h-Space Theory

.

by
Valeriy Y.Tarasov
E-mail: vytarasov@yahoo.com

.

Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file

.

Abstract
The h-space theory is a variant of unified physical theory – a theory of everything.
This theory was built de novo, as the existing physical theories are incompatible and so unsuitable for unification.
A new approach is needed, and has been developed by re-evaluating the definitions of primary physical concepts.
The starting point for the re-evaluation was the following equation – Et = mvL, where energy – E, time – t, length – L, mass – m, velocity – v.
Analysis of these physical concepts resulted in the construction of a unique equation of the primary concepts such as space, length, energy and velocity.
From this, models could be developed that explain all well-known physical phenomena.
In addition, h-space theory predicts phenomena rejected by the current mainstream theories, such as limits to gravitational and electrostatic interactions, and the possibility of cold fusion (as a consequence of the electric charge definition, a modification of Coulomb’s law and the definitions of elementary particles in h-space theory).
The final section of this article describes a number of experimental tests that could be used to verify the h-space theory.
.

Read the whole article
Download the ZIP file

.

545 comments to h-Space Theory

  • ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Congratulations, Dr. Rossi , a great interview. I suggest to all the readers of the journal to listen carefully . Force and courage, Rossi.

    http://salvo5puntozero.tv/intervista-chiacchierata-con-andrea-rossi-inventore-e-cat-12122014/

  • Andrea Rossi

    Franco Sarbia:
    There is not a term.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Joe wrote in December 13th, 2014 at 1:58 AM

    Wladimir,

    You write,
    “And when the proton crosses this point where Ft = Fz, the force Ft becomes stronger, and finally the proton decays in a neutron.”

    Must beta+ decay occur exactly at the point in space where Ft = Fz? If so, why? If not, does this mean that Ft = Fz is just a rough estimate?
    ————————————————-

    Joe,
    actually it is more complex than shown in the figure.
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Image:Acceleration_on_the_proton_by_electron_orbit_in_Rossi-Effect.png

    Because that situation shown in the figure occurs when the proton and the electon are in phase (both them are in the right side regarding the center of the helical trajectory).
    In this case Ft tries to increase the radius of the proton’s helical trajectory.

    But as the proton has acceleration, it means that the proton and the electron are not always in phase.

    When the proton and the electron are out of phase (the proton at right, and the eletron at left side of the center of the helical trajectory).
    In this case Ft tries to shrinkage the radius of the proton’s helical trajectory.

    So,
    as the proton progresses in its motion, actually the radius of the helical trajectory experiences a very fast dilation-shrinkage.

    When the proton hits the plane of the orbit, Fz= 0, and Ft is maximum. And therefore the maximum dilation-shrinkage in the radius of the helical trajectory occurs when the proton is crossing the plane of the orbit.

    I dont know where is the point where the proton captures the pair electron-positron. But probable it is when the proton hits the plane of the electron’s orbit, because it is the point where occurs the maximum dilation-shrinkage of the cross-section of the proton’s orbit around the center of its helical trajectory.

    Joe,
    also note that, as the proton progresses in its motion toward the plane of the orbit, we have:

    1- The component Ft increases

    2- The component Ft is maximum when the proton hits the plane of the electron’s orbit

    It means that while the proton is moving, the radius of the electron’s orbit also is submitted to a shrinkage.
    So, it is reasonable to suppose that the radius of the electron’s orbit experiencies discrete contractions (discrete shrinkages in the radius, multiples of the Planck’s constant).
    The components Fz and Fm contribute for the shrinkage of the radius of the electron’s orbit.

    But when the proton crosses the plane of the orbit, the components Fz and Fm change their action, and now they contribute for the expansion of the radius of the electron’s orbit.

    Therefore, when the proton crosses the plane, the radius of the electron’s orbit can experience a big expansion (multiple of the Planck’s constant), and such expansion on the surface of the electron’s orbit is responsible for extracting the pair electron-positron from the aether (a similar phenomenon as occurs in the atom, when the electron emits photons extracting them from the aether because the electron changed its orbit from one energy level to another in the electrosphere of the atom).

    regards
    wlad

  • Robert Curto

    Dr. Rossi, this is from Roger Green, I hope your readers will click on:

    ( see the link on the comment of Joseph Fine 2014/12/13 h 03.44 PM)

    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale Florida
    USA

  • Franco Sarbia

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.

    How much time will still require the procedure to obtain a patent for e-cat and cat hot,valid for the international market?
    Warm Regards.

    Franco Sarbia

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland, Wladimir Guglinski:
    I forgot to answer to the question 4 of the Frank Acland’s comment, sorry: I answer in seconds while working…
    Answer: as you have read on the Report of the ITP after the Lugano test, energy comes substantially from isotopical shifts, which is not a fusion, at least for what concerns the final results.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • orsobubu

    Felix, OMG that’s an amazing, professional elaboration. It is a long time I would propose to Nikolova a movie script of The New Fire, but lacked an actor and director up to the task. I have to say that the face measures do match very well, but the most interesting fact is the matching during the face animated movements, where the mind of the observers automatically fills and compensates the less than perfect details. You could make a great service to art, to the comprension of the head of the inventor and, ultimately, to the comprension of the inner reactor and science itself, if you posted the video elaborated in such a way to hide the left side with a black matter or something. We cannot elaborate on the E-cat features, because they are not disclosed, so we are forced to twiddle with its inventor’s features. I think we’re into something big here.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Frank Acland wrote in December 12th, 2014 at 10:46 PM

    Dear Andrea,
    I have been reading some translated reports of the interview and wonder if you could confirm whether these translated points are correct:

    1. That the 1 MW plant operates with no external drive input for 3/4 of the operation (self sustain mode)
    2. That Industrial Heat will sell heat (not plants)
    3. That you have discussed the E-Cat with the CEO of Volvo
    4. That the E-Cat reaction is not necessarily fusion
    5. Massive sales will begin once the first 1 MW plant is verified consolidated
    ———————————————————————-

    .

    Andrea Rossi wrote in December 12th, 2014 at 11:37 PM

    Frank Acland:
    1- That’s so far our best available situation with E-Cats and Hot Cats.
    2- No, I did not say this. I said that our plants now make heat and that’s the product our Customers can use so far.
    3- Yes, in Göteborg during the year 2012, after an engineer of Volvo had attended a test in our factory in Bologna ( Italy).
    4- ???
    5- What I said is that mass production cannot start before the operation of the first industrial prototype, installed in a factory of a Customer, is consolidated after a long period of continuous operation ( at least one year).
    —————————————————————

    .

    Dear Andrea,
    You forgot to answer the question 4

    regards
    wlad

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Joe,
    I think that the proton transmute to neutron in a fraction of second after crossing the plane of the orbit of the elecron, because:

    1- Beyond the Coulomb force Fz acting in the helical trajectory shown in the figure, there is also a magnetic force Fm due to the attraction between the magnetic field of the proton and the magnetic field of the electron’s orbit.
    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Image:Acceleration_on_the_proton_by_electron_orbit_in_Rossi-Effect.png

    2- Therefore the compoment accelerating the proton is Fz + Fm.

    3- The component Ft trying to increse the radius of the helical trajectory is never stronger than Fz + Fm before the proton to hit the plane of the orbit.

    4- In the instant when the proton crosses the plane of the orbit Ft is maximum, and Fz= 0.

    5- When the proton crosses the plane, Fz and Fm change their direction, and so the force trying to increase the radius of the helical trajectory is Fz + Fm + Ft. In this instant the proton captures a pair positron-electron from the aether, and it becomes a neutron emitting a positron.

    regards
    wlad

  • Joe

    Wladimir,

    You write,
    “And when the proton crosses this point where Ft = Fz, the force Ft becomes stronger, and finally the proton decays in a neutron.”

    Must beta+ decay occur exactly at the point in space where Ft = Fz? If so, why? If not, does this mean that Ft = Fz is just a rough estimate?

    All the best,
    Joe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    1- That’s so far our best available situation with E-Cats and Hot Cats.
    2- No, I did not say this. I said that our plants now make heat and that’s the product our Customers can use so far.
    3- Yes, in Göteborg during the year 2012, after an engineer of Volvo had attended a test in our factory in Bologna ( Italy).
    4- What I said is that mass production cannot start before the operation of the first industrial prototype, installed in a factory of a Customer, is consolidated after a long period of continuous operation ( at least one year).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    I am sorry I cannot understand Italian — because you apparently had an interesting interview with Salvo Mandarà today.

    I have been reading some translated reports of the interview and wonder if you could confirm whether these translated points are correct:

    1. That the 1 MW plant operates with no external drive input for 3/4 of the operation (self sustain mode)
    2. That Industrial Heat will sell heat (not plants)
    3. That you have discussed the E-Cat with the CEO of Volvo
    4. That the E-Cat reaction is not necessarily fusion
    5. Massive sales will begin once the first 1 MW plant is verified consolidated

    Thank you!

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yuri:
    Both.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Wladimir Guglinski
    December 12th, 2014 at 11:20 AM

    eernie1 wrote in December 11th, 2014 at 4:56 PM

    wlad,
    In your reply to me I think you meant 2s1 instead of 1s1.How can an electron electrosphere(in the eV range)accelerate the neutron up to 14 MeV?
    ————————————————————–

    Eernie,
    I would like to calculate the energy of the proton when it crosses the plane of the orbit of the electron.
    However the calculation is very complex, because:

    1- The attraction force on the proton increases proportional to the inverse of the square of the distance.
    So, as the proton progresses, the force on it increases quickly.

    2- With the acceleration of the proton, the magnetic field induced by the motion of the proton increases with the growth of its speed. And therefore the attraction force between the magnetic field of the proton and the magnetic field of the electron orbit also increases.

    .

    Therefore the kinetic energy of the proton grows quickly and strongly, and when the proton crosses the orbit of the electron its kinetic energy had a very big increase.

    regards
    wlad

  • Yuri

    Hello Andrea, I’ve just read a translation into English of your interview on Vessy’s blog, http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/. When you say to the interviewer that the E-Cat is in ssm for 3/4 of the time do you refer to the low-temperature E-Cat of IH’s customer or to the Hot-Cat?
    Regards,
    Yuri G.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    ERRATA:

    Where it is written:

    Consider that the radius of the electron’s orbit is 0,5×10-10m (20 times shorter than the distance 10^-11m). In this case the proton will move 95% of its trajectory with the condition Fz > Ft.

    the correct is:

    Consider that the radius of the electron’s orbit is 0,5×10-12m (20 times shorter than the distance 10^-11m). In this case the proton will move 95% of its trajectory with the condition Fz > Ft.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Joe wrote in December 12th, 2014 at 4:34 PM

    Wladimir,

    A decrease in radius could be expected in the absence of the Coulomb interaction. But since this interaction exists and would be trying to increase the radius of the helical trajectory, what law of Nature are you using to explain how the Coulomb interaction can be countered?
    ————————————————————-

    Joe,
    the attraction force between the proton and the electron is shown in the figure, where it is decomposed in two components Fz and Ft:

    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Image:Acceleration_on_the_proton_by_electron_orbit_in_Rossi-Effect.png

    The component Fz accelerates the proton, and therefore the action of Fz decreases the radius orbit of the helical trajectory of the proton.

    The component Ft tries to increase the radius of the helical trajectory.

    As Fz is very larger than Ft when the proton is far away of the plane of the electron’s orbit, then Ft is not able to increase the radius of the helical trajectory.

    The distance between the nucleus 3Li7 and the plane of the orbit is about 10^-11m.
    Consider that the radius of the electron’s orbit is 0,5×10-10m (20 times shorter than the distance 10^-11m). In this case the proton will move 95% of its trajectory with the condition Fz > Ft.

    But when the proton arrives to a position near to the plane of the orbit, the condition is Ft = Fz (the proton already has travelled 95% of its displacement).
    And when the proton crosses this point where Ft = Fz, the force Ft becomes stronger, and finally the proton decays in a neutron.

    regards
    wlad

  • Andrea Rossi

    Orsobubu:
    bang, bang!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Joe

    Wladimir,

    A decrease in radius could be expected in the absence of the Coulomb interaction. But since this interaction exists and would be trying to increase the radius of the helical trajectory, what law of Nature are you using to explain how the Coulomb interaction can be countered?

    All the best,
    Joe

  • orsobubu

    Fantastic interview, I’ve really enjoyed it, congratulations to Mandarà, a journalist I didn’t know. I’m only sorry that not italian readers will have some difficulties, maybe the video can be uploaded on youtube with the machine translation utility

    Andrea, you know that every man has his face divided into two halves, not perfectly symmetrical; well, if you look at the video and cover by the hand the left side of your face, observing only the right side, you will find that you and actor Clint Eastwood are like two peas in a pod! ehheheh

  • Dear readers (especially those who can understand Italian),

    I own a small web TV and this morning I had the pleasure to have an interview with Andrea Rossi.

    Please find the link to whatch it: http://salvo5puntozero.tv/intervista-chiacchierata-con-andrea-rossi-inventore-e-cat-12122014/

    I hope you will enjoy it.

    Thanks and regards.
    Salvo Mandarà

  • Greg Leonard

    Dear Silvio Caggia
    What will happen when the AI discover the biggest threat to the human race is … the human race.
    The biggest threat to the planet Earth is … too many humans

    Hopefully it will take some time before we get to that stage.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    eernie1 wrote in December 11th, 2014 at 4:56 PM

    wlad,
    In your reply to me I think you meant 2s1 instead of 1s1.How can an electron electrosphere(in the eV range)accelerate the neutron up to 14 MeV?
    —————————————-

    Eernie,
    the proton and the neutron are not accelerated by the energy of the electron orbit, they actually are accelerated by the magnetic field produced by the orbit.

    The proton moves along the distance between the nucleus and the orbit, in the order of 10^-11m, which is a very big distance ( 10.000 times larger than the radius of the nucleus )

    regards
    wlad

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    eernie1
    December 11th, 2014 at 4:56 PM

    wlad,
    In your reply to me I think you meant 2s1 instead of 1s1.How can an electron electrosphere(in the eV range)accelerate the neutron up to 14 MeV?
    —————————————-

    Eernie,
    as I already had explained with the help of many figures, when two nuclei align their magnetic fields along the z-axis direction, the outter electron orbit is shared by the electrosphere of the two nuclei, and so the orbit takes the position perpendicular to the z-axis.

    In the case Pd-D2, the orbit 1s1 takes the position perpendicular to the z-axis, and so we have:

    1- Firstly the proton has a big acceleration due to its attraction with the orbit 1s1

    2- After the proton transmutation to neutron, the neutron is accelerated due to its repulsion with the orbit 1s1.

    I had shown it to Joe, in the case of Ni-3Li7:

    http://peswiki.com/index.php/Image:Why_neutron_is_repelled_by_the_electron_orbit.png

    regards
    wlad

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Joe
    December 12th, 2014 at 2:39 AM

    Wladimir,

    In your model, as the proton approaches the plane of rotation, does the radius of its helical trajectory increase, decrease, or remain constant?
    ————————————————–

    Joe,
    when a particle is accelerated, the radius of the HT decreases (tends to zero when the velocity aproach to the velocity of light).

    when a paritcle is disaccelerated, the radius of the HT increases (tends to infinite when the velocity tends to zero).

    Therefore as the proton approaches the plane of rotation the radius of its helical trajectory decreases.

    regards
    wlad

  • silvio caggia

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    In next years we will have:
    A) Free (or near free) energy (e-cat and other competitors)
    B) Artificial Intelligence
    The combination of A) and B) will give always more services and goods with always less human work.
    We have to resign to the idea that work will be limited to only a small percentage of “work-addicted” people.
    The real challenge will be to invent new ways to distribute services and goods to everyone on the earth according to their needs.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    As you well know cars are made with intense use of robots, but still carmakers are strong employers. The areas of employment are extensive, not just in R&D, but also along the production lines and all the infinite series of activity made necessary from the evolving sophistication of a product like this.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    You have talked the necessity of bringing down the cost of E-Cat production for competitive reasons and using robotized production lines, which would reduce the role of human employees in the manufacturing process.

    Do you forsee most employment opportunities surrounding the E-Cat coming on the R&D side of your operations? Or other areas?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alex:
    I spammed your comment because written in an untranslatable Language. Please resend it in English.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dr Peter Forsberg:
    I agree.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Hans-Joachim Müller

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    to have a job for earning money is very important for the majority of man. But from a general point of view this discussion is a little bit on the surface. What man needs is food, clothing, heat, electricity, transportation, education, information, health care and so on and so on. To generate these things in a higher amount, higher quality and with a smaller amount of costs and work is the goal of every tecnical progress and developement. An also very hard problem is, to give all people, willing to contibute, the chance to contribute and to earn money in this way for her life.
    Nevertheless,I think the developement of E-cat will bring about also large impulses for employment of many people.

    Hans-Joachim Müller

  • orsobubu

    Andrea, this is a great answer to an important question. You should go and explain something yourself in Frank’s E-cat World site, where he posted another very good article titled “When Robots Replace Human Workers”. They would not listen to me. In average, people commenting the article (who are, without almost any exclusion, big fans of your achievements) are totally unaware of the relationship between work and capital/money.

    They sincerely think various incredible fantasies like this: every future, single, independent worker will free himself from current wage system buying a robot and putting it to work, and he is compensated for it: “People don’t have to have economic value. All they need is credit. If someone has no money, he takes out a loan, just like he is a student. Instead of investing the money in a diploma for which there is no market, he buys robots that stand in a factory somewhere. The robots earn an income, and the income goes to the owner’s bank account. The only limiting factor will be the demand for robots and the products they manufacture.”

    heheheee

  • Peter Forsberg

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    Regarding your view about financial specualtion. I could not agree with you more. There are flaws in the western capitalistic model. I am a strong believer in the free market, but in the capital sector there are serious flaws that cause enormous risk and harm.

    Regards

    Peter

  • Joe

    Wladimir,

    In your model, as the proton approaches the plane of rotation, does the radius of its helical trajectory increase, decrease, or remain constant?

    All the best,
    Joe

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Thank you for this important question. The mass production of E-Cats will generate a miscellanea of jobs: blue collars, white collars, chemical engineers, physicists, infomatics, electronic engineers…industrial E-Cats are very complex machines, demanding many integrated disciplines; I hope this work of us will be a game changer in the employment sector. I really hope that we will be able to create jobs in massive measure, directly and indirectly. I have been born as an enterpreneur, and the essence of enterpreneurship is to create jobs. Unfortunately in our present times money is made principally by means of financial speculations and it is not good, because this kind of richness is made without producing things with real value; real value can be conferred only by the work incorporated in it. In this sense we hope to help the game changing. Industry and production of real things redistributes welfare and make shared richness, while financial speculation concentrates richness in few parasitic organizations without making jobs and therefore without sharing richness. Financial speculation is the real liability of contemporary economy; is made by persons that want to earn money without producing anything useful, just making money with money, so that the money loses its original nature, which is the incorporation of work. Banks are using money to make more money in more or less borderline speculations, instead of financing the industries properly.To return to the sound economy based on the production of real things we must invent products worth to be made; the E-Cat, if it works well, can help. In the meantime the law should forbid ( really) to the banks to act as financial speculators, using the money to speculate instead of financing really productive activities that create jobs and produce shared welfare.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    What are the kinds of jobs you hope to see created as a result of your work with the E-Cat?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • eernie1

    Wlad,
    If you were talking about the electron of the 1D2 then 1s1 is the correct nomenclature.
    Regards.

  • eernie1

    wlad,
    In your reply to me I think you meant 2s1 instead of 1s1.How can an electron electrosphere(in the eV range)accelerate the neutron up to 14 MeV?
    Regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    John Atkinson:
    All the energy sources must be integrated at the service of mankind and all must be exploited at the maximum possible. Environmental issues can be resolved with the best available Technologies. We must create jobs, not destroy them.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    ERRATA:

    Dear JR,

    in my last post, where it is written:

    While the proton is trying to keep its trajectory along the z-axis, the centripetal force of the electron (transmited via Coulomb attraction) tries to open the helical trajectory of the proton, by increasing the radius Rp.

    the correct is:

    While the proton is trying to keep its trajectory along the z-axis, the centrifugal force of the electron (transmited via Coulomb attraction) tries to open the helical trajectory of the proton, by increasing the radius Rp.

    As you know, I avoid to use the word “centrifugal”, because it is ficticious, in spite of it is the most simple way for explanation

    regards
    wlad

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    Joe wrote in December 10th, 2014 at 8:53 PM

    2- But the action of the electron 2s1 changes the radius R, and now the orbit has a new radius Rc. However, with that instantaneous velocity V the proton cannot have another different radius. With the velocity V the radius must be kept as R.

    i) By the word “orbit”, do you mean the rotation of the 2s1 electron?
    ————————————————————-

    No, Joe.
    There are two orbits:

    1- The orbit of the electron 2s1. Let’s call its radius Re

    2- The orbit of the helical trajectory of the proton. Let’s call it Rp.

    The rotation of the electron 2s1 in the orbit with radius Re changes the radius Rp of the helical trajectory of the proton, from Rp to Rc. (“c” of change, and not of charge).

    The orbit of 2s1 changes the radius Rp because there is Coulomb attraction between the electron and the proton.
    While the proton is trying to keep its trajectory along the z-axis, the centripetal force of the electron (transmited via Coulomb attraction) tries to open the helical trajectory of the proton, by increasing the radius Rp.
    But as the proton moves is moving with acceleration, its radius Rp actually has tendency to decrease, and not to increase.

    .

    ii) If so, does “Rc” mean “radius of charge”?
    —————————————————

    Explained above

    regards
    wlad

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    eernie1 wrote in December 10th, 2014 at 9:33 PM

    Wlad,
    As long as we are speculating about Mosier-Boss, how about the following known fusions.
    1D2+1D2=1T3+p(3.02 MeV)
    1T3+1D2=2He4+n(14.1MeV)
    1T3+1T3=2He4+2n(12.9MeV)
    How do you think her reactions achieved the large energies?
    ——————————————-

    Eernie,
    these are reactions by HOT fusion:

    https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/nuclear-fusion-waste-products.121166/

    They are obtained by Tokomak or any other hot fusion reactor
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

    You cannot get 1T3+1D2 = 2He4+n(14.1MeV) directly by cold fusion.

    In Mosier-Boss cold fusion, there is a sandwich Pd-D2-T3

    We have:
    1- The neutron of D2 exits the D2 with 2,2MeV and it is captured by T3. The neutron decays, and T3 transmutes to 2He4.
    2- The proton exits the D2 with 2.2MeV and it is pulled by the orbit 1s1, moving with acceleration toward the 1s1 orbit. When it is crossing the orbit 1s1, the proton transmutes to a neutron, and the neutron is pushed by the orbit 1s1 with acceleration toward the Pd nucleus, getting energy up to 14MeV before to hit the Pd nucleus.

    regards
    wlad

  • john Atkinson

    I see no down side for e-cat if oil prices continue to fall.I believe the cost of oil is primarilly controlled by OPEC.They have desided to not reduce their oil out put to the world market even though North America and other countries are producing more of their on oil which also furnishs the world oil.Opecs stratigy, I believe , is to allow the world market supply to continue to exceed the market demand for oil and drive the prices lower to the point where it is no longer profitable for the north American continent and other regions in the world to pump it out of the ground.Once it reachs this price and is sustain for some time, oil prices will again come up.Once e-cat is introduced into the market and is proven to be a reliable, clean and cheap energy alternative to oil, the oil prices will decline to the point where its supply will equel its demand which will continually drop. I believe the e-cat will remain much cheaper than oil to produce energy and the e-cat will control the oil prices and not the oil prices control the e- cat. Is this not what all this is about?

  • eernie1

    Wlad,
    As long as we are speculating about Mosier-Boss, how about the following known fusions.
    1D2+1D2=1T3+p(3.02 MeV)
    1T3+1D2=2He4+n(14.1MeV)
    1T3+1T3=2He4+2n(12.9MeV)
    How do you think her reactions achieved the large energies?
    Regards.

  • Joe

    Wladimir,

    You write,
    “2- But the action of the electron 2s1 changes the radius R, and now the orbit has a new radius Rc. However, with that instantaneous velocity V the proton cannot have another different radius. With the velocity V the radius must be kept as R.”

    i) By the word “orbit”, do you mean the rotation of the 2s1 electron?

    ii) If so, does “Rc” mean “radius of charge”?

    All the best,
    Joe

  • Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    I think Greg Leonard may be onto something.

    I recall sometime ago there was talk of an E-cat “TIGER”
    Congratulations to You & Your Team.

    Your R&D is advancing much faster then I could have ever imagined. 🙂

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kB5ROD4CGG8

    Regards: Dan C.

    PS,
    U.S. Oil production increasing from about 5M barrels a day to 9M with another 1M coming probably has a little bit to do with the price drop. just a little bit… 🙂

  • Robert Curto

    I would like to share my OPINION with:
    Perter Forsberg and Greg Leonard.
    OPEC does this over and over.
    They try to do as much damage as possible to:

    Natural gas production, they already have enough tree huggers claiming dirty water, earthquakes, etc.

    Alternative Energy, Wind, Solar, etc.

    Fuel made from waste, wood, etc.

    After they do as much damage as possible the price will go back up.

    You have to remember God made the Oil.
    All they have to do is pump it out of the Well for thirty years, at very little cost.
    SOMEDAY E-Cat will make them happy to sell their oil for $10 a barrel, and make a nice profit.

    Robert Curto
    Ft. Lauderdale Florida
    USA

  • Wladimir Guglinski

    eernie1 wrote in December 10th, 2014 at 11:27 AM

    Wlad,
    In the Mosier-Boss reaction, have you forgotten about the energy used to cause the fusion of the deuterons or the mass change which can be translated as energy that must be accounted for?
    ————————————————–

    Eernie,
    the energy used to cause the fusion of deuterons in cold fusion is small, since cold fusion occurs at low energy of pressure and temperature.

    The mass change is taking in account when we calculate the binding energy 2,2MeV of the deuteron, by using Einstein equation E= mc² applied to the mass defect.

    regards
    wlad

  • silvio caggia

    @Valeriy Y. Tarasov
    Your theory seems to me very similar to RS2theory forum.rs2theory.org
    but my knowledge of both is so little that I could be wrong…
    I suggest to both guru a cross check, maybe you can cooperate in some way…

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>