Dear Andrea,
I am fascinated by all these tests which are being done with your Partners and many on ECW wonder what is being tested.
1. Now I assume that these tests may be under NDA, but can you say that in general they test the integration of an Ecat SKL into their product?
2. Do in some tests they also verify your specified properties, showing that e.g. the ECat SKL produces more electrical energy than it consumes?
A while ago you said that new ideas have lead to higher efficiencies, that may allow for higher electrical outputs.
3. Have you made progress on that?
4. How quickly can you produce a new SKL at this moment? Within: Hours, days, weeks
All success with this new important test this week!
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
CC:
The creation is favored by the high density of allowable energy states in vacuum, while it is obstaculated by the low number of permitted states in metals.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Regardless, noting the “lack of pollution” is an imperative to communicate with those in power. These decision makers are not necessarily the brightest citizens in our money first regardless of pollution government.
Since you are now able to allow investors and partners to test your invention, have you considered allowing Tesla to do so? They are constantly looking for new technology, like yours, and have a very rapid innovation culture. This means that they could incorporate your invention quickly. Their company scope is energy in all its forms (mobile, grid, residential). And they have plenty of money.
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the suggestion, but I think that the lack of pollution is put in evidence. Maybe we must make it better ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
when you open the engine bonnet of a sports car, you first try to understand how many cylinders there are and then you observe all the other wonders that together make its power. It is very intriguing the idea that in the future we will first observe how many ECats there are and these will be clearly visible, perhaps each one will be inside a cylinder that emits light and each one will emit a beam of light upwards.
Non vedo l’ora, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea, I went to ecat.com today and noticed a couple of possible revisions, I noticed that your list of features does not mention the lack of pollution which I believe is one of the most important features of the ecat and you indicate a 10 kW home unit. My home is all electric and is rated at 200 A which gives it a 44 kW rating, my electric heater alone is rated at 17 kW, the tankless water heater is 13 kW.
Toyota 5K-C engine in a 1991 Liteace
5K engine in a 1993 Toyota Kijang
The 1.5 L (1,486 cc) 5K was produced from 1983 through 1996. Typical output is 53 kW (71 hp; 72 PS) at 5600 rpm. Bore and stroke is 80.5 mm × 73 mm (3.17 in × 2.87 in). It was available with either 4- or 5-speed manual transmissions. Like the smaller 4K model, it uses hydraulic lifters as well as solid lifters for the pushrod.[clarification needed]
Is the new model similar in output, ie combining together for up to 2kW 3kW, or maybe 10dW?
The modules you are working with, that connect together as modules, what power output does each module contribute?
1K, 5K, 10k, 25k, 50k?
I see on the internet Toyota quoted at “The 1.5 L (1,486 cc) 5K was produced from 1983 through 1996. Typical output is 53 kW (71 hp; 72 PS) at 5600 rpm. Bore and stroke is 80.5 mm × 73 mm (3.17 in × 2.87 in).Toyota K engine – Wikipedia”
In the next 20 years 3d printing may reach the nanoscale level resolution for printing objects. If you could build an E-cat on the molecular level how small do you think an E-cat could be built and still function.
Congratulations on your moving forward with your long held plan of “in mercatu veritas”. I have to say that your success is leading to some confusion. Now, it seems that you have a mysterious global partner, the partners that are constituted of the +5 operating businesses having +12 months of experience with the SK, the partners arising out of the SKL Skype-facilitated testing as well as the current 3rd-party testing, and the potential partners currently participating in the current 3rd-party testing. This is a good sort of confusion given the goal of “in mercatu veritas”.
A few days ago, you said that the certification testing has been scheduled. As such, it seems right that the protocols have been agreed to with the certifying agency, otherwise what is the point of scheduling the testing.
Logic says this mean that the purpose and goal of the certification has been defined. If this is so, are you able to share whether the certification is for industrial use, household use, or both?
Thanks for the answer to my last questions. It’s good to hear that you have several e-cat SKL under test at the same time.
May I ask a few questions about this.
1. Is it now Easier to construct these additional devices than first one?
2. Have you been testing these all together with the controller? To demonstrate it could control multiple devices?
3. If so was this able to demonstrate the devices in parallel and/or sequential connection?
4. Can you say how many devices you used in these tests?
5. Have you found ways to simplify the manufacture and connections in these devices now that the prototype is shown to be working well?
6. Do you plan to run tests with much larger arrays of e-cats 10s, 100’s ,1000sin the near future?
Dear Andrea,
In our previous conversation you said that you are ‘advanced’.
May I ask in what you are advanced?
1. Integration in a product?
2. Plant to manufacture Ecats?
3. Development of a reliable Ecat?
4. Testing, which is coming to an end soon?
5. All of them?
You are now working together with partners of whom you said are willing to use it for integration in their products.
Some questions about that, assuming al certifications are received:
6. Do all these partners have the intention to integrate the Ecat SKL into their product?
7. Or is one or more willing to participate in the Ecat production?
8. Is it still the intention of the Leonardo Corporation (possibly with partners) to also bring an Ecat products on the market? (E.g. a domestic unit that produces 5KWe electricity).
Thanks for answering our questions and success for the certification tests.
Kind regards, Gerard
It’s good to hear the testing is going well. I get the impression that quietly you are getting a lot of work done these weeks that will have a strong baring in what happens going forward.
I hope it is going well for all the teams involved.
I think you mentioned that there are multiple tests going on with several third parties.
Can I ask
1. if some of these are going on concurrently? Or are they all held sequentially 1 after the other?
2. Do you also have several e-cat SKL under test at the same time?
3. Are all those third parties potential manufacturers?
4. Or also other organizations including Academic groups, national or international research groups, and organizations potentially interested in the distribution etc (such as environment impact and benefits) etc?
I hope any way that it is going well and that any questions they raise are giving you insight into the best way to present the product later this year.
Anonymous:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nick:
Thank you for your attention to it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I read
http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Your resiliency is a myth.
Godspeed with the Ecat SKL,
Nick
Mr Rossi:
I think the Ecat SKL does not exist.
Dear Andrea,
I am fascinated by all these tests which are being done with your Partners and many on ECW wonder what is being tested.
1. Now I assume that these tests may be under NDA, but can you say that in general they test the integration of an Ecat SKL into their product?
2. Do in some tests they also verify your specified properties, showing that e.g. the ECat SKL produces more electrical energy than it consumes?
A while ago you said that new ideas have lead to higher efficiencies, that may allow for higher electrical outputs.
3. Have you made progress on that?
4. How quickly can you produce a new SKL at this moment? Within: Hours, days, weeks
All success with this new important test this week!
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Frank Acland:
No, it is with a Partner.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
The creation is favored by the high density of allowable energy states in vacuum, while it is obstaculated by the low number of permitted states in metals.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
How can be created virtual particles in vacuum polarization, and which are the factors that obstaculate such creation ?
CC
Dear Andrea,
Best of luck with the next test! Can you say if this is the third party test with the certifying entity?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Tom Conover:
Theoretically there would not be limits to the number of modules that could be assembled.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
No. We will have another important one on the next week.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Do you have any outside testing teams working with the SKL this weekend?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea,
Are gigawatt devices potentially configurable?
Regardless, noting the “lack of pollution” is an imperative to communicate with those in power. These decision makers are not necessarily the brightest citizens in our money first regardless of pollution government.
Thank you for your ongoing comments in this blog.
Warm regards,
Tom
James Rice:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi:
Since you are now able to allow investors and partners to test your invention, have you considered allowing Tesla to do so? They are constantly looking for new technology, like yours, and have a very rapid innovation culture. This means that they could incorporate your invention quickly. Their company scope is energy in all its forms (mobile, grid, residential). And they have plenty of money.
Looks like a perfect fit to me.
Chuck Davis:
Thank you for the suggestion, but I think that the lack of pollution is put in evidence. Maybe we must make it better ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giuseppe:
He,he,he…Maybe !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
when you open the engine bonnet of a sports car, you first try to understand how many cylinders there are and then you observe all the other wonders that together make its power. It is very intriguing the idea that in the future we will first observe how many ECats there are and these will be clearly visible, perhaps each one will be inside a cylinder that emits light and each one will emit a beam of light upwards.
Non vedo l’ora, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea, I went to ecat.com today and noticed a couple of possible revisions, I noticed that your list of features does not mention the lack of pollution which I believe is one of the most important features of the ecat and you indicate a 10 kW home unit. My home is all electric and is rated at 200 A which gives it a 44 kW rating, my electric heater alone is rated at 17 kW, the tankless water heater is 13 kW.
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Mason:
Both.
Thank you for your kind wishes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mike Phalen:
I am not able to answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
The evidence of electron-proton at picometric scale has been verified: see references 4, 17,6, 3 on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
It depends on the choice of modules, which depends on the specific situations,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I see on the internet that …
Toyota 5K-C engine in a 1991 Liteace
5K engine in a 1993 Toyota Kijang
The 1.5 L (1,486 cc) 5K was produced from 1983 through 1996. Typical output is 53 kW (71 hp; 72 PS) at 5600 rpm. Bore and stroke is 80.5 mm × 73 mm (3.17 in × 2.87 in). It was available with either 4- or 5-speed manual transmissions. Like the smaller 4K model, it uses hydraulic lifters as well as solid lifters for the pushrod.[clarification needed]
Is the new model similar in output, ie combining together for up to 2kW 3kW, or maybe 10dW?
Thanks if you can answer …
Warm Regards,
Tom
Hi Andrea,
The modules you are working with, that connect together as modules, what power output does each module contribute?
1K, 5K, 10k, 25k, 50k?
I see on the internet Toyota quoted at “The 1.5 L (1,486 cc) 5K was produced from 1983 through 1996. Typical output is 53 kW (71 hp; 72 PS) at 5600 rpm. Bore and stroke is 80.5 mm × 73 mm (3.17 in × 2.87 in).Toyota K engine – Wikipedia”
Thanks if you can answer,
Warm regards,
Tom
Do you really think that electron-proton pico-metric aggregates ?
Hi Dr. Rossi,
In the next 20 years 3d printing may reach the nanoscale level resolution for printing objects. If you could build an E-cat on the molecular level how small do you think an E-cat could be built and still function.
Thanks, Mike
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on your moving forward with your long held plan of “in mercatu veritas”. I have to say that your success is leading to some confusion. Now, it seems that you have a mysterious global partner, the partners that are constituted of the +5 operating businesses having +12 months of experience with the SK, the partners arising out of the SKL Skype-facilitated testing as well as the current 3rd-party testing, and the potential partners currently participating in the current 3rd-party testing. This is a good sort of confusion given the goal of “in mercatu veritas”.
A few days ago, you said that the certification testing has been scheduled. As such, it seems right that the protocols have been agreed to with the certifying agency, otherwise what is the point of scheduling the testing.
Logic says this mean that the purpose and goal of the certification has been defined. If this is so, are you able to share whether the certification is for industrial use, household use, or both?
My best to you and your team.
Sincerely and Respectfully,
Mason
Stephen:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
4- enough
5- not yet
6- I think so
Warm Regards,
A.R.
George N.:
No,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is the “mobile” partner also involved in the manufacture of industrial robots?
Best,
George N
Teppo:
We measured less than 40 dB(A) at 0.5 m of distance for one module and assembling more modules the sum is logarithmic.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Thanks for the answer to my last questions. It’s good to hear that you have several e-cat SKL under test at the same time.
May I ask a few questions about this.
1. Is it now Easier to construct these additional devices than first one?
2. Have you been testing these all together with the controller? To demonstrate it could control multiple devices?
3. If so was this able to demonstrate the devices in parallel and/or sequential connection?
4. Can you say how many devices you used in these tests?
5. Have you found ways to simplify the manufacture and connections in these devices now that the prototype is shown to be working well?
6. Do you plan to run tests with much larger arrays of e-cats 10s, 100’s ,1000sin the near future?
Best Regards
Stephen.
Dear Andrea,
does E-Cat SKL make any sound when operating?
BR,
Teppo
Gerard McEk:
A mixture of all of them with a series of Partners.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In our previous conversation you said that you are ‘advanced’.
May I ask in what you are advanced?
1. Integration in a product?
2. Plant to manufacture Ecats?
3. Development of a reliable Ecat?
4. Testing, which is coming to an end soon?
5. All of them?
You are now working together with partners of whom you said are willing to use it for integration in their products.
Some questions about that, assuming al certifications are received:
6. Do all these partners have the intention to integrate the Ecat SKL into their product?
7. Or is one or more willing to participate in the Ecat production?
8. Is it still the intention of the Leonardo Corporation (possibly with partners) to also bring an Ecat products on the market? (E.g. a domestic unit that produces 5KWe electricity).
Thanks for answering our questions and success for the certification tests.
Kind regards, Gerard
CC:
This name is related to the spontaneous formation of an electron cloud around a cathod heated in vacuum.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
how would you define the “space charge” cited in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
All the best
CC
Sam:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
Sorry, I do not understand your question. Can you kindly rephrase ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Stephen:
1- sequentially
2- yes
3- not all
4- no
Thank you for your hopes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Maybe
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Will you schedule the public presentation after the testing of the certifying agency is completed?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea
It’s good to hear the testing is going well. I get the impression that quietly you are getting a lot of work done these weeks that will have a strong baring in what happens going forward.
I hope it is going well for all the teams involved.
I think you mentioned that there are multiple tests going on with several third parties.
Can I ask
1. if some of these are going on concurrently? Or are they all held sequentially 1 after the other?
2. Do you also have several e-cat SKL under test at the same time?
3. Are all those third parties potential manufacturers?
4. Or also other organizations including Academic groups, national or international research groups, and organizations potentially interested in the distribution etc (such as environment impact and benefits) etc?
I hope any way that it is going well and that any questions they raise are giving you insight into the best way to present the product later this year.
Best Regards to all involved
Stephen.
Dear Andrea,
something like “e-cat inside” should be a good strategy?
Hello DR Rossi
I came across this
interesting product.
https://thehardwareacademy.com/
Regards
Sam
Gerard McEk:
Your assumption is correct: 3.
I cannot yest give a date, but we have advanced.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein H. Vormedal:
Several.
Warm Regards,
A.R.