Dear Andrea Rossi:
A very good replication of your effect, with very intelligent variations, has been made repeatedly by Dr Brian Ahern in Boston. Probably he has been the first to replicate : do you agree?
Susan
Bernie Koppenhofer:
It is too soon to answer. Thank you for your trust, but I still have to work very much before being ready to answer to such a heavy question.
In the meantime, let’s complete the R&D and tests program.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Konner P.:
Thank you for your kind words.
Update:
now it’s 01.40 p.m. of Monday Oct 19 inside the computer container.
The 1 MW E-Cat has electric problems to one of the 4 reactors and we are repairing it. The E-Cat X , in the other laboratory, is working well so far, but it is still soon to comment. Still very promising, still alive… so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Because that was the maximum amount that was possible to withdraw from the E-Cat by the Professors without breaking the reactor, due to its complex internal design.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
First of all, again congratulations for your US Patent.
Can you give us an update for both the 1 MW E-Cat and the E-Cat X?
Thank you,
KP
Mario Cefis:
Dr Alexander Parkhomov has beyond any doubt made the most complete and important replication, but also others have made a very interesting job in the USA, in China, in Russia and in Europe too with the replication of the apparatus.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
During the Airbus convention new replications of your apparatus have been reported; among all the replications made so far which one you think is the most important?
Mario
Mariana Tsutserova:
It is totally false. I will never sell Leonardo Corporation, because I think it has a great future. Obviously we are not sure that the tests on course will have a positive output, but I trust in it. I strongly hope we are making a great company, with a great intellectual property, a great and advanced manufacturing concern, jobs and a great future and I will never leave this ship. If she will sink, I will sink with her.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for your consideration of my US Patent: we are continuing with the other applications to extend the protection of the IP.
Thank you also for the information and the links, very promising, regarding the Sandia electric turbine generator. Still prototypal, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congratulations on your recent patent and the 64+ other patent applications you are working on.
The following article described S-CO2 Electric Turbine/Generator developments which appeared in IEEE Spectrum Magazine this past August.
A second article describes a related agreement between Sandia Labs and 8 other companies to develop a “fossil-fueled” energy system using Super-Critical CO2 Technology.
The article discussed a 6 MW generator. A proposed similar 20 MW generator would have a volume of only 4 Cubic Meters.
Coincidentally, you are testing a 1 MW “non-fossil-fueled” energy source with a volume of 4 cubic meters.
If a 20 MW heat source requires a volume of 20×4 = 80 cubic meters, the total volume of a 20 MW energy system might be on the order of 80 + 4 = 84+ cubic meters for the heat source and generator plus additional space for spares and a control room to accommodate the person or persons who run the system. That does not seem like a large building.
Maybe they also could “throw in” a library, a conference area, some vending machines, a water fountain and a bathroom or two.
Oeystein Lande:
I concluded that the 0.2% ash sample of the charge was not representative for the whole charge, as you can read also in the Cook Rossi paper published on Arxiv.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Have you concluded If the 0,2% Ash sample analysed in the Lugano test was representative for the whole reactor core, or did some isotopic separation occur, that made the Ash sample not representative?
Arthur Lindon:
Replications in laboratory do not violate the intellectual property, which is related to the market, not to the scientific experiments. If all our tests on course and the R&D will confirm the validity of the product, we will manufacture it in such a way and with such a competitivity that the reverse engineering will be extremely difficult, if aimed to compete with us. This said, some competition sooner or later will arrive ( by the way, the patent will expire 20 years after the priority date also in all the Countries of the world where we are extending the patent). But in the meantime we will have reached further competitivity. The whole process to the advantage of the Customers. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for your US Patent. After its publication and the publication of the Lugano Report many replications have been made and published and many others are on course. Are you worried of the competition that will be born from these replications?
Godspeed,
Arthur
Paul:
The work presented by Peter Gluck is interesting, I will spend this night in the plant to finish to study the more interesting parts.
We also had one scientist of ours to attend that is preparing for me a detailed report about what is not written. It has been an important event, organized by a giant whose interest in the LENR speaks for the earthquake that our Team has raised.
As a matter of fact many replications have been made, but surely the distance between a laboratory item and an industrial plant is important.
About the interview on the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
I was very groggy because that day I had not been able to sleep during the rest time, but anyway has been fun.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck sent out the long list of reports from the Airbus conference today and
it appears no one has been able to clearly describe the Rossi Effect.
Jean-Paul Biberian was unable to replicate the Parkhomov formula successfully.
you have worked on your IP for over 20 years before finding the ideal conditions for
LENR to exist, we can say that Industrial Heats investment remains secure.
By the way: I listened your interview on the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
Very interesting
Giorgio:
I am studying the papers now, inside the computers container in the factory where the 1 MW E-Cat is operating ( stable, at 01.45 p.m. of Saturday Oct 17).
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anneliese:
It is a continuation, wherein we are giving a mathematical structure to the reconciliations of the results from the Lugano test; we are helped by expert mathematicians.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CD:
I sympathize with your impatience, but there are still a lot of unknowns, so the way we are planning is to remain flexible until we will have completed the R&D and tests on course. We must keep present and future in mind inside a jungle of problems through which we have to build our road day by day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ops.. in the previous message, I forgot to say that the resistor wire could be omitted using the dielectric heating effect, probably more constant on the whole surface.
Hi Andrea,
I don’t know at all the way in which the power is applied to the e-cat, recently we hear that should be useful a wave at resonant frequency.
If it would be so, and the frequency quite high, considered that the shape of the wafer as it appears on the patent sheet, it is a quite perfect capacitor, I can imagine that the great part of the current is reactive, and it could be easily reduced introducing a proper inductor in parallel as power factor corrector.
I hope that in this manner the cop could increase a bit.
Could you give us some information about the evolution of the kW heat / kW electric ratio ?
In bocca al lupo in this second half of validation ! Every thing should be different after that, but you never know… Here just a song of the very talented singer Lianne La Havas which gets me going and maybe you and other readers will enjoy : http://youtu.be/YFic-xaLsPs
Video is not needed – just listen if I may suggest.
Mr Rossi:
We are very nervous because you continue not to give us a precise scheduling about the sales of the E-Cat: can you tell when, at last, we will be able to buy it or if it will never be possible?
CD
Paul:
Yes, every E-Cat has to be tested before delivery.
No problem to start, stop and restart.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea,
Will you be testing each reactor before it is shipped to a customer?
Are there any issues with starting, stopping, and then re-starting an e-cat reactor?
Paul
Dear Andrea,
I also want to congratulate you for your 1st U.S. patent. Félicitations !
I hope that you’ll reach the 65th and even more 🙂
About
It may or may not include the fossil fuel fuel tank(s) 😉 …
French Regards,
Dear Andrea Rossi:
A very good replication of your effect, with very intelligent variations, has been made repeatedly by Dr Brian Ahern in Boston. Probably he has been the first to replicate : do you agree?
Susan
Bernie Koppenhofer:
It is too soon to answer. Thank you for your trust, but I still have to work very much before being ready to answer to such a heavy question.
In the meantime, let’s complete the R&D and tests program.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi: When do you think it will be possible for us to invest in Leonardo Corporation?
Konner P.:
Thank you for your kind words.
Update:
now it’s 01.40 p.m. of Monday Oct 19 inside the computer container.
The 1 MW E-Cat has electric problems to one of the 4 reactors and we are repairing it. The E-Cat X , in the other laboratory, is working well so far, but it is still soon to comment. Still very promising, still alive… so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alexvs:
Because that was the maximum amount that was possible to withdraw from the E-Cat by the Professors without breaking the reactor, due to its complex internal design.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Why the sample withdrawn from the E-Cat in Lugano was only 2 mg from a 1 g charge ?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
First of all, again congratulations for your US Patent.
Can you give us an update for both the 1 MW E-Cat and the E-Cat X?
Thank you,
KP
Mario Cefis:
Dr Alexander Parkhomov has beyond any doubt made the most complete and important replication, but also others have made a very interesting job in the USA, in China, in Russia and in Europe too with the replication of the apparatus.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
During the Airbus convention new replications of your apparatus have been reported; among all the replications made so far which one you think is the most important?
Mario
Mariana Tsutserova:
It is totally false. I will never sell Leonardo Corporation, because I think it has a great future. Obviously we are not sure that the tests on course will have a positive output, but I trust in it. I strongly hope we are making a great company, with a great intellectual property, a great and advanced manufacturing concern, jobs and a great future and I will never leave this ship. If she will sink, I will sink with her.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nero:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
We read in some blogs that you are selling Leonardo Corporation: is that true?
Mariana
Dear Andrea,
further analysis of major quantities of the very ashes were detected more congruent with your expectations? Nero
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for your consideration of my US Patent: we are continuing with the other applications to extend the protection of the IP.
Thank you also for the information and the links, very promising, regarding the Sandia electric turbine generator. Still prototypal, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Andrea,
Congratulations on your recent patent and the 64+ other patent applications you are working on.
The following article described S-CO2 Electric Turbine/Generator developments which appeared in IEEE Spectrum Magazine this past August.
A second article describes a related agreement between Sandia Labs and 8 other companies to develop a “fossil-fueled” energy system using Super-Critical CO2 Technology.
The article discussed a 6 MW generator. A proposed similar 20 MW generator would have a volume of only 4 Cubic Meters.
Coincidentally, you are testing a 1 MW “non-fossil-fueled” energy source with a volume of 4 cubic meters.
If a 20 MW heat source requires a volume of 20×4 = 80 cubic meters, the total volume of a 20 MW energy system might be on the order of 80 + 4 = 84+ cubic meters for the heat source and generator plus additional space for spares and a control room to accommodate the person or persons who run the system. That does not seem like a large building.
Maybe they also could “throw in” a library, a conference area, some vending machines, a water fountain and a bathroom or two.
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/the-smarter-grid/supercritical-carbon-dioxide-can-make-electric-turbines-greener
https://share.sandia.gov/news/resources/news_releases/brayton_mou/#.ViRQEaRy5LT
Thermal regards,
Joseph Fine
Frank Acland:
Yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Would the projected size of 2 x 2 x 1 m for the industrial plant include the computer controls?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Oeystein Lande:
I concluded that the 0.2% ash sample of the charge was not representative for the whole charge, as you can read also in the Cook Rossi paper published on Arxiv.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi
Have you concluded If the 0,2% Ash sample analysed in the Lugano test was representative for the whole reactor core, or did some isotopic separation occur, that made the Ash sample not representative?
Regards
Lande
Arthur Lindon:
Replications in laboratory do not violate the intellectual property, which is related to the market, not to the scientific experiments. If all our tests on course and the R&D will confirm the validity of the product, we will manufacture it in such a way and with such a competitivity that the reverse engineering will be extremely difficult, if aimed to compete with us. This said, some competition sooner or later will arrive ( by the way, the patent will expire 20 years after the priority date also in all the Countries of the world where we are extending the patent). But in the meantime we will have reached further competitivity. The whole process to the advantage of the Customers. F9.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link also to youtube.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello dr. Rossi,
here is your interview with the psychologist Dr. Vessella Nikolova. Answer his questions was difficult !!
Andrea Rossi: Full Interview by Vessela Nikolova
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yemci4qonEc
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for your US Patent. After its publication and the publication of the Lugano Report many replications have been made and published and many others are on course. Are you worried of the competition that will be born from these replications?
Godspeed,
Arthur
Paul:
The work presented by Peter Gluck is interesting, I will spend this night in the plant to finish to study the more interesting parts.
We also had one scientist of ours to attend that is preparing for me a detailed report about what is not written. It has been an important event, organized by a giant whose interest in the LENR speaks for the earthquake that our Team has raised.
As a matter of fact many replications have been made, but surely the distance between a laboratory item and an industrial plant is important.
About the interview on the blog of
http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
I was very groggy because that day I had not been able to sleep during the rest time, but anyway has been fun.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck sent out the long list of reports from the Airbus conference today and
it appears no one has been able to clearly describe the Rossi Effect.
Jean-Paul Biberian was unable to replicate the Parkhomov formula successfully.
you have worked on your IP for over 20 years before finding the ideal conditions for
LENR to exist, we can say that Industrial Heats investment remains secure.
By the way: I listened your interview on the blog of http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com
Very interesting
Steven N.Karels:
I cannot answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi.
Did you switch to deuterium to avoid the generation of tritium?
Giorgio:
I am studying the papers now, inside the computers container in the factory where the 1 MW E-Cat is operating ( stable, at 01.45 p.m. of Saturday Oct 17).
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jimmy Waters:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link with all the papers from the Airbus convention.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello dr. Rossi:
HERE ARE ALL THE PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE AIRBUS-ISCMNS WORKSHOP
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.it/2015/10/all-papers-presented-at-airbus-iscmns.html
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
in your work did you test both deuterium and protium to compose LiAlH4?
Thank you,
Jimmy
Mr Rossi:
What do you think of the convention just organized by Airbus?
Cheers,
Giorgio
Hello dr. Rossi,
here has been published a new theory LENR by Dr.Geneste of Airbus.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1_tFmz65k8BUGc3Um92SF9xSUozbGM5ZDFIWXpRLUViMmZB/view?pli=1
Richard:
When I say Hydrogen I mean Hydrogen, not a specific isotope.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anneliese:
It is a continuation, wherein we are giving a mathematical structure to the reconciliations of the results from the Lugano test; we are helped by expert mathematicians.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CD:
I sympathize with your impatience, but there are still a lot of unknowns, so the way we are planning is to remain flexible until we will have completed the R&D and tests on course. We must keep present and future in mind inside a jungle of problems through which we have to build our road day by day.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Michael Schneider:
It is too soon to give data related to the E-Cat X.
Thank you for your kind words and for the nice link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alessandro Coppi:
Thank you for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cathrin:
Thank you, it is the result of hundreds of hours of work with my patent Attorneys.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am very impressed by your US Patent: it seems so simple and clear, but it is so huge!
Congratulations,
Cathrin
Ops.. in the previous message, I forgot to say that the resistor wire could be omitted using the dielectric heating effect, probably more constant on the whole surface.
Hi Andrea,
I don’t know at all the way in which the power is applied to the e-cat, recently we hear that should be useful a wave at resonant frequency.
If it would be so, and the frequency quite high, considered that the shape of the wafer as it appears on the patent sheet, it is a quite perfect capacitor, I can imagine that the great part of the current is reactive, and it could be easily reduced introducing a proper inductor in parallel as power factor corrector.
I hope that in this manner the cop could increase a bit.
Best regards
I mean kW electric/ kW heat ratio of Ecat-X of course
Michael
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Could you give us some information about the evolution of the kW heat / kW electric ratio ?
In bocca al lupo in this second half of validation ! Every thing should be different after that, but you never know… Here just a song of the very talented singer Lianne La Havas which gets me going and maybe you and other readers will enjoy : http://youtu.be/YFic-xaLsPs
Video is not needed – just listen if I may suggest.
Michael S
Mr Rossi:
We are very nervous because you continue not to give us a precise scheduling about the sales of the E-Cat: can you tell when, at last, we will be able to buy it or if it will never be possible?
CD