sei anni che la seguo. Ho seguito la sua passione e tenacia durante il test di un anno dell’impianto da 1Mw. Ho temuto per la sua salute. Questi eventi mi hanno convinto della sua onestà. Sinceramente ritengo che esistano due alternative possibili: o effettivamente ha qualcosa di valido o é profondamente convinto di avere qualcosa di valido. Nella speranza che il mercato sentenzi le porgo i miei migliori auguri.
It’s six years that I follow your work. I followed your passion and tenacity during the one-year test of the 1 MW plant. I feared for your health. These events have convinced me of your honesty. I honestly believe that there are two possible alternatives: either effectively you have something valuable or you are deeply convinced that you have something valuable. Waiting for the market verdict, I send you and your Team my best wishes.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
So, not even the hurricane can stop you, ha ha !
I wish you the success your work merits, I am sure that with the QuarkX you will complete your enormous job.
Godspeed,
Niclas
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it confirmed that the basic module of the QuarkX will be rated 20 W ? How difficult will it be to assemble 50 thousand modules to make a 1 MW plant ?
Mr Andrea Rossi,
The fact that the QuarkX module has a power of 20 W opens enormous sectors of market also in the households. Am I correct?
Cheers
T.F.
Paul:
I am more hurricane than him.
I am working in my factory.
Just reinforced windows and closed all the doors.
We expect to be hit tomorrow, I’ll be here working anyway.
Warm Regards
A.R.
James:
Ethan Siegel is a Prof of Physics, specialized in String theory. A Physicist of our Team is a student of his and I know he is an excellent Professor. I think from his point of view he maybe right. He will change his attitude toward LENR when he will see plants in operation, because he is intellectually honest.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kris:
No, electron capture happens only in atoms with excess of protons. To say that in LENR happens electron capture means either to fool naif audiences or not to have understood what LENR are.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
Thank you for your insight.
My answer is: no, I didn’t even know about the existence of these virtual particles.
Interesting, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Are your formulas and data relating more to simple quarks or exotic quarks?
Does your 5 sigma point to exotic quarks?
Thank you!
Tom
Warning: The following includes a hidden {OPTIONAL QUESTION}.
my notes, followed by extracts from the article above …
[Are your Quark(x) family members related to the heavy tetraquarks that Skwarnikik and Britton are researching, or are they just the run of the mill configurations of two or three quarks? I can appreciate the up/down and top/bottom kinds, as I once isolated math in a motion software program that I wrote that purified for me the need for “UP” (or “DOWN”) and “LEFT” (or “RIGHT”), but the charm/strange quarks eluded me in this mathematical journey. I suspect that if I had continued this journey, that the charm/strange quark components would have defined the speed and vectors of my equations, which I built separately for the model I created by incorporating these concepts for speed and vector (ie: energy, or motion, or [MeV]) in formulated constructs not related to the primary equation I found for up/down and right/left. My math journey mentioned above begs me to ask you to consider this inquiry below, but I would be very happy with just a simple answer to the questions above [THANK YOU!!] …
Optional Question: Does your quark(x) theory stick to the simple quarks in the standard model (up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom) or are you chasing the exotic quarks, referred to in the link above as X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700)?]
———————————-
PUBLIC RELEASE: 8-JUL-2016
Physicists discover family of tetraquarks
Syracuse University Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton confirm existence of rare ‘exotic’ particle, find evidence of 3 others
Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton G’16, both members of the Experimental High-Energy Physics Group at Syracuse and the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) collaboration at CERN, have confirmed the existence of a tetraquark candidate known as X(4140). They also have detected three other exotic particles with higher masses, called X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700).
All four particles were the subject of Britton’s Ph.D. dissertation, which he defended in May and then submitted, on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, as a journal article to Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society, 2016).
A tetraquark is a particle made of four quarks: two quarks and two antiquarks.
Tetraquarks–and, by extension, pentaquarks, containing five quarks–are considered exotic because they have more than the usual allotment of two or three quarks.
According to the Standard Model of particle physics, there are six kinds of quarks, whose intrinsic properties cause them to be grouped into pairs with unusual names: up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom.
The particles that Skwarnicki and Britton study have two charm quarks and two strange quarks. Charm and strange quarks are the third- and fourth-most massive of all quarks.
That all four quarks in the new family are “heavy” is noteworthy.
“The heavier the quark, the smaller the corresponding particle it creates,” says Skwarnicki, adding that the names of the particles reflect their masses. “The names are denoted by mega-electron volts [MeV], referring to the amount of energy an electron gains after being accelerated by a volt of electricity. … This information, along with each particle’s quantum numbers, enhances our understanding of the formation of particles and the fundamental structures of matter.”
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for the information, but I am not able to answer since I am not a biologist. I prefer not to talk of matters I do not know.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am not sure if this question has been asked to you before, but are you familiar with the work of Ukrain professor Vladimir Vysottski? Recently he has investigated the much higher than expected reduction of Caesium137 in the bottom around Tjernobil. In laboratory tests he found that bacteria are able to transmute Ce137 to Ba137 with a factor 30 higher than the natural half-time rate (30.2 Y). It will be presented in the ICCF20 this week. With your existing knowledge of LENR, would you be able to explain that also? Would you think bacteria can play this role?
Thank you for answering our questions
I hope that sigma 5 will be reached very soon.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dr Andrea Rossi:
So basically you said that the QuarkX will produce heat, with which, where electric power and not heat is wanted, electric power will be produced by means of the Carnot cycle, since the efficiency of the direct electricity production is too low. Is this correct ?
Caro Andrea è dal 1980 che seguo le tue ricerche sulla produzione di energia.
Oggi è apparsa questa pubblicità sul mio desktop mentre leggevo notizie su e-Cat World.
ENEL (Ente Nazionale Energia Elettrica) sta già presentando in Italia il Quark-x annunciando che: “Basta tanto così per ridurre i consumi della tua impresa”
Coraggio, la competizione è agguerrita, prego non bisogna perdere tempo! (Risata)
Dear Andrea is from 1980 that I follow your research on energy production.
Today appeared this advertisement on my desktop as I read news about E-Cat World.
ENEL (National Electric Energy Agency) is already presenting in Italy Quark-x announcing that: “Just so much to reduce consumption of your business”
Courage, the competition is fierce, please do not waste time! (Laugh)
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2016
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane and J. Michael Kosterlitz
“for theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2015
Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. McDonald
“for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2014
Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura
“for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light sources”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2013
François Englert and Peter W. Higgs
“for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider”
You often refer to the Carnot cycle, mostly to generate electricity with turbines etc…
Do you think small direct heat into mechanical energy applications are possible? I am thinking of a thermal chainsaw or lawnmower. These are applications where there is an electrical equivalent, but which are a lot less convenient than the models with a portable internal combustion engine in the 25 tot 100 cc-range.
Dr Rossi:
IH has filed for a patent that is a copycat of your Ecat in May 2016, while at the same time they were saying everywhere that your plant does not work.
Odd, isn’t it?
Besides, their new partner Brillouin, who before the agreement with IH worked only with electrolysis, now declares that reached a COP of 5 with a device that is a copycat of your “old” Hot Cat: another oddity, isn’t it?
HV
Svein Henrik:
Most of the energy is turned into heat. The efficiency in lm/W is low.
We will give exact numbers when we will have decided the final configuration, but we’ ll prefer heat because is the way to get the maximum of efficiency also to make electricity (Carnot).
Warm Regards
A.R.
Pietro F.:
Thank you for your great sustain to our Team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes, we have a backup ( genset ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Can you continue work on the QuarkX if you lose utility-supplied electrical power (power outages are predicted for Florida due to the hurricane).
Stay safe! Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Buongiorno Andrea,
sei anni che la seguo. Ho seguito la sua passione e tenacia durante il test di un anno dell’impianto da 1Mw. Ho temuto per la sua salute. Questi eventi mi hanno convinto della sua onestà. Sinceramente ritengo che esistano due alternative possibili: o effettivamente ha qualcosa di valido o é profondamente convinto di avere qualcosa di valido. Nella speranza che il mercato sentenzi le porgo i miei migliori auguri.
It’s six years that I follow your work. I followed your passion and tenacity during the one-year test of the 1 MW plant. I feared for your health. These events have convinced me of your honesty. I honestly believe that there are two possible alternatives: either effectively you have something valuable or you are deeply convinced that you have something valuable. Waiting for the market verdict, I send you and your Team my best wishes.
Buon lavoro
Pietro F.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
So, not even the hurricane can stop you, ha ha !
I wish you the success your work merits, I am sure that with the QuarkX you will complete your enormous job.
Godspeed,
Niclas
Mr Andrea Rossi:
After today and tomorrow we will be able to say that the QuarkX is “hurricane proof”, correct ?
Cheers,
Patrick
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is it confirmed that the basic module of the QuarkX will be rated 20 W ? How difficult will it be to assemble 50 thousand modules to make a 1 MW plant ?
Mr Andrea Rossi,
The fact that the QuarkX module has a power of 20 W opens enormous sectors of market also in the households. Am I correct?
Cheers
T.F.
Dear Andrea
Is now the QuarkX stable, without any risk ?
Thank you,
Bartolo
Paul:
I am more hurricane than him.
I am working in my factory.
Just reinforced windows and closed all the doors.
We expect to be hit tomorrow, I’ll be here working anyway.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea,
Is hurricane Matthew affecting your progress?
Paul
James:
Ethan Siegel is a Prof of Physics, specialized in String theory. A Physicist of our Team is a student of his and I know he is an excellent Professor. I think from his point of view he maybe right. He will change his attitude toward LENR when he will see plants in operation, because he is intellectually honest.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Debra:
I know of some interesting work on course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Philip:
Based on my experiments, yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Duncan:
Possibly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Kris:
No, electron capture happens only in atoms with excess of protons. To say that in LENR happens electron capture means either to fool naif audiences or not to have understood what LENR are.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Here is the issue of EGO OUT for this cold October Day:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-05-2016-lenr-one-comment-some-info.html
wishing tyhe best to you and Readers,
peter
Tom Conover:
Thank you for your insight.
My answer is: no, I didn’t even know about the existence of these virtual particles.
Interesting, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Please view the information at these two sites first, then consider my inquiry if possible:
http://phys.org/news/2016-07-physicists-family-tetraquarks.html
and also at
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-07/su-pdf070716.php
Are your formulas and data relating more to simple quarks or exotic quarks?
Does your 5 sigma point to exotic quarks?
Thank you!
Tom
Warning: The following includes a hidden {OPTIONAL QUESTION}.
my notes, followed by extracts from the article above …
[Are your Quark(x) family members related to the heavy tetraquarks that Skwarnikik and Britton are researching, or are they just the run of the mill configurations of two or three quarks? I can appreciate the up/down and top/bottom kinds, as I once isolated math in a motion software program that I wrote that purified for me the need for “UP” (or “DOWN”) and “LEFT” (or “RIGHT”), but the charm/strange quarks eluded me in this mathematical journey. I suspect that if I had continued this journey, that the charm/strange quark components would have defined the speed and vectors of my equations, which I built separately for the model I created by incorporating these concepts for speed and vector (ie: energy, or motion, or [MeV]) in formulated constructs not related to the primary equation I found for up/down and right/left. My math journey mentioned above begs me to ask you to consider this inquiry below, but I would be very happy with just a simple answer to the questions above [THANK YOU!!] …
Optional Question: Does your quark(x) theory stick to the simple quarks in the standard model (up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom) or are you chasing the exotic quarks, referred to in the link above as X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700)?]
———————————-
PUBLIC RELEASE: 8-JUL-2016
Physicists discover family of tetraquarks
Syracuse University Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton confirm existence of rare ‘exotic’ particle, find evidence of 3 others
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-07/su-pdf070716.php)
Professor Tomasz Skwarnicki and Ph.D. student Thomas Britton G’16, both members of the Experimental High-Energy Physics Group at Syracuse and the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb) collaboration at CERN, have confirmed the existence of a tetraquark candidate known as X(4140). They also have detected three other exotic particles with higher masses, called X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700).
All four particles were the subject of Britton’s Ph.D. dissertation, which he defended in May and then submitted, on behalf of the LHCb collaboration, as a journal article to Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society, 2016).
A tetraquark is a particle made of four quarks: two quarks and two antiquarks.
Tetraquarks–and, by extension, pentaquarks, containing five quarks–are considered exotic because they have more than the usual allotment of two or three quarks.
According to the Standard Model of particle physics, there are six kinds of quarks, whose intrinsic properties cause them to be grouped into pairs with unusual names: up/down, charm/strange and top/bottom.
The particles that Skwarnicki and Britton study have two charm quarks and two strange quarks. Charm and strange quarks are the third- and fourth-most massive of all quarks.
That all four quarks in the new family are “heavy” is noteworthy.
“The heavier the quark, the smaller the corresponding particle it creates,” says Skwarnicki, adding that the names of the particles reflect their masses. “The names are denoted by mega-electron volts [MeV], referring to the amount of energy an electron gains after being accelerated by a volt of electricity. … This information, along with each particle’s quantum numbers, enhances our understanding of the formation of particles and the fundamental structures of matter.”
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Did you change idea about the electron capture in LENR, after the recent troves on the matter?
Thanks,
Kris
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When you will introduce the quarkx, you will also introduce your theory about it ?
Cheers,
D.
Enea:
He, he, he…
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ulrike:
Substantially yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Jim:
Not yet, but we are approaching it.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Ing Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the info and the link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Daniel:
Maybe you are right too.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
Thank you for the information, but I am not able to answer since I am not a biologist. I prefer not to talk of matters I do not know.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You wrote that by means of electrolysis it is impossible to reach LENR: are you sure of this lemma ?
Dear Andrea,
I am not sure if this question has been asked to you before, but are you familiar with the work of Ukrain professor Vladimir Vysottski? Recently he has investigated the much higher than expected reduction of Caesium137 in the bottom around Tjernobil. In laboratory tests he found that bacteria are able to transmute Ce137 to Ba137 with a factor 30 higher than the natural half-time rate (30.2 Y). It will be presented in the ICCF20 this week. With your existing knowledge of LENR, would you be able to explain that also? Would you think bacteria can play this role?
Thank you for answering our questions
I hope that sigma 5 will be reached very soon.
Kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea
Do you think that more replications of your effect are arriving to a positive conclusion?
Regards,
Debra
Dr Rossi,
Did you read the comment of Ethan Siegel on the LENR ? What tdo you think ?
James
Dr Andra Rossi:
I share the opinion of Umbi.
Cheers,
Daniel
Director forced to step down after Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory reactor fails
The world’s most powerful spherical tokamak will be off-line for a year while new magnets are built.
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/magazine/physicstoday/news/10.1063/PT.5.1092%3Bjsessionid%3DKZz1kfASM9LOtEihx-dDY2kl.x-aip-live-03
Andrea:
Did you reach the 5 Sigma with the QuarkX ?
Jim
Dr Andrea Rossi:
So basically you said that the QuarkX will produce heat, with which, where electric power and not heat is wanted, electric power will be produced by means of the Carnot cycle, since the efficiency of the direct electricity production is too low. Is this correct ?
Caro Andrea è dal 1980 che seguo le tue ricerche sulla produzione di energia.
Oggi è apparsa questa pubblicità sul mio desktop mentre leggevo notizie su e-Cat World.
ENEL (Ente Nazionale Energia Elettrica) sta già presentando in Italia il Quark-x annunciando che: “Basta tanto così per ridurre i consumi della tua impresa”
Coraggio, la competizione è agguerrita, prego non bisogna perdere tempo! (Risata)
La meta è vicina, con incoraggiamento
Enea
https://goo.gl/photos/8F7WYehnVD8tbgxu9
Dear Andrea is from 1980 that I follow your research on energy production.
Today appeared this advertisement on my desktop as I read news about E-Cat World.
ENEL (National Electric Energy Agency) is already presenting in Italy Quark-x announcing that: “Just so much to reduce consumption of your business”
Courage, the competition is fierce, please do not waste time! (Laugh)
The goal is near, with encouragement
Enea
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
TodayI wrote two bog issues:
A DOCUMENT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/special-issue-relevant-document-with.html
The second is the usual daily info plus a comment for Rossi zeroers
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-04-2016-lenr-challenge-to-rossi.html
zmy best wishes.
peter
Tom Conover:
1- no
2- yes
3- ask him
Thank you for the links!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Koen Vandewalle:
Thank you for the suggestion.
To be studied.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Keith Ketelsen:
We are working very well and now we are really close to Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
HV:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Umbi:
Maybe you are right.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
3 questions, please:
1) I am thinking that your 5 sigma results relate to condensed matter physics.
Am I incorrect in this observation?
2) I think it likely (> 89%) that you will achieve 5 sigma in the next 90 days.
Am I possibly correct in this observation?
3) I think it possible that Dr. Cook would publish after 5 sigma. Likely?
Thank you for your answers! You are very kind.
********
My gift to you:
Please google “new york times Unusual Matter 2016”. (or a link is provided below).
2 hours ago this article was published.
New Your Times magazine honored the three Nobel Prize winners in Physics:
“3 Who Studied Unusual States of Matter Win Nobel Prize in Physics”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/05/science/nobel-prize-physics-topology.html
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2016
David J. Thouless, F. Duncan M. Haldane and J. Michael Kosterlitz
“for theoretical discoveries of topological phase transitions and topological phases of matter”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2015
Takaaki Kajita and Arthur B. McDonald
“for the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2014
Isamu Akasaki, Hiroshi Amano and Shuji Nakamura
“for the invention of efficient blue light-emitting diodes which has enabled bright and energy-saving white light sources”
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2013
François Englert and Peter W. Higgs
“for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider”
Domestic E-CAT ? We will never see … I think
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You often refer to the Carnot cycle, mostly to generate electricity with turbines etc…
Do you think small direct heat into mechanical energy applications are possible? I am thinking of a thermal chainsaw or lawnmower. These are applications where there is an electrical equivalent, but which are a lot less convenient than the models with a portable internal combustion engine in the 25 tot 100 cc-range.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can you update us about the Quarkx tests ?
Dr Rossi:
IH has filed for a patent that is a copycat of your Ecat in May 2016, while at the same time they were saying everywhere that your plant does not work.
Odd, isn’t it?
Besides, their new partner Brillouin, who before the agreement with IH worked only with electrolysis, now declares that reached a COP of 5 with a device that is a copycat of your “old” Hot Cat: another oddity, isn’t it?
HV
Svein Henrik:
Most of the energy is turned into heat. The efficiency in lm/W is low.
We will give exact numbers when we will have decided the final configuration, but we’ ll prefer heat because is the way to get the maximum of efficiency also to make electricity (Carnot).
Warm Regards
A.R.