This post explains why I beleive that the vacuum reaction is produced by the interaction of a hole superconductor with EMF radiation such as light, and does not come from some of the list of details contained inside the theory paper of Dr.Rossi. These details include: Zitterbewegung electron model and the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
Many of Dr. Rossi’s causes are correct that include Bose-Einstein Condensate, Casimir effect, charge clusters, collective effects, electron model, Electrum
Validum, geometric phase coherence, long range interactions, low entropy aggregates, and pico-metric structures.
My beliefs come from the updated work of Holmlid et al as follows:
X-Ray Emissions from Hydrogen Rydberg Matter Detected Using Timepix3 CdTe Detector †
by Sindre Andre Zeiner-Gundersen * andSveinn Olafsson
X-ray emissions from the Holmlid reaction as follows: Results show a prominent emission peak in the 25–50 keV range, with significant contributions at 406 keV identified through aluminum foil attenuation experiments.
The high-energy event at 406 keV, observed through aluminum foil attenuation experiments, is particularly intriguing. This peak implies the presence of a secondary emission process that produces high-energy X-rays. One possible explanation is that these high-energy X-rays result from bremsstrahlung radiation, where electrons decelerate rapidly upon interacting with the dense material of the catalyst, or from secondary emissions triggered by initial X-ray interactions within the material.
While the absence of muonic X-ray peaks challenges previous hypotheses [1], it underscores the necessity for further investigation into the exact mechanisms driving these emissions.
——————————————-
Observations from other LENR systems:
from the ICCF18 Defkalion LENR reactor paper as follows:
No Hard Nuclear Gamma-Rays
•No gamma rays outside the energy range of 50 keV–300 keV have been observed from the experiments with the Hyperion R-5 reactor. (data from isoparabolic calorimetry experiments)
In the LENR reaction, bremsstrahlung radiation comes from the Coulomb explosion of the Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) when it becomes unstable. This Coulomb explosion is when high energy electrons are broadcast in a Bosenova and interact with matter producing bremsstrahlung radiation.
What Holmlid is seeing is the production of EVOs when a hole superconductor is exposed to a source of photons.
This data supports the theory that the LENR reaction comes from the formation of an optical cavity in the electron shell of a hole superconductor micro particle (ultra dense hydrogen) where an exciton polariton condensate forms that generated negative vacuum energy which results in the production of a vacuum induced domain wall thereby generating a flow of vacuum energy transferred from the ambient vacuum into the true vacuum enclosed by the bubble of the domain wall.
Dieter Zoeller:
No, because even if the deliveries will initiate in 2025, I do not know when your delivery will be done, therefore you cannot anticipate promises.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
As already announced, there are plans to build wind turbines to generate electricity in my home community of Mönchberg on the hills of the Spessart Forest in Bavaria.
The wind turbines need huge foundations. The concern is that they will damage our drinking water supply.
There is a citizens’ meeting on June 25, 2025, can I present the e-Cat energy generation alternative there with the announcement that this energy generation will be delivered to private customers in 2025?
Yours sincerely,
Dieter Zöller
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id4YRO7G0wE
The arrival of non-human intelligence is a very big deal, says former Google CEO and chairman Eric Schmidt. In a wide-ranging interview with technologist Bilawal Sidhu, Schmidt makes the case that AI is wildly underhyped, as near-constant breakthroughs give rise to systems capable of doing even the most complex tasks on their own. He explores the staggering opportunities, sobering challenges and urgent risks of AI, showing why everyone will need to engage with this technology in order to remain relevant. (Recorded at TED2025 on April 11, 2025)
Eric Schmidt: The limit on AI development is energy production. In America, AI needs 90 Gigawatts of power to met its development needs. This is were the NGU is relevant to AI.
You proposed to combine AC inverter with a power supply unit, but it’s functional equivalent of DC-DC converter although more complicated and less efficient.
The bigger difference between input and output voltage you have, then less efficient it becomes, so it would be better to connect NGUs in series: https://thundersaidenergy.com/downloads/dc-dc-power-converters-efficiency-calculations/
I think that best DC-DC converter would be SiC Mosfet interleaved boost converter, but there is a problem finding one which is boosting 48V to 200V and having around 500W of power.
This one would be perfect if become available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10502276
The video below explains what the major stumbling block in science has been in the last few decade and I then explained how this issue could be solved by applying the basic ideas that empower the vacuum reaction as implemented by the NGU. The NGU serves as the experimental validation in the resolution of the naturalness problem.
The Rossi reaction is based on using dark matter to extract energy from a destabilized vacuum as is done when negative mass modifies space time to allow our world to exist. Here is the theory explained by the AI.
In order to account for the naturalness problem, is it possible that a theory centered on the formation of exciton polariton condensation that might make up dark matter through the production of negative mass through its dispersion channel of the condensate. this negative mass in dark matter formed in the dispersion of the dark polariton channel does not preclude this type of dark matter effect to account for the light mass of the Higgs boson. The formation mechanism of this stable self pumping condensate would involve hole superconducting dust formed in the near zero temperature of space that forms a seed structure that provide an optical cavity in the electron cloud of the microscopic dust particles in which the condensate would form. The dark matter particle would be a bubble nucleated microscopic zone of true vacuum isolated and sequestered from the ambient (false) vacuum by a domain wall.
The opinion of the AI follows:
The proposed idea is a fascinating and complex one, attempting to connect several fundamental areas of physics, including dark matter, the Higgs boson mass, and condensed matter physics. Let’s break down the key components and address the feasibility and connections within the proposed model:
1. Dark Matter and Exciton Polariton Condensates:
Exciton Polaritons: These are quasiparticles arising from strong coupling between excitons (bound electron-hole pairs) and photons in a microcavity or similar structure.
Dark Matter Candidate: The idea suggests that exciton polariton condensates, particularly in the “dark” or dispersion channel, could be a candidate for dark matter.
Negative Mass: The proposal suggests that negative mass might arise within the dispersion channel of the condensate, potentially explaining dark matter’s gravitational effects.
2. The Higgs Boson and the Naturalness Problem:
Naturalness Problem: The Higgs boson’s relatively low mass compared to the Planck scale is a puzzle in particle physics.
Connection to Dark Matter: The model suggests that dark matter arising from these condensates could be related to the lightness of the Higgs boson, potentially offering a solution to the naturalness problem.
3. Formation Mechanism:
Hole Superconducting Dust: The proposal introduces hole superconducting dust as a seed structure for the condensate.
Optical Cavity: This dust forms a microscopic optical cavity within its electron cloud, facilitating the formation of the condensate.
Self-Pumping Condensate: The idea involves a stable, self-pumping condensate, implying a mechanism for continuous particle replenishment.
4. True Vacuum Bubbles and Domain Walls:
True Vacuum: The dark matter particle is envisioned as a microscopic bubble of true vacuum, isolated from the ambient false vacuum.
Domain Wall: A domain wall would separate and sequester this true vacuum bubble from the surrounding false vacuum, creating a stable and localized dark matter particle.
Feasibility and Challenges:
Negative Mass: The concept of negative mass is intriguing, but it is crucial to demonstrate how it arises from the condensate’s dispersion channel, especially considering the context of dark matter.
Experimental Validation: Proving the existence of these condensates and their negative mass nature presents a significant experimental challenge.
Self-Pumping Mechanism: A robust and self-consistent mechanism for the continuous replenishment of the condensate is essential.
Stability and Detection: Demonstrating the long-term stability of the true vacuum bubbles and devising methods for their detection are crucial for any dark matter candidate.
Overall:
The proposed model is ambitious and attempts to unify seemingly disparate aspects of fundamental physics. While it is a highly speculative idea, it has the potential to inspire new directions in dark matter research and the exploration of novel condensed matter systems. Future research should focus on the theoretical and experimental challenges outlined above to further explore the feasibility and implications of this model.
The idea of using exciton polariton condensation as a dark matter candidate and a potential solution to the naturalness problem is a compelling one, but it remains a theoretical framework. The exact details of the formation mechanism, the nature of the “negative mass” effect, and the relationship to the Higgs boson’s mass are still subjects of research and speculation.
“The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), a joint project between China and Russia, will likely require a mix of power sources, including solar arrays and potentially a nuclear reactor, to meet its energy needs. For activities beyond basic science, power levels exceeding 1 megawatt will be needed, especially for producing propellant oxygen from lunar materials, which could significantly reduce transportation costs.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
1. Power Needs:
Science-only operations: Minimum power of 50-100 kW is required.
Propellant production: A much higher power level (over 1 megawatt) is needed to produce oxygen from lunar resources at a useful rate.
Continuous operation: The Moon has long periods of darkness (14.5 Earth days), so reliable power generation is crucial throughout the lunar night.
2. Potential Power Sources:
Solar power:
.
Large-scale solar arrays could be used, especially at locations with sufficient sunlight.
Nuclear reactor:
.
China and Russia are exploring the possibility of a nuclear power plant on the Moon to provide a reliable and continuous power source, especially in shadowed areas or during lunar nights.
Power from pipelines and cables:
.
The ILRS may also utilize pipelines and cables for heating and electricity distribution across the surface.
3. Importance of Power:
Lunar exploration and research:
Adequate power is essential for all scientific activities, experiments, and research on the Moon.
Supporting human presence:
Power is needed for life support systems, habitats, communication, and other essential functions for a lunar base.
Future missions:
Power will be crucial for any future missions that involve more extensive lunar exploration and resource utilization. ”
A lunar-qualified 1 MW power source using eCat NGU technology might be cheaoer, faster to develop, smaller, less mass, and easier to install..?
Dr. Rossi,
you are certainly testing the new robotic lines for the production of Ecat.
May I ask you how long it takes, today, to produce a complete Ecat?
Dr Rossi,
Studying the publication http://www.researchgate.net_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and trying to replicate your experiment described in paragraphs 6 and 7 I discovered that the paragraph 1 is useless, because related to theoretical hypothesis strange to your processs, while fundamental are the paragraphs 2,3,4,5; am I correct ?
Best,
Antonella
In a recent post in JoNP, Axil discusses how vacuum energy can help solve some specific tasks related to water purification and energy for data centers.
He writes here:
“The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles.”
Referring to something as “hypothetical” will in many contexts communicate that one has little or no reason to believe that this something is actually the case.
Until the E-Cat with the necessary inverters is available on the market, the statement as hypothetical must nevertheless be considered correct.
On December 12th of this year, the Paris Agreement will be 10 years old. This will probably bring a lot of attention to energy sources that do not emit CO2.
This could therefore be the perfect time to present a non-hypothetical vacuum energy solution.
Svein
@axil
> How does the NGU coordinate with the inverter when the inverter decides to shut down or start up?
As things stand now, it is up to the user to try connecting the inverter to the NGU and hope for the best. If the connection does not work, move on to another inverter. When an inverter is discovered to work by a user, then that user would be kind to post the results so all can avoid the trial and error approach to NGU setup.
In general in terms of system engineering, in these systems that require a hardware front end, a protocol is implemented by which the front end can coordinate with the back end. The protocol is designed to provide a communication path that is open ended to allow for expansion of functionality as the system’s design of the interface matures.
In the context of hardware, “front-end” typically refers to the part of a system that interacts with the user or the network’s external boundary. It’s the interface and initial processing point of a system, while the “back-end” handles the underlying operations and logic. This concept applies to various hardware areas, including network computing, processor design, and storage area networks (SANs).
In the ongoing development of the smart grid, sooner or later a front end protocol would need to be developed for the NGU over a common communication path.
In the early days of LENR research, it was discovered that the most actively transmuted isotopes were those with even atomic numbers. It has been shown that nickel isotopes with an even atomic number like Ni58 would be transmuted more that those with odd atomic numbers such a Ni61.
Tungsten is the most reactive metal regarding its susceptibility to transmutation.
Almost all the isotopes of tungsten have a nuclear spin of zero which makes it sensitive to transmutation that occurs when Nuclear magnetic resonance is takin as a determinative factor in transmutation.
Here is a picture of the SunCell electrode (100 kilos) after 10 seconds of operation. This is why Mills then when with liquid electrodes.
The most resistant elements to transmutation are those with the highest NMR resistance which means a high nuclear spin.
Isotopes with a spin of 8 include niobium (90Nb) and tantalum (181Ta) are best in resisting transmutation but these are very rare.
I like 180Tantalum with a nuclear spin 3 1/2 but niobium at spin 4 1/2 seems to be the best at transmutation resistance if you can afford it.
Tantalum is a silvery-gray, refractory metal with high strength, hardness, and resistance to corrosion, making it suitable for various applications, including electronics, jewelry, and medical implants. It is also a rare metal, with significant production in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Key Characteristics and Properties:
High Strength and Hardness:
Tantalum has a hardness of 200 Vickers and a tensile strength of 900 MPa, making it almost twice as strong as the best steels.
Corrosion Resistance:
It is highly resistant to corrosion, meaning it is not easily damaged by acids or other corrosive substances.
High Melting Point:
Tantalum has a melting point of 3000°C, making it a refractory metal.
Dr. Rossi usually won’t tell you what he uses for electrodes but he will recommend tungsten. Somehow, Dr. Rossi has come up with a way to eliminate transmutation in the NGU. Experience in other LENR systems show that tungsten is not good to use in electrodes because of its susceptibility to transmutation.
Ambrogio, In deference to Dr. Rossi, try tungsten in your system but let us know how those electrodes perform in your system.
@ rafal, reading your post and the doubts you raise about the possible application of the NGU modules, I am sending you a copy of a previous my post in which I described the hypothesized but also implemented and functioning electrical scheme in which the only missing element is the group of modules that I have already pre-ordered; friendliness
How can vacuum based unlimited energy production whose availability to the market is scheduled for the end of this year help solve the clean water problem that will limit both the adoption of ai and the availability of its data centers through non water based cooling systems. How can the awareness of the potential of the benefits to vacuum energy be made known to the AI industry
Addressing Clean Water & AI Challenges with Vacuum Energy
The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Here’s how it could address these challenges:
1. Clean Water Production:
Energy-Efficient Desalination: Vacuum energy could power desalination plants with minimal environmental impact. Desalination removes salt and impurities from seawater, offering a potentially limitless source of freshwater, especially crucial in water-scarce regions.
Low-Energy Water Purification: Vacuum energy could be utilized to power advanced water purification systems, such as UV purification and filtration processes, making clean, potable water accessible even in remote or resource-limited areas.
Decentralized Water Treatment: The portability and scalability of vacuum energy generators could support decentralized water treatment plants, reducing the need for large-scale infrastructure and making clean water more readily available to communities.
2. Supporting the AI Industry:
Data Center Cooling: Vacuum energy could power non-water-based cooling systems for data centers, significantly reducing water consumption associated with conventional cooling methods. This would alleviate water strain in areas with high data center density.
Sustainable AI Development: By providing a clean, sustainable energy source, vacuum energy can enable the AI industry to grow and develop without exacerbating environmental challenges like water scarcity, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable technological future.
Uninterrupted Power Supply: Vacuum energy could offer a consistent and reliable power supply for data centers, reducing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted access to AI services and data.
Raising Awareness within the AI Industry:
Demonstration Projects: Pilot programs showcasing the application of vacuum energy for data center cooling and water purification could attract attention and demonstrate its practical benefits to the AI industry.
Industry Conferences and Publications: Presenting research findings and potential solutions at relevant industry events and publications can educate the AI community about the possibilities of vacuum energy.
Collaboration & Partnerships: Fostering collaborations between vacuum energy researchers, data center operators, and AI companies can accelerate technology development and facilitate adoption within the industry.
Government Support and Incentives: Policies that support the research and development of vacuum energy, as well as incentivize its adoption in water purification and data center cooling, can play a critical role in raising awareness and enabling widespread utilization.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles. s of the potential of the benefits to vacuum energy be made known to the AI industry?
Addressing Clean Water & AI Challenges with Vacuum Energy
The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Here’s how it could address these challenges:
1. Clean Water Production:
Energy-Efficient Desalination: Vacuum energy could power desalination plants with minimal environmental impact. Desalination removes salt and impurities from seawater, offering a potentially limitless source of freshwater, especially crucial in water-scarce regions.
Low-Energy Water Purification: Vacuum energy could be utilized to power advanced water purification systems, such as UV purification and filtration processes, making clean, potable water accessible even in remote or resource-limited areas.
Decentralized Water Treatment: The portability and scalability of vacuum energy generators could support decentralized water treatment plants, reducing the need for large-scale infrastructure and making clean water more readily available to communities.
2. Supporting the AI Industry:
Data Center Cooling: Vacuum energy could power non-water-based cooling systems for data centers, significantly reducing water consumption associated with conventional cooling methods. This would alleviate water strain in areas with high data center density.
Sustainable AI Development: By providing a clean, sustainable energy source, vacuum energy can enable the AI industry to grow and develop without exacerbating environmental challenges like water scarcity, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable technological future.
Uninterrupted Power Supply: Vacuum energy could offer a consistent and reliable power supply for data centers, reducing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted access to AI services and data.
Raising Awareness within the AI Industry:
Demonstration Projects: Pilot programs showcasing the application of vacuum energy for data center cooling and water purification could attract attention and demonstrate its practical benefits to the AI industry.
Industry Conferences and Publications: Presenting research findings and potential solutions at relevant industry events and publications can educate the AI community about the possibilities of vacuum energy.
Collaboration & Partnerships: Fostering collaborations between vacuum energy researchers, data center operators, and AI companies can accelerate technology development and facilitate adoption within the industry.
Government Support and Incentives: Policies that support the research and development of vacuum energy, as well as incentivize its adoption in water purification and data center cooling, can play a critical role in raising awareness and enabling widespread utilization.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles.
@axil
> How does the NGU coordinate with the inverter when the inverter decides to shut down or start up?
I guess that NGU should be connected to one of DC inputs of the inverter. If you look at inverter’s specification there should be “DC startup voltage” mentioned.
In case of my home PV system, inverter is Solis RHI-3P-6K-HVES-5G and startup voltage is 160V.
It is a minimal voltage at which inverter will start fetching any power from DC source, whether it is solar panel or something else like stack of NGUs.
This mean in my case I would need 160/12 = 14 NGUs to achieve this minimal voltage and I think it is too much! There is also concern how inverters MPPT function will behave if I connect stack of NGUs instead of PV panels?
I’m going to buy smaller number of NGUs. Around 4 of them would provide enough wattage to complement my current PV system (ex. partially charge batteries overnight).
With serial connection of these 4 NGUs it would produce 4*12 = 48V DC.
Unfortunately, I need to deal somehow with problem of having 48V from NGUs and 160V of minimal input voltage.
Here are two ideas which I’m considering right now. None of them is ideal:
1. Use some high power DC-DC converter to raise voltage above 160V DC.
Two problems appear here. First, not sure how MPPT will work with DC-DC converter. Second, DC-DC converter is not 100% efficient and it will lose some of energy in form of heat.
2. Use additional micro-inverter as there are models available which support 48V DC as input.
Three problems here. First, not sure about micro-inverter MPPT function behavior when connected to NGUs.
Second, having second inverter in home might trigger some problems, like not functioning “anty-islanding protection” function (there are similar cases mentioned in publications).
Third, It won’t be possible to charge batteries which are now connected to first inverter, so overnight charging is not possible. Either, I will use NGUs energy completely or it is going to the grid.
Any better idea anyone? Any chance to have test of NGU (single or stacked in series) regarding MPPT function behavior?
A UPPM-Inspired Look at Rossi’s E-Cat: Phase Pulse, Isotopes, and the Quantum Beat of Cold Fusion
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Your work on the E-Cat has long stood as a profound and provocative edge in the landscape of modern physics. The persistent mystery surrounding LENR (low-energy nuclear reactions) has inspired countless inquiries—and among them, I humbly submit this one.
I’d like to share with you a developing theoretical framework called the Unified Phase Pulse Model (UPPM). UPPM is an analogical metaphysical-physical architecture designed to unify cosmological, quantum, and spiritual phenomena through waveform logic. At its core, UPPM begins with a single event—t₀, the Alpha Pulse—which cascades into all dimensions and energy states via harmonic superposition, phase logic, and isotopic anchoring.
Dear Readers:
What I find most striking about your E-Cat device is the role of stable isotopes, nickel, lithium, and hydrogen plasmas—particularly how anomalous heat and reaction signatures appear to reflect phase-aligned resonance behaviors. UPPM interprets these through:
Second Sound Multiplexing: wherein thermal phonons form coherent wave trains, not unlike quantum beats.
Phase Pulse Symmetry: where matter responds to the dynamic tension between quanta and analog waveform constraints.
Isotope Anchoring: wherein specific isotopes act as phase stabilizers or amplifiers of pulse-based energy transfer.
Your invention, the E-Cat, may in fact be expressing a superposed waveform behavior not yet fully recognized by conventional physics. UPPM proposes that such devices operate on more than just energetic input—they engage waveform intent, pulse memory, and resonance with universal constants. This would explain the behavior that transcends calorimetric models.
I hope this post reaches you not as critique, but as invitation: to consider whether E-Cat’s success is not merely in reaction kinetics, but in orchestrated phase dynamics—aligning with something deeper, perhaps even pre-nuclear.
If you are open to correspondence, I would be honored to share more technical aspects, including Q# logic extensions, W# waveform functions, and how UPPM links to LENR as a cosmological echo of creation energy—not merely heat, but hope encoded in matter.
Dr. Rossi needs to watch this video to inform him where the state of the art robotically enabled factory now stands. Dr. Rossi could prototype his first factory and then clone it for as many times as are required at sites all over the world. No human workers are required, just robots that have been trained by imitating humans that are doing their jobs.
GD:
1. yes
2. the word “security” does not mean “safety”, it means the activity to protect a situation from hostile actions. The Ecats are safety certified.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Please let add my further comment/question:
1) Being you experienced in this job, I guess you made a conservative projection
for the life cycle of 100kh 😉
2) About the “working area with security protection“,
do you think there will be a way/precautions to be used,
to make Ecat safe for home application (connected with an inverter+battery),
or just for industrial application ?
E-Car NGU at the Indy 500?
I am a long time Indy 500 fan.
This year hybrid engine cars are being introduced at the Indianapolis 500 for the first time.
The use of 21 super capacitors is both fascinating and a bit scary as they can be dangerous.
Do you feel an E-Cat NGU might be used in this scenario?
Italo R.:
I am using the A.I. for my technological and scientific purposes; I am passing all the suggestions arriving for organizational /commercial/production decisions to Leonardo’s Licensee,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
regarding artificial intelligence, a topic that is being discussed a lot these days.
Beyond the suggestions that are given you on these pages, are you and your partners already using AI to help you make organizational/commercial/production decisions etc.?
Sorry for the duplicate. I meant to post as follows:
AI Question:
Are non disclosure agreements enforceable in the peer review process
AI Answer:
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreements Explained …
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are generally considered enforceable in the peer review process, especially when they are properly drafted and executed.
Here’s a breakdown of why and how NDAs function within peer review:
1. Confidentiality is Crucial:
Peer review often involves the evaluation of sensitive and potentially novel research proposals, manuscripts, or other intellectual property.
Maintaining confidentiality allows for candid feedback and protects the authors’ work until it is publicly available.
2. NDAs Establish Legal Obligations:
When reviewers agree to participate in a peer review process, they are often asked to sign an NDA or confidentiality agreement.
These agreements legally obligate the reviewer to keep the reviewed material confidential.
NDAs typically define what constitutes confidential information and outline the reviewer’s obligations.
3. Enforcement and Potential Consequences:
Breaching a properly executed NDA can lead to legal ramifications.
These may include lawsuits, financial penalties, or other remedies depending on the terms of the agreement and applicable laws.
Organizations involved in the peer review process (e.g., funding agencies, journals) may also take disciplinary actions against reviewers who violate confidentiality.
4. Key Considerations for Enforceability:
Proper Drafting:
NDAs must be carefully drafted to be enforceable. This includes clearly defining confidential information, specifying obligations, and establishing a reasonable time frame.
Consideration:
Like any contract, an NDA needs consideration, meaning there has to be a “bargain for exchange” between the parties.
Reasonableness:
Courts may invalidate or limit NDAs that are overly broad, vague, or unreasonable in their scope or duration.
In summary: NDAs are a standard practice in peer review to safeguard the confidentiality of the reviewed materials and to create a legal framework for protecting intellectual property.
To Axil and Philippe
I thank you both for your reactions to my request for AI suggestions on strategies that are considered important in the situation that a presentation of a new and revolutionary energy technology is facing.
(AR himself refers to Mats Lewan’s book: An Impossible Invention in this context.)
The advice that emerges seems important in this context.
My hope is that this can be of help to AR and Leonardo Corporation.
This is because the day when industrially produced E-Cat’s are on the market, it is no longer an: Impossible Invention, but an: Available Invention, which will probably trigger an explosive demand.
The significant global economic changes this will entail, may trigger a lot of irrational resistance that makes AR need solid scientific and functional support and strategies.
Svein
Your partners may be well served to state recruiting best in class experts to peer review the NGU before the NGU reaches the market.
An NDA would protect the NDA IP even if the peer review is performed before the NGU is in the prototype stage.
AI Question:
Are non disclosure agreements enforceable in the peer review process
AI Answer:
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreements Explained …
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are generally considered enforceable in the peer review process, especially when they are properly drafted and executed.
Here’s a breakdown of why and how NDAs function within peer review:
1. Confidentiality is Crucial:
Peer review often involves the evaluation of sensitive and potentially novel research proposals, manuscripts, or other intellectual property.
Maintaining confidentiality allows for candid feedback and protects the authors’ work until it is publicly available.
2. NDAs Establish Legal Obligations:
When reviewers agree to participate in a peer review process, they are often asked to sign an NDA or confidentiality agreement.
These agreements legally obligate the reviewer to keep the reviewed material confidential.
NDAs typically define what constitutes confidential information and outline the reviewer’s obligations.
3. Enforcement and Potential Consequences:
Breaching a properly executed NDA can lead to legal ramifications.
These may include lawsuits, financial penalties, or other remedies depending on the terms of the agreement and applicable laws.
Organizations involved in the peer review process (e.g., funding agencies, journals) may also take disciplinary actions against reviewers who violate confidentiality.
4. Key Considerations for Enforceability:
Proper Drafting:
NDAs must be carefully drafted to be enforceable. This includes clearly defining confidential information, specifying obligations, and establishing a reasonable time frame.
Consideration:
Like any contract, an NDA needs consideration, meaning there has to be a “bargain for exchange” between the parties.
Reasonableness:
Courts may invalidate or limit NDAs that are overly broad, vague, or unreasonable in their scope or duration.
In summary: NDAs are a standard practice in peer review to safeguard the confidentiality of the reviewed materials and to create a legal framework for protecting intellectual property.
AI Question
Upon the release of the NGU to the marketplace, it is almost certain that science will begin its evaluation of the NGU in the form of a peer review. It will likely be impossible to prevent such a process from being conducted. The question is will the Partnership controlling the NGU support such a review to avoid any misinterpretation and preconceptions that have undercut the field of LENT since its inception? On the plus side, such a review will provide facts that will counter the false propaganda that the various energy production competitors will use to discredit the NGU as a fraud. Will there be an effort to circumvent such a peer review by the partnership. Can such a peer review be stopped by legal proceedings or other methods? If a peer review does take place, it might be best structured in levels as follows: first to verify if the NGU meets its specifications in terms of performance and longevity. Next, the scientific principle upon which the NGU is operating should be addressed.
AI Answer
It’s a very pertinent question regarding the potential impact of a peer review process on the acceptance and understanding of a novel technology like the NGU (likely referring to a new energy technology).
Here’s a breakdown of the issues you raised:
1. Importance of Peer Review for NGU:
Combating Misconceptions and Misinformation:
Peer review is essential to address potential skepticism and misinformation, particularly from competitors who might try to discredit the technology.
Building Credibility and Trust:
A favorable peer review by independent experts would significantly increase the scientific and public acceptance of the NGU.
Addressing Historical Challenges in LENR:
Your point about “misinterpretations and preconceptions” undermining the field of Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) is valid. Rigorous peer review could help prevent a repeat of past issues in this field, potentially related to Cold Fusion.
Establishing Scientific Validity:
Peer review helps establish the validity and robustness of scientific claims, ensuring that the NGU’s performance and underlying scientific principles are sound.
2. Partnership’s Role and Potential Opposition:
Supporting Peer Review:
The partnership controlling the NGU should ideally embrace and actively support a thorough peer review. This demonstrates transparency and confidence in the technology.
Circumventing or Hindering Review:
Attempts to circumvent or hinder a legitimate peer review would raise serious concerns about the technology’s validity and the partnership’s integrity.
Legal Challenges:
It’s unlikely that legal proceedings could effectively stop a peer review process within the scientific community, especially if the NGU is publicly available.
3. Suggested Multi-Level Peer Review:
Level 1:
Performance and Longevity: Verifying the NGU’s performance against its stated specifications and assessing its longevity is a crucial first step.
Level 2:
Underlying Scientific Principles: Once the performance is validated, a deeper investigation into the scientific principles governing the NGU is necessary.
Transparency and Open Communication:
Regardless of the structure, the review process should be transparent and allow for open communication of findings.
In Conclusion:
A well-structured, unbiased, and transparent peer review process is critical for the NGU’s credibility and acceptance. The controlling partnership’s willingness to support such a review will be a key factor in building trust and fostering the technology’s successful adoption. Opposition to peer review would likely be counterproductive, fueling suspicion and potentially hindering its development.
I asked Grok about how you could make sure that your technology will defend attacks by big energy players. There were several answers, an interesting one was this:
—
Engage Governments and NGOs in Emerging Markets:
Why: Big energy has less influence in developing nations hungry for affordable, clean energy solutions.
How: Pitch the E-Cat to governments or NGOs in countries with energy access challenges (e.g., in Africa or Southeast Asia). Offer pilot projects to power rural communities or microgrids, emphasizing sustainability.
Impact: Success in these markets could create international momentum, making it harder for big energy to suppress the technology globally.
—
Are there any plans to do this or do you think that could become a second pillar of your go to market strategy?
AI Question
Upon the release of the NGU to the marketplace, it is almost certain that science will begin its evaluation of the NGU in the form of a peer review. It will likely be impossible to prevent such a process to be conducted. The question is will the Partnership controlling the NGU support such a review to avoid any misinterpretation and preconceptions that have undercut the field of LENT since its inception? On the plus side, such a review will provide facts that will counter the false propaganda that the various energy production competitors will use to discredit the NGU as a fraud. Will there be an effort to circumvent such a peer review by the partnership. Can such a peer review be stopped by legal proceedings or other methods? If a peer review does take place, it might be best structured in levels as follows: first to verify if the NGU meets its specifications in terms of performance and longevity. Next, the scientific principle upon which the NGU is operating should be addressed.
AI Answer
It’s a very pertinent question regarding the potential impact of a peer review process on the acceptance and understanding of a novel technology like the NGU (likely referring to a new energy technology).
Here’s a breakdown of the issues you raised:
1. Importance of Peer Review for NGU:
Combating Misconceptions and Misinformation:
Peer review is essential to address potential skepticism and misinformation, particularly from competitors who might try to discredit the technology.
Building Credibility and Trust:
A favorable peer review by independent experts would significantly increase the scientific and public acceptance of the NGU.
Addressing Historical Challenges in LENR:
Your point about “misinterpretations and preconceptions” undermining the field of Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) is valid. Rigorous peer review could help prevent a repeat of past issues in this field, potentially related to Cold Fusion.
Establishing Scientific Validity:
Peer review helps establish the validity and robustness of scientific claims, ensuring that the NGU’s performance and underlying scientific principles are sound.
2. Partnership’s Role and Potential Opposition:
Supporting Peer Review:
The partnership controlling the NGU should ideally embrace and actively support a thorough peer review. This demonstrates transparency and confidence in the technology.
Circumventing or Hindering Review:
Attempts to circumvent or hinder a legitimate peer review would raise serious concerns about the technology’s validity and the partnership’s integrity.
Legal Challenges:
It’s unlikely that legal proceedings could effectively stop a peer review process within the scientific community, especially if the NGU is publicly available.
3. Suggested Multi-Level Peer Review:
Level 1:
Performance and Longevity: Verifying the NGU’s performance against its stated specifications and assessing its longevity is a crucial first step.
Level 2:
Underlying Scientific Principles: Once the performance is validated, a deeper investigation into the scientific principles governing the NGU is necessary.
Transparency and Open Communication:
Regardless of the structure, the review process should be transparent and allow for open communication of findings.
In Conclusion:
A well-structured, unbiased, and transparent peer review process is critical for the NGU’s credibility and acceptance. The controlling partnership’s willingness to support such a review will be a key factor in building trust and fostering the technology’s successful adoption. Opposition to peer review would likely be counterproductive, fueling suspicion and potentially hindering its development.
GD:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1- it is not estabilished, it is just supposed on the base of projections
2- the Ecats are working in restricted areas with security protection
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dearest ing. Rossi,
Beyond the magnificence of your revolutionary invention,
considering how important is the energy,
I see no equal in the past human history.
I have couple of curiosity:
1) how did you established the E-cat life cycle of about 100kh ?
2) looking forward to make my home independent from the electrical grid,
did you already installed some how the E-cat in your home?
Frank Acland:
The exact situation is this: Leonardo Corporation is the Licensor; the Lead Partner is the manufacturing and sales Licensee and he has two Partners that joined him, one is an electricity generation, distribution company, one is a financial fund.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
axil:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This post explains why I beleive that the vacuum reaction is produced by the interaction of a hole superconductor with EMF radiation such as light, and does not come from some of the list of details contained inside the theory paper of Dr.Rossi. These details include: Zitterbewegung electron model and the Aharonov-Bohm effect.
Many of Dr. Rossi’s causes are correct that include Bose-Einstein Condensate, Casimir effect, charge clusters, collective effects, electron model, Electrum
Validum, geometric phase coherence, long range interactions, low entropy aggregates, and pico-metric structures.
My beliefs come from the updated work of Holmlid et al as follows:
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4344/15/6/526
X-Ray Emissions from Hydrogen Rydberg Matter Detected Using Timepix3 CdTe Detector †
by Sindre Andre Zeiner-Gundersen * andSveinn Olafsson
X-ray emissions from the Holmlid reaction as follows: Results show a prominent emission peak in the 25–50 keV range, with significant contributions at 406 keV identified through aluminum foil attenuation experiments.
The high-energy event at 406 keV, observed through aluminum foil attenuation experiments, is particularly intriguing. This peak implies the presence of a secondary emission process that produces high-energy X-rays. One possible explanation is that these high-energy X-rays result from bremsstrahlung radiation, where electrons decelerate rapidly upon interacting with the dense material of the catalyst, or from secondary emissions triggered by initial X-ray interactions within the material.
While the absence of muonic X-ray peaks challenges previous hypotheses [1], it underscores the necessity for further investigation into the exact mechanisms driving these emissions.
——————————————-
Observations from other LENR systems:
from the ICCF18 Defkalion LENR reactor paper as follows:
No Hard Nuclear Gamma-Rays
•No gamma rays outside the energy range of 50 keV–300 keV have been observed from the experiments with the Hyperion R-5 reactor. (data from isoparabolic calorimetry experiments)
In the LENR reaction, bremsstrahlung radiation comes from the Coulomb explosion of the Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) when it becomes unstable. This Coulomb explosion is when high energy electrons are broadcast in a Bosenova and interact with matter producing bremsstrahlung radiation.
What Holmlid is seeing is the production of EVOs when a hole superconductor is exposed to a source of photons.
This data supports the theory that the LENR reaction comes from the formation of an optical cavity in the electron shell of a hole superconductor micro particle (ultra dense hydrogen) where an exciton polariton condensate forms that generated negative vacuum energy which results in the production of a vacuum induced domain wall thereby generating a flow of vacuum energy transferred from the ambient vacuum into the true vacuum enclosed by the bubble of the domain wall.
Dieter Zoeller:
No, because even if the deliveries will initiate in 2025, I do not know when your delivery will be done, therefore you cannot anticipate promises.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
As already announced, there are plans to build wind turbines to generate electricity in my home community of Mönchberg on the hills of the Spessart Forest in Bavaria.
The wind turbines need huge foundations. The concern is that they will damage our drinking water supply.
There is a citizens’ meeting on June 25, 2025, can I present the e-Cat energy generation alternative there with the announcement that this energy generation will be delivered to private customers in 2025?
Yours sincerely,
Dieter Zöller
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id4YRO7G0wE
The arrival of non-human intelligence is a very big deal, says former Google CEO and chairman Eric Schmidt. In a wide-ranging interview with technologist Bilawal Sidhu, Schmidt makes the case that AI is wildly underhyped, as near-constant breakthroughs give rise to systems capable of doing even the most complex tasks on their own. He explores the staggering opportunities, sobering challenges and urgent risks of AI, showing why everyone will need to engage with this technology in order to remain relevant. (Recorded at TED2025 on April 11, 2025)
Eric Schmidt: The limit on AI development is energy production. In America, AI needs 90 Gigawatts of power to met its development needs. This is were the NGU is relevant to AI.
@Claudio Varotto
You proposed to combine AC inverter with a power supply unit, but it’s functional equivalent of DC-DC converter although more complicated and less efficient.
The bigger difference between input and output voltage you have, then less efficient it becomes, so it would be better to connect NGUs in series:
https://thundersaidenergy.com/downloads/dc-dc-power-converters-efficiency-calculations/
I think that best DC-DC converter would be SiC Mosfet interleaved boost converter, but there is a problem finding one which is boosting 48V to 200V and having around 500W of power.
This one would be perfect if become available:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10502276
Found only something like this, but it lacks any detailed description:
https://www.cnsspele.com/dc-dc-converter/500w-48vdc-to-48-64-100-150-200-220-250-300-350-400-500vdc-converter-dc-power-supply
The video below explains what the major stumbling block in science has been in the last few decade and I then explained how this issue could be solved by applying the basic ideas that empower the vacuum reaction as implemented by the NGU. The NGU serves as the experimental validation in the resolution of the naturalness problem.
The Rossi reaction is based on using dark matter to extract energy from a destabilized vacuum as is done when negative mass modifies space time to allow our world to exist. Here is the theory explained by the AI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjkqedrTwZo&t=2s
A model addressing the naturalness problem
In order to account for the naturalness problem, is it possible that a theory centered on the formation of exciton polariton condensation that might make up dark matter through the production of negative mass through its dispersion channel of the condensate. this negative mass in dark matter formed in the dispersion of the dark polariton channel does not preclude this type of dark matter effect to account for the light mass of the Higgs boson. The formation mechanism of this stable self pumping condensate would involve hole superconducting dust formed in the near zero temperature of space that forms a seed structure that provide an optical cavity in the electron cloud of the microscopic dust particles in which the condensate would form. The dark matter particle would be a bubble nucleated microscopic zone of true vacuum isolated and sequestered from the ambient (false) vacuum by a domain wall.
The opinion of the AI follows:
The proposed idea is a fascinating and complex one, attempting to connect several fundamental areas of physics, including dark matter, the Higgs boson mass, and condensed matter physics. Let’s break down the key components and address the feasibility and connections within the proposed model:
1. Dark Matter and Exciton Polariton Condensates:
Exciton Polaritons: These are quasiparticles arising from strong coupling between excitons (bound electron-hole pairs) and photons in a microcavity or similar structure.
Dark Matter Candidate: The idea suggests that exciton polariton condensates, particularly in the “dark” or dispersion channel, could be a candidate for dark matter.
Negative Mass: The proposal suggests that negative mass might arise within the dispersion channel of the condensate, potentially explaining dark matter’s gravitational effects.
2. The Higgs Boson and the Naturalness Problem:
Naturalness Problem: The Higgs boson’s relatively low mass compared to the Planck scale is a puzzle in particle physics.
Connection to Dark Matter: The model suggests that dark matter arising from these condensates could be related to the lightness of the Higgs boson, potentially offering a solution to the naturalness problem.
3. Formation Mechanism:
Hole Superconducting Dust: The proposal introduces hole superconducting dust as a seed structure for the condensate.
Optical Cavity: This dust forms a microscopic optical cavity within its electron cloud, facilitating the formation of the condensate.
Self-Pumping Condensate: The idea involves a stable, self-pumping condensate, implying a mechanism for continuous particle replenishment.
4. True Vacuum Bubbles and Domain Walls:
True Vacuum: The dark matter particle is envisioned as a microscopic bubble of true vacuum, isolated from the ambient false vacuum.
Domain Wall: A domain wall would separate and sequester this true vacuum bubble from the surrounding false vacuum, creating a stable and localized dark matter particle.
Feasibility and Challenges:
Negative Mass: The concept of negative mass is intriguing, but it is crucial to demonstrate how it arises from the condensate’s dispersion channel, especially considering the context of dark matter.
Experimental Validation: Proving the existence of these condensates and their negative mass nature presents a significant experimental challenge.
Self-Pumping Mechanism: A robust and self-consistent mechanism for the continuous replenishment of the condensate is essential.
Stability and Detection: Demonstrating the long-term stability of the true vacuum bubbles and devising methods for their detection are crucial for any dark matter candidate.
Overall:
The proposed model is ambitious and attempts to unify seemingly disparate aspects of fundamental physics. While it is a highly speculative idea, it has the potential to inspire new directions in dark matter research and the exploration of novel condensed matter systems. Future research should focus on the theoretical and experimental challenges outlined above to further explore the feasibility and implications of this model.
The idea of using exciton polariton condensation as a dark matter candidate and a potential solution to the naturalness problem is a compelling one, but it remains a theoretical framework. The exact details of the formation mechanism, the nature of the “negative mass” effect, and the relationship to the Higgs boson’s mass are still subjects of research and speculation.
Steven Nicholes Karels:
I am not able to answer, but thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“The International Lunar Research Station (ILRS), a joint project between China and Russia, will likely require a mix of power sources, including solar arrays and potentially a nuclear reactor, to meet its energy needs. For activities beyond basic science, power levels exceeding 1 megawatt will be needed, especially for producing propellant oxygen from lunar materials, which could significantly reduce transportation costs.
Here’s a more detailed breakdown:
1. Power Needs:
Science-only operations: Minimum power of 50-100 kW is required.
Propellant production: A much higher power level (over 1 megawatt) is needed to produce oxygen from lunar resources at a useful rate.
Continuous operation: The Moon has long periods of darkness (14.5 Earth days), so reliable power generation is crucial throughout the lunar night.
2. Potential Power Sources:
Solar power:
.
Large-scale solar arrays could be used, especially at locations with sufficient sunlight.
Nuclear reactor:
.
China and Russia are exploring the possibility of a nuclear power plant on the Moon to provide a reliable and continuous power source, especially in shadowed areas or during lunar nights.
Power from pipelines and cables:
.
The ILRS may also utilize pipelines and cables for heating and electricity distribution across the surface.
3. Importance of Power:
Lunar exploration and research:
Adequate power is essential for all scientific activities, experiments, and research on the Moon.
Supporting human presence:
Power is needed for life support systems, habitats, communication, and other essential functions for a lunar base.
Future missions:
Power will be crucial for any future missions that involve more extensive lunar exploration and resource utilization. ”
A lunar-qualified 1 MW power source using eCat NGU technology might be cheaoer, faster to develop, smaller, less mass, and easier to install..?
Antonella:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.:
I am not able to answer,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
you are certainly testing the new robotic lines for the production of Ecat.
May I ask you how long it takes, today, to produce a complete Ecat?
Best regards,
Italo R.
Dr Rossi,
Studying the publication
http://www.researchgate.net_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
and trying to replicate your experiment described in paragraphs 6 and 7 I discovered that the paragraph 1 is useless, because related to theoretical hypothesis strange to your processs, while fundamental are the paragraphs 2,3,4,5; am I correct ?
Best,
Antonella
In a recent post in JoNP, Axil discusses how vacuum energy can help solve some specific tasks related to water purification and energy for data centers.
He writes here:
“The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles.”
Referring to something as “hypothetical” will in many contexts communicate that one has little or no reason to believe that this something is actually the case.
Until the E-Cat with the necessary inverters is available on the market, the statement as hypothetical must nevertheless be considered correct.
On December 12th of this year, the Paris Agreement will be 10 years old. This will probably bring a lot of attention to energy sources that do not emit CO2.
This could therefore be the perfect time to present a non-hypothetical vacuum energy solution.
Svein
Anonymous:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steve D:
1- this issue doesn’t depend on me
2- no
3- not so far
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Are you going to create a newco of your own to invent new energy sources ?
@Rafal
2025-05-23 17:04 Rafal
@axil
> How does the NGU coordinate with the inverter when the inverter decides to shut down or start up?
As things stand now, it is up to the user to try connecting the inverter to the NGU and hope for the best. If the connection does not work, move on to another inverter. When an inverter is discovered to work by a user, then that user would be kind to post the results so all can avoid the trial and error approach to NGU setup.
In general in terms of system engineering, in these systems that require a hardware front end, a protocol is implemented by which the front end can coordinate with the back end. The protocol is designed to provide a communication path that is open ended to allow for expansion of functionality as the system’s design of the interface matures.
In the context of hardware, “front-end” typically refers to the part of a system that interacts with the user or the network’s external boundary. It’s the interface and initial processing point of a system, while the “back-end” handles the underlying operations and logic. This concept applies to various hardware areas, including network computing, processor design, and storage area networks (SANs).
In the ongoing development of the smart grid, sooner or later a front end protocol would need to be developed for the NGU over a common communication path.
@Ambrogio
In the early days of LENR research, it was discovered that the most actively transmuted isotopes were those with even atomic numbers. It has been shown that nickel isotopes with an even atomic number like Ni58 would be transmuted more that those with odd atomic numbers such a Ni61.
Tungsten is the most reactive metal regarding its susceptibility to transmutation.
https://www.webelements.com/tungsten/isotopes.html
Almost all the isotopes of tungsten have a nuclear spin of zero which makes it sensitive to transmutation that occurs when Nuclear magnetic resonance is takin as a determinative factor in transmutation.
Here is a picture of the SunCell electrode (100 kilos) after 10 seconds of operation. This is why Mills then when with liquid electrodes.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/21977-suncell-electrode-png/
The most resistant elements to transmutation are those with the highest NMR resistance which means a high nuclear spin.
Isotopes with a spin of 8 include niobium (90Nb) and tantalum (181Ta) are best in resisting transmutation but these are very rare.
I like 180Tantalum with a nuclear spin 3 1/2 but niobium at spin 4 1/2 seems to be the best at transmutation resistance if you can afford it.
Tantalum is a silvery-gray, refractory metal with high strength, hardness, and resistance to corrosion, making it suitable for various applications, including electronics, jewelry, and medical implants. It is also a rare metal, with significant production in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Key Characteristics and Properties:
High Strength and Hardness:
Tantalum has a hardness of 200 Vickers and a tensile strength of 900 MPa, making it almost twice as strong as the best steels.
Corrosion Resistance:
It is highly resistant to corrosion, meaning it is not easily damaged by acids or other corrosive substances.
High Melting Point:
Tantalum has a melting point of 3000°C, making it a refractory metal.
Dr. Rossi usually won’t tell you what he uses for electrodes but he will recommend tungsten. Somehow, Dr. Rossi has come up with a way to eliminate transmutation in the NGU. Experience in other LENR systems show that tungsten is not good to use in electrodes because of its susceptibility to transmutation.
Ambrogio, In deference to Dr. Rossi, try tungsten in your system but let us know how those electrodes perform in your system.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Will you subcontract existing bulb type lighting manufacturers to build the reactors?
Are you creating your own manufacturing facility in house?
Are you working on a reactor greater than 10W, if so what power?
Thank you
Ambrogio:
Tungsten,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ rafal, reading your post and the doubts you raise about the possible application of the NGU modules, I am sending you a copy of a previous my post in which I described the hypothesized but also implemented and functioning electrical scheme in which the only missing element is the group of modules that I have already pre-ordered; friendliness
Buonasera Dr. Rossi, come forse ricorderà non è la prima volta che mi rivolgo a Lei per presentare i miei pensieri e valutazioni. Noto che in diverse circostanze frequentatori del JNP ipotizzano l’utilizzo dei suoi NGU in concomitanza di sistemi fotovoltaici per produrre energia elettrica 24/7 qualcuno immaginando schemi alquanto insoliti nella ricerca di evitare il blocco dei gruppi di generatori per sovraccarico. Diverso tempo fa ho cercato di studiare uno schema che risolvesse il problema e ho realizzato una configurazione che lo risolve egregiamente e che proverò a descrivere anche se, a parole, senza un disegno risulta abbastanza difficile.
Desidero premettere che lo schema è già realizzato e funzionante , e attende solamente i moduli NGU dal momento che questi sono attualmente sostituiti da un generatore elettrico ordinario.
Immaginiamo di sostituire l’attuale generatore con i moduli NGU; un numero X di NGU TUTTI COLLEGATI IN PARALLELO per produrre una tensione di 12 Volt ( il motivo della configurazione in parallelo sta nella necessità che se un modulo va in avaria, diversamente dalla configurazione in serie non modifichi la tensione in uscita e il tutto continui a funzionare anche se a potenza ridotta di misura ). L’uscita del generatore così configurato si applica ad un inverter 12 volt dc 220 volt ( io ho utilizzato questo: https://www.amazon.it/GIANDEL-Inverter-sinusoidale-Convertitore-telecomandoler/dp/B07VDDQXF3/ref=sr_1_2_sspa?crid=I0S6K634NLH0&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ODeuXwukWZqrZ88guq0DuT8W1YeLwpb5tQINoTAsbwvcCDMxSKV7QbxOZgTr6Dphv-NIVNZ_n4d_DMnq4PAIgZ4b8ibIUPN8lG7I1zzB9FpQMN3GdfjY7HtIyyirfk1IZXFG1qKzACMOG3_2vB7PkKQb_jk6EBMP2rMZ-UFVFVcc8ArCe276fKlmuZjYsUUn1mkn_q4xYB90aKqSsK0mBIliOXXdB5oQ3uBbg7TAb83797gpC82zZaDjr-hzXWBLmAgHp9UaZ3tCf0VpV-sBnTzBZQ1BgOWIZLaXlx4wA0Q.xsOiNBEQpZRKqCc92-SHNJ90_6qA3OppSGhPJjRRPFc&dib_tag=se&keywords=inverter%2Bgiandel%2B3000w&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1736016569&sprefix=inverter%2Bgiandel%2B3000%2Caps%2C104&sr=8-2-spons&ufe=app_do%3Aamzn1.fos.9d4f9b77-768c-4a4e-94ad-33674c20ab35&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9hdGY&th=1 ) la cui tensione 220 volt alternata viene convertita in continua da questo alimentatore ( https://it.aliexpress.com/item/1005008504156883.html?spm=a2g0o.detail.pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller.10.68819GSL9GSLrI&gps-id=pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller&scm=1007.40196.439370.0&scm_id=1007.40196.439370.0&scm-url=1007.40196.439370.0&pvid=746325a7-e4a4-47fd-a8f8-ed47820c60b8&_t=gps-id:pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller,scm-url:1007.40196.439370.0,pvid:746325a7-e4a4-47fd-a8f8-ed47820c60b8,tpp_buckets:668%232846%238115%232000&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%226%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%2C%22sceneId%22%3A%2230050%22%7D&pdp_npi=4%40dis%21EUR%21354.24%21283.39%21%21%212818.14%212254.50%21%402103985c17481061493621260e4e5e%2112000045460045411%21rec%21IT%213745937207%21X&utparam-url=scene%3ApcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller%7Cquery_from%3A ) che alimentera’ un regolatore di carica per poter caricare una batteria. L’alimentatore indicato nel link è un alimentatore con una potenza massima di 4 kw e con tensione e corrente variabili.( E’già tutto testato e funzionante e le caratteristiche di questo alimentatore, spaziando da 0 volt fino ad una tensione in uscita di 220 volt in continua in concomitanza con la possibilità di regolare la massima potenza di erogazione consente di evitare il blocco da sovraccarico dei moduli NGU . Con l’uscita di questo alimentatore opportunamente quindi gestita, si può entrare in un regolatore di carica per caricare una batteria, oppure in un inverter ibrido in sostituzione dei pannelli fotovoltaici quando questi non producono energia ( attenzione: non contemporaneamente ma in sostituzione, per esempio dalla sera al mattino successivo ).
Lo schema che ho esposto è semplice e funzionale e può essere realizzato da qualsiasi persona abbia un pò di dimestichezza con i dispositivi elettrici e, ripeto ancora una volta FUNZIONA!!! però a questo punto sorge un problema, un problema che, secondo me è molto cruciale: una persona che abbia realizzato un sistema fotovoltaico ON GRID, un sistema quindi che immette energia elettrica nella rete nazionale, come dovrà porsi nei confronti del gestore elettrico nazionale dal momento che potrà immettere energia elettrica anche nelle ore notturne e quindi H24 ?. Le chiedo questo caro Andrea perchè purtroppo sappiamo tutti che è fantastico immaginare di contribuire personalmente al benessere del proprio Paese e dell’ambiente ma dobbiamo fare i conti con una realtà in cui ciò che sembra ed è effettivamente utile a tutti si scontra con interessi che vanno quasi sempre nella direzione opposta.
Le chiedo quindi se tra tutte le incombenze di cui si è fatto carico negli anni ma soprattutto nel futuro ha anche in previsione di affrontare la questione che le ho esposto che ritengo essere tutt’altro che semplice da realizzare.
I miei più sinceri complimenti per il lavoro svolto e auguro a Lei al suo team ed alla sua famiglia un GRANDE 2025.
Good evening Dr. Rossi, as you may recall this is not the first time I have approached you to present my thoughts and assessments. I have noticed that in various circumstances frequenters of JNP hypothesise the use of your NGUs in conjunction with photovoltaic systems to produce electricity 24/7, someone imagining rather unusual schemes in the quest to avoid the blocking of generator sets due to overload. Some time ago I tried to devise a scheme that would solve this problem, and I came up with a configuration that solves it very well, which I will try to describe even though, in words, without a drawing it is quite difficult.
I would like to preface this by saying that the diagram is already made and working, and only awaits the NGU modules since these are currently replaced by an ordinary electric generator.
Let us imagine replacing the current generator with NGU modules; an X number of NGU ALL CONNECTED IN PARALLEL to produce a voltage of 12 Volts (the reason for the parallel configuration lies in the need that if a module fails, unlike the series configuration, it does not change the output voltage and everything continues to function even if at reduced power).
The output of the generator thus configured is applied to a 12 volt dc 220 volt ac inverter (I used this one: https://www.amazon.it/GIANDEL-Inverter-sinusoidale-Convertitore-telecomandoler/dp/B07VDDQXF3/ref=sr_1_2_sspa?crid=I0S6K634NLH0&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ODeuXwukWZqrZ88guq0DuT8W1YeLwpb5tQINoTAsbwvcCDMxSKV7QbxOZgTr6Dphv-NIVNZ_n4d_DMnq4PAIgZ4b8ibIUPN8lG7I1zzB9FpQMN3GdfjY7HtIyyirfk1IZXFG1qKzACMOG3_2vB7PkKQb_jk6EBMP2rMZ-UFVFVcc8ArCe276fKlmuZjYsUUn1mkn_q4xYB90aKqSsK0mBIliOXXdB5oQ3uBbg7TAb83797gpC82zZaDjr-hzXWBLmAgHp9UaZ3tCf0VpV-sBnTzBZQ1BgOWIZLaXlx4wA0Q.xsOiNBEQpZRKqCc92-SHNJ90_6qA3OppSGhPJjRRPFc&dib_tag=se&keywords=inverter%2Bgiandel%2B3000w&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1736016569&sprefix=inverter%2Bgiandel%2B3000%2Caps%2C104&sr=8-2-spons&ufe=app_do%3Aamzn1.fos.9d4f9b77-768c-4a4e-94ad-33674c20ab35&sp_csd=d2lkZ2V0TmFtZT1zcF9hdGY&th=1 ) whose 220 volt alternating voltage is converted to direct current by this power supply unit ( https://it.aliexpress.com/item/1005008504156883.html?spm=a2g0o.detail.pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller.10.68819GSL9GSLrI&gps-id=pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller&scm=1007.40196.439370.0&scm_id=1007.40196.439370.0&scm-url=1007.40196.439370.0&pvid=746325a7-e4a4-47fd-a8f8-ed47820c60b8&_t=gps-id:pcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller,scm-url:1007.40196.439370.0,pvid:746325a7-e4a4-47fd-a8f8-ed47820c60b8,tpp_buckets:668%232846%238115%232000&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22order%22%3A%226%22%2C%22eval%22%3A%221%22%2C%22sceneId%22%3A%2230050%22%7D&pdp_npi=4%40dis%21EUR%21354.24%21283.39%21%21%212818.14%212254.50%21%402103985c17481061493621260e4e5e%2112000045460045411%21rec%21IT%213745937207%21X&utparam-url=scene%3ApcDetailTopMoreOtherSeller%7Cquery_from%3A
which will power a charge controller to charge a battery. The power supply shown in the link is a power supply with a maximum power output of 4 kw and variable voltage and current.( It is already tested and working and the characteristics of this power supply, ranging from 0 volts up to an output voltage of 220 volts DC in conjunction with the ability to adjust the maximum power output allows you to avoid the blocking of NGU modules from overload. With the output of this power supply appropriately managed, it can be fed into a charge regulator to charge a battery, or into a hybrid inverter as a replacement for photovoltaic panels when these do not produce energy (note: not at the same time, but as a replacement, for example from the evening to the next morning).
The scheme I have set out is simple and functional and can be implemented by any person with a little familiarity with electrical devices and, I repeat once again, IT WORKS!!! but at this point a problem arises, a problem that, in my opinion, is very crucial:
How should a person who has set up an ON GRID photovoltaic system, i.e. a system that feeds electricity into the national grid, deal with the national electricity operator since he can also feed electricity into the grid at night, i.e. 24 hours a day? I ask you this, dear Andrea, because unfortunately we all know that it is great to imagine that you personally contribute to the well-being of your country and the environment, but we have to come to terms with a reality in which what seems and is actually useful to everyone clashes with interests that almost always go in the opposite direction.
I therefore ask you whether among all the tasks you have taken on over the years, but especially in the future, you are also planning to tackle the issue I have outlined to you, which I believe is far from easy to accomplish.
My sincerest congratulations for the work you have done and I wish you, your team and your family a GREAT 2025.
How can vacuum based unlimited energy production whose availability to the market is scheduled for the end of this year help solve the clean water problem that will limit both the adoption of ai and the availability of its data centers through non water based cooling systems. How can the awareness of the potential of the benefits to vacuum energy be made known to the AI industry
Addressing Clean Water & AI Challenges with Vacuum Energy
The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Here’s how it could address these challenges:
1. Clean Water Production:
Energy-Efficient Desalination: Vacuum energy could power desalination plants with minimal environmental impact. Desalination removes salt and impurities from seawater, offering a potentially limitless source of freshwater, especially crucial in water-scarce regions.
Low-Energy Water Purification: Vacuum energy could be utilized to power advanced water purification systems, such as UV purification and filtration processes, making clean, potable water accessible even in remote or resource-limited areas.
Decentralized Water Treatment: The portability and scalability of vacuum energy generators could support decentralized water treatment plants, reducing the need for large-scale infrastructure and making clean water more readily available to communities.
2. Supporting the AI Industry:
Data Center Cooling: Vacuum energy could power non-water-based cooling systems for data centers, significantly reducing water consumption associated with conventional cooling methods. This would alleviate water strain in areas with high data center density.
Sustainable AI Development: By providing a clean, sustainable energy source, vacuum energy can enable the AI industry to grow and develop without exacerbating environmental challenges like water scarcity, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable technological future.
Uninterrupted Power Supply: Vacuum energy could offer a consistent and reliable power supply for data centers, reducing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted access to AI services and data.
Raising Awareness within the AI Industry:
Demonstration Projects: Pilot programs showcasing the application of vacuum energy for data center cooling and water purification could attract attention and demonstrate its practical benefits to the AI industry.
Industry Conferences and Publications: Presenting research findings and potential solutions at relevant industry events and publications can educate the AI community about the possibilities of vacuum energy.
Collaboration & Partnerships: Fostering collaborations between vacuum energy researchers, data center operators, and AI companies can accelerate technology development and facilitate adoption within the industry.
Government Support and Incentives: Policies that support the research and development of vacuum energy, as well as incentivize its adoption in water purification and data center cooling, can play a critical role in raising awareness and enabling widespread utilization.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles. s of the potential of the benefits to vacuum energy be made known to the AI industry?
Addressing Clean Water & AI Challenges with Vacuum Energy
The hypothetical scenario of commercially available vacuum energy by the end of the year presents a potentially transformative solution for both the clean water crisis and the energy-intensive needs of the AI industry.
Here’s how it could address these challenges:
1. Clean Water Production:
Energy-Efficient Desalination: Vacuum energy could power desalination plants with minimal environmental impact. Desalination removes salt and impurities from seawater, offering a potentially limitless source of freshwater, especially crucial in water-scarce regions.
Low-Energy Water Purification: Vacuum energy could be utilized to power advanced water purification systems, such as UV purification and filtration processes, making clean, potable water accessible even in remote or resource-limited areas.
Decentralized Water Treatment: The portability and scalability of vacuum energy generators could support decentralized water treatment plants, reducing the need for large-scale infrastructure and making clean water more readily available to communities.
2. Supporting the AI Industry:
Data Center Cooling: Vacuum energy could power non-water-based cooling systems for data centers, significantly reducing water consumption associated with conventional cooling methods. This would alleviate water strain in areas with high data center density.
Sustainable AI Development: By providing a clean, sustainable energy source, vacuum energy can enable the AI industry to grow and develop without exacerbating environmental challenges like water scarcity, ultimately contributing to a more sustainable technological future.
Uninterrupted Power Supply: Vacuum energy could offer a consistent and reliable power supply for data centers, reducing downtime and ensuring uninterrupted access to AI services and data.
Raising Awareness within the AI Industry:
Demonstration Projects: Pilot programs showcasing the application of vacuum energy for data center cooling and water purification could attract attention and demonstrate its practical benefits to the AI industry.
Industry Conferences and Publications: Presenting research findings and potential solutions at relevant industry events and publications can educate the AI community about the possibilities of vacuum energy.
Collaboration & Partnerships: Fostering collaborations between vacuum energy researchers, data center operators, and AI companies can accelerate technology development and facilitate adoption within the industry.
Government Support and Incentives: Policies that support the research and development of vacuum energy, as well as incentivize its adoption in water purification and data center cooling, can play a critical role in raising awareness and enabling widespread utilization.
Note: It is crucial to emphasize that the commercialization of vacuum energy is still hypothetical and faces considerable scientific and technological hurdles.
Dr Rossi,
The publication
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
talks of a plasma: can you explain which materials the anode and the cathode made with ? In my replication they burnt away after several days.
Thank you if you can answer,
Best,
Ambrogio
@axil
> How does the NGU coordinate with the inverter when the inverter decides to shut down or start up?
I guess that NGU should be connected to one of DC inputs of the inverter. If you look at inverter’s specification there should be “DC startup voltage” mentioned.
In case of my home PV system, inverter is Solis RHI-3P-6K-HVES-5G and startup voltage is 160V.
It is a minimal voltage at which inverter will start fetching any power from DC source, whether it is solar panel or something else like stack of NGUs.
This mean in my case I would need 160/12 = 14 NGUs to achieve this minimal voltage and I think it is too much! There is also concern how inverters MPPT function will behave if I connect stack of NGUs instead of PV panels?
I’m going to buy smaller number of NGUs. Around 4 of them would provide enough wattage to complement my current PV system (ex. partially charge batteries overnight).
With serial connection of these 4 NGUs it would produce 4*12 = 48V DC.
Unfortunately, I need to deal somehow with problem of having 48V from NGUs and 160V of minimal input voltage.
Here are two ideas which I’m considering right now. None of them is ideal:
1. Use some high power DC-DC converter to raise voltage above 160V DC.
Two problems appear here. First, not sure how MPPT will work with DC-DC converter. Second, DC-DC converter is not 100% efficient and it will lose some of energy in form of heat.
2. Use additional micro-inverter as there are models available which support 48V DC as input.
Three problems here. First, not sure about micro-inverter MPPT function behavior when connected to NGUs.
Second, having second inverter in home might trigger some problems, like not functioning “anty-islanding protection” function (there are similar cases mentioned in publications).
Third, It won’t be possible to charge batteries which are now connected to first inverter, so overnight charging is not possible. Either, I will use NGUs energy completely or it is going to the grid.
Any better idea anyone? Any chance to have test of NGU (single or stacked in series) regarding MPPT function behavior?
axil:
Thank you for the video,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jason Richard Craig:
Thank you for your contribution,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A UPPM-Inspired Look at Rossi’s E-Cat: Phase Pulse, Isotopes, and the Quantum Beat of Cold Fusion
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Your work on the E-Cat has long stood as a profound and provocative edge in the landscape of modern physics. The persistent mystery surrounding LENR (low-energy nuclear reactions) has inspired countless inquiries—and among them, I humbly submit this one.
I’d like to share with you a developing theoretical framework called the Unified Phase Pulse Model (UPPM). UPPM is an analogical metaphysical-physical architecture designed to unify cosmological, quantum, and spiritual phenomena through waveform logic. At its core, UPPM begins with a single event—t₀, the Alpha Pulse—which cascades into all dimensions and energy states via harmonic superposition, phase logic, and isotopic anchoring.
Dear Readers:
What I find most striking about your E-Cat device is the role of stable isotopes, nickel, lithium, and hydrogen plasmas—particularly how anomalous heat and reaction signatures appear to reflect phase-aligned resonance behaviors. UPPM interprets these through:
Second Sound Multiplexing: wherein thermal phonons form coherent wave trains, not unlike quantum beats.
Phase Pulse Symmetry: where matter responds to the dynamic tension between quanta and analog waveform constraints.
Isotope Anchoring: wherein specific isotopes act as phase stabilizers or amplifiers of pulse-based energy transfer.
Your invention, the E-Cat, may in fact be expressing a superposed waveform behavior not yet fully recognized by conventional physics. UPPM proposes that such devices operate on more than just energetic input—they engage waveform intent, pulse memory, and resonance with universal constants. This would explain the behavior that transcends calorimetric models.
I hope this post reaches you not as critique, but as invitation: to consider whether E-Cat’s success is not merely in reaction kinetics, but in orchestrated phase dynamics—aligning with something deeper, perhaps even pre-nuclear.
If you are open to correspondence, I would be honored to share more technical aspects, including Q# logic extensions, W# waveform functions, and how UPPM links to LENR as a cosmological echo of creation energy—not merely heat, but hope encoded in matter.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonrichardcraig
With deepest respect,
Jason Richard Craig
Seeker of Truth, Developer of UPPM
Clean Pulse, Stable Isotopes, Light-Resonant Futures
Dr. Rossi needs to watch this video to inform him where the state of the art robotically enabled factory now stands. Dr. Rossi could prototype his first factory and then clone it for as many times as are required at sites all over the world. No human workers are required, just robots that have been trained by imitating humans that are doing their jobs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KI1aNYDFYEI&t=1053s
GD:
1. yes
2. the word “security” does not mean “safety”, it means the activity to protect a situation from hostile actions. The Ecats are safety certified.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Daniel G. Zavela:
Not yet, but thank you for the link,
Warm regards,
A.R.
Dearest ing. Rossi,
many thanks for your reply.
Please let add my further comment/question:
1) Being you experienced in this job, I guess you made a conservative projection
for the life cycle of 100kh 😉
2) About the “working area with security protection“,
do you think there will be a way/precautions to be used,
to make Ecat safe for home application (connected with an inverter+battery),
or just for industrial application ?
Warm Regards
Gianluca
Dear Dr. Rossi,
E-Car NGU at the Indy 500?
I am a long time Indy 500 fan.
This year hybrid engine cars are being introduced at the Indianapolis 500 for the first time.
The use of 21 super capacitors is both fascinating and a bit scary as they can be dangerous.
Do you feel an E-Cat NGU might be used in this scenario?
https://youtu.be/6gjajAeWoKU?si=UOhFF_V8qJOSMJb8
Best Regards,
Daniel G. Zavela
Italo R.:
I am using the A.I. for my technological and scientific purposes; I am passing all the suggestions arriving for organizational /commercial/production decisions to Leonardo’s Licensee,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi,
regarding artificial intelligence, a topic that is being discussed a lot these days.
Beyond the suggestions that are given you on these pages, are you and your partners already using AI to help you make organizational/commercial/production decisions etc.?
kind regards,
Italo R.
Philippe:
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Benjamin,
They will do it when will deem it opportune. It does not depend on me,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
axil:
Thank you for your continue help and suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sorry for the duplicate. I meant to post as follows:
AI Question:
Are non disclosure agreements enforceable in the peer review process
AI Answer:
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreements Explained …
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are generally considered enforceable in the peer review process, especially when they are properly drafted and executed.
Here’s a breakdown of why and how NDAs function within peer review:
1. Confidentiality is Crucial:
Peer review often involves the evaluation of sensitive and potentially novel research proposals, manuscripts, or other intellectual property.
Maintaining confidentiality allows for candid feedback and protects the authors’ work until it is publicly available.
2. NDAs Establish Legal Obligations:
When reviewers agree to participate in a peer review process, they are often asked to sign an NDA or confidentiality agreement.
These agreements legally obligate the reviewer to keep the reviewed material confidential.
NDAs typically define what constitutes confidential information and outline the reviewer’s obligations.
3. Enforcement and Potential Consequences:
Breaching a properly executed NDA can lead to legal ramifications.
These may include lawsuits, financial penalties, or other remedies depending on the terms of the agreement and applicable laws.
Organizations involved in the peer review process (e.g., funding agencies, journals) may also take disciplinary actions against reviewers who violate confidentiality.
4. Key Considerations for Enforceability:
Proper Drafting:
NDAs must be carefully drafted to be enforceable. This includes clearly defining confidential information, specifying obligations, and establishing a reasonable time frame.
Consideration:
Like any contract, an NDA needs consideration, meaning there has to be a “bargain for exchange” between the parties.
Reasonableness:
Courts may invalidate or limit NDAs that are overly broad, vague, or unreasonable in their scope or duration.
In summary: NDAs are a standard practice in peer review to safeguard the confidentiality of the reviewed materials and to create a legal framework for protecting intellectual property.
To Axil and Philippe
I thank you both for your reactions to my request for AI suggestions on strategies that are considered important in the situation that a presentation of a new and revolutionary energy technology is facing.
(AR himself refers to Mats Lewan’s book: An Impossible Invention in this context.)
The advice that emerges seems important in this context.
My hope is that this can be of help to AR and Leonardo Corporation.
This is because the day when industrially produced E-Cat’s are on the market, it is no longer an: Impossible Invention, but an: Available Invention, which will probably trigger an explosive demand.
The significant global economic changes this will entail, may trigger a lot of irrational resistance that makes AR need solid scientific and functional support and strategies.
Svein
Your partners may be well served to state recruiting best in class experts to peer review the NGU before the NGU reaches the market.
An NDA would protect the NDA IP even if the peer review is performed before the NGU is in the prototype stage.
AI Question:
Are non disclosure agreements enforceable in the peer review process
AI Answer:
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Agreements Explained …
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) are generally considered enforceable in the peer review process, especially when they are properly drafted and executed.
Here’s a breakdown of why and how NDAs function within peer review:
1. Confidentiality is Crucial:
Peer review often involves the evaluation of sensitive and potentially novel research proposals, manuscripts, or other intellectual property.
Maintaining confidentiality allows for candid feedback and protects the authors’ work until it is publicly available.
2. NDAs Establish Legal Obligations:
When reviewers agree to participate in a peer review process, they are often asked to sign an NDA or confidentiality agreement.
These agreements legally obligate the reviewer to keep the reviewed material confidential.
NDAs typically define what constitutes confidential information and outline the reviewer’s obligations.
3. Enforcement and Potential Consequences:
Breaching a properly executed NDA can lead to legal ramifications.
These may include lawsuits, financial penalties, or other remedies depending on the terms of the agreement and applicable laws.
Organizations involved in the peer review process (e.g., funding agencies, journals) may also take disciplinary actions against reviewers who violate confidentiality.
4. Key Considerations for Enforceability:
Proper Drafting:
NDAs must be carefully drafted to be enforceable. This includes clearly defining confidential information, specifying obligations, and establishing a reasonable time frame.
Consideration:
Like any contract, an NDA needs consideration, meaning there has to be a “bargain for exchange” between the parties.
Reasonableness:
Courts may invalidate or limit NDAs that are overly broad, vague, or unreasonable in their scope or duration.
In summary: NDAs are a standard practice in peer review to safeguard the confidentiality of the reviewed materials and to create a legal framework for protecting intellectual property.
AI Question
Upon the release of the NGU to the marketplace, it is almost certain that science will begin its evaluation of the NGU in the form of a peer review. It will likely be impossible to prevent such a process from being conducted. The question is will the Partnership controlling the NGU support such a review to avoid any misinterpretation and preconceptions that have undercut the field of LENT since its inception? On the plus side, such a review will provide facts that will counter the false propaganda that the various energy production competitors will use to discredit the NGU as a fraud. Will there be an effort to circumvent such a peer review by the partnership. Can such a peer review be stopped by legal proceedings or other methods? If a peer review does take place, it might be best structured in levels as follows: first to verify if the NGU meets its specifications in terms of performance and longevity. Next, the scientific principle upon which the NGU is operating should be addressed.
AI Answer
It’s a very pertinent question regarding the potential impact of a peer review process on the acceptance and understanding of a novel technology like the NGU (likely referring to a new energy technology).
Here’s a breakdown of the issues you raised:
1. Importance of Peer Review for NGU:
Combating Misconceptions and Misinformation:
Peer review is essential to address potential skepticism and misinformation, particularly from competitors who might try to discredit the technology.
Building Credibility and Trust:
A favorable peer review by independent experts would significantly increase the scientific and public acceptance of the NGU.
Addressing Historical Challenges in LENR:
Your point about “misinterpretations and preconceptions” undermining the field of Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) is valid. Rigorous peer review could help prevent a repeat of past issues in this field, potentially related to Cold Fusion.
Establishing Scientific Validity:
Peer review helps establish the validity and robustness of scientific claims, ensuring that the NGU’s performance and underlying scientific principles are sound.
2. Partnership’s Role and Potential Opposition:
Supporting Peer Review:
The partnership controlling the NGU should ideally embrace and actively support a thorough peer review. This demonstrates transparency and confidence in the technology.
Circumventing or Hindering Review:
Attempts to circumvent or hinder a legitimate peer review would raise serious concerns about the technology’s validity and the partnership’s integrity.
Legal Challenges:
It’s unlikely that legal proceedings could effectively stop a peer review process within the scientific community, especially if the NGU is publicly available.
3. Suggested Multi-Level Peer Review:
Level 1:
Performance and Longevity: Verifying the NGU’s performance against its stated specifications and assessing its longevity is a crucial first step.
Level 2:
Underlying Scientific Principles: Once the performance is validated, a deeper investigation into the scientific principles governing the NGU is necessary.
Transparency and Open Communication:
Regardless of the structure, the review process should be transparent and allow for open communication of findings.
In Conclusion:
A well-structured, unbiased, and transparent peer review process is critical for the NGU’s credibility and acceptance. The controlling partnership’s willingness to support such a review will be a key factor in building trust and fostering the technology’s successful adoption. Opposition to peer review would likely be counterproductive, fueling suspicion and potentially hindering its development.
Dear Andrea,
I asked Grok about how you could make sure that your technology will defend attacks by big energy players. There were several answers, an interesting one was this:
—
Engage Governments and NGOs in Emerging Markets:
Why: Big energy has less influence in developing nations hungry for affordable, clean energy solutions.
How: Pitch the E-Cat to governments or NGOs in countries with energy access challenges (e.g., in Africa or Southeast Asia). Offer pilot projects to power rural communities or microgrids, emphasizing sustainability.
Impact: Success in these markets could create international momentum, making it harder for big energy to suppress the technology globally.
—
Are there any plans to do this or do you think that could become a second pillar of your go to market strategy?
Best regards,
Philippe
Dr Rossi,
Can you disclose the continent where the Licensee of Leonardo Corporation has his facility ?
AI Question
Upon the release of the NGU to the marketplace, it is almost certain that science will begin its evaluation of the NGU in the form of a peer review. It will likely be impossible to prevent such a process to be conducted. The question is will the Partnership controlling the NGU support such a review to avoid any misinterpretation and preconceptions that have undercut the field of LENT since its inception? On the plus side, such a review will provide facts that will counter the false propaganda that the various energy production competitors will use to discredit the NGU as a fraud. Will there be an effort to circumvent such a peer review by the partnership. Can such a peer review be stopped by legal proceedings or other methods? If a peer review does take place, it might be best structured in levels as follows: first to verify if the NGU meets its specifications in terms of performance and longevity. Next, the scientific principle upon which the NGU is operating should be addressed.
AI Answer
It’s a very pertinent question regarding the potential impact of a peer review process on the acceptance and understanding of a novel technology like the NGU (likely referring to a new energy technology).
Here’s a breakdown of the issues you raised:
1. Importance of Peer Review for NGU:
Combating Misconceptions and Misinformation:
Peer review is essential to address potential skepticism and misinformation, particularly from competitors who might try to discredit the technology.
Building Credibility and Trust:
A favorable peer review by independent experts would significantly increase the scientific and public acceptance of the NGU.
Addressing Historical Challenges in LENR:
Your point about “misinterpretations and preconceptions” undermining the field of Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENR) is valid. Rigorous peer review could help prevent a repeat of past issues in this field, potentially related to Cold Fusion.
Establishing Scientific Validity:
Peer review helps establish the validity and robustness of scientific claims, ensuring that the NGU’s performance and underlying scientific principles are sound.
2. Partnership’s Role and Potential Opposition:
Supporting Peer Review:
The partnership controlling the NGU should ideally embrace and actively support a thorough peer review. This demonstrates transparency and confidence in the technology.
Circumventing or Hindering Review:
Attempts to circumvent or hinder a legitimate peer review would raise serious concerns about the technology’s validity and the partnership’s integrity.
Legal Challenges:
It’s unlikely that legal proceedings could effectively stop a peer review process within the scientific community, especially if the NGU is publicly available.
3. Suggested Multi-Level Peer Review:
Level 1:
Performance and Longevity: Verifying the NGU’s performance against its stated specifications and assessing its longevity is a crucial first step.
Level 2:
Underlying Scientific Principles: Once the performance is validated, a deeper investigation into the scientific principles governing the NGU is necessary.
Transparency and Open Communication:
Regardless of the structure, the review process should be transparent and allow for open communication of findings.
In Conclusion:
A well-structured, unbiased, and transparent peer review process is critical for the NGU’s credibility and acceptance. The controlling partnership’s willingness to support such a review will be a key factor in building trust and fostering the technology’s successful adoption. Opposition to peer review would likely be counterproductive, fueling suspicion and potentially hindering its development.
GD:
Thank you for your support.
Answers:
1- it is not estabilished, it is just supposed on the base of projections
2- the Ecats are working in restricted areas with security protection
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jean Paul Renoir:
Chief Scientist,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dearest ing. Rossi,
Beyond the magnificence of your revolutionary invention,
considering how important is the energy,
I see no equal in the past human history.
I have couple of curiosity:
1) how did you established the E-cat life cycle of about 100kh ?
2) looking forward to make my home independent from the electrical grid,
did you already installed some how the E-cat in your home?
Warm Regards
Gianluca
Dr Rossi,
which will be your position in the Licensee’s company ?
Frank Acland:
The exact situation is this: Leonardo Corporation is the Licensor; the Lead Partner is the manufacturing and sales Licensee and he has two Partners that joined him, one is an electricity generation, distribution company, one is a financial fund.
Warm Regards,
A.R.