I’m hearing good things about your possible future E-Cat factory in Sweden (Mats Lewan’s blog). Any chance that this factory will be powered by E-Cats? This would not be unlike Tesla Motor’s Gigafactory being powered by its own solar panels and a great demonstration of the E-Cat!
Bert Wesley:
The Clown, as you call it, forgot that I didn’t make any data of the report. The data for the report have been collected only by the ERV.
We are talking of 12 millions of raw data, that, if printed, would make 66 000 pages. The exclusive holder of the raw data is the ERV.
The temperature indicated by what you call The Clown is wrong, never cited that temperature in the report .
Who wrote these stupidities obviously knows nothing of the test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan C.:
Your comment is quite confusing. kW are units of power, kWh are units of energy. The numbers you write are nonsense.
I am not able to answer. Can you rephrase correctly ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- The ERV is a nuclear engineer, who worked in nuclear power plants and has a long career as an expert for validations and certifications. The imbecile that wrote such stupidities probably has introjected himself and his own culture in the brain of the ERV. Obviously what you report as a “rumor” is a nonsense. Also the number is wrong. I cannot disclose the data of the report until the report is disclosed in Court.
2- As you know, I made my own measurements with my instrumentation and also I had access to the displays of the ERV’s instrumentation installed in the plant, so I was able to make a comparision. The data were coherent, within the normal margin of error of the instruments.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1. I have read rumors of the ERV report stating that steam output was constantly 100.1 C throughout the test, even when the plant was shut down — is this accurate? If not, can you say what the average temperature of the steam was?
2. Was there any difference between the measurements by your own instruments and the ERV’s instruments of steam output?
Dr. Rossi: Thank you for the recent information you have provided on this site and for giving the Mats Lewan interview, both very positive and informative. I was wondering if you have received back the reports on the isotopic tests of the ash from the year long test. Could you tell us if they are consistent with the Lugano test?
The Clown says you pasted the data of the report and confused them. He says you put 100.1 °C also when the plant was shut down.
Do you think is worth to answer ?
Cheers,
Bert
Frank Acland:
1- it took place inside a plant about 20 meters long, 3 meters high, 3 meters wide, obviously closed
2- it was in a separate area of the same building
3- Darden and his investors met the Customer in the meeting room of the offices, that is separated from the production area
4- we are in the process to find an agreement
5- the control system is separate
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I read with great interest the article published by Mats Lewan regarding your visit to Sweden and your report of some of the details of the 1 year E-Cat test. I wonder if you could clarify a couple of points:
1. From what I have read the customer’s work took place inside a sealed enclosure, maybe a shipping container also?
2. Was the customer’s production facility positioned next to the plant in the same building?
3. Mats wrote that “IH never had access to the customer’s area”, however you mentioned yesterday that Tom Darden and his investors spoke with the customer in his factory. Can you explain what Mats meant?
4. Did you buy the building you looked at in Sweden for your factory?
5. Mats said the 100 W QuarkX is the size of a pen — does each QuarkX include its own control system built in, or is that separate?
Oystein Lande:
1. the container itself was not insulated, because this would have been useless, since all the hot bodies inside the container were thermally insulated
2. The doors were open during the operation and there was a ventilation system that sent the warm air through the exhaust windows of the roof of the factory
Besides: you correctly write that if the 1% of the heat produced was lost through the insulation, 10 thermal kW were emitted.
As you well know, just to give an example that explains which amount of energy we are talking of and as any household knows, 10 kW of power are barely enough to maintain during a mild winter a temperature of 25 °C in a two rooms apartment with close windows.
A 2 rooms apartment has a volume of about 200 cubic meters.
We were in a factory with windows in the roof always open; by the way, as you know, warm air goes naturally toward the top being lighter than air colder than it; the volume of the factory is 6 000 cubic meters which means about 30 times the volume of a two rooms apartment.
Now: if 10 kW of power are able to hold a 2 rooms apartment of 200 cubic meters at 22°C with closed windows, how much are able the same to heat a factory of 6 000 cubic meters with open windows on the roof and a ventilation system to exhaust it ? Obviously the temperature was warmer inside the reactors container, in fact I told you that there were about 40 °C, but, due to the fact that the doors of the container were open and that also inside the container there was a ventilation system, the internal temperature of the reactors container never is gone above the 40 °C.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attributes with which you are dealing with enemies one thousand folds stronger and powerful than you. For us it is fun to watch this sort of movie, but I understand for you it is hard to sustain all this and at the same time to continue to work on your E-Cat.
Thank you for all you are doing,
Rosalba
I am a litle surprised that you needed no HVAC system in the e-cat container producing 1MW heat. If you only lost 1% of this inside the container, it still meant 10KW heating,…
1. I Expect the container itself where not insulated? and therefore transferring effectively the lost heat to the outside surroundings.
2. Did you have closed doors of the e-cat container during running?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Questions, if you can answer:
1- before the beginning of the test did Tom Darden meet the president of the Customer (JM) ?
2- did he know that the president of JM, the Customer, was also your attorney ?
3- if yes, did he sign a contract with JM after knowing what in points 1 and 2 ?
4- when he accompanied his investors to visit the plant of the Customer, did Tom Darden and his investors speak with the Customer in his factory ?
5- during these visits did he say anything negative to you and to his investors, or he only said positive things ?
6- is it true that Tom Darden collected substantial amounts of money from the investors after their visit to the plant to the Customer ?
7- at the time Darden made the visits to the plant in the factory of the Customer, had he already received from the ERV the first quarter report ?
8 if yes, were the results of the report with the data of the first quarter moreless equal to the results of the final report ?
Thank you for your answers,
Cheers,
Micky
Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to Mats Lewan during your important visit to Sweden.
His blog post about your meeting is well written and very revealing.
Mats is like an escrow of trust in our community. I hope you can keep him in the loop as much as you can and let him attend some important events even if under NDA.
Just focus on the quark-x.
Oystein Lande:
1- No, we had two containers, one with the control systems, one with the E-Cats
2- In the E-Cat container there was no air conditioned, because inside that container the temperature was the same you have in any industrial thermic central.
The temperature was warm obviously, but not too much, because all the hot parts were well insulated, also to conserve the energy. Reactors, steam pipes and water pipes were very well insulated.
There was also a ventilation system that conveyed the warm air toward the windows of the ceiling. Normally we were not inside the E-Cat container, where we had to go only in case of reparations or maintainance; here the temperature was around 40°C.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am so glad you are continuing your work, turning a blind eye to the other problems. With you we will have the LENR.
Take care of yourself.
Ronaldo
Frank Acland:
I confirm that the ERV has made the measurements coherently with the protocol signed in the Agreement between the two parties.
He made all the measurements with his own certified instrumentation and at the end of the test the RRV has himself disconnected and retrieved his instrumentetion, to send it to the manufacturers of every instrument to re-certify every instrument to be sure that during the test none of them has changed the margin of error.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
According to the contract published in the court documents, this is the way that the ERV was to perform the measurements in the Validation test: “To make this measurement the ERV will measure the flow of the heated fluid and the Delta T between the temperature of the fluid before and after the E-Cat reaction”.
Is this the measurement system used in the ERV report?
This new technology should sound like something from the Star Trek universe. I think Quark Cell is a fitting name.
I can hear Picard ask for some more Quark cells when he needs to refuel the hyperdrive.
Thanks for considering Sweden for your new factory, it would be such an honor to have the first Quark cell factory on Swedish land.
Robert:
Leonardo Corporation wanted to lock the plant after the end of the test waiting for the payment. The plant has been stopped and locked upon agreement between the two parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
How is going the QuarkX today?
Cheers,
Dear Andrea Rossi:
I’m hearing good things about your possible future E-Cat factory in Sweden (Mats Lewan’s blog). Any chance that this factory will be powered by E-Cats? This would not be unlike Tesla Motor’s Gigafactory being powered by its own solar panels and a great demonstration of the E-Cat!
Sincerely,
Peter Metz
Dear Andrea,
My blog issue for today under the sign of “dies irae”
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-18-2016-lenr-irre-and-days-of-wrath.html
But the future will solve the problems,
Best,
peter
seen on ECT about implications by Industrial Heat – Interesting
Billy Jackson
.. all that falls apart right when you show they made one themselves … without Rossi’s help then filed a patent claiming a COP of 11+ …
of everything they have done or said.. IH has to explain that one more than any other part of the lawsuit.
All the magic and accusations of sleight of hand or fraud, just goes up in smoke when you are taught the magic trick and present it as your own …
Dear Andrea,
Thank you for your courage and perseverance.
You are inspiring.
Dimitry
Oystein Lande:
The data you are asking for are part of the report that we cannot make public before the disclosure of it in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bert Wesley:
The Clown, as you call it, forgot that I didn’t make any data of the report. The data for the report have been collected only by the ERV.
We are talking of 12 millions of raw data, that, if printed, would make 66 000 pages. The exclusive holder of the raw data is the ERV.
The temperature indicated by what you call The Clown is wrong, never cited that temperature in the report .
Who wrote these stupidities obviously knows nothing of the test.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, still very promising and in good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan C.:
Your comment is quite confusing. kW are units of power, kWh are units of energy. The numbers you write are nonsense.
I am not able to answer. Can you rephrase correctly ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
Not yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
How can I put a control system in a pen ?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- The ERV is a nuclear engineer, who worked in nuclear power plants and has a long career as an expert for validations and certifications. The imbecile that wrote such stupidities probably has introjected himself and his own culture in the brain of the ERV. Obviously what you report as a “rumor” is a nonsense. Also the number is wrong. I cannot disclose the data of the report until the report is disclosed in Court.
2- As you know, I made my own measurements with my instrumentation and also I had access to the displays of the ERV’s instrumentation installed in the plant, so I was able to make a comparision. The data were coherent, within the normal margin of error of the instruments.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Regarding the ERV report:
1. I have read rumors of the ERV report stating that steam output was constantly 100.1 C throughout the test, even when the plant was shut down — is this accurate? If not, can you say what the average temperature of the steam was?
2. Was there any difference between the measurements by your own instruments and the ERV’s instruments of steam output?
Thank you if you can answer,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Is the reason the control system is separate from the pen-sized reactor is due to the extreme temperatures the reactor produces or for other reasons?
Dr. Rossi: Thank you for the recent information you have provided on this site and for giving the Mats Lewan interview, both very positive and informative. I was wondering if you have received back the reports on the isotopic tests of the ash from the year long test. Could you tell us if they are consistent with the Lugano test?
Dear Andrea,
How can 10KWh be a lot, But 10KWh be so little?
This sounds contradictory.
Take a coffee brake Andrea, I got this one.
10KWh at $0.001 per KWh is insignificant.
10KWh at $3.00 per KWh is a LOT.
Quarky, I mean quirky regards
Dan C.
Dear Andrea :
Still good the QuarkX ?
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
The Clown says you pasted the data of the report and confused them. He says you put 100.1 °C also when the plant was shut down.
Do you think is worth to answer ?
Cheers,
Bert
Dear Andrea,
The blog issue for today can be found here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-17-2016-lenr-world-has-irreversibly.html
all the best and +
peter
Audie Tessmer:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Christen:
Thank you for the interesting information, I suppose it is very important for the next computer generations.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- it took place inside a plant about 20 meters long, 3 meters high, 3 meters wide, obviously closed
2- it was in a separate area of the same building
3- Darden and his investors met the Customer in the meeting room of the offices, that is separated from the production area
4- we are in the process to find an agreement
5- the control system is separate
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
I read with great interest the article published by Mats Lewan regarding your visit to Sweden and your report of some of the details of the 1 year E-Cat test. I wonder if you could clarify a couple of points:
1. From what I have read the customer’s work took place inside a sealed enclosure, maybe a shipping container also?
2. Was the customer’s production facility positioned next to the plant in the same building?
3. Mats wrote that “IH never had access to the customer’s area”, however you mentioned yesterday that Tom Darden and his investors spoke with the customer in his factory. Can you explain what Mats meant?
4. Did you buy the building you looked at in Sweden for your factory?
5. Mats said the 100 W QuarkX is the size of a pen — does each QuarkX include its own control system built in, or is that separate?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
This may be of interest to you “Physicists discover a new form of light”: http://phys.org/news/2016-05-physicists.html
Warm regards from Spain
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Thank you for the very clear explication you gave to Oystein
Cheers,
Audie
Rosalba:
Thank you for your sympathy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
Very, very good.
I am working with her right now.
Warmest Regards,
A.R.
Oystein Lande:
1. the container itself was not insulated, because this would have been useless, since all the hot bodies inside the container were thermally insulated
2. The doors were open during the operation and there was a ventilation system that sent the warm air through the exhaust windows of the roof of the factory
Besides: you correctly write that if the 1% of the heat produced was lost through the insulation, 10 thermal kW were emitted.
As you well know, just to give an example that explains which amount of energy we are talking of and as any household knows, 10 kW of power are barely enough to maintain during a mild winter a temperature of 25 °C in a two rooms apartment with close windows.
A 2 rooms apartment has a volume of about 200 cubic meters.
We were in a factory with windows in the roof always open; by the way, as you know, warm air goes naturally toward the top being lighter than air colder than it; the volume of the factory is 6 000 cubic meters which means about 30 times the volume of a two rooms apartment.
Now: if 10 kW of power are able to hold a 2 rooms apartment of 200 cubic meters at 22°C with closed windows, how much are able the same to heat a factory of 6 000 cubic meters with open windows on the roof and a ventilation system to exhaust it ? Obviously the temperature was warmer inside the reactors container, in fact I told you that there were about 40 °C, but, due to the fact that the doors of the container were open and that also inside the container there was a ventilation system, the internal temperature of the reactors container never is gone above the 40 °C.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
“Dear Dr Rossi:
Maybe your readers are interested, to better understand who Tom Darden and Mr Weaver are, to read carefully the following links:
The Pennsauken project
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/nyregion/anatomy-of-a-deal-new-jersey-style.html
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/federal_subpoenas_are_issued_f.html
The two bankruptcies in Feb 2016
http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160208/PC05/160209426
EnCap (Owned by Cherokee Investment Partners) bankruptcy in 2008
http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/topstories/index.ssf/2008/07/encaps_bankruptcy_filing_risks.html
These gentlemen are not very credible , the readers will understand.
Regards,
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo
Dear Andrea,
Congratulations for the attributes with which you are dealing with enemies one thousand folds stronger and powerful than you. For us it is fun to watch this sort of movie, but I understand for you it is hard to sustain all this and at the same time to continue to work on your E-Cat.
Thank you for all you are doing,
Rosalba
Dear mr Rossi,
I am a litle surprised that you needed no HVAC system in the e-cat container producing 1MW heat. If you only lost 1% of this inside the container, it still meant 10KW heating,…
1. I Expect the container itself where not insulated? and therefore transferring effectively the lost heat to the outside surroundings.
2. Did you have closed doors of the e-cat container during running?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Update about the QuarkX ?
Ciao,
Roberto
Micky:
1- yes
2- yes
3- yes
4- yes
5- He spoke only positively of the plant and the test on course
6- yes
7- yes
8- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Patrick Ellul:
Thank you for the suggestions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Questions, if you can answer:
1- before the beginning of the test did Tom Darden meet the president of the Customer (JM) ?
2- did he know that the president of JM, the Customer, was also your attorney ?
3- if yes, did he sign a contract with JM after knowing what in points 1 and 2 ?
4- when he accompanied his investors to visit the plant of the Customer, did Tom Darden and his investors speak with the Customer in his factory ?
5- during these visits did he say anything negative to you and to his investors, or he only said positive things ?
6- is it true that Tom Darden collected substantial amounts of money from the investors after their visit to the plant to the Customer ?
7- at the time Darden made the visits to the plant in the factory of the Customer, had he already received from the ERV the first quarter report ?
8 if yes, were the results of the report with the data of the first quarter moreless equal to the results of the final report ?
Thank you for your answers,
Cheers,
Micky
Caro Andrea,
Thank you so much for taking the time to talk to Mats Lewan during your important visit to Sweden.
His blog post about your meeting is well written and very revealing.
Mats is like an escrow of trust in our community. I hope you can keep him in the loop as much as you can and let him attend some important events even if under NDA.
Just focus on the quark-x.
Thank you and best regards,
Patrick
Oystein Lande:
1- No, we had two containers, one with the control systems, one with the E-Cats
2- In the E-Cat container there was no air conditioned, because inside that container the temperature was the same you have in any industrial thermic central.
The temperature was warm obviously, but not too much, because all the hot parts were well insulated, also to conserve the energy. Reactors, steam pipes and water pipes were very well insulated.
There was also a ventilation system that conveyed the warm air toward the windows of the ceiling. Normally we were not inside the E-Cat container, where we had to go only in case of reparations or maintainance; here the temperature was around 40°C.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ronaldo:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I am so glad you are continuing your work, turning a blind eye to the other problems. With you we will have the LENR.
Take care of yourself.
Ronaldo
Hampus Ericsson:
It is an honour for me to make a factory there.
I hope that Picard will not settle for a bicycle,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear mr. Rossi,
You say you had 3KW HVAC coolest for the computer container.
1. This is not the same as e-cat container?
2. How much HVAC cooling did you supply to inside E-cat container to keep it at working conditions…?
Frank Acland:
I confirm that the ERV has made the measurements coherently with the protocol signed in the Agreement between the two parties.
He made all the measurements with his own certified instrumentation and at the end of the test the RRV has himself disconnected and retrieved his instrumentetion, to send it to the manufacturers of every instrument to re-certify every instrument to be sure that during the test none of them has changed the margin of error.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
According to the contract published in the court documents, this is the way that the ERV was to perform the measurements in the Validation test: “To make this measurement the ERV will measure the flow of the heated fluid and the Delta T between the temperature of the fluid before and after the E-Cat reaction”.
Is this the measurement system used in the ERV report?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Hi Rossi
This new technology should sound like something from the Star Trek universe. I think Quark Cell is a fitting name.
I can hear Picard ask for some more Quark cells when he needs to refuel the hyperdrive.
Thanks for considering Sweden for your new factory, it would be such an honor to have the first Quark cell factory on Swedish land.
Greetings from northern Sweden, Hampus Ericsson
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Robert:
Leonardo Corporation wanted to lock the plant after the end of the test waiting for the payment. The plant has been stopped and locked upon agreement between the two parties.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
Interesting,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carol Woelke:
Thank you, I am doing my best, together with my great Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.