Dear Andrea,
you said that the QuarkX overheating has been solved recovering the heat.
Can we say that simply you just applied a heat exchanger?
Probably it is not so easy, but the QuarkX in stand alone should work and behave differently respect coupled with something that turns the heat in something else. Or not?
Regards, Giuseppe
Would like to ask you couple questions about a domestic unit.
1. Assuming the domestic unit of 10 kW, will it require 500 QuarkXs?
2. If this is the case, how large will the domestic unit be that also includes a control system and an engine (Sterling?) to convert heat to electricity?
3. How difficult will it be to recharge 500 Quark X every 6 to 12 months?
4. And a separate question on your current QuarkXs contenders that you are testing. What is the COP of the top contender?
5. Also, based on the comment you made couple days ago regarding the cost per kW to be under $100. Do you expect a domestic unit of 10 kW cost under $1000?
Rupert:
I cannot comment, but where did you find the report? it has not been yet deposited in Court and is supposed to be still confidential. I am receiving all these comments about it and I do not understand what is going on!
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi.
Will the Quark-X satisfy any environmental specs such as vibration, linear acceleration, acoustic noise, humidity, magnetic fields, radiation, vacuum etc.? That will determine its usefulness mainly in mobile and space applications.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I saw the ERV’s report which gives evidence of all you said so far.
By the way, the puppets of IH now are saying that when IH will loose the litigation, the same will have no money to finance other LENR: what a ridiculous thing! IH already has made disappear all the 100 millions they got from the investors and subsituted the real money with shares that have the worth of toilet paper…
Thank you for your work,
Gary
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The report of the ERV dwarfs all the stupidities said by the corrupted surrogates of Cherokee-IH.
Every expert can understand that the water flowmeter has been put in correct position; you repeatedly said that it was at a lower level respect the source and the point of delivery to the plant, so that it intrinsecally had to be always full, independently from the entity of the flow; the external water reservoir is clearly used only to refill the internal water tank in case of leaks, as well as it is clear that the external reservoir was higher than the internal tank, so that a floating valve maintained a constant level in the internal tank, where water arrives by gravity to compensate the possible leaks. Clearly the external reservoir is not affected by the hydraulic pressure of the live water piping system and it is also logic that the water circulation is forced. As an expert of thermal facilities, I can see all this at a glance. This plant is genial also under the engineering point of view, not just under the scientific content.
The stupidity of IH, who lost your license to pack away 100 millions of their investors, is colossal.
You will win, for the sake of all of us.
May God bless you,
Roberto
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You explained that during the whole year of the 1 MW Ecat test you have been there in the plant from 6 P.M. to 10 A.M., so you spent there the entire nights for one year: an impressive dedication indeed.
God bless you,
Egon
Congratulations on your February 2017 goal! You mentioned “removing heat” as the solution for the front runner, did that require changing a,b,c or d below?
A. Heat transfer only?
B. Fuel formula only?
C. Both.
D. Other.
Karl:
Yes: for example, Prof. Sergio Focardi has been a group director in CERN, as well as Prof. Bo Hoistad: also worked in the Laboratories of CERN Prof. Giuseppe Levi, Prof. Hanno Essen and, obviously, the immense Prof. Sven Kullander, former Chairman of the Royal Swedish Academy os Sciences: these are the names that in this moment I remember, but surely there are others.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If in february will be presented the QuarkX, do you think that together with it you will propose a theoretical explication about its work?
Cheers,
Curiosone
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Have you an idea of how much could be the price per kW installed of the QuarkX after its massive industrialization? Which target do you have?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
You like the movie “The Concert” also because you see in the life of the orchestra conductor something similar to what happened to you, am I correct?
All the best,
Samuel
Svein Henrik:
1- making it smaller
2- see 1
3- a 1 MW rated plant composed by 50,000 modules with a rating of 25 W each can generate an energy of 1 MWh/h
4- yes
5- the Sigma 5 issue is related to experimental prototypes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Trying to get a better picture of the 5 Sigma testing, may I ask:
1) Is the testing related to product reliability?
2) Is each ‘event’ you are measuring some kind of activation of the QuarkX
3) Is your partner a manufacturer?
Dear Andrea.
It seems that the power of the QuarkX easily Was reduced from 100W to 20W.
1) How was this done?
2) May you easily change the power between 100 and 20W?
3) May a 1MW heatplant of 50 000 QuarkX each with a power of 25W, be run with a output of 1MW?
4) With 20% “dead” QuarkXs, will the plant still be able to produce 1MWh/h?
5) If yes, is 5 Sigma for the plant, then maintained?
By the way, You are not in haste. Use the time needed for a “5 Sigma success”.
Regards: Svein Henrik
Enrico Billi:
Welcome back !!!
I hope so and I am working as you suggest:
Lavolale, Lavolale !
( Are you still working in China as a Physicist ? )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
I know you are a Prof of an Italian engineering faculty, so you know that to “produce” a good engineer it takes at least 5 years. Imagine the time necessary to produce a so complex revolutionary product like ours.
We are taking not much more time that the time it needs to produce an engineer along a well known and consolidated procedure, a luxury we do not have. We have to cut our path through an unknown jungle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi: here is another legacy of your work, Airbus is working on the LENR clearly following your path.
See below:
Material assembly for a fusion reactor and method for producing the same
Abstract
translated from German
Disclosed is a material structure for a fusion reactor, comprising at least one material, which is designed as a foam-like support material for condensable binding and fusing of hydrogen, wherein the substrate is provided with positively charged voids for condensing hydrogen atoms, small pores for receiving the condensate and comprises accelerating condensation after prior entry of atoms or molecules in these and large pores for the transport of a catalyst into the small pores. Furthermore, a process for producing the material assembly is disclosed.
Congratulations Andrea,
National Geographic shows recently a picture of the Sun with this description: “It is already the 4th time this year the Sun appera completely smooth to the sight of Nasa scientists. Could be the signal the next Ice age will happen in 2019.”
For that date do you think we can buy a domestic e-cat or at least see distributed heating systems on our cities?
LavolaLe lavoLaLe,
Dear Andrea,
you said that the QuarkX overheating has been solved recovering the heat.
Can we say that simply you just applied a heat exchanger?
Probably it is not so easy, but the QuarkX in stand alone should work and behave differently respect coupled with something that turns the heat in something else. Or not?
Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea,
Today the Blog issue is this
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-27-2016-lenr-cannot-be-killed.html
Let’s protect this great invention!
yours faithfully,
peter
Dear Andrea,
Would like to ask you couple questions about a domestic unit.
1. Assuming the domestic unit of 10 kW, will it require 500 QuarkXs?
2. If this is the case, how large will the domestic unit be that also includes a control system and an engine (Sterling?) to convert heat to electricity?
3. How difficult will it be to recharge 500 Quark X every 6 to 12 months?
4. And a separate question on your current QuarkXs contenders that you are testing. What is the COP of the top contender?
5. Also, based on the comment you made couple days ago regarding the cost per kW to be under $100. Do you expect a domestic unit of 10 kW cost under $1000?
Kind regards,
Gennady
Rupert:
I cannot comment, but where did you find the report? it has not been yet deposited in Court and is supposed to be still confidential. I am receiving all these comments about it and I do not understand what is going on!
Warm Regards
A.R.
Roberto:
I cannot comment issues that have to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gary:
I cannot comment issues to be discussed in Court.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Toussaint:
Yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Fusionrudy:
Yes.
F8.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi.
Will the Quark-X satisfy any environmental specs such as vibration, linear acceleration, acoustic noise, humidity, magnetic fields, radiation, vacuum etc.? That will determine its usefulness mainly in mobile and space applications.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that the Quark-x 1 mega-watt plant will be more easy to buid on a industrial scale
than the low-temp E-CAT ?
Warm Regards,
Toussaint françois
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I saw the ERV’s report which gives evidence of all you said so far.
By the way, the puppets of IH now are saying that when IH will loose the litigation, the same will have no money to finance other LENR: what a ridiculous thing! IH already has made disappear all the 100 millions they got from the investors and subsituted the real money with shares that have the worth of toilet paper…
Thank you for your work,
Gary
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
The report of the ERV dwarfs all the stupidities said by the corrupted surrogates of Cherokee-IH.
Every expert can understand that the water flowmeter has been put in correct position; you repeatedly said that it was at a lower level respect the source and the point of delivery to the plant, so that it intrinsecally had to be always full, independently from the entity of the flow; the external water reservoir is clearly used only to refill the internal water tank in case of leaks, as well as it is clear that the external reservoir was higher than the internal tank, so that a floating valve maintained a constant level in the internal tank, where water arrives by gravity to compensate the possible leaks. Clearly the external reservoir is not affected by the hydraulic pressure of the live water piping system and it is also logic that the water circulation is forced. As an expert of thermal facilities, I can see all this at a glance. This plant is genial also under the engineering point of view, not just under the scientific content.
The stupidity of IH, who lost your license to pack away 100 millions of their investors, is colossal.
You will win, for the sake of all of us.
May God bless you,
Roberto
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Congratulations for the solid report of the ERV. Great achievement, a page of history.
Rupert
Egon:
Yes, that’s what happened.
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You explained that during the whole year of the 1 MW Ecat test you have been there in the plant from 6 P.M. to 10 A.M., so you spent there the entire nights for one year: an impressive dedication indeed.
God bless you,
Egon
John Travolta:
Thank you: F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Tom Conover:
A.
Thank you for you sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi Andrea,
Congratulations on your February 2017 goal! You mentioned “removing heat” as the solution for the front runner, did that require changing a,b,c or d below?
A. Heat transfer only?
B. Fuel formula only?
C. Both.
D. Other.
Warm Regards,
Tom
Hi, Andrea:
Thank you for your great work: we all are waiting for February.
Godspeed,
John
Karl:
Yes: for example, Prof. Sergio Focardi has been a group director in CERN, as well as Prof. Bo Hoistad: also worked in the Laboratories of CERN Prof. Giuseppe Levi, Prof. Hanno Essen and, obviously, the immense Prof. Sven Kullander, former Chairman of the Royal Swedish Academy os Sciences: these are the names that in this moment I remember, but surely there are others.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cedrick:
So far, yes. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi, Andrea:
Still valid your forecast of a presentation by February 2017?
Cheers
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts of this blog.
JoNP
Samuel:
Also.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Amy Makang:
The target is to go far below 100 $/Kw of power.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Curiosone:
Maybe. I M studying it.
Warm Regards
A.R.
JP Renoir:
Recovering the heat.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Has somebody who worked in the laboratories of CERN in Geneva taken in consideration your work?
Thanks,
Karl
Dear Andrea Rossi:
How did you resolve the overheating issue of the QuarkX?
JPR
If in february will be presented the QuarkX, do you think that together with it you will propose a theoretical explication about its work?
Cheers,
Curiosone
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Have you an idea of how much could be the price per kW installed of the QuarkX after its massive industrialization? Which target do you have?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
You like the movie “The Concert” also because you see in the life of the orchestra conductor something similar to what happened to you, am I correct?
All the best,
Samuel
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Svein Henrik:
1- making it smaller
2- see 1
3- a 1 MW rated plant composed by 50,000 modules with a rating of 25 W each can generate an energy of 1 MWh/h
4- yes
5- the Sigma 5 issue is related to experimental prototypes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- also
3- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Here is the EGO OUT issue for this Tuesday
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/10/oct-25-2016-lenr-midas-touch-of-time.html
warm greetings,
peter
Dear Andrea,
Trying to get a better picture of the 5 Sigma testing, may I ask:
1) Is the testing related to product reliability?
2) Is each ‘event’ you are measuring some kind of activation of the QuarkX
3) Is your partner a manufacturer?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Andrea.
It seems that the power of the QuarkX easily Was reduced from 100W to 20W.
1) How was this done?
2) May you easily change the power between 100 and 20W?
3) May a 1MW heatplant of 50 000 QuarkX each with a power of 25W, be run with a output of 1MW?
4) With 20% “dead” QuarkXs, will the plant still be able to produce 1MWh/h?
5) If yes, is 5 Sigma for the plant, then maintained?
By the way, You are not in haste. Use the time needed for a “5 Sigma success”.
Regards: Svein Henrik
CO2 records from 3 million years.
http://www.focus.it/ambiente/ecologia/record-di-co2-da-3-milioni-di-anni-400-parti-per-milione-di-anidride-carbonica
Mattias:
I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Koppenhofer:
I will be. And I will be a very serious one, since all my money will be invested in the industrialization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Enrico Billi:
Welcome back !!!
I hope so and I am working as you suggest:
Lavolale, Lavolale !
( Are you still working in China as a Physicist ? )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the information.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
I know you are a Prof of an Italian engineering faculty, so you know that to “produce” a good engineer it takes at least 5 years. Imagine the time necessary to produce a so complex revolutionary product like ours.
We are taking not much more time that the time it needs to produce an engineer along a well known and consolidated procedure, a luxury we do not have. We have to cut our path through an unknown jungle.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the link and for your considration.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi: here is another legacy of your work, Airbus is working on the LENR clearly following your path.
See below:
Material assembly for a fusion reactor and method for producing the same
Abstract
translated from German
Disclosed is a material structure for a fusion reactor, comprising at least one material, which is designed as a foam-like support material for condensable binding and fusing of hydrogen, wherein the substrate is provided with positively charged voids for condensing hydrogen atoms, small pores for receiving the condensate and comprises accelerating condensation after prior entry of atoms or molecules in these and large pores for the transport of a catalyst into the small pores. Furthermore, a process for producing the material assembly is disclosed.
https://patents.google.com/patent/EP3070050A1/en?q=G21B3%2F00&sort=new
Dr. Rossi there is no time, we must hurry!
IPCC Agrees Outlines of New Reports in Support of Paris
Report on 1.5ºC Goal in 2018
http://newsroom.unfccc.int/paris-agreement/ipcc-agrees-outlines-of-new-reports-in-support-of-paris/
UN warning: CO2 records in the air, “We are in a new era of climate” Dr. Rossi must be done fast !!
http://www.ilsecoloxix.it/p/mondo/2016/10/25/ASzTSnpE-allarme_siamo_record.shtml
Congratulations Andrea,
National Geographic shows recently a picture of the Sun with this description: “It is already the 4th time this year the Sun appera completely smooth to the sight of Nasa scientists. Could be the signal the next Ice age will happen in 2019.”
For that date do you think we can buy a domestic e-cat or at least see distributed heating systems on our cities?
LavolaLe lavoLaLe,
Enrico Billi