The geometry intrinsic to motion, space and time

.
by
Brent Whipple

.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.
Part I. A Comprehensive Principle
1. The geometry of spacetime has to support objectivity. That is inescapable.
All of natural science must share a common grounding in the reality of nature.
Also the mathematics we have discovered and use to describe the reality of nature can only arise out of, and so can only refer to, the same natural reality.
Natural science and mathematics have a common foundation, they spring from a common source.
Since this reference of the complex to the simple has been realized, the quest to understand and describe our universe has become a quest for an inferred principle that comprehends all of evolution and therefore can organize the apparent diversity of nature and affect the entire course of evolution.
Because of this the quest to understand nature has become the quest for the initial condition of the universe, that is, for the initial appearance of objective reality which we think of as spacetime.
All the mysteries of the evolution of the universe are bound up with the unknown, foundational nature of spacetime.
.
Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file
.

15 comments to The geometry intrinsic to motion, space and time

  • Andrea Rossi

    JPR:
    Also today we are working in good standing,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jeff:
    Thank you for your support.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jeff

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    The fact that you are on the verge of an industrial production without public financing, compared to the fact that the hot fusionists are trying to produce something since 50 years with enormous public funding, notwithstanding all the problems you had is miraculous.
    Continue the good job,
    Jeff

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dear Readers:
    Please go to
    http://www.rossilivecat.com
    to find comments published today in other posts of this blog

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lars Lindberg:
    With the heat you make steam, with the steam you can make electricity.
    Direct production of electricity will be possible, we did it, but the efficiency is low.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lars Lindberg

    Dear Mr Rossi,
    to produce heat is great but do you think you can make a QuarkX that can produce electricity in the future?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Lars Lindberg:
    To demonstrate.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Lars Lindberg

    Dear Mr Rossi,
    what is the purpose of the demonstration?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    The measurements practically confirm each other within the margin of error of the instrumentation.
    Besides, the margin of error is insignificant in respect of the COP.
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Buck

    Happy Holidays Andrea.

    I am glad to hear that the just completed test with the independent engineer provided confirmation for your measurements.

    A question: Did this engineer assess the degree of statistical correlation for his measurements over three days with the measurements you gathered at the same time? This assumes that he set up measurement devices parallel and run concurrently to yours. Would you be able to share the measure of correlation?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Coppi:
    It doesn’t surprise me either.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Alessandro Coppi

    Giuseppe said:
    “This all is finalized to get from Italian Government funds graciously supplied from the taxpayer of Italy, to steal your technology”.
    Why it doesn’t surprise me at all?

    Alessandro Coppi
    (sadly from Italy)

  • Andrea Rossi

    BWhipple:
    Congratulations for your publication. I like your enthusiasm.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • bwhipple

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I am very pleased that you and the JoNP reviewers have decided to publish “The Geometry Intrinsic to Motion, Space and Time”.

    I have been working with the evolution of these ideas for many years. An earlier version of their development titled “What Is Nature?” was presented (in poster session) at Frontiers of Quantum and Mesoscopic Thermodynamics 2011 in Prague.

    The publication in JoNP now raises two areas of what-to-do-next questions.

    The first is that since I submitted the PDF that has been published I have continued to develop this theory and a new PDF is now pretty much ready – probably by Monday. This new version is consistent with the published version. What has been improved is the explanation of what are difficult and wide-ranging ideas. These new explanations have the effect of making the arguments clearer and deeper and in this way the paper has become stronger. I would like to update if that is possible. I will send an updated PDF when it is available in the next few days.

    The second area of questions has to do with the Cook- Rossi collaboration. I don’t want to intrude in this important process but it is clear to me that the ideas presented in my paper must be able to be developed, in some as yet unknown way, to join with the nuclear lattice structure Prof Cook is developing. I reread the Cook- Rossi paper a couple weeks ago and have been thinking about this off and on since then. The bridge from the telosphere to the quark-nucleon structure is a long bridge but it has to be there. Knowing both ends is a big help in finding the whole bridge. At any rate maybe we could discuss some ideas on how this might develop.

    All the very best to you

    Brent Whipple

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>