Buck:
I hope in June to make a very important press conference in Sweden. In that occasion we’ll disclose where the E-CatX plant is.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Isaias Coberly:
Yes, also today I am very satisfied for how she is working.
I hope to make an important press conference in June in Sweden.
Yes, Prof. Norman Cook is working with me for the theoretical interpretation of the Effect, and soon will reach me in my US laboratory, because we are very close to the solution of the puzzle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Also today the E-Cat QuarkX has worked well?
Can we hope to see you in a great press conference show this masterpiece of you ?
Is Prof. Norman Cook working with you on it ?
Cheers,
Isaias
Frank Acland just asked you about your plans for putting an E-Cat X Quark system at a customer site by April. Is this the 1st E-Cat X customer you previously indicated to be in the UK? Will this system currently being built be installed in the UK?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
While all the other competitors of yours talk, you are the one that makes plants.
You are the sole worker of the LENR that merits to be invested in.
Godspeed,
Sean
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Fascinating to watch this all develop. I am very much looking forward to the report of the ERV, and the public introduction of your products.
It is logical, of course, that you would develop a standard sized unit for production, the Quark. I am a little surprised that it is 100W, which seems very small after the other units you have been using, which have generally been in the kW range.
I would assume that you are building modules to assemble groups of Quarks, probably groupings of ten, which can themselves be assembled into units of 10, giving power ratings of 1KW, 10KW, 100KW or 1MW, and so on.
Again, to extrapolate logically, one would design each module to be able to power the individual Quarks it contained, with connections for coolant flows and electricity.
Each module would fit into some sort of frame which would hold multiple modules, and would contain the control electronics and interfaces. The frame would be the base unit, the domestic e-cat, for instance.
As I imagine it, there would be three basic pieces of equipment to be assembled:
1. The 100W quarks.
2. The 1KW modules.
3. The frames to assemble the modules, in 10, 100 or 1000 KW units. The frames, in proper boxes with displays and controls, will be the actual products.
I imagine that IH and Leonardo will manufacture the quarks themselves, and assemble the final products from parts manufactured elsewhere.
So, if this is generally correct, a couple of questions.
1. When refuelling is required, will individual Quarks be replaced by the user, or will modules be replaced? This is where I get a little confused by the size of the quarks. It seems to me that they could be easily swapped out, but when you get into 100s of the little guys, that’s a lot of swapping! On the other hand, if you swap out modules, that’s going to mean connecting and disconnecting things, opportunities for wear and breakage. Maybe need a plumber or other specialist?
2. Will you sell units to be incorporated into other devices? If someone were manufacturing a self-powered vacuum cleaner or other widget, could they purchase quarks or modules to incorporate into their designs?
3. Given what you have said before, each unit will deliver an amount of power up to a rated maximum (10KW or whatever). That power will be splittable into variable amounts of electricity and heat (100% heat, 50% heat and 50% electricity, and so on). Obviously the heat will be managed through a coolant flow, into some kind of distribution system. How do you see distributing the electricity?
I would love to see e-cat technology incorporated into new product designs very soon!
All the best.
Ron
Regarding your plans for putting an E-Cat X Quark system at a customer site by April:
1. Do you have a customer who has agreed to use it?
2. Do you have a system already built that could be provided?
3. Will this system require a year-long trial period like with the 1MW plant?
4. If 3. is no, how long of a trial period would be needed?
5. Would it be possible for selected visitors to see the E-Cat X Quark working in the next few months?
You wrote: “Could e-cat low temperature heat renewable biomass including yard, vegetative, and agricultural wastes as a feedstock to produce advanced biofuel and power?”
Forget biofuels because all biofuel schemes are destructive. Using “crop waste” to make ethanol depletes the soil and accelerates erosion. Ethanol is a rotten fuel because you can’t get the water out of it, which damages engines, and it is inherently low in energy density so you lower mileage. Biodiesel also damages engines and increases repair bills, and we never want energy production to compete with food production. Synthetic fuels are OK, but when you try to mix freshly grown biology with energy production you are asking for trouble. Experiments with genetically engineered algae and bacteria to make biofuels are horribly dangerous because any monster organism you create cannot possibly be contained.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I can explain the anomaly of Ni isotopes transmutations in the E-Cat.
Please see my publications profile: http://orcid.org/0000-003-2665-4558
Sergij Begun
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Could e-cat low temperature heat renewable biomass including yard, vegetative, and agricultural wastes as a feedstock to produce advanced biofuel and power?
A similar plant could:
– Reduce wastes
– produce car fuel
– produce electric power via gas turbine
– produce heat
– without pollution!
1MW thermal should be the right size…
While you can use the Carnot cycle to convert heat to electricity using the E-Cat QuarkX (or “QuarX” ), I think you have said you do not use heat transfer fluids (such as water, super-critical CO2 etc.) to power a turbine/generator.
Thermo-electric conversion is very inefficient. Can you comment as to whether the E-Cat QuarkX produces electricity directly by emission of electrons, or by producing a flux of X-Rays/Ultraviolet photons which are then converted to a current by the photoelectric effect.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your US Patent.
For your foes it will be very hard to circumvent it.
We all wait to see your E-Cat for sale off the shelves: do not forget your Eve of New Year Dream!
Sarita
Dear Andrea Rossi
You have my best wishes for finished your work and make possible one of the greatest change on our History 🙂
Have only one question. Can we use your Produkt at Home too (big or small Produkt) and how safe ist to use it for normal users or in danger situations (Fire, Cold, under Water etc.)Thank You
Renee:
We are working very hard on the prototypes and I really hope to put in operation the first series of E-Cat quarkX in the factory of a Customer by April. We are working very hard on it in the laboratory of Leonardo Corporation. Today we made another step forward.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Please think about the possibility to help the LENR World to celebrate the 27th anniversary of the field (March 23) with a decisive victory. You could do this by publication
of the Executive Summary of the ERV Report or even better the balance energy bought vs energy sold made by the accountant of the Customer during the 350 days of the experiment as I have asked on my blog yesterday.
Wishing you a long triumphal technology march,
Thank you for taking the time and effort to continue to answer my questions about the E-Cat. While we continue waiting patiently (!) for information from the ERV report, I have another question related to the manufacture of the E-Cats. The question is: when the time comes will the E-Cats manufactured by Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat (or any other manufacturer) be the same or will they be different in some way (but possibly to the same specifications). Or perhaps I am mistaken, will only Leonardo Corporation manufacture the E-Cats? Thanks again for answering my questions.
Eernie1:
Industrial Heat has been licensed from Leonardo Corporation to manufacture the E- Cats and sell them in exclusive in its Territory, which includes also the USA.
Therefore, since I understand you are interested to a commercial activity related to the E-Cats in the USA, for this issue you must contact directly Industrial Heat.
The contact is: jvaughn@industrialheat.co
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is not clear to me from your blogs if IH also has the license to distribute and manufacture devices in their territories, that use the E-CatX technology. If not, will you reassign that license to other entities? Please consider me for at least a small territory. I have past experience in starting three successful small companies and assure you your company(Leonardo) will be satisfied with my efforts.
Investment regards.
Romy:
As everybody has seen, I always just turned a blind eye on them and I agree with you: the point is to make a product: if we make a good product the chatters will fade away, if we do not make it, the chatters are pointless.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
All the imbeciles that are making the mumbojumbotango against you are all directly or indirectly competitors of you, sometimes disguised as bloggists. Do not lose time with these guys, we know the story; don’t lose your precious time with them, just give us the E-Cat and they will disappear.
Godspeed,
Romy
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for your US Patent.
Are you still working on 200 patents of yourself ?
Cheers,
Erinn
Sean Killoren:
Thank you!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck:
I hope in June to make a very important press conference in Sweden. In that occasion we’ll disclose where the E-CatX plant is.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Isaias Coberly:
Yes, also today I am very satisfied for how she is working.
I hope to make an important press conference in June in Sweden.
Yes, Prof. Norman Cook is working with me for the theoretical interpretation of the Effect, and soon will reach me in my US laboratory, because we are very close to the solution of the puzzle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland,
Forgot to answer this:
5- YES
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Also today the E-Cat QuarkX has worked well?
Can we hope to see you in a great press conference show this masterpiece of you ?
Is Prof. Norman Cook working with you on it ?
Cheers,
Isaias
Good Day Andrea:
Frank Acland just asked you about your plans for putting an E-Cat X Quark system at a customer site by April. Is this the 1st E-Cat X customer you previously indicated to be in the UK? Will this system currently being built be installed in the UK?
@Christopher Calder
I was thinking to a plant like this:
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/04/f22/demonstration_market_transformation_russel_3423.pdf
Regards
Silvio
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
While all the other competitors of yours talk, you are the one that makes plants.
You are the sole worker of the LENR that merits to be invested in.
Godspeed,
Sean
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- it is in preparation
3- no
4- within 2016
5- yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ron Stringer:
Thank you for your intelligent insight.
I will respond when we will be ready.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Fascinating to watch this all develop. I am very much looking forward to the report of the ERV, and the public introduction of your products.
It is logical, of course, that you would develop a standard sized unit for production, the Quark. I am a little surprised that it is 100W, which seems very small after the other units you have been using, which have generally been in the kW range.
I would assume that you are building modules to assemble groups of Quarks, probably groupings of ten, which can themselves be assembled into units of 10, giving power ratings of 1KW, 10KW, 100KW or 1MW, and so on.
Again, to extrapolate logically, one would design each module to be able to power the individual Quarks it contained, with connections for coolant flows and electricity.
Each module would fit into some sort of frame which would hold multiple modules, and would contain the control electronics and interfaces. The frame would be the base unit, the domestic e-cat, for instance.
As I imagine it, there would be three basic pieces of equipment to be assembled:
1. The 100W quarks.
2. The 1KW modules.
3. The frames to assemble the modules, in 10, 100 or 1000 KW units. The frames, in proper boxes with displays and controls, will be the actual products.
I imagine that IH and Leonardo will manufacture the quarks themselves, and assemble the final products from parts manufactured elsewhere.
So, if this is generally correct, a couple of questions.
1. When refuelling is required, will individual Quarks be replaced by the user, or will modules be replaced? This is where I get a little confused by the size of the quarks. It seems to me that they could be easily swapped out, but when you get into 100s of the little guys, that’s a lot of swapping! On the other hand, if you swap out modules, that’s going to mean connecting and disconnecting things, opportunities for wear and breakage. Maybe need a plumber or other specialist?
2. Will you sell units to be incorporated into other devices? If someone were manufacturing a self-powered vacuum cleaner or other widget, could they purchase quarks or modules to incorporate into their designs?
3. Given what you have said before, each unit will deliver an amount of power up to a rated maximum (10KW or whatever). That power will be splittable into variable amounts of electricity and heat (100% heat, 50% heat and 50% electricity, and so on). Obviously the heat will be managed through a coolant flow, into some kind of distribution system. How do you see distributing the electricity?
I would love to see e-cat technology incorporated into new product designs very soon!
All the best.
Ron
Dear Andrea,
Regarding your plans for putting an E-Cat X Quark system at a customer site by April:
1. Do you have a customer who has agreed to use it?
2. Do you have a system already built that could be provided?
3. Will this system require a year-long trial period like with the 1MW plant?
4. If 3. is no, how long of a trial period would be needed?
5. Would it be possible for selected visitors to see the E-Cat X Quark working in the next few months?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Sergij Begun:
Thank you for your information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
No, we are not ready. I hope we’ll start the industrial production in 2016.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Silvio Caggia,
You wrote: “Could e-cat low temperature heat renewable biomass including yard, vegetative, and agricultural wastes as a feedstock to produce advanced biofuel and power?”
Forget biofuels because all biofuel schemes are destructive. Using “crop waste” to make ethanol depletes the soil and accelerates erosion. Ethanol is a rotten fuel because you can’t get the water out of it, which damages engines, and it is inherently low in energy density so you lower mileage. Biodiesel also damages engines and increases repair bills, and we never want energy production to compete with food production. Synthetic fuels are OK, but when you try to mix freshly grown biology with energy production you are asking for trouble. Experiments with genetically engineered algae and bacteria to make biofuels are horribly dangerous because any monster organism you create cannot possibly be contained.
Christopher Calder
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I can explain the anomaly of Ni isotopes transmutations in the E-Cat.
Please see my publications profile:
http://orcid.org/0000-003-2665-4558
Sergij Begun
Dear Andrea,
Any Quarks produced by the robots yet? (10, 100, 1000?)
Respectfully yours,
Tom
Jayjay:
I hope by June.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ilir Mehmetaj:
The domestic E-Cat has to obtain the safety certification to cover these bases.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Sarita Morphis:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Leonardo Corporation wi give detailed data about this when the preliminar R&D will have been completed.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Silvio Caggia:
No.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Could e-cat low temperature heat renewable biomass including yard, vegetative, and agricultural wastes as a feedstock to produce advanced biofuel and power?
A similar plant could:
– Reduce wastes
– produce car fuel
– produce electric power via gas turbine
– produce heat
– without pollution!
1MW thermal should be the right size…
Dear Andrea Rossi,
While you can use the Carnot cycle to convert heat to electricity using the E-Cat QuarkX (or “QuarX” ), I think you have said you do not use heat transfer fluids (such as water, super-critical CO2 etc.) to power a turbine/generator.
Thermo-electric conversion is very inefficient. Can you comment as to whether the E-Cat QuarkX produces electricity directly by emission of electrons, or by producing a flux of X-Rays/Ultraviolet photons which are then converted to a current by the photoelectric effect.
Thermal regards,
Joseph Fine
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations for your US Patent.
For your foes it will be very hard to circumvent it.
We all wait to see your E-Cat for sale off the shelves: do not forget your Eve of New Year Dream!
Sarita
Dear Andrea Rossi
You have my best wishes for finished your work and make possible one of the greatest change on our History 🙂
Have only one question. Can we use your Produkt at Home too (big or small Produkt) and how safe ist to use it for normal users or in danger situations (Fire, Cold, under Water etc.)Thank You
Dear Andrea,
When do you think you will make the presentation of the new E-Cat quarkX ?
Jayjay
Renee:
We are working very hard on the prototypes and I really hope to put in operation the first series of E-Cat quarkX in the factory of a Customer by April. We are working very hard on it in the laboratory of Leonardo Corporation. Today we made another step forward.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
When do you hope to have the new E-Cat quarkX in operation for a customer ?
Cheers,
Renee
Juny Bloom:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your kind suggestion, I will see what I can do with the agreement of all the involved parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Please think about the possibility to help the LENR World to celebrate the 27th anniversary of the field (March 23) with a decisive victory. You could do this by publication
of the Executive Summary of the ERV Report or even better the balance energy bought vs energy sold made by the accountant of the Customer during the 350 days of the experiment as I have asked on my blog yesterday.
Wishing you a long triumphal technology march,
Peter
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Still sound the E-Cat quarkX ?
Juny Bloom
Thomas Florek:
Nice work!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Metz:
So far the sole industries that can manufacture the E-Cat are Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Randy:
Is working 24/7 very well in the US Laboratory of Leonardo Corporation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can you update us about the E-Cat quarkX ?
Cheers,
Randy
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Thank you for taking the time and effort to continue to answer my questions about the E-Cat. While we continue waiting patiently (!) for information from the ERV report, I have another question related to the manufacture of the E-Cats. The question is: when the time comes will the E-Cats manufactured by Leonardo Corporation and Industrial Heat (or any other manufacturer) be the same or will they be different in some way (but possibly to the same specifications). Or perhaps I am mistaken, will only Leonardo Corporation manufacture the E-Cats? Thanks again for answering my questions.
Sincerely,
Peter Metz
Hello Andrea,
March 14, marks the 137th birthday of Albert Einstein. Several of my collaborators decided to celebrate.
https://youtu.be/HXUN1Nh15u8
Happy Einstein’s birthday!
Eernie1:
Industrial Heat has been licensed from Leonardo Corporation to manufacture the E- Cats and sell them in exclusive in its Territory, which includes also the USA.
Therefore, since I understand you are interested to a commercial activity related to the E-Cats in the USA, for this issue you must contact directly Industrial Heat.
The contact is: jvaughn@industrialheat.co
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
It is not clear to me from your blogs if IH also has the license to distribute and manufacture devices in their territories, that use the E-CatX technology. If not, will you reassign that license to other entities? Please consider me for at least a small territory. I have past experience in starting three successful small companies and assure you your company(Leonardo) will be satisfied with my efforts.
Investment regards.
Matt:
Let’s finish the R&D on course, then I will give the new data, positive or negative as they might be.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Christopher Sutcliff:
Very promising, next week will be critical for the scheduling.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
In 2012 you claimed the longest period of SSM was 2 hours (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510&cpage=57#comment-247795). In 2013 you claimed the longest period was 3 hours (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=771&cpage=5#comment-524789). In 2014 you once again claimed the longest period of SSM was 2 hours (http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=866&cpage=2#comment-1033648). Can you elaborate on this a little? Is there a theoretical basis to this or is this just what you’ve achieved so far? Have you been able to get longer periods since 2014?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the R&D on the QuarkX ?
Maggie:
If the E-Cat will hit the market, yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Metz:
I do not know. When the Report will be delivered, we will read what has been done.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Romy:
As everybody has seen, I always just turned a blind eye on them and I agree with you: the point is to make a product: if we make a good product the chatters will fade away, if we do not make it, the chatters are pointless.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
All the imbeciles that are making the mumbojumbotango against you are all directly or indirectly competitors of you, sometimes disguised as bloggists. Do not lose time with these guys, we know the story; don’t lose your precious time with them, just give us the E-Cat and they will disappear.
Godspeed,
Romy