Dr Rossi:
Which relationship is there between the electromagnetic waves described in 1865 by Maxwell in his paper “Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field” and the Clifford algebra ?
I understand that there are at least 2 tests In the pipeline:
1. A characterization and performance test by a potential customer. That we will not have details about.
2. Certification test which I suppose will certify
A) it’s safety
B) it’s applicability
C) it’s reliability.
Is this correct in each case?
3. In the test case 1. Will we hear any basic results of that test above whether it was successful or not?
4. In the test case 2. Will that certification include performance information such as reliability at full out put power etc?
5. Will there additional third party tests going forward I. The near future from other customers or independent test groups and can you say in what time frame?
6. In the case that test the performance of first test on the the e-cat SKL is not to be made visible. Would one of the other testing bodies likely make these test results public?
7. I suppose you might want to present this information in your public demonstration though.
Anyway it sound like it is progressing. This is a big break through given the restrictions that everyone has been under these last months due to Covid.
Dear Readers:
Today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics has been published the paper
“Brief Review of Alternative Physics- An alternative Opinion on Physics”,
by Dr Aleksey Savchenko, A.A. Bochvar Institute of Inorganic Materials, Moscow, Russia
Mason:
1- the basic module 95-5
2- they will decide when the time with be enough to make a certification
3- yes
4- September – October I suppose
5- to be defined
6- 95-5
7- I hope so
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Very exciting end to 2020 coming up, it seems, for you.
Regarding the certification agency, will it just certify the safety of the device, or will it certify the power input/output of the device, or something else?
Best regards
Patrick
In your exchange this morning with Brice, you affirm an important shift in the testing schedule: the inclusion of a 3rd-party testing of the SKL for a potential future business partner prior to the already described 3rd-party certification testing. This opens the door to several questions that I hope you are able to respond to.
1. Will this next 3rd-party test be on the 80:20% or the 95:5% SKL with a power rating of 5kW? Or, the 20kW SKL?
2. Will this next 3rd-party testing be “short” or “long”, for example, less than a week in duration or 2x-4x that duration?
3. Will you be present for this 3rd-party testing strictly as an advisor, and to ensure the security of the SKL?
4. Has the certification 3rd-party testing been scheduled? If yes, can you share for which of the upcoming months?
5. Is the certification 3rd-party testing still meant to provide certification for household use as previously stated? Or, has it been scaled back to only industrial use?
6. Has it been determined which version of the SKL will be certified? The 80:20%? The 95:5%? The 5kW or 20kW?
7. Do you still hope to present and demonstrate the SKL in Stockholm this year to the public and world press?
Best of luck for this pending 3rd-party testing, though as an optimist I am not inclined to think it is needed, only wanted.
As always, my best to you, to Team Rossi, and to your wife.
Dear Andrea, The US energy corporations are determined to maintain control of a centralized power generation system despite the recognized disadvantages of transmission losses, fire danger, frequent power blackouts and escalating overhead costs! https://pamplinmedia.com/but/239-news/479192-387118-nuscale-mini-nukes-approved
“Momentum-exchange current drive by electrostatic waves in an unmagnetized collisionless plasma”
ABSTRACT:
“For a planar electrostatic wave interacting with a single species in a collisionless plasma, momentum conservation implies current conservation. However, when multiple species interact with the wave, they can exchange momentum, leading to current drive. A simple, general formula for this driven current is derived. As examples, we show how currents can be driven for Langmuir waves in electron–positron–ion plasmas, and for ion-acoustic waves in electron–ion plasmas.”
Dear Andrea,
Can you answer this question? :
Where will the tests expected in September take place?
Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, or another country?
Warm greetings and best wishes
Gian
Recently you mentioned a paper by Hanno Essen; within this paper he indicates that correlated coherent electrons are important in superconductivity. As within the E-Cat SKL there is a condition created where electrons are; axis aligned, spins orientated in the same direction and with charge orbits in phase, is formation of a coherent superconductive state possible?
Will the successful 3rd party testing in September be followed by another testing by an official certification company? Is the 3rd party tester a future business partner?
@Sam:
The link you sent seems to suggest that the SKL of Dr Rossi has unleashed everywhere, even at the highest echelons, a research about the electricity exploitable directly from plasma.
Roberto
To summarize the output of the Rossi Effect, recent comments on your blog suggest that the quality of the plasma produced by the E-Cat devices sets your invention apart from LENR/”Cold Fusion” devices that demonstrate excess heat primarily?
Would you be comfortable with the following description, or requiring additional/different elements?
Rossi Effect output = sustained high energy plasma in the form of knotted skyrmions from dense electron clusters.
Happy Labor Day weekend.
Wishing you the best of luck and a positive result from the independent testing in September.
Dr Rossi:
I am sending this link to an interesting theoretical theorization that seems to me connected with the concept of electron you adhere to: https://kowalski-physics.blogspot
All the best,
T.C.
Martyn Aubrey:
1a. yes
1b. yes
2. no: the comparision of the Casimir force with the Coulomb repulsion force have independent trends from the comparision between the magnetic forces and the Coulombian repulsion force, as you can see in Fig. 1 of paragraph 1 of the paper you cited, where are reported the trends of Casimir, Coulomb and magnetic forces as a function of distance.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
I am curing all the particulars to avoid errors in the test that will be made soon. It will be very important for a technology I think is a revolution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Are these phenomena:
a. Each distinct and separate, but combine together in a synergy to produce the over-all Rossi Effect?
b. All required together in specific proportions to be effective?
c. You are still not totally sure, and are continuing to work to deduce exactly how much the different phenomena each contribute towards the Rossi Effect?
2. In Figure 1: “Trends of Casimir, Coulomb and magnetic forces as a function of distance”, you show, and then explain the calculations of, the two separate values of “Distance as number of reduced Compton wavelengths” at which the Magnetic force and the Casimir force each balance the Coulomb repulsion.
Does having these two distinct balance points at different positions on the Coulomb repulsion plot imply that different frequency external signals (or signal components) are required to bring each of the Magnetic and Casimir forces to their individual balance points with the Coulomb repulsion?
Thank you again, if you can answer these questions.
I wish you all success in the third party test, and I am looking forward to watching your virtual presentation of the Ecat SKL.
Thank you for your kind response. Civilized people never need to excuse themselves for humor. On the contrary…
Where perception and measurability cease, fantasy or clairvoyance will necessarily take over.
I just wanted to represent the concept idea of interference of the dimensions perceptible to us with other, discontinuous dimensions, with discontinuity in all kinds of variations.
The question is whether humans and mankind can ever understand and do something with such a discontinuous system.
Brice:
I studied carefully the work of Dr Parkhomov about the “strange radiations” that I decided to take care of seriously and we made the same measurements he published to check if we have any similar result. We did not have any strange radiation, and it is to us obvious because of the structure of the Ecat SKL. We will be able to give a certification that the Ecat SKL does not emit any kind of known noxious radiation.
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This is also true for the few electric aeroplanes which already exist. An important disadvantage of electric aeroplanes is besides its very short flight autonomy that the weight of a full or an empty battery keeps the same (while an aeroplane with kerosine weighs much less at the end of its flight). So, I believe we need to get rid of lithium batteries, I believe that a few SKL-reactors, improving safety, are the right solution. They’ll make transportation much safer, they’ll diminish the risks of a huge fire (less heat needs to be dissipated or can be located away from the batteries) and they make cars and aeroplanes much lighter, thus safer again! And be aware that a car that weighs much less thanks to some SKL-reactors will increase action radius and acceleration power of cars and planes (shorter runways).
Some people on some forums mention that there might pose a risk of what they call ‘strange radiation’. Is this possible?
Dr Rossi:
Which relationship is there between the electromagnetic waves described in 1865 by Maxwell in his paper “Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field” and the Clifford algebra ?
Greetings, Andrea!
Thank you and your team for your unending persistence in research and development work!
Will testing certification be for
A: Industrial market only ?
B: Worldwide ?
C: Home units ?
D: All of the above?
E: None of the above?
Thank you if you can reply.
Each day is a gift from God,
Warm regards,
Tom Conover
Dear Andrea
I understand that there are at least 2 tests In the pipeline:
1. A characterization and performance test by a potential customer. That we will not have details about.
2. Certification test which I suppose will certify
A) it’s safety
B) it’s applicability
C) it’s reliability.
Is this correct in each case?
3. In the test case 1. Will we hear any basic results of that test above whether it was successful or not?
4. In the test case 2. Will that certification include performance information such as reliability at full out put power etc?
5. Will there additional third party tests going forward I. The near future from other customers or independent test groups and can you say in what time frame?
6. In the case that test the performance of first test on the the e-cat SKL is not to be made visible. Would one of the other testing bodies likely make these test results public?
7. I suppose you might want to present this information in your public demonstration though.
Anyway it sound like it is progressing. This is a big break through given the restrictions that everyone has been under these last months due to Covid.
All the best for these important tests.
Stephen
Dear Readers:
Today on the Journal of Nuclear Physics has been published the paper
“Brief Review of Alternative Physics- An alternative Opinion on Physics”,
by Dr Aleksey Savchenko, A.A. Bochvar Institute of Inorganic Materials, Moscow, Russia
Mason:
1- the basic module 95-5
2- they will decide when the time with be enough to make a certification
3- yes
4- September – October I suppose
5- to be defined
6- 95-5
7- I hope so
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick:
It would be a full certification.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Very exciting end to 2020 coming up, it seems, for you.
Regarding the certification agency, will it just certify the safety of the device, or will it certify the power input/output of the device, or something else?
Best regards
Patrick
Good Day Andrea,
In your exchange this morning with Brice, you affirm an important shift in the testing schedule: the inclusion of a 3rd-party testing of the SKL for a potential future business partner prior to the already described 3rd-party certification testing. This opens the door to several questions that I hope you are able to respond to.
1. Will this next 3rd-party test be on the 80:20% or the 95:5% SKL with a power rating of 5kW? Or, the 20kW SKL?
2. Will this next 3rd-party testing be “short” or “long”, for example, less than a week in duration or 2x-4x that duration?
3. Will you be present for this 3rd-party testing strictly as an advisor, and to ensure the security of the SKL?
4. Has the certification 3rd-party testing been scheduled? If yes, can you share for which of the upcoming months?
5. Is the certification 3rd-party testing still meant to provide certification for household use as previously stated? Or, has it been scaled back to only industrial use?
6. Has it been determined which version of the SKL will be certified? The 80:20%? The 95:5%? The 5kW or 20kW?
7. Do you still hope to present and demonstrate the SKL in Stockholm this year to the public and world press?
Best of luck for this pending 3rd-party testing, though as an optimist I am not inclined to think it is needed, only wanted.
As always, my best to you, to Team Rossi, and to your wife.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Mason
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
3- probably in October
4- only the results of the certification agency
5- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
“The water that flows is never the same” ( Heraclitus )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, The US energy corporations are determined to maintain control of a centralized power generation system despite the recognized disadvantages of transmission losses, fire danger, frequent power blackouts and escalating overhead costs! https://pamplinmedia.com/but/239-news/479192-387118-nuscale-mini-nukes-approved
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
Let me see if I understand correctly:
1. The test scheduled for September is with a third party which is a potential business partner, not an independent certification agency.
2. Another test will be done by an independent certification agency.
3. Will this second test be done also in September?
4. Will the results of both tests be made public?
5. Do you still expect a public presentation will be made this year?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Brice:
1- yes
2- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
KeithT:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian:
I cannot answer now,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea.
“Momentum-exchange current drive by electrostatic waves in an unmagnetized collisionless plasma”
ABSTRACT:
“For a planar electrostatic wave interacting with a single species in a collisionless plasma, momentum conservation implies current conservation. However, when multiple species interact with the wave, they can exchange momentum, leading to current drive. A simple, general formula for this driven current is derived. As examples, we show how currents can be driven for Langmuir waves in electron–positron–ion plasmas, and for ion-acoustic waves in electron–ion plasmas.”
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0011516
Do you think this effect is related at all with your SKL?
Best regards,
Patrick
Dear Andrea,
Can you answer this question? :
Where will the tests expected in September take place?
Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, Italy, or another country?
Warm greetings and best wishes
Gian
Dear Andrea,
Recently you mentioned a paper by Hanno Essen; within this paper he indicates that correlated coherent electrons are important in superconductivity. As within the E-Cat SKL there is a condition created where electrons are; axis aligned, spins orientated in the same direction and with charge orbits in phase, is formation of a coherent superconductive state possible?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Will the successful 3rd party testing in September be followed by another testing by an official certification company? Is the 3rd party tester a future business partner?
Wish you success!
Brice
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel Zavela:
The answer to your question is no: I think that my theoretical bases have been described in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Thank you for your kind wishes, and I take advantage of your comment to wish
Happy Labor Day
to all our American Readers,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Physicist II:
The Clifford algebra related to thr reflection and rotation of vectors.
See ref 12 of the paper you cited, pp. 11-12
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Sam:
The link you sent seems to suggest that the SKL of Dr Rossi has unleashed everywhere, even at the highest echelons, a research about the electricity exploitable directly from plasma.
Roberto
Dr Rossi,
After reading
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
, in particular in reference to paragraphs 1,2,4, can you explain which system do you use to calculate the zitterbewegung changes during the dV phases ?
Thank you for your answer,
Physicist II
Dear Dr. Rossi,
To summarize the output of the Rossi Effect, recent comments on your blog suggest that the quality of the plasma produced by the E-Cat devices sets your invention apart from LENR/”Cold Fusion” devices that demonstrate excess heat primarily?
Would you be comfortable with the following description, or requiring additional/different elements?
Rossi Effect output = sustained high energy plasma in the form of knotted skyrmions from dense electron clusters.
Happy Labor Day weekend.
Wishing you the best of luck and a positive result from the independent testing in September.
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Sam:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
September
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WaltC:
1- yes
2- no and we do not expect it will
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tien Cookson:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
I am sending this link to an interesting theoretical theorization that seems to me connected with the concept of electron you adhere to:
https://kowalski-physics.blogspot
All the best,
T.C.
Dear Andrea,
So would you consider the coming test to be the most important E-Cat test you have done so far?
Thank you very much,
Frank Acland
Dr. Rossi,
1) Have you analyzed the ash of any of the recent SKL devices?
2a) If yes: Is it significantly different from earlier E-Cat ash analyses that you’ve done?
2b) If no: Do you expect that it would significantly different from earlier E-Cat ash analyses?
Thanks,
WaltC
Hello DR Rossi
This is a link to an article about
Electric current in Plasma.
https://scitechdaily.com/unexpected-electrical-current-discovered-that-could-stabilize-fusion-reactions-bringing-the-fusion-energy-that-drives-the-sun-to-earth/
Regards
Sam
Dr. Rossi:
You stated to Frank Ackland that the testing is scheduled but not yet started. Are they scheduled to begin in
A: September
B: October
C: November
$: November
We all look forward to the successful results of these tests.
Hello DR Rossi
Have you been in touch with
people that are doing the testing
of the E-Cat-SKL?
Regards
Sam
Martyn Aubrey:
1a. yes
1b. yes
2. no: the comparision of the Casimir force with the Coulomb repulsion force have independent trends from the comparision between the magnetic forces and the Coulombian repulsion force, as you can see in Fig. 1 of paragraph 1 of the paper you cited, where are reported the trends of Casimir, Coulomb and magnetic forces as a function of distance.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
I am curing all the particulars to avoid errors in the test that will be made soon. It will be very important for a technology I think is a revolution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In your work on the E-Cat SKL are your major priorities in the current period?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr Rossi,
In your paper, http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions, you describe possible phenomena which together form your “Rossi Effect”.
1. Are these phenomena:
a. Each distinct and separate, but combine together in a synergy to produce the over-all Rossi Effect?
b. All required together in specific proportions to be effective?
c. You are still not totally sure, and are continuing to work to deduce exactly how much the different phenomena each contribute towards the Rossi Effect?
2. In Figure 1: “Trends of Casimir, Coulomb and magnetic forces as a function of distance”, you show, and then explain the calculations of, the two separate values of “Distance as number of reduced Compton wavelengths” at which the Magnetic force and the Casimir force each balance the Coulomb repulsion.
Does having these two distinct balance points at different positions on the Coulomb repulsion plot imply that different frequency external signals (or signal components) are required to bring each of the Magnetic and Casimir forces to their individual balance points with the Coulomb repulsion?
Thank you again, if you can answer these questions.
I wish you all success in the third party test, and I am looking forward to watching your virtual presentation of the Ecat SKL.
Best Regards,
Martyn Aubrey
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cecilia:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is the reaction of the Ecat SKL related in some way to the phenomenon described in the following link?
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180302144835.htm
Kind regards,
Cecilia
Dear Andrea:
Your single paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
has reached the stunning record of 48 000 full readings ( and counting…)
Best,
Prof
Dear Eernie1,
Thank you for your kind response. Civilized people never need to excuse themselves for humor. On the contrary…
Where perception and measurability cease, fantasy or clairvoyance will necessarily take over.
I just wanted to represent the concept idea of interference of the dimensions perceptible to us with other, discontinuous dimensions, with discontinuity in all kinds of variations.
The question is whether humans and mankind can ever understand and do something with such a discontinuous system.
Curious greetings,
Koen
Brice:
I studied carefully the work of Dr Parkhomov about the “strange radiations” that I decided to take care of seriously and we made the same measurements he published to check if we have any similar result. We did not have any strange radiation, and it is to us obvious because of the structure of the Ecat SKL. We will be able to give a certification that the Ecat SKL does not emit any kind of known noxious radiation.
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
An electric car that catches fire is a huge thread because the fire can’t be extinguished, the whole car must be put in a container filled with water! https://www.thedrive.com/news/28420/parked-teslas-keep-catching-on-fire-randomly-and-theres-no-recall-in-sight
This is also true for the few electric aeroplanes which already exist. An important disadvantage of electric aeroplanes is besides its very short flight autonomy that the weight of a full or an empty battery keeps the same (while an aeroplane with kerosine weighs much less at the end of its flight). So, I believe we need to get rid of lithium batteries, I believe that a few SKL-reactors, improving safety, are the right solution. They’ll make transportation much safer, they’ll diminish the risks of a huge fire (less heat needs to be dissipated or can be located away from the batteries) and they make cars and aeroplanes much lighter, thus safer again! And be aware that a car that weighs much less thanks to some SKL-reactors will increase action radius and acceleration power of cars and planes (shorter runways).
Some people on some forums mention that there might pose a risk of what they call ‘strange radiation’. Is this possible?
Success with the third party testing!!!
Brice
Bob Belovich:
Thanks to you for your reading of this blog: our readers are the essence of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.