them through education and the classical representation of elementary particles.
“Energy from nothing” does not exist, but the problem is of course defining or describing “something” (matter).
The answers in the sense of: “Everything consists of electromagnetic waves”, is a few steps too many at once to arrive at a new, overall better understanding. There are no horses in a 100 horsepower engine.
That insights and understanding will grow in you and your team as the experiments demonstrate their results. It also seems to me that there are insights that could have significant commercial or military value. Due to a general lack of civilization and striving for harmony in the world of the people, you choose to keep those things secret, or you are forced to hide those things from the people.
This is unfortunate. But just as unfortunate is that every year in education we saddle many young people with deficient or incomplete insights. Some very potentially wise people drop out because they do not find the harmony between science and everyday reality.
I try to phrase this carefully and politely, but despite the availability of technology, we still live in the Middle Ages when it comes to how people work together.
Personally, I had actually hoped that through some revelation of your revolutionary technique, there would also be a new example of how humanity could deal with science and knowledge, other than trade, struggle, and conquest.
Wilfried Babelotzky:
I have already explained it in my paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
See the Conclusions to make it shorter and simpler, albeit superficial.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
1. I prefer not to answer
2. see 1
3- higher
4. confidential
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
1- it is a normal cycle of efficiency
2- yes
3- yes
4- cyclic
5- thermal
6. no
7- premature
8- no
9- yes
10- n.a.
11- no
12- not yet
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Franco:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buongiorno, Forse potrebbe essere utile per le Vostre applicazioni:
Cordiali saluti.
Tesla annuncia tecnologia con nanofili ?
I nanofili sono strutture nanometriche di recente sviluppo quasi unidimensionali, realizzate con semiconduttori o metalli, e allo studio anche per le loro proprietà elettriche.
Nello specifico, i nanofili di silicio hanno interessato anche il CNR, che nel 2008 pubblicò sulla rivista Nano Letters uno studio su questi materiali, tra le cui caratteristiche c’era anche l’elevata conduttività dello loro strutture ordinate.
ENGLISH SYNOPSIS
Tesla announces a technology based on nanowires on which also the Italian CNR has made R&D about. Maybe this tech can be of interest for your Team.
Dear Andrea
May I ask a few of further questions?
About the waves in the output that you mentioned to Aleksei.
1. Do you know the cause of thus effect?
2. Is it due to the control?
3. Us it due to some feed back process in the energy generation it self?
4. Is it cyclic or more variable?
5. Is it coincident with any other effect or parameters that can be measured., thermal, weight etc.
6. Would a Fourier transform on the signal give useful data?
Any way it’s interesting and I hope it gives you a window for useful diagnostics or even improved control.
About the recent improvement that you are working on:
7. Is it correct for us to assume you are aiming for a 19kW electrical an 1kW thermal out put from this same (or similar sized) device?
8. Does this device require proportionally more fuel charge when operating In this new high power configuration compared to the previous 5kW configuration?
9. Or is the same fuel charge quantity sufficient in both cases?
10. If 9 Is this true also if the device can work over 6months or more?
11. Do you already have a planned date for the 3rd party testing?
12. Would you be able to give us some idea when we can hear if it has completed or not?
Thanks I hope they are general enough questions that you can answer but as always I understand if you prefer to not answer them for now.
Best of luck going forward!
Stephen.
Dear Andrea,
It must be exiting times for you while you are making so many huge steps forward.
I guess you are still testing the newest development: The Ecat SKL 95% .
I have some questions that are also bothering some readers on ECW:
1. Were you already able to generate 19 kWe or more?
2. When generating these kind of powers, does that require a more frequent recharge of the Ecat than running at 5 kW?
2b. If so do you think the frequency of recharging is linear with the total developed energy in the Ecat SKL?
3. You mentioned that the output shows ‘waves’. Are these low frequency (~ 1 Hz or lower)?
4. I guess you prefer these waves not to happen?
4b. Are you already successful in suppressing these?
Thanks and kind regards, Gerard
@ Jane:
I think, You can exclude this suspicious assumption.
At least three rare combinations of prerequisites must coexist to allow virtual particles to pop in and out of existence, and as we saw in the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
those three prerequisites are not coexisting in that device
Dear Andrea,
how can you explain to a layman where the energy of the E-Cat SKL comes from?
It’s not a chemical reaction, it’s not a fission and it’s not a fusion, what is it?
Could one say that the properties of electrons are used to withdraw energy from atoms? Then the “used” atoms would have to have a lower energy level and thus also changed properties, right?
I believe that for the theory and the results to be widely recognized there must be a simplified model in order to explain it “not entirely wrong”, for example like Bohr’s atomic model.
Best wishes
Wilfried
Dear Andrea!
Will E-catSK, which only gives heat energy, still exist?
It would be much easier than E-catSKL if one only need heat energy.
Best regards
Nils Fryklund
Jane:
This cannot be excluded.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Do happen in the Ecat SKL creation and annihilation of particles and antiparticles cited in par 3 of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
?
Jane
Bill Conley:
1- I hope within this year
2- a,b,d,e
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
It was wonderful to see the confidence expressed in your response to CC about SKL photos and descriptions being made available later this year. A couple of questions about that:
1) When do you anticipate the SKL information will become available?
a) Before 3rd party tests
b) During 3rd party tests
c) After 3rd party tests
d) At the presentation
e) After the presentation
2) What SKL information do you think we will see:
a) SKL photos (reactor, cooling system, controller)?
b) Videos of SKL in operation (during testing)?
c) High-level schematics (e.g. drawings w/ dimensions, etc. not to include IP data)?
d) Specifications (including electrical specs and thermal output)?
e) Test results?
Thanks as always for your answers. This is getting exciting.
BC
CC
Definitely yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Eernie1:
The analogue I use can be seen in the cover of ref 12 in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
We do have patents pending.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
Thank you for the links,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi
I think you will find this both fun and interesting:
Who needs a car with 3 or 4 of these 20cm side cubed devices and we could have our own jet packs!
I found this very well written Batchelor if Science dissertation on the web.
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:852969/FULLTEXT01.pdf
I was impressed by it
This link on Elon Musk and Tesla considering electrical powered Aircraft in 3 to 4 years is also intriguing:
https://electrek.co/2020/08/25/tesla-elon-musk-batteries-enabling-electric-aircraft-coming/
Best Regards
Stephen.
Dear Andrea,
Today is five years since the publication of your United States patent US 9,115,913 B1 of August 25th 2015.
Is there likely to be any patents published in the months after a presentation?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dear Andrea,
As you know, much of scientific theory depended upon the interpretation of analogues assembled by the scientists in their field of expertise. An example of this is the Bohr atom described as a model in a planetary configuration(balls of mass revolving about a central mass).The actions of the model were governed by the mathematics of Quantum mechanics.
When I first entered the scientific field in 1950 this was taken as gospel and believed by the majority of investigators. As I matured and experienced experimental results, I began to have my doubts about the accuracy of this model for a number of reasons including the doubts that arose from other investigators in their examinations.
To make a short explanation of what I conceived as an analogue of atomic configuration, my first premise was that every particle(electron, proton, photon etc.)was a separate EM field spinning at a prescribed rate(frequency) and orientation(clockwise or counterclockwise, up or down) and these orientations determined the properties of the particles as they interacted with each other. An electron and a positron together spinning in phase created an EPO of approximately 1 Mev. Other particle interactions create other configurations.
May I ask if you have an analogue you use, other than the commonly accepted form, in your theories?
Investigating regards.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Do you think that photos and description of the Ecat SKL will be published this year ?
Eleonor Mandi:
Sorry, this is a classified part of our IP.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JR:
No, the light is much lower, as well as the temperature.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
in your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
you write “dense exotic electron clusters in E-Cat are presented”.
Can you describe how you obtain the density of such clusters?
Thank you if you can answer,
Eleonor
Dr Rossi:
The comment of Aleksei Savchenko suggests me a further question: in this new version of the Ecat SKL does the plasma look like we can see in the video on
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
?
Thanks
Aleksei Savchenko:
Thank you for explaining.
The answer is yes, the total efficiency combined is the same.
Other answers:
The electricity output is rather stable, with smooth waves +/- 10%
The efficiency has variations contingent with these waves.
Thank you for your attention and your kind wishes,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of August 25 2020:
Coal-fired plant stockpiles rise to three years high while while US power generation at 40 year low.
Rod Walton
Dear Andrea,
I would like to precise Stephen’s questions of 24 August 11.05 AM, concerning the correlation between heat and electricity, produced by SKL.
I guess he meant also that if in the range of electricity to heat ratio (you reached 95%, it is fantastic, nevertheless, I believe you) the total SKL efficiency remains the same (excess of heat and electricity)?
The matter is that many devices produce heat as well as electricity but they need energy for this. In your case you closed the cycle and some of your output electricity returns to SKL as input. Is it changed when you move from heat to electricity? What is the average transformation coefficient (output to input) in your latest SKL before your vacations?
The other question – in your last testings the 4 kW of average electricity extracted continuously or in a large range like sawtooth? And what is the range, their changes vs time and does these jumps influence on input electricity as well as on SKL efficiency?
I do not trouble you with questions during your vacations and I am glad that you make a right decision to make a break, which can permit you to rise on the next upper level in scientific developments (as usual in these cases following not only my experience).
I wish you and your great and secret Team huge successes.
Best regards,
Aleksei
John Atkinson:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Considering the future and the evolution of energy production caused after the introduction of the e-cat. If I were a young high school student or just beginning college or contemplating a technical school what should be my main field of study be. The job market growth required to support the e-cat directly by it self ,seems to me, would be enormous. Thank you for your time and knowledge.
Gerard McEk:
Not necessary apologies.
Answers:
1. if the total of energy is 100, the consequence is that the higher is the percentage of electricity, the lower is the percentage of heat
2. that is the target
3. I think so
Thank you for your kind sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P
We conserved a truckload of papers.
Thank you for the suggestion and for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
1. 1,2,3. adesrease of thermal output with an increase of electric output
4. no
5. premature
6. maybe
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wilfried Babelotzky:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
The high degree of efficiency enables passive cooling, at least for small outputs. Could it be that the new concept of the E-Cat SKL makes it easier to reduce the size to the size of a battery for smartphones?
Best wishes
Wilfried
Dear Andrea
May I ask is the recent improvement in efficiency.
1. An increase of electrical power with the similar thermal output?
2. A decrease in thermal output with similar electrical out put?
3 . A combination of both ie a large decrease in thermal out put along with a large electric power gain.
4. could this improvement allow a similar 20cm side cubed sized cooler to passively cool the device with out fans?
5.I understand that you were Considering a theoretical improvement in efficiency to in excess of 95% are you already observing this kind of performance or is this something for the future as tuning improves .
6 Will it Be this version that is to be tested in September?
I wonder what you would come up with if you had regular holidays 😉
Best Regards
Stephen.
Have you documented/filmed parts of your work in recent years? It would be great to see a documentary “An Impossible Invention” on National Geographic in a few years that shows the world your and your team’s hard work with both setbacks and progress.
Looking forward to the upcoming presentation in Stockholm
Regards
/ P