Mr Rossi
After 6 years of talks and no facts, I am sure you will never introduce any product in the market. I bet 1,000 $ on it, I will wil 3,000 $ if you, as I hope, will not put any QuarkX for sale within the year 2017.
Jo:
If you have evidence of what you write, please send it to info@leonardocorp1996.com
If this evidence does not exist, your comment is not deonthologically correct.
From my side, anyway, NO COMMENT.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
We of the silent majority have in our network an investigator that has found evidence of the fact that Industrial Heat paid tens of thousand $ per month to make published in LENR Forum an infinite series of slanders against you and your technology, continuing to repeat the slanders, ignoring the answers. We will send you this evidence soon. The money is gone to their puppets ( but most of them are just pseudonyms).
Win for us all,
Godspeed,
Jo
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Is still valid the assumption that in february 2017 a very important presentation, related to the QuarkX, will be made?
Cheers,
VG
Mr Andrea Rossi,
If the temperature of the QuarkX is higher than 1600 Celsius you have obviously a great problem of overheating: did you completely resolve it already?
Dear Andrea,
do you think that, once all the certifications are reached, sigma 5 is consolidated, more R&D has been done and f8, is possible that QuarkX can be the power source, i mean only electricity, of a small portable object or the heat necessary to activate the effect is too much and it is an insormountable obstacle?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you confirm if you have evidence of the fact that the thousands of comments published on LENR Forum against you have been paid by IH?
There are rumors that there is strong evidence of this. The thing is serious, so your answer is important.
Mr Rossi
You are working 16 hours per day to complete the R&D on the QuarkX and to help yur attorneys for the litigation, but still you find the time to answer to us on this blog: God bless you for this all.
Please allow me also this question: does the temperature of the QuarkX reach 1600 Celsius?
Thank you,
Anonymous
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight, but the fact that the Higgs field is responsible to turn Bosons into Fermions is commonly accepted in the context of the Standard Model, mainly in the CERN echelons.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Yes, a boson may of course decay to a fermion-antifermion pair. A familiar example of such process is that an ordinary gamma ray photon, if it is energetic enough, may turn to an electron-positron pair. But mathematically that kind of process is equivalent to just coupling between the boson and the fermion fields. It does not involve truly changing bosonic character into fermionic one, because the antifermion and fermion quantum numbers cancel each other in this case. Another way to consider: antifermion is equivalent to ordinary fermion which propagates backward in time. By making a Lorentz transformation a process which looks like decay to particle-antiparticle pair to one observer can look like ordinary coupling or scattering to another inertial observer.
Anyway, this matter is not related to the E_cat at all…
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight…but: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2012465?In=it
See also:
” Evidence for the direct decay of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson to Fermions ” ( Nature Physics ).
It is true, anyway, that the issue is still discussed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea, Cary Williams:
It is a misunderstanding that the Higgs boson would turn bosons into fermions. Supersymmetry can do that, if it exists, but not the Higgs. Higgs only gives mass to particles, be they bosons or fermions. The Higgs is only a scalar field (the simplest type of field that exists) and as such it cannot cause such profound changes as to turn bosonic degrees of freedom (ordinary numbers) into fermionic ones (anticommuting numbers). The reverse is possible, fermions can pair themselves to make bosons, but out of integer spin particles (bosons) it is not possible by doing additions and subtractions to make half-integer ones (fermions).
The confusion may have arised because people have considered supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model which then contain supersymmetry, and by necessity they must also contain some form of Higgs or Higgses. But even in those models, the Higgs gives the mass while the supersymmetry mixes bosons and fermions.
best regards, /pekka
Gavino:
Because if you sue guys that have not the money to pay when they lose, you collect a series of Pirrus victories. Besides, they do not produce damages to us. They never did.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cary Williams:
Let’s try this: the Higgs field lurks everywhere with his hunchy Higgs bosons, and permanently they are revealed by the Global Symmetry to break the Local Symmetry and turn Bosons into Fermions. Everywhen the temperature reaches the mass value of an e.p., a wave corresponding to that e.p. is raised and, at certain conditions, it interacts inside the Higgs field. The situation is much more complicated, but you can say the work of the Higgs field is permanent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Does the Higgs boson turn bosons into fermions continuously, or after the “creation” of Fermions it has finished its job and rests?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cary
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Looking at all the documents in the Pacemaker it appears your position is very strong: you produced evidence, Cherokee Fund Partners and IH produced only assumptions.
If this is the situation, if they do not propose a settlement they are mad.
What do you think?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- There are rumors that IH paid beween 50 and 100 thousand dollars per month to the puppets that attacked you in the blogs.
2- They are about ten against you
What do you think?
H.W.
I find it particularly disturbing when someone removes information from their own website after realizing it conflicts with the narrative they are trying to portray. In this case, Tony Tether seemed confident about the legitimacy of your demonstration and that it produced high COP.
Dear Andrea,
My modest contribution of today to the LENR saga:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-19-2016-lenr-and-messiness.html
Very good wishes to you & Readers
peter
Jo:
Please, please, please send us the evidence !!!!
Mr Rossi
After 6 years of talks and no facts, I am sure you will never introduce any product in the market. I bet 1,000 $ on it, I will wil 3,000 $ if you, as I hope, will not put any QuarkX for sale within the year 2017.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Now we suspect that LENR Forum is “biased”.
“Non ti curar di lor,
Ma guarda e passa”
Godspeed,
Ronaldo
Alain:
Yes. Definitely. The QuarkX is harnessed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR
Saturday, November 19th, 12.15 P.M.:
I am very glad of what I am seeing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Virgil Gran:
Yes, so far. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mark:
Now I can absolutely say yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jo:
If you have evidence of what you write, please send it to
info@leonardocorp1996.com
If this evidence does not exist, your comment is not deonthologically correct.
From my side, anyway, NO COMMENT.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
We of the silent majority have in our network an investigator that has found evidence of the fact that Industrial Heat paid tens of thousand $ per month to make published in LENR Forum an infinite series of slanders against you and your technology, continuing to repeat the slanders, ignoring the answers. We will send you this evidence soon. The money is gone to their puppets ( but most of them are just pseudonyms).
Win for us all,
Godspeed,
Jo
Dr Andrea Rossi
Do you confirm that the explication of your effect can be contained inside the Standard Model?
Cheers,
Mark
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Is still valid the assumption that in february 2017 a very important presentation, related to the QuarkX, will be made?
Cheers,
VG
Update?
Mr Andrea Rossi,
If the temperature of the QuarkX is higher than 1600 Celsius you have obviously a great problem of overheating: did you completely resolve it already?
Giuseppe:
That’s matter of R&D.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
do you think that, once all the certifications are reached, sigma 5 is consolidated, more R&D has been done and f8, is possible that QuarkX can be the power source, i mean only electricity, of a small portable object or the heat necessary to activate the effect is too much and it is an insormountable obstacle?
Best Regards, Giuseppe
Lucas Digne:
1- yes
2- the paper of Prof. Norman Cook has to be studied, as all the things that this Prof writes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
anonymous:
Yes, it does.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
FC:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
rossifan:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
the daily standard edition of EGO OUT is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-18-2016-dutch-lenr-event.html
A very fine weekend!
peter
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you confirm if you have evidence of the fact that the thousands of comments published on LENR Forum against you have been paid by IH?
There are rumors that there is strong evidence of this. The thing is serious, so your answer is important.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Do you know if there are in course in the world other replications of your effect ?
FC
Mr Rossi
You are working 16 hours per day to complete the R&D on the QuarkX and to help yur attorneys for the litigation, but still you find the time to answer to us on this blog: God bless you for this all.
Please allow me also this question: does the temperature of the QuarkX reach 1600 Celsius?
Thank you,
Anonymous
Dear Dr Rossi,
1- Did you read the main papers published by the last ICCF?
2- Which paper do you deem worth the time to read it?
Cheers,
Lucas
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight, but the fact that the Higgs field is responsible to turn Bosons into Fermions is commonly accepted in the context of the Standard Model, mainly in the CERN echelons.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Yes, a boson may of course decay to a fermion-antifermion pair. A familiar example of such process is that an ordinary gamma ray photon, if it is energetic enough, may turn to an electron-positron pair. But mathematically that kind of process is equivalent to just coupling between the boson and the fermion fields. It does not involve truly changing bosonic character into fermionic one, because the antifermion and fermion quantum numbers cancel each other in this case. Another way to consider: antifermion is equivalent to ordinary fermion which propagates backward in time. By making a Lorentz transformation a process which looks like decay to particle-antiparticle pair to one observer can look like ordinary coupling or scattering to another inertial observer.
Anyway, this matter is not related to the E_cat at all…
regards, /pekka
JPR:
08.20 of Nov 18th: good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight…but:
http://cds.cern.ch/record/2012465?In=it
See also:
” Evidence for the direct decay of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson to Fermions ” ( Nature Physics ).
It is true, anyway, that the issue is still discussed.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea, Cary Williams:
It is a misunderstanding that the Higgs boson would turn bosons into fermions. Supersymmetry can do that, if it exists, but not the Higgs. Higgs only gives mass to particles, be they bosons or fermions. The Higgs is only a scalar field (the simplest type of field that exists) and as such it cannot cause such profound changes as to turn bosonic degrees of freedom (ordinary numbers) into fermionic ones (anticommuting numbers). The reverse is possible, fermions can pair themselves to make bosons, but out of integer spin particles (bosons) it is not possible by doing additions and subtractions to make half-integer ones (fermions).
The confusion may have arised because people have considered supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model which then contain supersymmetry, and by necessity they must also contain some form of Higgs or Higgses. But even in those models, the Higgs gives the mass while the supersymmetry mixes bosons and fermions.
best regards, /pekka
Frank Acland:
No, we are working closed doors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
During this time of R&D, have you had any visits from representatives of well-established companies that are interested in your technology?
If so, what has their reaction been to what they have learned.
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Gavino:
Because if you sue guys that have not the money to pay when they lose, you collect a series of Pirrus victories. Besides, they do not produce damages to us. They never did.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hines Wardy:
1- No comment
2- 10*0 < 1 Warm Regards, A.R.
Ezekiel Elliott:
No comment.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Cary Williams:
Let’s try this: the Higgs field lurks everywhere with his hunchy Higgs bosons, and permanently they are revealed by the Global Symmetry to break the Local Symmetry and turn Bosons into Fermions. Everywhen the temperature reaches the mass value of an e.p., a wave corresponding to that e.p. is raised and, at certain conditions, it interacts inside the Higgs field. The situation is much more complicated, but you can say the work of the Higgs field is permanent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
on my Blog today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-17-2016-lenr-info-many-hydrino.html
Warm regards,
peter
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Does the Higgs boson turn bosons into fermions continuously, or after the “creation” of Fermions it has finished its job and rests?
Thank you if you can answer,
Cary
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Looking at all the documents in the Pacemaker it appears your position is very strong: you produced evidence, Cherokee Fund Partners and IH produced only assumptions.
If this is the situation, if they do not propose a settlement they are mad.
What do you think?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- There are rumors that IH paid beween 50 and 100 thousand dollars per month to the puppets that attacked you in the blogs.
2- They are about ten against you
What do you think?
H.W.
Why don’t you sue all the guys that are libelling you?
Cheers,
Gavino
Hank Mills:
Thank you.
Interesting.
Here emerges the intellectual honesty of Dr Tether. Good to know. I never saw this before.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Filiberto Drawec:
We had to invent it. No commercial materials could stand the temperatures we reach.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jonas Gray:
Why does it take 9 month for a woman to bear a child?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The material the quarkx is made with is in commerce or you had to invent it?
Dear Andrea,
Here is the file with Tony Tether’s comments. It can be found on the “Way Back Machine” which archives websites.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160712181747/http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/img/20110630Tether-Krivit-E-mails.pdf
I find it particularly disturbing when someone removes information from their own website after realizing it conflicts with the narrative they are trying to portray. In this case, Tony Tether seemed confident about the legitimacy of your demonstration and that it produced high COP.
JPR:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.