United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

40,543 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Franz:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A,R,

  • Andrea Rossi

    Hans:
    I give you the same answer I gave to Dawn few minutes ago.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dawn:
    I strongly suggest not to invest money in anything that is not already well diddused in the market. Investments in things that are in an R&D stage are mostly destined to finish in nothing.
    This is valid also for me. We do not accept investments if not from companies specialzed in the energy field, whose management is perfectly aware of all the risks connected with an enterprise like ours.
    If and when we will be able to launch our product in the market massively, then we will accept investments to finance our expansion. Our ship is a warship, we are in the middle of the war and I will never put at risk the money that people has earned during their life in a situation like this.
    When we will have our product massively in the market, we will go public, respecting all the laws. Now we are fughting a very risky war and I want not to fight with the blood of the others.
    Thank you for your trust,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Kevin,

    Speed and velocity are indeed different. A velocity might be 20 kilometers per hour in the North direction. Its Speed would be 20 kilometers per hour. Speed is the magnitude of the velocity (without direction).

    Steve

  • Dawn

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    Is it possible to invest in your company ?
    Thanks,
    Dawn

  • Kevin

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    I had a discussion with friends who said speed and velocity are not the same thing. They are, true ?
    Have you the time and patience to confirm ?
    Cheers,

  • Roberto

    Dear Vessela Nikolova,
    I bought your book after the comment you sent here.
    The second edition of te book “Ecat the New Fire” is dramatically good.
    It merits the money it costs to the last cent.
    Ciao a tutti,
    Roberto

  • Franz

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I read the interview you made with Mats Lewan in Stockolm a couple of weeks ago.
    Do you confirm that the production for Europe will be made in Sweden ?

  • Hans

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    What would you say today to persons that ask you to invest their money in your enterprise?
    I am very interested to your answer, as well as the group of persons I am in contact with.
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Hans

  • Andrea Rossi

    Valeriy Tarasov:
    Yes, I have read it.
    Very interesting,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Derek Karpstein:
    Is going well ahead also today.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luigi:
    I totally agree with you. Vessela Nikolova has discovered things I didn’t know. I too read this second edition of her book and it is really interesting.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Dear Andrea Rossi:
    I suggest to all the readers of the JoNP to read the last edition of the book “Ecat the New Fire” of Vessela Nikolova : if you begin to read it you can’t stop to the end.
    What a story !
    Ciao,
    Luigi

  • Dear Andrea,

    Daily issue of Ego Out here:
    http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-26-2016-from-lenr-world-greatness.html

    It discussses predicts greatness of LENR.
    And smarrllness, insignificance of its enemies
    peter

  • Derek Karpstein

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Update of the QuarkX ?

  • I don’t know if you have seen already this publication – http://www.nature.com/news/has-a-hungarian-physics-lab-found-a-fifth-force-of-nature-1.19957.
    It is about the interaction of proton (around 1MeV) with 7Li, resulting in production of unstable 8Be and its decay to the pairs of positron and electron. The unusual thing is that at certain angle separating the trajectory of the electron and positron the amount of the positron-electron pairs should decrease, but it is not. The discussion in the paper is rather specific, but anyway, to put it in a nutshell, interaction of 7Li and proton resulted in unexpected production of electrons and positrons. It can give a good hint for the explanation of LENR.

    I like these experimental results :), since in my h-space theory the decay of 8Be to positron-electron pairs should exist (independent form any limitation from the standard model) and is a consequence of the positron-electron composition of nuclei. Just one more plus point (from the experiment) for my quite alternative theory :).

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    The problem has been duly assessed. My work would be perfectly continued without me.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Drew G.:
    The attorneys are always in contact for many issues.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Drew G.

    Dr Rossi:

    Are your attorneys in contact with IH about a possible out-of-court settlement of the lawsuit?

    Drew G.

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Please forgive me for being morbid, but this is a question that any inventor I think must consider — if you were to die today, what would the fate of the E-Cat QuarkX be?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Dan C.:
    I assume yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Luis Navarro:
    Thank you for your links,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    hEllo dr . Rossi:
    I am swending an interesting article .

    More Information on the New IH and Apco Agenda to ditch LENR completely!

    Now they got a lot of money and are looking for a way out as always did in past with all their R&D for which got money from their investors.

    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/more-information-on-the-new-ih-apco-agenda-to-ditch-lenr-completely/

    IH & Darden Seemed Pretty F***ing Sure of COP 3-20 when Selling ECats in China …
    http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/ih-darden-seemed-pretty-fing-sure-of-cop-3-20-when-selling-ecats-in-china/

  • Luis Navarro

    Dear Andrea,
    Latest article by http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
    More Information on the New IH & Apco Agenda to Ditch LENR Completely!
    Posted on 2016/05/26
    Best regards
    Luis

  • Dan C.

    Dear Andrea,

    You’ve indicated the E-cat fuel charge will likely be measured to last the equivalent of 24/7 for 1 year.

    If I live where there’s a short heating season of 2 months, Can the E-cat be used 2 month a year for 6 years without recharging the fuel or would there be a degradation of the fuel during the off times prohibiting this?

    Warm regards,
    Dan C.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Donald Chandler:
    Very interesting.
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Donald Chandler

    Dear Dr Rossi

    This research from MIT concerns hybrid heat/light to electricity converters in wafer form. Could be relevant to your Quark?

    http://gizmodo.com/new-solar-cell-turns-light-into-heat-to-potentially-dou-1778593027

    Kind Regards
    Donald Chandler

  • Andrea Rossi

    Orsobubu:
    Very interesting, thank you.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • orsobubu

    Dear Andrea, this post is OT, but if you’ll have 2 minutes downtime, try to look at it, you’ll be definitely intrigued because we are talking about SPACE technology and SECRET PATENTS!

    The actuators of the next Webb space telescope mirrors are hexapod structures attached to the rear of each of its 18 hexagonal mirrors, designed to move and bend them independently up to 1/10,000th the thickness of a human hair to achieve a perfect focus, at 50 degrees above absolute zero… it seems that mirror actuator technology is proprietary, and government and NASA must respect the intellectual property of its industry partners. Some details of the structure visible in these videos were then censored in key areas, as seen here from 40″:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcB13kWDGVM

    and here from 20″:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhGfgREoBj4

    …but curiously go and see here from 25″:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APE_MiJ8GRY

    and especially in this sharp photo, behind the secondary mirror where an identical, smaller hexapod is applied:

    http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/science-instruments-of-nasa-s-james-webb-space-telescope-successfully-installed

    At NASA they are amateurs compared to the secrecy at Leonardo Corp!

    (You can see some other interesting details here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gvPl3qWZIM)

  • Andrea Rossi

    Peter Gluck:
    Thank you for your link,
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    She’s doing well.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Alessandro Ferrari:
    Thank you for the link.
    I know this interesting paper.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DvH:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • DvH

    Hello Mr. Rossi,

    can you provide some information about the current situation of Mr. Penon, the ERV ?
    Is his contract for THE TEST done and finished ?

    greetings
    dvh

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Are you still on schedule to start your test of the E-Cat QuarkX with your potential customer/partner in June?

    Many thanks,

    Frank Acland

  • Alessandro Ferrari

    Dear Dr. Rossi,
    I’m following, allmost daily, any news about you and your e-cat since your presentazione in Bologna with Focardi in 2011.
    Today I saw an article about angular decay anomaly in Be8 generated by bombarding a Li7 target with protons.
    Here is the link
    http://www.nature.com/news/has-a-hungarian-physics-lab-found-a-fifth-force-of-nature-1.19957
    I hope it can be usefull to your theorical and experimental research.
    Can e-cat quark become a successfull product as soon as possibile.
    Best regards,
    Alessandro

  • Anonymous

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    How is today “she”?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Marco Serra:
    I confirm that the electromagnetic fields generated by the QuarkX are not due to thermal conversion.
    F8.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
    Thank you for the information: let’s wait for the report.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ing. Michelangelo De Meo

    Dear Dr Rossi:
    Another replication from China, that confirms the former replications:

    Latest Chinese report translation from Zhang Hang concludes excess heat output 123X more than possible chemical yield
    “Test of Abnormal Heat in Hydrogen Loaded Metal – Report 2”
    This changing document is being edited and translated by Bob Higgins with answers to questions being added periodically, you can download the most current version from the link below.
    https://goo.gl/Ly9uE4
    The actual COP order of magnitude is stubbornly in line with Optris derived evidence from our recent *GlowStick* 5.3 experiment when accounting for the split heater coil.
    Conclusion (at time of writing)
    “During this experiment, abnormal exothermic heat production from a fuel of nickel powder plus lithium aluminum hydride was observed for over 80 hours. Within an 80 hour period, the highest excess heat was 205W, and the minimum was 30W. The average temperature of the whole period 1229°C; the average heating power was 700W (including self-consumption of the power supply); and the average production of excess heat was 164W. An average excess heat 164 watts from an average heat input of 700W corresponds to a COP of 1.23. During the longer second round experiment, 47MJ of excess heat was generated. The maximum possible energy yield from chemical reaction of the fuel is calculated to be 0.38MJ; so the measured excess heat energy generated during the second round was more than two orders of magnitude higher. Follow-up work will seek to improve the reaction COP.”

  • Marco Serra

    Dear Andrea
    In these days I’ve read some questions from your readers regarding the Quark-X and its ratio for heat to electrical conversion.
    If I don’t remember bad, in previous posts you was talking about direct electric generation.
    Can you clean the field from uncertainties and confirm us that the electric power generated by the Quark-X is generated in a direct way and not by heat conversion ?

    God bless you
    Marco Serra

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fred:
    To the chatters I answer with work.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jack:
    Very.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ortega:
    Yes, I received an email, but let’s wait for the report of it.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • ortega

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    did you read that today in china has been again replicated your effect?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>