Dr. Rossi,
To extend off of Steven Nicholes Karels’ recent suggestion somewhat, if Leonardo (or its partner) offered a fairly standard 120v AC (and/or 240v AC) portable power station, it could serve as a “Standardized Interface” that EV makers could work to to offer “E-Cat Onboard” (to coin a phrase) capabilities. Specifically, it could provide EV makers with the option to offer:
– “Mobile Onboard EV Charging” with some EV-Maker-tweaks to their vehicles,
– “Remote, Non-mobile Charging” with no tweaks to their vehicles and
– “Home-Residence EV Charging” to simplify at-home charger installation issues.
Plus, a 120v/240v AC Portable Power Station, based on an E-Cat, is essentially an Universal Widget– it’s usable in hundreds of different home/remote/industrial applications
Axil, your explanation is very interesting but in the max EVO size explanation as a different grow of volume Vs surface I think you are using the wrong way.
Volume and surface are different physical quantities and can’t be compared.
In a balloon there is the outward pressure from the gas and the inward pressure derived from the surface tension. They are both pressures and they can be compared.
The surface tension becomes an inward pressure thanks to the curvature of the balloon.
As the balloon grows the curvature lower and the surface tension to generate the same inward pressure grows.
Until the balloon can’t sustain the required tension anymore and it pops.
I think it’s about the same thing in other context as EVO
Giuliana:
I don’t think it will affect much our activity, albeit I hope for the elimination of custom fees everywhere: I think competitivity should be at the base of the selection.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When Dr Rossi says “in phase” he means the polariton is or is becoming coherent. When he says that the polariton is “not in phase” he means that the polariton which is a compound particle (like the proton which is composed of other more fundamental particles) has broken apart into its constituent parts that being the electron and the photon. When this breakup happens, both the electron and the photon have the same energy with the electron having a very high energy of .95C and the photon having a wavelength of ultraviolet A (UVA) light.
The polariton breakup is an explosion called a Bosenova
Implosion and explosion of a Bose-Einstein condensate “Bosenova”
The polariton converts the photon which is a boson into an electron when the photon absorbs the properties of the electron, this happens when the electron and photon are in phase. When the BEC which is an aggregation of polaritons explode, the BEC is forced to be out of phase.
Rossi leaves unsaid that “out of phase” means BEC explosion.
Look at the VEGA post so that you may beleive that the EVO explodes to produce energy.
These explosions are detected on Dr Rossi’s oscilloscope as sharp voltage spikes as trillions of electrons explode out of the BEC at near light speed.
This is a video of the BECs exploding. in a flash of light in the Vega experiment. Those explosions are producing trillions of high energy electons.
The EVO explodes due to instability of the condensate (EVO) which happens when the domain wall that encloses the EVO can no longer contain the volume of the EVO. This happens because the surface of the domain wall goes as R^2 and the volume of the EVO goes as R^3 where R is the radius of the EVO. R^3 will always grow faster than R^2. This geometrical relationship puts a hard limit on the maximum size of the growth the condensate (AKA EVO).
The AI will explain better than me as follows:
The statement is generally correct, explaining why volume grows faster than surface area as an object increases in size, using the specific example of an evolving object (EVO) with a domain wall.
Here’s a breakdown:
Surface Area of a Domain Wall: The domain wall, often visualized as a boundary separating regions with different properties (like magnetic domains), has a surface area. In a simplified, spherical EVO model, the surface area of this domain wall scales with the square of the radius (R), i.e., proportional to R^2.
Volume of an EVO: The volume of a spherical EVO scales with the cube of the radius (R), i.e., proportional to R^3.
Different Growth Rates: Because the volume scales with R^3 and the surface area scales with R^2, the volume will always increase at a faster rate than the surface area as the radius (R) increases.
Implications for EVOs: This difference in growth rates has important consequences for the evolution of objects with domain walls. As an EVO grows:
Surface tension effects weaken relative to volume: The domain wall’s surface tension, which tends to minimize the surface area, will become less influential compared to the energy associated with the volume.
The volume of the EVO dominates: The volume of the EVO will become more important in determining the overall behavior and dynamics of the object as it expands.
In simpler terms: Imagine inflating a balloon (a simple example of an EVO). The surface area of the balloon increases as you blow air into it, but the amount of air (the volume) increases much more rapidly. This demonstrates how the volume grows faster than the surface area, even in a basic example. The same principle applies to more complex EVOs with domain walls, affecting their overall evolution.
——————–
There is a confusing complication in that there are two types of polaritons, bright polaritons and dark polaritons. The bright polaritons will constantly produce light while the EVO is alive and is fed energy into the EVO via pumping a EMF waveform into it. It is the dark EVOs that are the type of particle that produces the EVO explosion. Dr. Rossi has used the constant production of light that are produced by the bright polaritons in his light product. Dr Rossi cut the LED out of the bulb so that he may exposed the plasma to be reflected by the parabolic reflector of the bulb E-Cat SKLep SSM .
I apply the AI for those who want more technical detail
There are generally two types of polaritons considered, known as bright polaritons and dark polaritons, specifically in the context of systems with strong light-matter coupling, such as in microcavities.
1. Bright Polaritons:
Definition: These are the polariton states that are strongly coupled to light and can therefore be directly excited and observed using optical techniques.
Origin: They typically arise from the strong coupling of a cavity photon mode with an optically allowed (bright) exciton transition.
Properties:
They have a significant photonic component, which means they inherit the ability to propagate and interact with light.
They exhibit a characteristic “avoided crossing” in their dispersion relation, demonstrating the strong light-matter coupling.
They can be used to study phenomena such as polariton condensation and lasing.
2. Dark Polaritons:
Definition: These polariton states do not directly couple to light and cannot be easily excited or observed optically.
Origin: They typically arise from the coupling of a cavity photon mode with optically forbidden (dark) exciton transitions or other non-radiative excitations.
Properties:
They are predominantly matter-like and possess a stronger excitonic component.
They can act as a reservoir for energy and particles in the system, potentially influencing the behavior of bright polaritons.
Their presence and interactions can affect the light-matter coupling strength and the dynamics of the bright polaritons.
Key differences:
Optical Accessibility: Bright polaritons are directly accessible via optical means, while dark polaritons are not.
Composition: Bright polaritons have a larger photonic component, while dark polaritons have a larger excitonic (matter – electron) component.
Role in Dynamics: Bright polaritons are the ones that typically participate in optical phenomena like condensation and lasing, while dark polaritons can play a significant role in influencing those dynamics indirectly.
Understanding the interplay between bright and dark polaritons is crucial for manipulating and utilizing polaritonic systems for various applications, including quantum technologies and optoelectronics.
In response to my Tesla Charging post, you posted
“The Ecat can be connected with a car model only by the manufacturer of it,”
The proposed concept has an eCat NGU modules driving an inverter that drives a Tesla Mobile Connecter. The output cable of the Mobile Connecter is a Tesla NAS connector that plugs into the charging connector on the Tesla.
Whether the source of power is a standard 115 VAC, 15 Amp circuit wall outlet, or the inverter makes no difference to the Tesla Mobile Connector.
The special feature was lowering the Tesla’s draw to 5 Amps, so that the Tesla Mobile Connector will draw no more that 600 Watts from the 700 Watt capable inverter. The 700 Watt inverter will draw no more that 700 Watts from the NGU modules, i.e., 7 each 100W NGU modules running in parallel and outputting 12 VDC.
My Tesla has the ability to lower the charging current requirement to as low as 5 Amps. With a charging system at 120 VAC, that would be a charging rate of 600W.
For Urban use, where parking spaces are extremely limited and access to charging stations is problematic, the use of an onboard charger would be desirable.
However, eCat NGU devices are expensive. What configuration might be commercially attractive?
I suggest a 700W NGU power unit(s) that drives a 700W pure sine wave inverter that in turn drives a Tesla Mobile Charger would be ideal.
Assuming the unit is plugged when not driving, about 22 hours per day would be available for charging. This would yield about 13 kW-hrs of charge per day.
With an efficiency of about 250 W/mile for a Tesla, would yield a daily driving range of about 50 miles per day. This is sufficient for most urban daily commutes.
7 100W NGU units will cost about $1,750 USD. The inverter is about $100 USD.
1. A 3000 watt ECAT consuming maximum amperage with a constant load is at what temperature?
Ambient being at 20C
2.Does this temperature correspond to all wattages?
The amount of electricity needed to power the world’s data centres is expected to double in the next five years, according to an International Energy Agency (IEA) report.
Most of the increase is being driven by the development and use of increasingly powerful AI models.
By 2030, data centres could consume 945TWh (terawatt hours) of electricity each year, the report found – three times more than the entire UK.
Dear Readers,
I discovered that to unserstand the paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
it is necessary to read it at least three times to absorb the core of Rossi’s work; Napoleon used to say ” …to understand in depth a book you must read it three times: the first you understand the length, the second the width and only after the third you understand the depth…”
FF
Dearest Andrea.
Yesterday I happened to read a newspaper article about the fact that, at the end of 2024, there were 6,471
patents classified under the Invention Secrecy Act chapter 17 sec.181-182-183-184. Especially
concerning the energy issue.
What do you think about it?
Thanks
To all e-cat believers,
we observe from a distance and mostly only perceive digital messages.
After our research, we believe that the ideas are true and we have pre-ordered at least one E-Cat variant.
All we can do is wait.
In support, I express my hope in a daily line of prayer.
“Great God, grant that the E-Cat pre-orders become deliveries this year.”
May this be an inspiration for some of you to express your hope and encouragement.
Many greetings to all those who have also been waiting years for this.
Dieter
Dear Andrea,
with the introduction of the Ecat also the construction sector, both civil and industrial, and the plant engineering sector in general, will have a significant impact. Surely, over time, household appliances and electrical equipment in general will be produced with their own embedded Ecat, this will eliminate or reduce the need for electrical and heating systems, lowering the production costs of houses.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
I’m excited to see you are still very hard at work. I’ve been following E-CAT for quite a number of years. I believe my first awareness was about 2005. It was much larger than recent pictures I’ve seen. I’ve already pre-ordered and look forward to shipments as soon as possible/avaialble (2025). Looking forward to arrival at my door. May your launch and shipments be abundantly succsssful.
Hello Dr. Rossi,
you wrote the ecats will also be produced in Europe. Do you meant the EU or could it be i.e. Serbia, Belarus, Russia..?
Or can you already proclaim in which country?
Best regards
R.Zimmermann
Dear Andrea
Your answer to Italo R. is what we followers like to hear.
I have a question:
When the E-Cat is ready for delivery, will 3rd party tests from some of the world’s renowned laboratories also be performed and presented?
Best regards: Svein
Dear Andrea,
Just to inform you that I’m still following your progress on this page closely, but I haven’t commented anything lately, for the natural reason that as your company approaches market entry, the ability of an outsider without access to restricted information to give useful advice approaches zero. Once the product is in the market, the situation will again be different.
Best regards, /pekka
Firstly I must commend your resiliense and spirit in bringing your life project forward, impressive!
I will appreciate it if you can commment on the following questions (sorry if these were already asked, I did not find though)
1. The maximum continious current for the 10 Watts 12 VDC cell is around 0.83 Ampere, correct?.
2. How precise is the shut-off (over)current ? Iow: Is there a given overload % for shut-off?
3. What is the minimum current (in amperes) before the cell shuts off?
4. What is/are the most efficient (best) operation mode(s) for the cell?
5. Is the output voltage clean continous DC or does it have “noise” or being pulsed DC in some form?
CARO ANDREA GIANNINO DA CRES TI SALUTA CON TANTA TANTA SIMPATIA E TI INVITA ( ASSIEME A CHI VUOI TU ) A VENIRE ; SARETE MIEI OSPITI ; QUI. DA. ME A ” CRES ”
Vhttps://www.cres-travel.com/kuce/kuca-lungomare-2
English:
Dear Andrea,
you are invited to spend your Easter Holidays my guest at Cres
Italo R.:
Thank you for your insight.
Our mission is to make the Ecat hit the market: this is the sole issue our Team presently are concentrating all our efforts upon.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
GEORGE PRAZAK:
1- the power system is conserved, the Twizy has been returned to its owner
2, 3, 4- depends on the specific situations
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. Is the Latina TWIZY powered by the Ecat still functioning with the generator?
2. Can the ECAT run continually or is it limited to a duty cycle?
3. If limited; is it possible to run at decreased amperage continually?
4. Will the ECAT cycle off and on if a duty cycle is warranted ?
Dr. Rossi,
The global geopolitical landscape is becoming increasingly intertwined with energy issues, as access to resources and energy security play a pivotal role in shaping international relations.
Many conflicts—whether military or economic—are driven, at least in part, by competition for energy resources.
The emergence of disruptive technologies like the E-Cat, which promises clean and potentially unlimited energy, could profoundly transform this dynamic.
If the E-Cat achieves commercial viability and widespread adoption (potentially as early as this year), it could significantly shift the balance of power in global energy markets.
Nations heavily reliant on fossil fuels may face economic and strategic upheavals as demand for traditional energy sources diminishes.
Conversely, countries investing in innovative technologies could gain a competitive edge by reducing their dependence on oil and gas imports and exports. Moreover, the availability of sustainable and affordable energy on a global scale could reduce resource-driven conflicts, foster economic growth in disadvantaged regions, and accelerate efforts to combat climate change.
Nevertheless, such transformative change would not come without challenges.
Established energy industries might resist disruption, while geopolitical tensions could arise as nations compete for control over intellectual property or manufacturing capabilities related to technologies like the E-Cat.
Ultimately, if successfully implemented, the E-Cat has the potential to redefine not only energy systems but also the broader framework of international relations.
Surely you are aware of these implications and have reflected deeply on them.
Could you share your thoughts on this?
Dr Rossi,
I am not surprised to read that Ruby, as many others, have replicated the experiment studying the paper http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
as well as I am not surprised this to be the most read publication of Researchgate, a collection of millions of scientific publications from all the world.
Cheers
Ambrogio
RA:
Although the custom situation is a bit confusing so far, anyway the Ecats for the USA will be made in the USA, the Ecats for Europe will be manufactured in Europe and the Ecats for Asia will be manufactured in Asia, therefore I suppose that the Ecats should not be harassed by the new customs, but I can’t guarantee, because the consequences of new taxes do not depend on us.
About the custom code, I don’t think it will be changed, it will still be the one for the electricity/heat generators.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buongiorno dott. Rossi, vista la brutta piega che sta prendendo la situazione dei dazi per l’Europa, ritiene che il suo prodotto possa essere sottoposto a sanzioni con un sovrapprezzo per chi lo acquista? Esiste già un codice doganale sul quale fare riferimento?
In altre parole, ritiene che ai costi di spedizione si possa aggiungere una tassazione a sorpresa per gli acquirenti?
Oppure il prodotto potrà essere prodotto, assemblato e distribuito in Europa da una realtà già attiva e funzionante all’interno della comunità europea?
La ringrazio in anticipo se potrà rispondere. Le auguro tutto il successo che merita e mi auguro di ricevere il suo prodotto entro la fine dell’anno.
Cordialità/RA
Good morning Dr. Rossi, given the bad turn the duty situation is taking for Europe, do you think that your product may be subject to penalties with a surcharge for those who buy it? Is there already a customs code to refer to?
In other words, do you think that surprise taxation can be added to the shipping costs for buyers?
Or will the product be able to be produced, assembled and distributed in Europe by a company already up and running within the European community?
Thank you in advance if you can respond. I wish you all the success you deserve and look forward to receiving your product by the end of the year. Best regards
Dear Dr. Rossi,
can you say something about the ownership structure of the company that will produce the ecat? Is it a concern? Who owns it? A financial group, i.e. many super-rich people? Or a single super-rich person? State-owned? Other?
Best regards
B.Walz
LarryG:
The Ecat modules have a floating insulation, therefore normally do not need to be connected with the ground, but in some cases ( for example connection with apparatuses that are grounded to the grid ) it is necessary the connection with the ground; in the manual it will be explained when and if a ground connection is necessary; in this cases the connection to the ground must be made by a certified electrician, because an erroneous connection would be dangerous.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
WaltC:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
To extend off of Steven Nicholes Karels’ recent suggestion somewhat, if Leonardo (or its partner) offered a fairly standard 120v AC (and/or 240v AC) portable power station, it could serve as a “Standardized Interface” that EV makers could work to to offer “E-Cat Onboard” (to coin a phrase) capabilities. Specifically, it could provide EV makers with the option to offer:
– “Mobile Onboard EV Charging” with some EV-Maker-tweaks to their vehicles,
– “Remote, Non-mobile Charging” with no tweaks to their vehicles and
– “Home-Residence EV Charging” to simplify at-home charger installation issues.
Plus, a 120v/240v AC Portable Power Station, based on an E-Cat, is essentially an Universal Widget– it’s usable in hundreds of different home/remote/industrial applications
Best Wishes,
WaltC
Axil, your explanation is very interesting but in the max EVO size explanation as a different grow of volume Vs surface I think you are using the wrong way.
Volume and surface are different physical quantities and can’t be compared.
In a balloon there is the outward pressure from the gas and the inward pressure derived from the surface tension. They are both pressures and they can be compared.
The surface tension becomes an inward pressure thanks to the curvature of the balloon.
As the balloon grows the curvature lower and the surface tension to generate the same inward pressure grows.
Until the balloon can’t sustain the required tension anymore and it pops.
I think it’s about the same thing in other context as EVO
Giuliana:
I don’t think it will affect much our activity, albeit I hope for the elimination of custom fees everywhere: I think competitivity should be at the base of the selection.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When Dr Rossi says “in phase” he means the polariton is or is becoming coherent. When he says that the polariton is “not in phase” he means that the polariton which is a compound particle (like the proton which is composed of other more fundamental particles) has broken apart into its constituent parts that being the electron and the photon. When this breakup happens, both the electron and the photon have the same energy with the electron having a very high energy of .95C and the photon having a wavelength of ultraviolet A (UVA) light.
The polariton breakup is an explosion called a Bosenova
Implosion and explosion of a Bose-Einstein condensate “Bosenova”
https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2001/03/implosion-and-explosion-bose-einstein-condensate-bosenova
The polariton converts the photon which is a boson into an electron when the photon absorbs the properties of the electron, this happens when the electron and photon are in phase. When the BEC which is an aggregation of polaritons explode, the BEC is forced to be out of phase.
Rossi leaves unsaid that “out of phase” means BEC explosion.
Look at the VEGA post so that you may beleive that the EVO explodes to produce energy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VuO7iYzyT8&t=210s
These explosions are detected on Dr Rossi’s oscilloscope as sharp voltage spikes as trillions of electrons explode out of the BEC at near light speed.
This is a video of the BECs exploding. in a flash of light in the Vega experiment. Those explosions are producing trillions of high energy electons.
The EVO explodes due to instability of the condensate (EVO) which happens when the domain wall that encloses the EVO can no longer contain the volume of the EVO. This happens because the surface of the domain wall goes as R^2 and the volume of the EVO goes as R^3 where R is the radius of the EVO. R^3 will always grow faster than R^2. This geometrical relationship puts a hard limit on the maximum size of the growth the condensate (AKA EVO).
The AI will explain better than me as follows:
The statement is generally correct, explaining why volume grows faster than surface area as an object increases in size, using the specific example of an evolving object (EVO) with a domain wall.
Here’s a breakdown:
Surface Area of a Domain Wall: The domain wall, often visualized as a boundary separating regions with different properties (like magnetic domains), has a surface area. In a simplified, spherical EVO model, the surface area of this domain wall scales with the square of the radius (R), i.e., proportional to R^2.
Volume of an EVO: The volume of a spherical EVO scales with the cube of the radius (R), i.e., proportional to R^3.
Different Growth Rates: Because the volume scales with R^3 and the surface area scales with R^2, the volume will always increase at a faster rate than the surface area as the radius (R) increases.
Implications for EVOs: This difference in growth rates has important consequences for the evolution of objects with domain walls. As an EVO grows:
Surface tension effects weaken relative to volume: The domain wall’s surface tension, which tends to minimize the surface area, will become less influential compared to the energy associated with the volume.
The volume of the EVO dominates: The volume of the EVO will become more important in determining the overall behavior and dynamics of the object as it expands.
In simpler terms: Imagine inflating a balloon (a simple example of an EVO). The surface area of the balloon increases as you blow air into it, but the amount of air (the volume) increases much more rapidly. This demonstrates how the volume grows faster than the surface area, even in a basic example. The same principle applies to more complex EVOs with domain walls, affecting their overall evolution.
——————–
There is a confusing complication in that there are two types of polaritons, bright polaritons and dark polaritons. The bright polaritons will constantly produce light while the EVO is alive and is fed energy into the EVO via pumping a EMF waveform into it. It is the dark EVOs that are the type of particle that produces the EVO explosion. Dr. Rossi has used the constant production of light that are produced by the bright polaritons in his light product. Dr Rossi cut the LED out of the bulb so that he may exposed the plasma to be reflected by the parabolic reflector of the bulb E-Cat SKLep SSM .
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jcNdQiagJgU
I apply the AI for those who want more technical detail
There are generally two types of polaritons considered, known as bright polaritons and dark polaritons, specifically in the context of systems with strong light-matter coupling, such as in microcavities.
1. Bright Polaritons:
Definition: These are the polariton states that are strongly coupled to light and can therefore be directly excited and observed using optical techniques.
Origin: They typically arise from the strong coupling of a cavity photon mode with an optically allowed (bright) exciton transition.
Properties:
They have a significant photonic component, which means they inherit the ability to propagate and interact with light.
They exhibit a characteristic “avoided crossing” in their dispersion relation, demonstrating the strong light-matter coupling.
They can be used to study phenomena such as polariton condensation and lasing.
2. Dark Polaritons:
Definition: These polariton states do not directly couple to light and cannot be easily excited or observed optically.
Origin: They typically arise from the coupling of a cavity photon mode with optically forbidden (dark) exciton transitions or other non-radiative excitations.
Properties:
They are predominantly matter-like and possess a stronger excitonic component.
They can act as a reservoir for energy and particles in the system, potentially influencing the behavior of bright polaritons.
Their presence and interactions can affect the light-matter coupling strength and the dynamics of the bright polaritons.
Key differences:
Optical Accessibility: Bright polaritons are directly accessible via optical means, while dark polaritons are not.
Composition: Bright polaritons have a larger photonic component, while dark polaritons have a larger excitonic (matter – electron) component.
Role in Dynamics: Bright polaritons are the ones that typically participate in optical phenomena like condensation and lasing, while dark polaritons can play a significant role in influencing those dynamics indirectly.
Understanding the interplay between bright and dark polaritons is crucial for manipulating and utilizing polaritonic systems for various applications, including quantum technologies and optoelectronics.
Dr Rossi,
What do you think about the new customs policy around the world ?
Best
Giuliana
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
In response to my Tesla Charging post, you posted
“The Ecat can be connected with a car model only by the manufacturer of it,”
The proposed concept has an eCat NGU modules driving an inverter that drives a Tesla Mobile Connecter. The output cable of the Mobile Connecter is a Tesla NAS connector that plugs into the charging connector on the Tesla.
Whether the source of power is a standard 115 VAC, 15 Amp circuit wall outlet, or the inverter makes no difference to the Tesla Mobile Connector.
The special feature was lowering the Tesla’s draw to 5 Amps, so that the Tesla Mobile Connector will draw no more that 600 Watts from the 700 Watt capable inverter. The 700 Watt inverter will draw no more that 700 Watts from the NGU modules, i.e., 7 each 100W NGU modules running in parallel and outputting 12 VDC.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
The Ecat can be connected with a car model only by the manufacturer of it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A Tesla Onboard Charging System
My Tesla has the ability to lower the charging current requirement to as low as 5 Amps. With a charging system at 120 VAC, that would be a charging rate of 600W.
For Urban use, where parking spaces are extremely limited and access to charging stations is problematic, the use of an onboard charger would be desirable.
However, eCat NGU devices are expensive. What configuration might be commercially attractive?
I suggest a 700W NGU power unit(s) that drives a 700W pure sine wave inverter that in turn drives a Tesla Mobile Charger would be ideal.
Assuming the unit is plugged when not driving, about 22 hours per day would be available for charging. This would yield about 13 kW-hrs of charge per day.
With an efficiency of about 250 W/mile for a Tesla, would yield a daily driving range of about 50 miles per day. This is sufficient for most urban daily commutes.
7 100W NGU units will cost about $1,750 USD. The inverter is about $100 USD.
Thoughts?
Daniel G. Zavela:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
George Prazak:
The answers depend on the design of the heater,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DR.ROSSI:
1. A 3000 watt ECAT consuming maximum amperage with a constant load is at what temperature?
Ambient being at 20C
2.Does this temperature correspond to all wattages?
Dear Dr.Rossi,
FYI
The amount of electricity needed to power the world’s data centres is expected to double in the next five years, according to an International Energy Agency (IEA) report.
Most of the increase is being driven by the development and use of increasingly powerful AI models.
By 2030, data centres could consume 945TWh (terawatt hours) of electricity each year, the report found – three times more than the entire UK.
https://news.sky.com/story/amount-of-electricity-needed-to-power-worlds-data-centres-expected-to-double-in-five-years-13345515
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Dear Readers,
I discovered that to unserstand the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
it is necessary to read it at least three times to absorb the core of Rossi’s work; Napoleon used to say ” …to understand in depth a book you must read it three times: the first you understand the length, the second the width and only after the third you understand the depth…”
FF
Art B:
Eventually it is possible
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dieter Zoeller:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gian Luca:
We are not involved in that issue,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dearest Andrea.
Yesterday I happened to read a newspaper article about the fact that, at the end of 2024, there were 6,471
patents classified under the Invention Secrecy Act chapter 17 sec.181-182-183-184. Especially
concerning the energy issue.
What do you think about it?
Thanks
To all e-cat believers,
we observe from a distance and mostly only perceive digital messages.
After our research, we believe that the ideas are true and we have pre-ordered at least one E-Cat variant.
All we can do is wait.
In support, I express my hope in a daily line of prayer.
“Great God, grant that the E-Cat pre-orders become deliveries this year.”
May this be an inspiration for some of you to express your hope and encouragement.
Many greetings to all those who have also been waiting years for this.
Dieter
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Will all the factories being set up to produce E-Cats be powered by E-Cats?
Giuseppe Censorio:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
with the introduction of the Ecat also the construction sector, both civil and industrial, and the plant engineering sector in general, will have a significant impact. Surely, over time, household appliances and electrical equipment in general will be produced with their own embedded Ecat, this will eliminate or reduce the need for electrical and heating systems, lowering the production costs of houses.
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Kevin L. Johnson:
Thank you for your support,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr. Rossi,
I’m excited to see you are still very hard at work. I’ve been following E-CAT for quite a number of years. I believe my first awareness was about 2005. It was much larger than recent pictures I’ve seen. I’ve already pre-ordered and look forward to shipments as soon as possible/avaialble (2025). Looking forward to arrival at my door. May your launch and shipments be abundantly succsssful.
Kevin
R.Zimmermann:
It will be in EU,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi,
you wrote the ecats will also be produced in Europe. Do you meant the EU or could it be i.e. Serbia, Belarus, Russia..?
Or can you already proclaim in which country?
Best regards
R.Zimmermann
Svein:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Your answer to Italo R. is what we followers like to hear.
I have a question:
When the E-Cat is ready for delivery, will 3rd party tests from some of the world’s renowned laboratories also be performed and presented?
Best regards: Svein
Viggo:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1- yes
2- no
3- 0.05 A
4- none in particular
5- clean
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
I understand,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just to inform you that I’m still following your progress on this page closely, but I haven’t commented anything lately, for the natural reason that as your company approaches market entry, the ability of an outsider without access to restricted information to give useful advice approaches zero. Once the product is in the market, the situation will again be different.
Best regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea,
Firstly I must commend your resiliense and spirit in bringing your life project forward, impressive!
I will appreciate it if you can commment on the following questions (sorry if these were already asked, I did not find though)
1. The maximum continious current for the 10 Watts 12 VDC cell is around 0.83 Ampere, correct?.
2. How precise is the shut-off (over)current ? Iow: Is there a given overload % for shut-off?
3. What is the minimum current (in amperes) before the cell shuts off?
4. What is/are the most efficient (best) operation mode(s) for the cell?
5. Is the output voltage clean continous DC or does it have “noise” or being pulsed DC in some form?
Best of luck forward!
Thank you!
Kind regards
Viggo
Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
Thank you for your kindness, but I am not going to have any holidays in this period,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CARO ANDREA GIANNINO DA CRES TI SALUTA CON TANTA TANTA SIMPATIA E TI INVITA ( ASSIEME A CHI VUOI TU ) A VENIRE ; SARETE MIEI OSPITI ; QUI. DA. ME A ” CRES ”
Vhttps://www.cres-travel.com/kuce/kuca-lungomare-2
English:
Dear Andrea,
you are invited to spend your Easter Holidays my guest at Cres
Italo R.:
Thank you for your insight.
Our mission is to make the Ecat hit the market: this is the sole issue our Team presently are concentrating all our efforts upon.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
GEORGE PRAZAK:
1- the power system is conserved, the Twizy has been returned to its owner
2, 3, 4- depends on the specific situations
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DR. ROSSI:
1. Is the Latina TWIZY powered by the Ecat still functioning with the generator?
2. Can the ECAT run continually or is it limited to a duty cycle?
3. If limited; is it possible to run at decreased amperage continually?
4. Will the ECAT cycle off and on if a duty cycle is warranted ?
Thanking you.
Dr. Rossi,
The global geopolitical landscape is becoming increasingly intertwined with energy issues, as access to resources and energy security play a pivotal role in shaping international relations.
Many conflicts—whether military or economic—are driven, at least in part, by competition for energy resources.
The emergence of disruptive technologies like the E-Cat, which promises clean and potentially unlimited energy, could profoundly transform this dynamic.
If the E-Cat achieves commercial viability and widespread adoption (potentially as early as this year), it could significantly shift the balance of power in global energy markets.
Nations heavily reliant on fossil fuels may face economic and strategic upheavals as demand for traditional energy sources diminishes.
Conversely, countries investing in innovative technologies could gain a competitive edge by reducing their dependence on oil and gas imports and exports. Moreover, the availability of sustainable and affordable energy on a global scale could reduce resource-driven conflicts, foster economic growth in disadvantaged regions, and accelerate efforts to combat climate change.
Nevertheless, such transformative change would not come without challenges.
Established energy industries might resist disruption, while geopolitical tensions could arise as nations compete for control over intellectual property or manufacturing capabilities related to technologies like the E-Cat.
Ultimately, if successfully implemented, the E-Cat has the potential to redefine not only energy systems but also the broader framework of international relations.
Surely you are aware of these implications and have reflected deeply on them.
Could you share your thoughts on this?
Kind Regards,
Italo R.
Ambrogio:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I am not surprised to read that Ruby, as many others, have replicated the experiment studying the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
as well as I am not surprised this to be the most read publication of Researchgate, a collection of millions of scientific publications from all the world.
Cheers
Ambrogio
RA:
Although the custom situation is a bit confusing so far, anyway the Ecats for the USA will be made in the USA, the Ecats for Europe will be manufactured in Europe and the Ecats for Asia will be manufactured in Asia, therefore I suppose that the Ecats should not be harassed by the new customs, but I can’t guarantee, because the consequences of new taxes do not depend on us.
About the custom code, I don’t think it will be changed, it will still be the one for the electricity/heat generators.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buongiorno dott. Rossi, vista la brutta piega che sta prendendo la situazione dei dazi per l’Europa, ritiene che il suo prodotto possa essere sottoposto a sanzioni con un sovrapprezzo per chi lo acquista? Esiste già un codice doganale sul quale fare riferimento?
In altre parole, ritiene che ai costi di spedizione si possa aggiungere una tassazione a sorpresa per gli acquirenti?
Oppure il prodotto potrà essere prodotto, assemblato e distribuito in Europa da una realtà già attiva e funzionante all’interno della comunità europea?
La ringrazio in anticipo se potrà rispondere. Le auguro tutto il successo che merita e mi auguro di ricevere il suo prodotto entro la fine dell’anno.
Cordialità/RA
Good morning Dr. Rossi, given the bad turn the duty situation is taking for Europe, do you think that your product may be subject to penalties with a surcharge for those who buy it? Is there already a customs code to refer to?
In other words, do you think that surprise taxation can be added to the shipping costs for buyers?
Or will the product be able to be produced, assembled and distributed in Europe by a company already up and running within the European community?
Thank you in advance if you can respond. I wish you all the success you deserve and look forward to receiving your product by the end of the year. Best regards
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Is the E-Cat able to charge batteries and other electronics via a USB-C connector?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
B. Walz:
Sorry, this information so far is restricted,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
can you say something about the ownership structure of the company that will produce the ecat? Is it a concern? Who owns it? A financial group, i.e. many super-rich people? Or a single super-rich person? State-owned? Other?
Best regards
B.Walz
Ruby:
Please read the paragraph 5 of the publication you cited,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
I am studying the paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Which instrumentation is necessary to replicate the experiment ?
Thank you if you can answer,
Ruby
LarryG:
The Ecat modules have a floating insulation, therefore normally do not need to be connected with the ground, but in some cases ( for example connection with apparatuses that are grounded to the grid ) it is necessary the connection with the ground; in the manual it will be explained when and if a ground connection is necessary; in this cases the connection to the ground must be made by a certified electrician, because an erroneous connection would be dangerous.
Warm Regards,
A.R.