You mention that the 1MW test completed on February 17th and it would not be unusual if it takes a couple of months before the ERV issues the report. Is it also possible that there were additional tests being performed, for example tests on the spent fuel(ash), that might require additional time before the report is released?
Fedir Mykhaylov:
Thank you for the link, but I think a thing like that can be used only for unmanned missions in the spacecrafts, for obvious reasons connected with the implyed ionizing radiations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Achilles:
Obviously the report will be delivered and all this mumbojumbo tango of the obscure forces or suppositions of any kind has no merit at all.
The time normally necessary for the formulation of a report based upon tens of millions of data collected in one year of test is a couple of months and the test has been completed on the 17th of February. Every person with a minimum kowledge of the matter understands that if the ERV takes a couple of months to complete his work, it is totally normal.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rodney Nicholson:
A) We found the way to do it
B) Too soon to answer, F8, F9
C) Too soon to answer, F8, F9
D) We are nt making R&D on this
E) Yes
Thank you for your kind words,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A few questions related to how best to handle the issue of what to do with with the surplus power when an E-cat’s capacity to produce energy exceeds the demand, at a particular time of day, for example?
A) If the E-cat can be simply turned on and off without ‘wasting’ fuel, that would be a very simple solution. But if that is not possible/practical/convenient, are there other solutions?
B) Plugging the unit into the main electricity supply and getting paid for the excess power would be very helpful, and would presumably require the conversion from DC to AC. But when there are a few hundred million E-cats in operation producing excess power much of the day, the large power companies are unlikely to want to accept and pay for power when they find themselves with too much generating capacity of their own, because LENR has eroded their market share.
C) Suppose you have a 30kW LENR-powered engine in your car. Could you plug it into your residence when you get home to continue generating power for the house when the vehicle is parked in the garage?
D) And may I ask if you have been making progress in research for developing E-cat units to supplant gasoline and diesel fueled engines?
E) Are you investigating innovative methods for storing the surplus energy an E-cat generates when the power produced is greater than current needs?
Thank you if you feel you feel able to respond to any of these issues, of course without disclosing competitive information.
Based on your current understanding of the Rossi Effect (as my English is not very good, I copy some of the inspiring words of Dr. Joseph Fine), can you calculate the maximum theoretical production of electricity and heat from any E-Cat system, as we can calculate from optimal Carnot-cycles ?
If so, then does the theoretical Rossi-Effect have better efficiency than Carnot, as we assume all conversions from source to electrical 100% efficient ? (no mechanical or electrical losses in motor and generator)
If my question is not clear, then the following is what I mean in numbers:
Suppose energy output of the E-Cat is 100 (kWh/h) from an electric input of 5 kWh/h
Then we have a nuclear power source that generates net 95 kWh/h.
From this 95 kWh/h, THEORETICALLY,
can be
A 95 kWh/h heat
B. 1 kWh/h electricity and 94 kWh/h heat
C. 10 kWh/h electricity and 85 kWh/h heat
D. 30 kWh/h electricity and 65 kWh/h heat
E. 47,5 kWh/h electricity and 47,5 kWh/h heat
F. 65 kWh/h electricity and 30 kWh/h heat
G. 85 kWh/h electricity and 10 kWh/h heat
H. 94 kWh/h electricity and 1 kWh/h heat
I. 95 kWh/h electricity
Up to what range (A to I) can the theoretical Rossi Effect (e.g. in a computer model) produce these energies ?
I do not expect someone to build such a device. Carnot was not held liable for the performance of the internal combustion engines).
If E-Cat (Quark) is very performant in the conversion from heat to electricty, then theoretically, could it be possible to use external heat sources (e.g. earlier produced and accumulated heat) to make electricity from ?
Robert Curto:
He,he,he… thank you for the “defense” !
The matter of fact is that I do my best with English, this wonderful language, studying it as well as I can, albeit I am aware of the fact that I will never be a Ken Follett !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, I have a comment to make to anyone who may criticize your English:
First we have to realize, Andrea Rossi was not born and raised in the USA.
He was born and raised in Italy, so English is a foreign language to him.
I think he does extremely well, making only an occasional minor mistake.
If you still have something negative to say about Dr. Rossi’s English,
I have a suggestion for you:
Go to Italy, start a blog, have thousands of people write to you in Italian.
Then be kind enough to respond to everyone in Italian.
I believe in freedom of speech, I just wish some people knew when to
shut up.
Robert Curto
Ft, Lauderdale Florida
USA
The King of Skeptiks:
Thank you for your adamant opinion.
P.S.
It’s “skeptic” , not “sceptic”: please have a knowledge at least of your kingdom !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Based on your current understanding of the Rossi Effect, and the technology available at the time, how many years ago do you think this effect could have been explored to determine if it was worthy of additional research/development?
a) Five years ago?
b) Ten years ago?
c) About 27 years ago (e.g. March 1989)?
d) Fifty years ago?
e) More than 50 years ago?
“What’s past is prologue..” (The Tempest, William Shakespeare)
Congratulations on your latest LENR theoretical discovery.
Looking forward to its publicized release.
Now that the 1MW test is over and your time is dedicated to the success of the E-Cat X at Leonardo’s lab in Miami, are you still Industrial Heat’s chief scientist?
With much respect,
Brokeeper
Gerard McEk:
Yes, it respects in full the Standard Model.
I am recovering my weight, thank you very much for your concern. My health is 100% ok.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which is the Territory controlled directly from Leonardo Corporation and its commercial licensees and agents ?
Thanks if you can answer,
Xavier
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations that you may have found the theory behind the Rossi Effect.
I am sure you don’t want to explain it now, but can you tell if is still standard physics?
You will agree that LENR in general may change the view on how things work on the sun (and maybe also in the center of the earth), so your work is now already astronomical!
Last question: Are your picking on weight already?
Good health and kind regards, Gerard
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Your progress in the understanding of the theory came also from the measurements made during the R&D on the E-Cat X ?
Thank you,
Charlotte
Dear Dr. Rossi, I still do not understand why newspapers and television do not speak about your achievements, patents and researches. Yes, there have been few cases, but the E-Cat is something so immensely important that everyone should talk about it. What is your opinion?
Regards,
Italo R.
Frank Acland:
I have made an important theoretical discover this very morning working with the E-Cat quarkX an I must talk with Prof. Cook.
About China: that issue is up to IH.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, it is my main job now: 12 hours per day go for it, between work on the books and on the prototype. Today has been special. I think I grasped in full the theory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alain Coetmeur:
1- yes, I saw it, it has been reproduced from other publications
2- no, it is an action IH made in his Territory, for which has been licensed from Leonardo Corporation
3- I cannot
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve:
I was referring to nobody in particular, just answering to the reader Regina, who said some Goliath was looming to attack us. When I say “us” I mean Leonardo Corp united with all its Licensees.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am so glad to read that the relationsip between Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat is still good !
So whom you were referring to when you said that David has not to be afraid of Goliath?
Cheers,
Steve
Dear Andrea
Congratulations for the way you and your licensees are destroying your enemies. We need yoyr production. Again congratulations for your US Patent.
Buck
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You mention that the 1MW test completed on February 17th and it would not be unusual if it takes a couple of months before the ERV issues the report. Is it also possible that there were additional tests being performed, for example tests on the spent fuel(ash), that might require additional time before the report is released?
Thank you for your response.
Sincerely,
Peter Metz
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that Leonardo Corporation will be a public company in future?
Regards,
Maggie
Fedir Mykhaylov:
Thank you for the link, but I think a thing like that can be used only for unmanned missions in the spacecrafts, for obvious reasons connected with the implyed ionizing radiations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wise Guy:
Give to the ERV about a couple of months to complete his work, to stay inside the normality in cases like this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
As I already said, these data will be delivered after the completion of the R&D on course., F8, F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Achilles:
Obviously the report will be delivered and all this mumbojumbo tango of the obscure forces or suppositions of any kind has no merit at all.
The time normally necessary for the formulation of a report based upon tens of millions of data collected in one year of test is a couple of months and the test has been completed on the 17th of February. Every person with a minimum kowledge of the matter understands that if the ERV takes a couple of months to complete his work, it is totally normal.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rodney Nicholson:
A) We found the way to do it
B) Too soon to answer, F8, F9
C) Too soon to answer, F8, F9
D) We are nt making R&D on this
E) Yes
Thank you for your kind words,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea:
A few questions related to how best to handle the issue of what to do with with the surplus power when an E-cat’s capacity to produce energy exceeds the demand, at a particular time of day, for example?
A) If the E-cat can be simply turned on and off without ‘wasting’ fuel, that would be a very simple solution. But if that is not possible/practical/convenient, are there other solutions?
B) Plugging the unit into the main electricity supply and getting paid for the excess power would be very helpful, and would presumably require the conversion from DC to AC. But when there are a few hundred million E-cats in operation producing excess power much of the day, the large power companies are unlikely to want to accept and pay for power when they find themselves with too much generating capacity of their own, because LENR has eroded their market share.
C) Suppose you have a 30kW LENR-powered engine in your car. Could you plug it into your residence when you get home to continue generating power for the house when the vehicle is parked in the garage?
D) And may I ask if you have been making progress in research for developing E-cat units to supplant gasoline and diesel fueled engines?
E) Are you investigating innovative methods for storing the surplus energy an E-cat generates when the power produced is greater than current needs?
Thank you if you feel you feel able to respond to any of these issues, of course without disclosing competitive information.
I am very glad to hear you are well.
Rodney Nicholson.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
A simple, direct question: are you sure that the ERV will deliver the report ? Or obscure forces will make him retain it ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Based on your current understanding of the Rossi Effect (as my English is not very good, I copy some of the inspiring words of Dr. Joseph Fine), can you calculate the maximum theoretical production of electricity and heat from any E-Cat system, as we can calculate from optimal Carnot-cycles ?
If so, then does the theoretical Rossi-Effect have better efficiency than Carnot, as we assume all conversions from source to electrical 100% efficient ? (no mechanical or electrical losses in motor and generator)
If my question is not clear, then the following is what I mean in numbers:
Suppose energy output of the E-Cat is 100 (kWh/h) from an electric input of 5 kWh/h
Then we have a nuclear power source that generates net 95 kWh/h.
From this 95 kWh/h, THEORETICALLY,
can be
A 95 kWh/h heat
B. 1 kWh/h electricity and 94 kWh/h heat
C. 10 kWh/h electricity and 85 kWh/h heat
D. 30 kWh/h electricity and 65 kWh/h heat
E. 47,5 kWh/h electricity and 47,5 kWh/h heat
F. 65 kWh/h electricity and 30 kWh/h heat
G. 85 kWh/h electricity and 10 kWh/h heat
H. 94 kWh/h electricity and 1 kWh/h heat
I. 95 kWh/h electricity
Up to what range (A to I) can the theoretical Rossi Effect (e.g. in a computer model) produce these energies ?
I do not expect someone to build such a device. Carnot was not held liable for the performance of the internal combustion engines).
If E-Cat (Quark) is very performant in the conversion from heat to electricty, then theoretically, could it be possible to use external heat sources (e.g. earlier produced and accumulated heat) to make electricity from ?
Curious and theoretical Regards,
Koen
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
When do you expect that the report with the results of the 352 days test will be delivered ?
Hello, Mr. Rossi.
I send to the JoNP this link that I think your readers will find useful.
With respect,
Fedor.
http://www.gizmag.com/water-nuclear-battery-radiolysis/33844/
Robert Curto:
He,he,he… thank you for the “defense” !
The matter of fact is that I do my best with English, this wonderful language, studying it as well as I can, albeit I am aware of the fact that I will never be a Ken Follett !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi, I have a comment to make to anyone who may criticize your English:
First we have to realize, Andrea Rossi was not born and raised in the USA.
He was born and raised in Italy, so English is a foreign language to him.
I think he does extremely well, making only an occasional minor mistake.
If you still have something negative to say about Dr. Rossi’s English,
I have a suggestion for you:
Go to Italy, start a blog, have thousands of people write to you in Italian.
Then be kind enough to respond to everyone in Italian.
I believe in freedom of speech, I just wish some people knew when to
shut up.
Robert Curto
Ft, Lauderdale Florida
USA
The King of Skeptiks:
Thank you for your adamant opinion.
P.S.
It’s “skeptic” , not “sceptic”: please have a knowledge at least of your kingdom !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
No, my work in Leonardo Corporation absorbs my full time, to the benefit of all our Licensees.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
I think either b) or c).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Based on your current understanding of the Rossi Effect, and the technology available at the time, how many years ago do you think this effect could have been explored to determine if it was worthy of additional research/development?
a) Five years ago?
b) Ten years ago?
c) About 27 years ago (e.g. March 1989)?
d) Fifty years ago?
e) More than 50 years ago?
“What’s past is prologue..” (The Tempest, William Shakespeare)
Timely regards,
Joseph Fine
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations on your latest LENR theoretical discovery.
Looking forward to its publicized release.
Now that the 1MW test is over and your time is dedicated to the success of the E-Cat X at Leonardo’s lab in Miami, are you still Industrial Heat’s chief scientist?
With much respect,
Brokeeper
Ing. Mchelanfelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
hello Dr. Rossi , I send an interesting article by Sifferkoll
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/a-usd-3-6-trillion-market-is-about-to-change-completely-due-to-lenr/
Anonymous:
Not so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Yes, it respects in full the Standard Model.
I am recovering my weight, thank you very much for your concern. My health is 100% ok.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
In the scientific committee of Leonardo Corporation are there also Italian scientists or engineers ?
Anonymous
Art Aini:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Luis Navarro:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Xavier:
Europe, Oceania, Africa, Asia, with exception of Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Emirates.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Which is the Territory controlled directly from Leonardo Corporation and its commercial licensees and agents ?
Thanks if you can answer,
Xavier
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Interesting article on the Guardian today in which the ex PM of Japan deems nuclear power unsafe and costly:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/mar/11/japan-naoto-kan-nuclear-power-unsafe-fukushima
The worls is ready for the E-Cats !
Luis Navarro
Mr Rossi:
The quark X Ecat does not exist and you are just talking of things that will never be put in the market.
Dear Andrea:
After the discoveries made during the R&D on the E-Cat quarkX are you making new patent applications ?
Cheers,
Art
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations that you may have found the theory behind the Rossi Effect.
I am sure you don’t want to explain it now, but can you tell if is still standard physics?
You will agree that LENR in general may change the view on how things work on the sun (and maybe also in the center of the earth), so your work is now already astronomical!
Last question: Are your picking on weight already?
Good health and kind regards, Gerard
Charlotte Sevian:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
What is important is not what the media say, it is what Leonardo Corporation and its great Team do.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Your progress in the understanding of the theory came also from the measurements made during the R&D on the E-Cat X ?
Thank you,
Charlotte
Dear Dr. Rossi, I still do not understand why newspapers and television do not speak about your achievements, patents and researches. Yes, there have been few cases, but the E-Cat is something so immensely important that everyone should talk about it. What is your opinion?
Regards,
Italo R.
Frank Acland:
I have made an important theoretical discover this very morning working with the E-Cat quarkX an I must talk with Prof. Cook.
About China: that issue is up to IH.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. A big day! You say “I think I grasped in full the theory” — has it changed very much from you paper with Norman Cook?
2. Also, do you expect that your licensee IH will manufacture E-Cats in China?
Many thanks!
Frak
Sebastian:
Yes, obviously, as everybody knows, Industrial Heat has the license to manufacture the E-Cats in its Territory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Arturo:
Yes, but together with my great Team !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, it is my main job now: 12 hours per day go for it, between work on the books and on the prototype. Today has been special. I think I grasped in full the theory.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nomozyk:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You said that Leonardo Corp will not be the only one manufacturing E-Cats.
Does that mean that one of your licensees will be manufacturing them?
Regards
Mario:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alain Coetmeur:
1- yes, I saw it, it has been reproduced from other publications
2- no, it is an action IH made in his Territory, for which has been licensed from Leonardo Corporation
3- I cannot
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck:
Thank you for your attention. I agree with you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve:
I was referring to nobody in particular, just answering to the reader Regina, who said some Goliath was looming to attack us. When I say “us” I mean Leonardo Corp united with all its Licensees.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Congratulations to you, Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat for your good work.
Nomozyk
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am so glad to read that the relationsip between Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat is still good !
So whom you were referring to when you said that David has not to be afraid of Goliath?
Cheers,
Steve
Dear Andrea
Congratulations for the way you and your licensees are destroying your enemies. We need yoyr production. Again congratulations for your US Patent.
Buck