United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

12,406 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dick Backwood:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • pg

    Dear Andrea:
    Can you say, at least, if the COP measured in the Report is higher than 15?

  • Giovanni

    Dear Andrea,
    has your ecat-q ever produced (apart from heath, electricity and light) some kind of THRUST?
    Best regards
    Giovanni

  • Svein Henrik

    Dear Andrea
    The COP of the 1-year report is interesting. If the new ECXQ is produsing the same or more electricity than it consumes, the COP is infinity. I guess the 100W of the ECXQ is net delivered energy. The only interesting questions is then related to the surpluss of heat versus electricity. This is related to R&D and from experience it will not be presented yet. Since R&D probably never will end, a mark one must be decided.
    1 Will the shelf be made in a way that so it fits for a improved version next year, and so on?
    2 Is it now possible to produce the units in a uniform quality?
    3 May a Beta edition be tested widely before commercialization?
    4 May such units be available before the symposium in Sweden?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Thomas Conover:
    He,he,he…nice movie.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Maggie:
    Yes, I can say that.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dick Backwood

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Are you measuring the radiations inside the QuarkX Cat ?
    Thanks,
    Dick

  • Thomas Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    Is this statement below accurate enough??

    Hot Topics,
    Tom

    .. You will soon have a massive production that will make worthless the work of your competitors. The report has completely resolved the certification issues for retail sales. Very soon ANYBODY will be able to buy an E-Cat and do with it what they want. Leonardo Corporation is working on it, awaiting final test results of the Quark that should be completed within two months or less. The ABB manufacturing systems will be ready when we are done with these tests. Leonardo Corporation is working strong on all fronts. Leonardo Corporation is optimistic about this time-frame. The ECat-Q is wonderful. It works. We love it!

    Frankly, the results of the one year test were too positive. was not only achieved, it was forever destroyed, abyssed even! The COP reported was so high we could not possibly consider having the numbers become public, as the sales cannot support guarantees that require “Andrea Rossi” personal attention 24 hours a day 7 days a week at hundreds, nay … thousands … of industrial sites! This would be ludicrous! The safety issues were likewise resolved – completely!

    All of you who follow this blog KNOW these answers already!

    Sit back.

    Buckle up.

    We are go for launch!

    10 … 9 … 8 … 7 … 6 …

  • Andrea Rossi

    Matt:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    No.
    A good product doesn’t need any report, but the pass parole of the Customers. The Report is important for us, for our decisions, for our evolution. Our Customers will be indirectly benefitted from it, though.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Thank you for your insight.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Gerard McEk:
    1- yes
    2- we already did with the E-Cat QuarkX
    3- we test modules of 500 W, later we’ll pile them up
    4- no, this is why we are at the preliminar R&D phase
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.
    5-

  • Matt

    I’m assuming that when you speak of an e-cat x jet engine it does not suggest that the e-cat x can produce thrust but rather it can produce electricity with a mass / energy ratio that is optimal enough to create an electric powered jet engine. Correct?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kim G. Patterson:
    1- The public is waiting for the product, not for the Report
    2- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Maggie

    Dear Andrea:
    Can you say, at least, if the COP measured in the Report is higher than 1.5 ?
    Cheers,
    Maggie

  • Kim G Patterson

    On a scale of 1-10 (10 as highest)

    1. Pending the release of ERV Summary to the public, how excited are you about its affect on the public?

    2. How Pleased are you with the reported COP in the ERV Report, now in your hand?

    Respect
    Kim

  • Gerard McEk

    Dear Andrea,
    In the past you mentioned that you hope to realize a QuarkX Jet combination in 2016.
    1. Are you progressing on that?
    2. Can you tell us when you think to start testing?
    3. At what energy level do you intend to test it?
    4. Is the QuarkX developed far enough for this application?
    Thanks and kind regards, Gerard

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    IMHO the requirement of a years testing of your device by a publically unknown agency has provided you with two advantages. (1) You were able to refine and reengineer your unit when the inevitable discovered malfunctions occurred so that a more industrial ready unit is now available. Perhaps not all the bugs have been encountered and eliminated but many probably have been.(2)The time you were given which would have been used in overseeing the production process for delivering finished commercial units enabled you to work on developing the E-CatX which has indications for a much more useful device.
    Consequential regards.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    I would think that the ERV report would be helpful in your sales and marketing strategy, as it would show an independent measurement of what E-Cat technology is capable of. Do you intend to use it in this way?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your attention.
    Our decisions do not depend from the vane rants of our enemies, whose importance for our development is, as it has always been, equal to zero.
    Whatever we do, they will always say stupidities. Besides, at this point what counts is not the discussion mumbojumbo- tango, but the massive production of the E-Cats; the report, in essence, is more important for us, for the investments decisions and the strategy of production, than for the public, who needs products, not papers.
    This having been said, I am sorry to be necessarily bound to answer you that the publication of the report will be made only after an agreement between the involved parties. About the synopsis, that is easier and will be published. I am not independent, because I depend on the contracts I have signed and the related NDA. The NDA says that I cannot give data, does not make a jerarchy of confidentiality or a distinction between what I can say and what I cannot. The breach of the NDA can have consequences.
    Again, you are too intelligent not to understand it. Nonetheless, I sympathize with your curiosity and passion on the topic.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea,

    I think your exchange with Peter Metz
    ERV synopsis in TENTHS of days is definitely NOT for your hypertensive friends. Perfect for your enemies.
    My impression is that from now the delay is useless inutile. It replaces the question of your enemies re the independence of the ERV with the question of your friends – how independent are you?
    Let’s forget even the executive summary or synopsis of the report- what harm could do if the basic data global COP, power density – typical will be known?

    Thank you,
    Peter

  • Andrea Rossi

    Claudette:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Very well, still very promising.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    Leonardo Corporation.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kandace Bushnell:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Oishi:
    Thank you for your kind words.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Will Meier:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    How is going the E-Cat Quarkx today?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Deborah Landin:
    No, because one thing is the production line of the 1 MW E-Cat tested for one year, one thing is the E-Cat QuarkX.
    They are two different lines of production and the first does not need the second.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Claudette

    Dr Rossi,
    Congratulations for the US Patent and the report of the ERV.
    Will be posible to visit a plant of the E-Cat within this year ?
    Claudette

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yung Manwarren:
    Doctorate in Nuclear Engineering.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Yung Manwarren

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Which education has the ERV that made the 350 days test of the 1 MW E-Cat ?
    Thanks,
    Yung

  • Cory Badlam

    Dear Andrea,
    If the ERV was paid by Leonardo and IH, how could he be independent ?
    Cory the Sceptic

  • Deborah Landin

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Somebody says that the E-Cat QuarkX is an excuse to delay the production of the E-Cats: is it true ?
    Deborah

  • Will Meier

    Dr Rossi:
    Congratulations for the positive report after the one year test of the 1 MW E-Cat.
    Is it possible that in Sweden you will announce the producton of the E-Cat QuarkX ?
    Godspeed,
    Will

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mcristo:
    When we will have a massive production that will make worthless the work of our competitors. Anybody will be able to buy an E-Cat and do with it what they want. We are working on it (F8).
    Leonardo Corporation is working strong on it. I am optimistic about the timeframe.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Oishi

    Hi, Andrea:
    Congratulations to you and your great Team for the successful report after the end of the test of the 1 MW plant. You made history.
    You risked your life not to abandon the plant…your success has been well merited.
    I have also been impressed from the persecution you have been tortured with in the nineties in Italy: I read your story on the beautiful book “an impossible invention” of Mats Lewan. Your resilience is unbelievable and I have infinite trust in you, waiting for the E-Cat for my house.
    Thank you for all you are doing,
    Oishi

  • Kandace Bushnell

    Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Bravo for the positive exit of the 1 year test of the E-Cat.
    Are the 1 MW plants already for sale ?
    Cheers,
    Kandace

  • mcristo

    Dear Dr. Rossi,

    It is clear the need for secrecy while a technology is in development and patents are being obtained. Even with the current External Review in progress, the report that comes could of course keep many details secret.

    But at some point in time, there must come total transparency for all the world to examine and test the technology for themselves.

    When do you think it will be possible ?

    With highest respect,

    Montecristo

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Metz:
    I meant within tens of days.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Peter Metz

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Regarding a synopsis of the ERV report when you wrote, “Yes, I will publish it within a tenth of days, anyway.” what exactly did you mean? Did you mean within ten days, or within tens of days? Still on schedule?

    Thanks.

    Sincerely,
    Peter Metz

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bob Tivnan:
    1- Yes
    2- Depends
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Bob Tivnan

    Dr. Rossi,

    1) Is there an optimal operating temperature range for the Quark X?

    2) If yes, will Leonardo design the heat transfer elements, or will you leave that for your customers?

    Thank you for aswering.

    Bob

  • Andrea Rossi

    Karl-Henrik Malmqvist:
    Thank you for your suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rodney Nicholson:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • All:

    Regarding the possible future price of crude oil. I do realize, of course, the extent of inflation. But remember that in 1997 the price of crude averaged less than $12 a barrel when there was really not very much of an oversupply – the price took no notice at all that it ‘ought’ to be higher because of inflation. Do not underestimate how low the price can eventually go, ten to twenty years from now, with an oversupply condition considerably greater than in 1997. Just my take.

    Precipitate regards,

    Rodney Nicholson.

  • Karl-Henrik Malmqvist

    Dear Andrea,
    My guess is that you now are experimenting to combine several quarks into clusters and trying to optimize the control loops (F8).
    When starting to sell products based on the quarks, have you considered that there in the price can be included a deposit for each quark? When replacing the quarks the deposit will be subtracted when handing in the depleted quarks that will be sent to Leonardo for refilling.
    By implementing a deposit and replacement system Leonardo corp (or the Licencee) will keep track of the quarks. Eg a quark kan be reloaded x times before beeing recycled.
    The deposit will keep curious byers from disassembling the depleted quarks.
    A deposit system will also add capital to Leonardo and the Licencee for the first year.
    Best Regards,
    Karl-Henrik, Sweden

  • Andrea Rossi

    Robert Curto:
    Thanks for the suggestion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Kenko:
    It will be enough to apply a time recorder.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • kenko

    Dear Mr. Rossi,

    I speculate that many applications that use E-cat Quarks will not need to be operating at full power 24/7/365.

    Are there other methods to tell when the Quark needs to replace the charge? It would seem to be inefficient to have to replace a Quark simply because some time has passed rather than the fuel is exhausted.

    TIA
    kenko

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>