Dr Andrea Rossi
Can we have the following information about the ERV that made the report:
2- has he been chosen and agreed upon by both Industrial Heat and Leonardo Corporation ?
3- has IH been able to talk with him for any complint for all the 1 year long test ?
4- has the ERV experience in plants that produce steam ?
5- has the ERV experience of nuclear reactions ?
6- who paid the ERV ?
7- has he experience of validations ?
8- how old is he ?
9- whose were the instruments he used to make the measurements ?
10- who installed the measurement instruments ?
11- did IH participate to the choice where to install the instruments ?
12- did IH maintain his personnel in the plant during all the days of the test ?
13- did IH have the right and the possibility to contact the ERV for delucidations along all the test period ?
14- is it true that IH visited multiple times the plant in operation with their investors ?
15- is it true that they collected 50 million dollars from Woodford funds and initiated a 200 million business in China after theyr delegations visited the plant in operation ?
16- is it true that during the visit IH made also their investors talk with the director of the factory of the Customer during their visits, after which the investors gave them the money to be invested ?
Thank you very much if you can answer: your answer will clear a situation after Mr Darden has diffused information based on which IH was totally unaware of the fact that there was a test on course based on the agreement.
I am very sorry, but I did not understand your question.
Can you kindly rephrase it ?
Can you comment on this guess about the E-Cat:
A. 24-hour test: 1 x E-Cat = COP ~10
B. 1MW 352-day test: 1 x E-Cat as activator (mouse?) @ COP ~10 applied to 5 other E-Cats = COP ~50
My US patent covers the reactor.
Yes, but your answer speed may signify
your culture and education also
The Report will be published when my attorney will give me green light.
The Report is signed by the ERV.
Yes, it will be on our website when the production will be in operation.
Now I understand where are the roots of your culture and education. This explains many things. I condone that the reading of our blog instead of the listening of “desperate housewives” marks a step forward along the path of your personal evolution.
Publication expectations = 99% wrong.
Dear Mr. Rossi
I have to thank you since your story is a TV watcher time saving event,compared to “THE TWILIGHT ZONE”, “007”, “LOST”, “DESPERATES HOUSEWIVES”, etc…fictions.
I need half hour a day only whith your blog!
(publication expectation = 1%)
Can we have, when it is opportune to you, a photo of the factory where the mass production will take place, with robot machines in place or being installed?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
We already know that the one-year test on the 1MW e-cat has proven the technology, but we are still waiting for the official release of the ERV report. Is it’s publication imminent, days or weeks away?
Although up to a few days ago we were saying that this is irrelevant to the roll out and commercialisation of the e-cat, since it’s the market that proves the technology, now that IH has tried to derail the commercialisation progress, the ERV will give more power to your elbow.
How many engineers and scientists will be signing the report?
I wish you a 6-0, 6-0, 6-0 win against the bad guys.
DrD you wrote.
>>>>In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive<<<<<
I thing that Dr. A.Rossi patented new technology. But IH try to patent the machinery, 1MW E-Cat reactor, build according to instructions of MR. Rossi.
Maybe by this way they want to prevent Mr.Rossi to build and sale this kind of E-Cat reactors.
Thank you for your insight
In the IH patent that is being discussed I see nothing inventive. The only inventive step (the fuel) is already disclosed in your issued patent. What extra is described is well known to those skilled in the art.
This is very strange.
What is the purpose of such an application (Rhetorical question).
The experimental details are also very poor, making guesses and allowances for them. I trust the ERV was more precise.
Thank you for your sympathy,
Our work will not be belated by the litigation.
Thank you for the links
John C Evans:
We will not do any more public demo.
We will sell our products.
Very best wishes for your success in this difficult situation!
1. Is now not a good time to demonstrate the E-Cat publicly and prove to the world LENR and the Rossi effect is 100% real?
2. If no, can you explain why a public demonstration is not possible or desirable now?
3. If yes, can you suggest a timeline for a public demonstration?
The temperature of the Web dispute is too high but it is a way to cool it down:
Thank you for what you have been able to share. I to find it interesting that IH would file a patent on a tech they consider failed.
Am I safe to assume that the certification for the quark is a safety certification like UL issues so that domestic operation of the unit won’t make the homeowners insurance rates go through the roof.
Always remember when they cheat you and tell lies the best revenge is living well. Once again I wish you successful and productive days.
John C Evans
Dear Mr. Andrea Rossi.
Disappointed conflict with IH.
1. The courts will delay access to the E-Cat market?
2. IH have access and the ability to use the E-CAT X technology .3. QuarkX Technology?
4. Behavior IH caused by commercial reasons (greed)?
5. Or you expect behind the scenes to destroy the competitive pursuit of new technologies?
I hope that these squabbles will not interfere with your academic work.
I hope that your plant will begin production E-Cat without delay.
3- you are totally right
1- No, I want not to put the money of people at risk until I am not sure that all is right.
I have enough money to spend to start the mass production, the rest must arrive from the products sale. I want not to sell paper, I want to sell products. I am an industrialist, not a yuppy or an opera ballet etoile.
2- I am not able to answer now
3- yes, of course, when we will have finished the R&D on course and will be ready to produce it massively, which will follow suit the end of the R&D (F8)
Thank you for the information.
were you aware that the Securities and Exchange Commission Issued Administrative Ruling Against Cherokee Investment Partners ???
I wish you all the luck in court!!
1. Now you have lost your a major finance source for your exponential expansion, would it be an idea to do it by crowd funding?
2. You said, there is no need to wait until court decides. If I remember right, you are going to build your first E-cat manufacturing plant in the UK. This means that the first commercial products will be sold in Europe and not in the US as long as it runs for court?
3. Is there any chance that an independable group like MFMP gets the opportunity to test a QuarkX in the not so far future? (I am not sure if they want to though).
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
since we have to expect discredit on the ecat ( that has already started) and the ‘powers that be’ will try to delay the mass production, I ask:
– When will Leonardo corp. be ready to receive orders ( i mean for the already tested 1MW power plant) and deliver in a few weeks?
– Is Leonardo corp already organized in this sense and ready or when it will be?
I think it is of great importance since from then all the discredits wil be of no importance.
Thank you and best regards,
Alessandro – Ecatnews.it
1- The R&D started in August 2015
2- when it will be stable and safe
3- 2016, I hope
From what you have written, it sounds like the E-Cat X is under an extended test.
1. If this is correct, how long has the test been running so far?
2. At what point in testing will you be satisfied that the E-Cat X will be suitable to be used in a commercial product
3. What is your timeline goal for when will be able to demonstrate the E-Cat X to the public?
I cannot comment on this, because is an issue pending in Court.
Just seen this interesting response by Mr Ian Walker maybe you could post this:
Fabio Penon was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which to base
their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access, they
were so happy with his work, and that of the team they selected and that they
agreed for him to run; that they spent $10 million dollars as a result.
There is no wiggle room with facts they are when all is said and done facts.
And it is fact that IH were happy enough with Fabio Penon’s
qualifications, experience and abilities spend $10 million dollars on
using him as their source of adequate Due Diligence for buying the
E-Cat License and seeing the E-Cat IP.
IH could at any time in the past few years have asked for him to
replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so, ipso facto by IH’s
own inaction he was IH’s choice for the ERV and they were fully
satisfied with him.
Kind Regards walker
Just seen this very interesting response on Vortex in regards to Fabio Penon and IH:
If we are correct Fabio Penon – was the primary engineer that IH helped select, on which
to base their Due Diligence, for purchase of the E-Cat license and IP access in fact ..
Industrial Heat was so happy with Fabio Penon’s qualifications, experience and abilities
that they spent $10 million dollars on using him as their source of adequate Due Diligence
for buying the E-Cat License and seeing the E-Cat IP.
further from what we have seen IH could have at any time in the past few years have asked
for him to replaced, but the fact remains they did not do so ?
You can find many books about Ni as catalyst for hydrogenation ( I used Ni as a hydrogenation catalyst in my plant to make fuels with organic wastes, in the eighties and the nineties): that is hydrogenation ON Ni, but there is no literature that we can define “classic” about the hydrogenation OF Ni. As far as I know. Obviously in LENR literature the issue is treated, but I don’t think there is a sort of a “manual” for it.
In your opinion, what is the most authoritative text, paper, or document on the hydrogenation (hydrogen loading) of nickel?
Thank you for your sympathy
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The fuss between you and Industrial Heat is a sad thing. I hope you did not give away all of your secrets, that you saved some parts as an insurance in case they would try to cheat you.
I wish you good health and good luck!
I never signed that patent application with TBarker as the coinventor.
Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link
hello dr. Rossi, I am sending a link about an idea to provide power to your Hot cat in places where there is no gas or electricity .
Dr Rossi you have been ccused of knowing IH filed that patent with you as co-inventor. It is said by law you had to sign it. Did you? You claimed you were unaware of it. The patent everyone on ecatworld is discussing. dated 2014. Also I am a fan of yours since 2012.
Thank you for your suggestion.
Yes, I read it. Is an intelligent analysis from an expert of the LENR.
Very well, very promising and our path is pretty good.
Playing tennis with my wife. 6-0, 6-0, 6-0. Guess who is the zero.
As a consequence of the result, I returned to work on the QuarkX.The results are better.
A- because several days have been not taken in account because we had reparations to make or powders and ashes samples to take off for analysis
C- if you want to win you must fear the defeat to the last
D- If you had 6 balls, could you have been a pin-ball ?
E- same as D. As a matter of fact, the only guinea pig available to spend there the night turn, I mean from 6 p.m. to 10 a.m. was me.
I think that due interpretation will be made in due place, where subjectivity becomes objectivity..