Dear Andrea,
Recently you said the first E-cat X 250 kW plant will delivered in the UK (F9=positive).
Some questions about that, if I may:
1. Is E-cat X chosen because also electric energy and or light is requested by the customer, or just heat?
2. If it is just heat, is the E-cat X chosen because of its robustness and or COP in comparison of the E-cat?
3. If 2. Is no, then what is the reason to use the E-cat X?
4. Will the plant operation be subject to an extensive measuring program like for the 1 MW plant?
5. If F9=positive, when can the plant be put into operation (roughly)?
Thanks for your patience with our relentless questions.
Good luck with the 1 MW final report and the further development of E-cat X!
Kind regards, Gerard
Audrey:
We are making a tremendous job and it will be so difficult to compete against us, that it will be less expensive and dangerous to find an agreement with us. We will be open to agreements as well as hard to be pushed away. We are ready. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations on your recent progress with Ecat-X and on the latest replication of your effect by MFMP.
Since the Ecat-X produces electricity directly, would it be possible to couple your device with an electrolyzer and an H2 fuel cell and (starting with an initial reservoir of H2 to get started) create a completely closed system- – that does not require any external power input to run continuously?
Kind regards; HRG.
Robert Curto:
Opinions are just opinions, must be respected, positive or negative as they might be.
Also negative opinions, even with some peppery irony, can be useful for something.
By Hegel’s phenomenology, the essence of positivity is negativity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Your pre-order is reserved and you will surely receive our proposal as soon as we’ll have ready our domestic E-Cat for sale. The number has no importance, all they who made a pre-order will receive promptly the proposal and will be free to confirm the order or cancel it. Anyway we still do not have a product with the necessary certification for domestic use.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Look Moo:
Now we’ ll start with 2 factories, one in the USA and one in Sweden, then we’ll see. We have also ready a strong network of outsourcing facilities.
It will be the market to indicate what to do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, If you were not such a nice guy, you could have responded to Alexus with:
Thank you for your warped opinion.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Congratulations on the sale of the E-Cat X plant in the UK!
So many things happening now. Just curious, I added my name to your list right away a few years ago. What is my order # on your list for home units (when they are available), am I in the first 100? I have two requests on file with you. 🙂
Fyodor:
I cannot answer these questions now: too premature. But allow me to say that only a non expert of the art needs a closed loop to calculate the COP.
Warm Regards
A.R.
1. Can you clarify if the public presentation will be of (A) the manufacturing plant or (B) the E-cat X itself?
2. If the latter, do you anticipate demonstrating it in self-looped mode. It seems like this could eliminate any arguments/controversy about calorimetry, etc?
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
Dear Andrea,
assuming 100 the degree of difficulty in realizing the 1MW E-Cat plant,
which may be the same value in achieving a 1 MW E-CatX plant!
Regards, Giuseppe
That’s brilliant news that the UK bought the first Industrial E-Cat X. Does that mean you will be making a trip to the UK for a period of time to oversee the install?
After all these years of watching from the sidelines, it would be great to come and personally shake your hand – I did after all get probably the first E-cat article in a newspaper (albeit a local paper) 🙂
I wonder whether that would be a possibility, I’m sure there are other eager UK participants – you deserve to enjoy some adulation after all the time couped up in that shipping container hehe.
James Rice:
Your comment is important.
I will be delighted to comply with what you propose, but not before having a product enough diffused in the market. Only at that point I will be sure that I do not risk to burn the savings of small investors. I still want not to play American foot-ball with the bones of the others. Our ship is still a warship, not a cruise ship. I could never forgive myself to have burnt the savings of persons that trust me. I can accept financing from professional investors, well aware of all the risks connected with us, but I cannot accept money from persons for whom a loss of their investments would make their life worse.
It is possible we will go public, but only after our E-Cats will have been well diffused in the market. Take as an example Bill Gate’s Microsoft: they went public only after their products were well diffused in the market. This is the model to follow, not to hurt people.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You probably cannot say too much about this, but with their recent discovery of low-energy gamma radiation on the order of 10-100 keV out of the reactor, do you think that the MFMP are on the right track in regards to your early work on the E-Cat?
Here, you’re saying with a seemingly knowing smirk that the thermalization of the gamma rays by lead is the reason (or one of them) behind the excess heat:
I wrote the following in reply to a post by D.Grub on the matter of had you said you would run your factory using E-Cat X but I thought I would run my thoughts past you for your comment.
Building a factory usiing the products it creates is a bit chicken and egg. I would expect a certain fraction of the initial run to be put aside to migrate the plant over to E-Cat X just for testing and to show, but until you have built the factory, you have not made enough E-Cat X to run the factory!
So you would short lease power then switch over gradually. My initial guess would be 1 in 10 as a nice round figure, in reality you would run it through a spreadsheet working out how much the reactors were worth, if each of them are worth significantly more than the cost the electricity to produce them then you keep selling them until the day before the graph lines cross.
As you have ANDED the positive tests made on the 1 MW plant with the R&D on course on the E-Cat X, I am afraid you are entering into a loop of non delivering products, kind of a neverending story.
To get things clear, are you envisioning an E-Cat Y?
Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations for your US Patent.
Do you have an idea about when the report of the 350 days test on the 1 MW E-Cat will be delivered?
Cheers,
John
Way back when, I attended your September 2012 conference in Switzerland, wherein you revealed the Hot Cat. I emailed you shortly thereafter with an offer to invest my savings in your company. I was too late. You kindly responded and said,
“I thank you very much for your kind and courageous offer. I will contact you when to invest on us will not be as risky as it is now. I want not to play football with your bones.”
I think the football-bones time is rapidly drawing to a close, and I would encourage you to do a small private placement now. You can sell up to $1 million a year of stock to non-accredited (non-millionaire) investors under Rule 504, Regulation D of the Securities Act.
That would allow the hundreds (thousands?) of small investors who have been faithful followers of your adventure to be a part of this historic event. It would be a shame if the only people to profit from an early investment in your inventions are millionaire venture capitalists.
Frank Acland:
No, if the results of the test made on the 1 MW plant and the R&D on course on the E-Cat X will be positive, we will make a massive aggression of the market, to bar the action of our competitors, that are “massively” waiting for our product to copy it. Our defense will be an offense based on the legal protection of the IP against the competitors and on the competitivity that will make it very difficult for them to enter in the business. We are years ahead of them, in any sense, as far as I know from the intelligence we have collected. It will be extremely difficult to compete against us for our competitors, as big as their names might be. Much cheaper to find an agreement with us.
This is the strategy, in a nutshell.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Valerio Pensabene:
Laboratory replication for scientific purposes are not patent infringements and I am delighted to read about them. Only if it is put in commerce an apparatus, that copies one or more of the claims of our patents, our attorneys will immediately file a suit.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When you mention economies of scale, do you intend to go into high-volume production mode as soon as possible, or to gradually build up as you test the market?
Dear Andrea,
Recently you said the first E-cat X 250 kW plant will delivered in the UK (F9=positive).
Some questions about that, if I may:
1. Is E-cat X chosen because also electric energy and or light is requested by the customer, or just heat?
2. If it is just heat, is the E-cat X chosen because of its robustness and or COP in comparison of the E-cat?
3. If 2. Is no, then what is the reason to use the E-cat X?
4. Will the plant operation be subject to an extensive measuring program like for the 1 MW plant?
5. If F9=positive, when can the plant be put into operation (roughly)?
Thanks for your patience with our relentless questions.
Good luck with the 1 MW final report and the further development of E-cat X!
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea Rossi
The 250kw EcatX has about the right power output for a new electric airplane engine.
See http://www.flyingmag.com/aircraft/siemens-unveils-260-kw-electric-aircraft-motor
Any chance of making an aircraft power EcatX prototype in the current in the current R&D phase?
Thanks,
Bob
Audrey:
We are making a tremendous job and it will be so difficult to compete against us, that it will be less expensive and dangerous to find an agreement with us. We will be open to agreements as well as hard to be pushed away. We are ready. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Only when I am there personally.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Usually your comments are intelligent, mainly when they are ironical.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi.
I appreciate your insight about negativity. I am Popperian too.
Greetings
Alexvs
Dear Andrea,
Is your lab where you work staffed 24/7, or only during the hours when you are there personally?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Are you not worried of the titanic dimensions of the competitors that are looming ?
Cheers,
Audrey
Herb Gillis:
I do not know, I never used H2 fuel cells and do not know them.
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations on your recent progress with Ecat-X and on the latest replication of your effect by MFMP.
Since the Ecat-X produces electricity directly, would it be possible to couple your device with an electrolyzer and an H2 fuel cell and (starting with an initial reservoir of H2 to get started) create a completely closed system- – that does not require any external power input to run continuously?
Kind regards; HRG.
Robert Curto:
Opinions are just opinions, must be respected, positive or negative as they might be.
Also negative opinions, even with some peppery irony, can be useful for something.
By Hegel’s phenomenology, the essence of positivity is negativity.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Your pre-order is reserved and you will surely receive our proposal as soon as we’ll have ready our domestic E-Cat for sale. The number has no importance, all they who made a pre-order will receive promptly the proposal and will be free to confirm the order or cancel it. Anyway we still do not have a product with the necessary certification for domestic use.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Look Moo:
Now we’ ll start with 2 factories, one in the USA and one in Sweden, then we’ll see. We have also ready a strong network of outsourcing facilities.
It will be the market to indicate what to do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Seneca:
I work in the factory where we are working on the E-Cat X from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m.
Very human.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Josh:
Much smaller. Very much smaller.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, If you were not such a nice guy, you could have responded to Alexus with:
Thank you for your warped opinion.
Robert Curto
Ft. Lauderdale Florida
USA
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you descibe your working day now that you are not “confined” inside the containers of the 1 MW plant?
Cheers,
Seneca
Dear Mr Rossi,
How many factories and what numbers of eCats do you need to manufacture on yearly basis to cover the market demands for the coming 10 years??
Congratulations on the sale of the E-Cat X plant in the UK!
So many things happening now. Just curious, I added my name to your list right away a few years ago. What is my order # on your list for home units (when they are available), am I in the first 100? I have two requests on file with you. 🙂
Thank you,
Tom Conover
Fyodor:
I cannot answer these questions now: too premature. But allow me to say that only a non expert of the art needs a closed loop to calculate the COP.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Mr. Rossi
I hope that you are well.
1. Can you clarify if the public presentation will be of (A) the manufacturing plant or (B) the E-cat X itself?
2. If the latter, do you anticipate demonstrating it in self-looped mode. It seems like this could eliminate any arguments/controversy about calorimetry, etc?
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
The 1 MW plant made with the E-Cat X has the same dimensions of the E-Cat that made the 350 days test, or smaller?
Regards,
Josh
Frank Acland:
In this moment we cannot think about presentations. Now we have to work on the E-Cats.
Warm Regards
A.R.”
Giuseppe:
100.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Lars:
Impossible to answer now.
Warm Regards
A.R.
How much direct electricity are you planning each small module will produce?
Dear Andrea,
assuming 100 the degree of difficulty in realizing the 1MW E-Cat plant,
which may be the same value in achieving a 1 MW E-CatX plant!
Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea,
Does this mean that the presentation that you have mentioned you hope to make will be in the UK?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Mark Saker:
Yes, I think it will be possible.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
That’s brilliant news that the UK bought the first Industrial E-Cat X. Does that mean you will be making a trip to the UK for a period of time to oversee the install?
After all these years of watching from the sidelines, it would be great to come and personally shake your hand – I did after all get probably the first E-cat article in a newspaper (albeit a local paper) 🙂
I wonder whether that would be a possibility, I’m sure there are other eager UK participants – you deserve to enjoy some adulation after all the time couped up in that shipping container hehe.
James Rice:
Your comment is important.
I will be delighted to comply with what you propose, but not before having a product enough diffused in the market. Only at that point I will be sure that I do not risk to burn the savings of small investors. I still want not to play American foot-ball with the bones of the others. Our ship is still a warship, not a cruise ship. I could never forgive myself to have burnt the savings of persons that trust me. I can accept financing from professional investors, well aware of all the risks connected with us, but I cannot accept money from persons for whom a loss of their investments would make their life worse.
It is possible we will go public, but only after our E-Cats will have been well diffused in the market. Take as an example Bill Gate’s Microsoft: they went public only after their products were well diffused in the market. This is the model to follow, not to hurt people.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fred:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jimmy:
UK
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Thank you for your opinion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ian Walker:
Thank you for your insight. I have no comments to make.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Janne:
I cannot comment in positive or in negative. Our theoretical work is still on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Erik Johansson:
Yes. Leonardo
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Andrea Rossi,
I read that you are going to make a factory to produce E-Cats also in Sweden: is that true?
Regards,
Erik
Dear Andrea,
You probably cannot say too much about this, but with their recent discovery of low-energy gamma radiation on the order of 10-100 keV out of the reactor, do you think that the MFMP are on the right track in regards to your early work on the E-Cat?
Here, you’re saying with a seemingly knowing smirk that the thermalization of the gamma rays by lead is the reason (or one of them) behind the excess heat:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9mx_tB77RE
Best Regards,
Janne
Dear Andrea Rossi
I wrote the following in reply to a post by D.Grub on the matter of had you said you would run your factory using E-Cat X but I thought I would run my thoughts past you for your comment.
Building a factory usiing the products it creates is a bit chicken and egg. I would expect a certain fraction of the initial run to be put aside to migrate the plant over to E-Cat X just for testing and to show, but until you have built the factory, you have not made enough E-Cat X to run the factory!
So you would short lease power then switch over gradually. My initial guess would be 1 in 10 as a nice round figure, in reality you would run it through a spreadsheet working out how much the reactors were worth, if each of them are worth significantly more than the cost the electricity to produce them then you keep selling them until the day before the graph lines cross.
I await your thoughts. 🙂
Kind Regards Ian Walker
Dear Mr. Rossi.
As you have ANDED the positive tests made on the 1 MW plant with the R&D on course on the E-Cat X, I am afraid you are entering into a loop of non delivering products, kind of a neverending story.
To get things clear, are you envisioning an E-Cat Y?
Greetings
Alexvs
Dr Andrea Rossi
Congratulations for your US Patent.
Do you have an idea about when the report of the 350 days test on the 1 MW E-Cat will be delivered?
Cheers,
John
Dr Andrea Rossi,
In which Country is the customer who bought the first industrial E-Cat X ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Jimmy
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I totally agree upon your answer to Frank Acland. Your strategy is a masterpiece, as well as your US Patent.
Godspeed,
Fred
Dear Dr. Rossi:
Way back when, I attended your September 2012 conference in Switzerland, wherein you revealed the Hot Cat. I emailed you shortly thereafter with an offer to invest my savings in your company. I was too late. You kindly responded and said,
“I thank you very much for your kind and courageous offer. I will contact you when to invest on us will not be as risky as it is now. I want not to play football with your bones.”
I think the football-bones time is rapidly drawing to a close, and I would encourage you to do a small private placement now. You can sell up to $1 million a year of stock to non-accredited (non-millionaire) investors under Rule 504, Regulation D of the Securities Act.
That would allow the hundreds (thousands?) of small investors who have been faithful followers of your adventure to be a part of this historic event. It would be a shame if the only people to profit from an early investment in your inventions are millionaire venture capitalists.
Sincerely,
Jim Rice
Frank Acland:
No, if the results of the test made on the 1 MW plant and the R&D on course on the E-Cat X will be positive, we will make a massive aggression of the market, to bar the action of our competitors, that are “massively” waiting for our product to copy it. Our defense will be an offense based on the legal protection of the IP against the competitors and on the competitivity that will make it very difficult for them to enter in the business. We are years ahead of them, in any sense, as far as I know from the intelligence we have collected. It will be extremely difficult to compete against us for our competitors, as big as their names might be. Much cheaper to find an agreement with us.
This is the strategy, in a nutshell.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Valerio Pensabene:
Laboratory replication for scientific purposes are not patent infringements and I am delighted to read about them. Only if it is put in commerce an apparatus, that copies one or more of the claims of our patents, our attorneys will immediately file a suit.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Caro Dr Rossi:
Do all these replications of the Rossi Effect infringe your US Patent?
Valerio
Dear Andrea,
When you mention economies of scale, do you intend to go into high-volume production mode as soon as possible, or to gradually build up as you test the market?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland