United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

14,636 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mark Saker:
    We all will see, F9.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Michael S.:
    Thank you for your sympathy, insight and suggestions.
    The cases are two: either we will put a product massively in the market, or not.
    If not, the problem does not exist.
    If yes, the problem is automatically resolved.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Michael S

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    According to what you have posted here recently your security threat has heightened. Personally I am not astonished. When people are ready to bomb civilians and send thousands into jail, they will certainly attempt to suppress a threat to their/their countries main resource. As you know ensuring 100% personal safety even of the US President is not possible.

    But now contrary to my message from two or three years ago, your situation is totally changed: you have patents to protect your IP !

    So maybe you could (and should) now change tactics and disclose fully your IP (I mean everything that allows full replication enabeling KW/MW production of energy) so that :
    1) in developed countries big and small corporations can rapidly reproduce (and therefore confirm), copy, continue to develop, commercialize and enhance ecat technology. And pay the deserved royalties to the inventor and his associates.
    2) in less developed/rogue countries industries would do the same as above BUT will not pay or pay very little royalties. This would be like pharma industry does with anti-Aids triterapy medication or hepatitis C (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/16/health/hepatitis-c-treatment-egypt.html?_r=0) : no or very little royalties considering the vital role of the “product” to the country.

    The advantages would be :
    You could continue prime technological development BUT also communicate with all different research groups and governments. You could travel free as a (very) respected man, without safety issues, invited everywhere, meeting the most interesting persons on this planet. Ultimately you would then have much more influence then being a beleaguered owner of a Company trying to build market domination. This ambition, excuse me for being so blunt, is I think very passé, and makes me think of people like Bill Gates in the 80’. You could bypass this step in your career since you have IP protection, and even if only in the US it would mean wealth well beyond your needs.

    You may be bound by contracts with your partners. But ultimately even they could profit from this opening up since your “Group” would keep a big advance in engineering and thus go to market speed. Secondly opening up would allow convincing definitively the main pure players (Powerplant and HVAC equipment industrials). They would immediately start their research and development and would then lobby in favor of the technology each in their country/zone of influence. Being right alone on the other hand trying to convince certification authorities must be very tough….

    Lastly, don’t underestimate the means and determination of powers that would like to shut down LENR. They are desperate (oil price has sunken so much and they definitely don’t want this to last forever), extremely smart, ruthless and vey rich. Think of Ustica, and several other unresolved issues. States & organizations can hide things/facts even when many people are involved, if not for ever, for a very long time. If you have this LENR knowledge you have the ethical responsibility to share it with the human race avoiding any risk of loss of this knowledge.

    With sympathy,

    Michael Schneider

    Ps Obviously you don’t need to publish this but I would appreciate a reaction from your part.

  • Mark Saker

    Dear Andrea,

    Would i be in the right vicinity that when you say

    “What I have seen today with my eyes was not expected so soon. ”

    Is it that you have a working prototype of E-cat X which contains >1 reactor and can provide heat + electric +light in the one unit thus fulfilling your idea of replacing street lights??

  • Marco

    Dear Andrea,

    is the current status of the ECat X (COP and/or dependability) so advanced, that with an ultracapacitor and/or battery can be put on loop and self sustain and produce energy without external energy, apart the initial?
    If not, are you working toward this goal? And if the answer is yes, are you near this goal? If the answer is not, do you plan to develop the ECat X to be put in loop?

    Regards,
    Marco.

  • Kristie

    Dear Andrea Rossi:
    Can we have an update also today?
    Thank you,
    K.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Janne:
    Technological
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Sebastian:
    b + c
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fyodor:
    Quantity of units, from which quantity of electricity.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Fyodor

    Mr. Rossi

    I hope that you are well . When you talk about a “massive production” do you mean the quantity of electricity or quantity of units?

    Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.

  • Sebastian

    Dear Andrea,

    When you say “the E-Cat X made a tremendous step forward a massive production”, do you mean:

    a) progress in the regulatory/legal area?
    b) progress with the E-cat X itself, in the production of electricity (such as better COP)?
    c) progress in the mass production of the E-cat X itself?

  • Janne

    Dear Andrea,

    You speak of a ‘loophole’ and ‘a step toward massive production’. I assume these are the one and the same. Is the advancement technological or business/regulatory in nature?

    Best Regards,

    Janne

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    Today we got a ‘loophole’.
    Much work remains to be done but in less time than expected, I hope.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giuseppe:
    Today we had a very good step forward that makes me hope to give soon not just more data, but information about the massive production of the Ecat X.
    What I have seen today with my eyes was not expected so soon. We got some exponential.
    Warm Regards
    Andrea

  • Giuseppe

    Dear Andrea,
    First off all, very nice pictures in the top of the pages.
    You just said the E-Cat X made a tremendous step forward!
    What does it mean, are you near to reveal some number?
    We can’t wait any more.
    Regards, Giuseppe

  • Italo R.

    Dear Dr. Rossi, you have written “… the E-Cat X made a tremendous step forward a massive production…” and this is really a very big news.
    Your happiness is the same of all your supporters.
    And what about certifications? Are they ready to let you put E-Cats X in the market?
    Bets Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Italo R.:
    very premature, but I want to add that today the E-Cat X made a tremendous step forward a massive production. Today I am very happy.
    Warmest Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Umbi:
    The 250 kW units have been designed on purpose being the maximum power that has been certified.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • umbi

    Strange choice 4 to 250kW and 50 to 20kW to reserve … 250kW E-CAT she was born after 1Mw plant construction ?

  • Italo R.

    I wish propose you the following link about E-Cat.

    There surely are many wrong details, nut some are interesting is real:

    http://www.laltrapagina.it/mag/e-cat-il-dispositivo-che-permette-di-riscaldare-casa-con-20-dollari-lanno/

    Kind Regards,
    Italo R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    They are waiting for a massive distribution in the market.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Yrka

    Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi.

    I read a report on the link Alban Wolfhart.
    Why serious experts in the energy sector does not take into account in the projections, “Rossi generator”?

    -Ignore? (Do not believe)
    -Lack of information? (Don `t know).
    -Another reason?

    Yury Isaev
    Engineer
    Tyumen, Russia

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jolin Norcross:
    Thanks for the insight.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alan Wolfhart:
    Thank you for the information,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Alban Wolfhart

    Report: Steam Generator Market Worth USD 888.20 Million USD by 2020

    * this may be understated?

    http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/prnewswire-energy-daily-news.html?rkey=20160209enUK201602094031&filter=1615

  • Jolin Norcross

    Dr Rosii,

    This may interest your readers Q: What Exactly Is the ‘Next-Generation’ Utility?

    experts are predicting a shift toward a decentralized grid system.

    The electricity business is much different from the consumer tech business.

    But similar forces of change are at work:

    Video > explaining how Utilities will lead the new energy transformation:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCljUpD8qvs

    Regards,

    Jolin Norcross

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rip Van Winkle:
    Tedious time inside the plant is an oxymoron, but all the same thank you for the nice link!
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr D:
    I am working to merit the trust of persons like you.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    That’s my dream, albeit not yet real.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Marco Serra

    Dear Andrea,
    You said “I think the electrical energy will be produced from us at competuitive costs ….”
    Is this your intention ? To produce and sell electrical energy intead of selling ECatX to allow everyone to self produce it ?

    God bless you
    Marco Serra

  • DrD

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    I take my hat off to you.
    I’m impatient but I appreciate the challenges; it is close I hope.
    One day some one will make a film about LENR and Andrea Rossi.
    I look forward to it and to my first E-cats and all the red faces.
    God Bless and Best Regards
    Dave

  • Rip Van Winkle

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,

    I have followed the progress of your invention for several years. I think it is remarkable (F9), and can be a force for liberation of mankind.

    If you ever have a tedious time, I would like to recommend this delightful board game: https://ordoabchaogame.wordpress.com/

    The game is free of charge and can be played by a single player and up to twelve players can participate. You create the game by downloading some .docx files and print them on paper.

    The game is on a very unrelated topic compared to the ECat. But sometimes mixing different ideas can generate the greatest insights.

    Faithfully yours

    Rip Van Winkle

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jensen Vogal:
    Nice!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jensen Vogal

    Dr Rossi here is a short interesting video on Disruptive technology

    the ecat promises to take the world into new uncharted territory.

    Thank You!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC7YfDr8_hM

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mats Lewan:
    Thank you for the citation from your book. I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea and Tom Conover, I agree. In fact, I brought up the topic of replacing open fire in my book on Rossi and the E-Cat, An Impossible Invention:

    “As a source of heat, merely replacing fire, it could provide significant benefits. According to the WHO, three billion people use open fires and leaky stoves for cooking and heating, daily. Over one million people die each year from the lung disease COPD, acquired from breathing polluted indoor air, while almost half of all deaths from pneumonia among children under five is also due to the poor air where fires burn indoors. Moreover, collecting firewood takes a lot of time from women and children, reducing their ability to perform other productive work and go to school. A clean, new heat source, free of radioactivity and emissions, can potentially address this problem, equally applicable to any other heating method.”

    An Impossible Invention, Chapter 20. Source (2014): http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/index.html

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    Thank you for your insight.
    As a matter of fact, domestic pollution is remarkably underestimated.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,
    @Curto,

    This information is Updated “February 2016”.
    4.3 million die each year from interior cook stove emissions. That is one every 7 seconds.

    Tom

    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs292/en/

    Household air pollution and health
    Fact sheet N°292
    Updated February 2016

    Key facts
    Around 3 billion people cook and heat their homes using open fires and simple stoves burning biomass (wood, animal dung and crop waste) and coal.
    Over 4 million people die prematurely from illness attributable to the household air pollution from cooking with solid fuels.
    More than 50% of premature deaths due to pneumonia among children under 5 are caused by the particulate matter (soot) inhaled from household air pollution.
    3.8 million premature deaths annually from noncommunicable diseases including stroke, ischaemic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer are attributed to exposure to household air pollution.
    Indoor air pollution and household energy: the forgotten 3 billion

    Around 3 billion people still cook and heat their homes using solid fuels (i.e. wood, crop wastes, charcoal, coal and dung) in open fires and leaky stoves. Most are poor, and live in low- and middle-income countries.

    Such inefficient cooking fuels and technologies produce high levels of household air pollution with a range of health-damaging pollutants, including small soot particles that penetrate deep into the lungs. In poorly ventilated dwellings, indoor smoke can be 100 times higher than acceptable levels for fine particles. Exposure is particularly high among women and young children, who spend the most time near the domestic hearth.

    Impacts on health

    4.3 million people a year die prematurely from illness attributable to the household air pollution caused by the inefficient use of solid fuels (2012 data) for cooking. Among these deaths:

    12% are due to pneumonia
    34% from stroke
    26% from ischaemic heart disease
    22% from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and
    6% from lung cancer.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Intriguing application.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    I think the electrical energy will be produced from us at competuitive costs, if the plants will work properly, but I am not able to produce numbers yet.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Umbi:
    We are using 4 E-Cats with a power of 250 kW each. We maintain the 50 20 kW E-Cats as a safety reserve.
    I do not see the point to make bigger modules, so far.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • umbi

    For 1MW plant you have used 50 E-Cats. Is it possible to think about a single reactor of 1 MW for industrial use ?

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello, Dr Rossi:
    what will it cost the system for 1 MW ? How much will cost to produce 1 MWh of electricity ? Can you make a comparison with other existing energy sources ? The maintenance costs ? The six-monthly maintainance costs ?
    I send you here a link to an article with the costs of the various energy sources .

    http://www.qualenergia.it/articoli/20150902-costi-di-produzione-solare-e-eolico-battono-le-fonti-fossili-sempre-piu-spesso

  • Robert Curto

    Dr. Rossi, can you manufacture an E-Cat Indoor Cookstove ? F9
    Need fuel once a year ?
    Getting fuel is an expensive and enormous effort.
    In my opinion, you could sell Hundreds of Millions.
    Google:
    4 million die each year by Indoor Cookstoves
    Click on:
    WHO

    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale Florida
    USA

    :

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the link.
    The final results will be ready, I suppose, by March, not before.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Robert

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Again congratulations for your US Patent I found on this post.
    I have one question, if you can answer: is this apparatus able to produce light?
    Regards,
    Robert

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Hello dr . Rossi,
    I am sending you here a nice video on ‘ E-Cat. When do you think will come out the final results ?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFpvm4IMGSs&feature=youtu.be

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- no
    2- no
    3- working
    4- yes and yes
    5- yes, in good standing
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luca:
    Too low efficiency.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>