I have a follow up question to the critique of “a point-like model of the electron”. Does your research indicate that this model’s infirmity does not depend on the temperature of the material? In other words does an electron in a higher energy environment appear less “point-like” than an electron in a lower energy environment?
Bob Belovich
P.S. Is there anything on your Christmas wish list beside the crystal ball? I continue to experience sourcing issues.
Dear Andrea,
You have been saying quite a while now that the ECat SKL generates energy not caused by a nuclear process. Somehow it may extract Zero Point energy, where these pico electron clusters play an important role. Like many here on ECW we look forward seeing the update/extension of your paper: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions. Some questions about this:
1. When will you publish this update, will it be (long?) before the presentation?
2. It will be not easy to measure changes to mass of the elements in the reactor or reaction products, even during longer runs. On what grounds did you conclude that no nuclear reactions take place in the Ecat SKL?
3. Do you believe that in the original Ecat or hot Cat LENR reactions took place?
One additional question:
4. You are now building an Ecat factory. When will it be ready according you planning?
I hope you and your team and your family will have a pleasant time despite the covid-19 pandemic limitations during Christmas. When I understand it right, 2021 will be THE year for the ECat SKL. I wish you all the success! May it baffle science and give hope to humanity.
Kind regards, Gerard
Your reply to Viviana Hercman that the core of the update of your paper will be a more defined theory about the primary source of the energy and that the update will be substantial. This can be understood as a very significant landmark. May I ask if this primary source of energy is:
a. from the universe (ZPE or alike)?
b. from microcosmos (E=MC2)?
c. a combination of above?
d. something else?
We respect that you can’t reveal the COP of the SKL-reactor so far, but is it possible to say something about how much energy you need to start one reactor?
a. a few penlight batteries is enough
b. by hand with an generator and a hand crank (at remote places)
c. a regular car battery
d. about the same energy as when the reactor is in full operation
e. significantly more energy, it is recommended to use the grid
On Power Engineering issue of December 15:
Meeting the Cyber Threat Head-On in Powergen
and
IEA: Global Electricity demand Declines As Effects of Covid 19 persist
Rod Walton
Physicist:
During our experiments we found the formation of charge clusters that have a density that cannot be easily explained inside the usual paradigms. To understand this phenomenon it is essential to overcome the paradigm according to which elementary particles are massive point-like objects, accepting instead the concept of a pure electromagnetic origin of the matter.
Not to mention the fact that from a point-like model of the electron would derive an infinite electric field.
The formation of clusters of electrons in phase causes a lower entropy and the exploiting of the zero-point energy, with transfer of energy to the electrons not in phase. We are working on the study of this mechanism and on an integration of the paper you cited, updating it with the discoveries we made in the last two years of experimentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Here are the new stats of your publications I got from your profile on http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions:
Readings 57006
Recommendations: 3440
Citations 21
Total Research Interest index: 986.5
and counting…
By the way: all the readings and the recommendations are traceable in the data-base of Researchgate.
Congratulations for this “impossible” achievement,
Prof
Dear Andrea:
Thank you for the link to the paper of Prof Hanno Essen.
It is very interesting to compare his Lagrangian with the long range interactions of your paper.
Cheers
Prof
Dear Readers,
From the questions asked of Andrea it is clear that many do not understand what is involved in inventing something, especially one as monumental as the ecat. Questions regarding future progress are futile. Andrea can only guess what it will bring. He is doing his best to resolve the problems and has made miraculous progress! Keep the faith!
You have mentioned before that for testing purposes you use a resistance as a load, likely connected directly to the E-Cat SKL electrical output, the energy dissipated as heat. For domestic or industrial usage it is likely that the E-Cat SKL output is to be converted to the local mains voltage supply required, this can then be connected to the electric heating devices designed for the voltage of the locality, the alternative that you are likely investigating is that it may be more economic for an E-Cat SKL to be directly connected as a combined E-Cat SKL and heater, avoiding the extra electrical conversion.
Also to avoid extra electrical conversion, is it possible to power a Peltier effect device directly, possibly for use in industrial or domestic cooling devices, fridges, freezers or air conditioning.
Dear Andrea,
We assume that our universe is controlled by particles possessing electric monopoles. The electron having a negative charge and the proton having a positive charge being the most effective. All our technology and science is based on this fact(electric currents and nuclear reactions). The magnetic fields we use along with these monopoles are always created with north and south( dipolar materials) Our world operates on this principle and develops usable machinery and devices we use in communication and energy production among other results. However science has not discovered the existence of separate magnetic monopoles, magnetron materials with stand alone north or south poles, that can be used to the extent of the electric monopoles. Do you think you may be creating these magnetic monopoles in your plasma which then supplies the excess energy you detect?
Attractive regards.
Dr Joseph Fine:
What is backwards for the one is forwards for the other,
Thank you for your kind wishes,that I am delighted to renew to you and your family,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
All elementary charges have an associated magnetic flux Φ = h/e generated by the Zitterbewegung current loop I=e/T (cT is the electron Compton wavelength)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If electrons and positrons have the same mass but a different charge, how are they different otherwise?
If an electron or positron spins clockwise or counter-clockwise shouldn’t make any difference.
(How does an electron know which way is up?)
Where does its charge come from anyway? Is ZBW somehow related to the positive or negative charge? And is its magnetic field somehow related to its charge?
Dear Andrea Rossi
I have a follow up question to the critique of “a point-like model of the electron”. Does your research indicate that this model’s infirmity does not depend on the temperature of the material? In other words does an electron in a higher energy environment appear less “point-like” than an electron in a lower energy environment?
Bob Belovich
P.S. Is there anything on your Christmas wish list beside the crystal ball? I continue to experience sourcing issues.
Dear Andrea,
You have been saying quite a while now that the ECat SKL generates energy not caused by a nuclear process. Somehow it may extract Zero Point energy, where these pico electron clusters play an important role. Like many here on ECW we look forward seeing the update/extension of your paper: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions. Some questions about this:
1. When will you publish this update, will it be (long?) before the presentation?
2. It will be not easy to measure changes to mass of the elements in the reactor or reaction products, even during longer runs. On what grounds did you conclude that no nuclear reactions take place in the Ecat SKL?
3. Do you believe that in the original Ecat or hot Cat LENR reactions took place?
One additional question:
4. You are now building an Ecat factory. When will it be ready according you planning?
I hope you and your team and your family will have a pleasant time despite the covid-19 pandemic limitations during Christmas. When I understand it right, 2021 will be THE year for the ECat SKL. I wish you all the success! May it baffle science and give hope to humanity.
Kind regards, Gerard
KeithT:
Yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is there any E-Cat SKL related experiments that will be conducted in a scientific institute or university before the presentation?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Calle H:
d, albeit everything existing has its source in the Universe…otherwise it wouldn’t be universal.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Your reply to Viviana Hercman that the core of the update of your paper will be a more defined theory about the primary source of the energy and that the update will be substantial. This can be understood as a very significant landmark. May I ask if this primary source of energy is:
a. from the universe (ZPE or alike)?
b. from microcosmos (E=MC2)?
c. a combination of above?
d. something else?
Thank you very much.
Calle H
Viviana Hercman:
The core will be a more defined theory about the primary source of the energy. The update will be substantial.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You said that an update of your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is in preparation as a consequence of the experiments of the last year: can you anticipate which is the core of the update ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Viviana
Brice:
c
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
We respect that you can’t reveal the COP of the SKL-reactor so far, but is it possible to say something about how much energy you need to start one reactor?
a. a few penlight batteries is enough
b. by hand with an generator and a hand crank (at remote places)
c. a regular car battery
d. about the same energy as when the reactor is in full operation
e. significantly more energy, it is recommended to use the grid
Just curious…
Have a nice day!
Brice
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering issue of December 15:
Meeting the Cyber Threat Head-On in Powergen
and
IEA: Global Electricity demand Declines As Effects of Covid 19 persist
Rod Walton
Physicist:
During our experiments we found the formation of charge clusters that have a density that cannot be easily explained inside the usual paradigms. To understand this phenomenon it is essential to overcome the paradigm according to which elementary particles are massive point-like objects, accepting instead the concept of a pure electromagnetic origin of the matter.
Not to mention the fact that from a point-like model of the electron would derive an infinite electric field.
The formation of clusters of electrons in phase causes a lower entropy and the exploiting of the zero-point energy, with transfer of energy to the electrons not in phase. We are working on the study of this mechanism and on an integration of the paper you cited, updating it with the discoveries we made in the last two years of experimentation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
How does your theoretical hypothesis on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
to explain the appearence of anomalous energy, if you exclude the LENR ?
David:
The Countries where my paper has been more read are USA, European Union, Russia, Japan, China.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Norma:
I, Andrea Rossi, am sure that the presentation of the Ecat SKL will be made within the year 2021 ( God willing ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Have you the strength to write here: “I am sure that the Ecat SKL will be presented within the year 2021” ?
Thank you if you can,
Norma
Dear Andrea:
From the stats of Researchgate related to your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
can you see the Countries your paper has been more read in ?
Cheers
David
Iggy Dalrymple:
Maybe in future, not now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
He said so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Do you think that Joe Biden will enforce a new policy more efficient in regard of the fight against the global warming ?
Dr Rossi:
Here are the new stats of your publications I got from your profile on
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions:
Readings 57006
Recommendations: 3440
Citations 21
Total Research Interest index: 986.5
and counting…
By the way: all the readings and the recommendations are traceable in the data-base of Researchgate.
Congratulations for this “impossible” achievement,
Prof
Dear Dr Rossi,
This product is hinting that it wants an E-Cat demo.
https://youtu.be/YKC1HzcWZ5s
Best regards,
Iggy
Frank Acland:
It is continuing to perform like we have shown in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
How is work progressing on the building of the first industrial plant?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Prof:
Actually, the paper of Hanno Essen is important and I am preparing an appendix to my paper with an integration of his Lagrangian with the Zitterbewegung of electrons that is at the base of
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Thank you for the link to the paper of Prof Hanno Essen.
It is very interesting to compare his Lagrangian with the long range interactions of your paper.
Cheers
Prof
Elsa Wahlstrom:
Yes. About this issue, I found extremely interesting the paper of Prof Hanno Essen I read recently:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/334679765_magnetic_energy_superconductivity_and_dark_matter
In this paper Prof Essen emphasizes the importance of long range magnetic interactions in systems where a large number of charged particles are involved.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
are also magnetic interactions among the long range interactions related to your theoretical system described in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
?
Keiko Austin:
Not yet,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Can you tell us the month of 2021 you foresee to make the presentation of the Ecat SKL ?
KeithT:
Thank you for your suggestion. Probably you mean Seebeck Effect, that, unfortunately, has a very low efficiency.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers,
From the questions asked of Andrea it is clear that many do not understand what is involved in inventing something, especially one as monumental as the ecat. Questions regarding future progress are futile. Andrea can only guess what it will bring. He is doing his best to resolve the problems and has made miraculous progress! Keep the faith!
Warm regards,
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
You have mentioned before that for testing purposes you use a resistance as a load, likely connected directly to the E-Cat SKL electrical output, the energy dissipated as heat. For domestic or industrial usage it is likely that the E-Cat SKL output is to be converted to the local mains voltage supply required, this can then be connected to the electric heating devices designed for the voltage of the locality, the alternative that you are likely investigating is that it may be more economic for an E-Cat SKL to be directly connected as a combined E-Cat SKL and heater, avoiding the extra electrical conversion.
Also to avoid extra electrical conversion, is it possible to power a Peltier effect device directly, possibly for use in industrial or domestic cooling devices, fridges, freezers or air conditioning.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
CC:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anderson Panetta:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Can we consider a promise the fact that you will make the presentation of the Ecat SKL within the next year ?
Dr Rossi:
Very interesting your answer to Dr Joseph Fine,
Cheers
CC
eernie1:
I don’t think so.
Thanks for your interesting idea,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
We assume that our universe is controlled by particles possessing electric monopoles. The electron having a negative charge and the proton having a positive charge being the most effective. All our technology and science is based on this fact(electric currents and nuclear reactions). The magnetic fields we use along with these monopoles are always created with north and south( dipolar materials) Our world operates on this principle and develops usable machinery and devices we use in communication and energy production among other results. However science has not discovered the existence of separate magnetic monopoles, magnetron materials with stand alone north or south poles, that can be used to the extent of the electric monopoles. Do you think you may be creating these magnetic monopoles in your plasma which then supplies the excess energy you detect?
Attractive regards.
Dr Joseph Fine:
What is backwards for the one is forwards for the other,
Thank you for your kind wishes,that I am delighted to renew to you and your family,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Lana:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I like your answer of yesterday to Dr Joseph Fine,
Cheers
Lana
Dear Andrea,
I like Feynman’s comment that positrons are electrons travelling backwards in time.
Or are the electrons the ones which are travelling back in time?)
And my/(our) best wishes to you and your team for a Merry Christmas and for a happy, healthy and memorable New year.
Buon natale e felice anno nuovo!
Joseph Fine
Prof:
Thank you for the update,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
what we call “charge density” is the partial time derivative of a scalar field that is the four-divergence of the electromagnetic four potential ( https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320274378_Maxwell%27s_Equations_and_Occam%27s_Razor )
This is related to Feynman’s observation “that positrons could simply be represented as electrons going from the future to the past in a back section of their world lines” https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1965/feynman/lecture/
All elementary charges have an associated magnetic flux Φ = h/e generated by the Zitterbewegung current loop I=e/T (cT is the electron Compton wavelength)
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Addendum:
An electron or positron’s magnetic field is related to its charge, but why does an electron or positron have a different charge?
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If electrons and positrons have the same mass but a different charge, how are they different otherwise?
If an electron or positron spins clockwise or counter-clockwise shouldn’t make any difference.
(How does an electron know which way is up?)
Where does its charge come from anyway? Is ZBW somehow related to the positive or negative charge? And is its magnetic field somehow related to its charge?
Curious,
Joseph Fine