Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that in February 2017 efforts will change from R & D to production? If not then what would be your best estimate for massive Production?
Bernie
“Is it possible that the official presentation of the QuarkX will be made around February 2017?”
To which you answered, “yes”.
This was the first mention of the February 2017 presentation on your site. Pretty interesting that Rhames guessed the date that you were planning to make the presentation by chance. 🙂
Dear Andrea
you recently stated that next February 2017 you will somehow disclose to the public the results of your efforts: how do you foresee will it happen: a conference, a public demonstration or test, a press release or…??
My best regards
Giovanni
Dr Andrea Rossi,
You said that you started to manufacture waste treatment plants with recovery of energy when you were about 21 years old, but you also got a doctorate in the academic year 1974-1975 from the Universita’ Statale degli Studi of Milan, Italy: did you have the faculty of the omnipresence (to be present at the same time in different places, doing different things)?.
Come va la commercializzazione degli impianti da 1MW?
Mi domando quale sarebbe la situazione attuale se non esistesse il QuarkX.
Il mercato Le sta dando ragione?
(google translate): How’s the sale of the systems 1MW?
I wonder what would be the situation if there were no QuarkX.
The market is giving him reason?
Have you pushed aside the original “hot cat” technology in favor of the Quark?
It seems to me, the hot cat should be an easier technology for your supporters to try and replicate: somewhat lower temperature range, simple mixture of elements according to Fluid Heater, slightly larger reactor chambers for easier loading/handling, etc. If an individual qualified to work in a laboratory, utilizing all safety procedures, set out to try and replicate a single variation of your technology (low temp E-Cat, hot cat with hydrogen tank, hot cat using LiAlH4, etc), which do YOU think would be most appropriate?
Rosenbur:
Thank you for your comment.
We had many problems to resolve:
– start and stop the reaction in seconds: done
– harness the overheating caused by the very high temperature: done
– producing direct current: done, even if its use remains confined inside the reactor increasing the heat
– producing a high COP: done
– make it in a way to consent an easy passage to the industrialization in big series: done
– make a very long and uninterrupted operation to collect Sigma5: on course in one of our labs
– make sophisticated measurements: on course
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
I am very pleased that the QuarkX is doing well.
I’m sure there were a few minor problems in the last six months. Could you tell the number of problems?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have the sensation that the QuarkX results are “too good to be true” and for this reason you are so conservative before introducing it. Am I correct?
Godspeed,
Tyler
Russell West:
Now that he has been elected, let him work and eventually consider the facts. I am strong enemy of assumptions in general.
By the way: a new energy source that needs politics to be developed is a cart with square wheels.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Anthony:
Yes, beyond any reasonable doubt. We measured with the oscilloscope its wave, frequency: we are using it inside the QuarkX to contribute to make heat. At the end, this is the most convenient use of it, so far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Sarò piĂą chiaro: Lei avrĂ notato quanta gente oramai nel campo delle LENR studia, si attiva e lavora per effettuare esperimenti e magari commercializzare invenzioni utili. Questo è principalmente grazie al Suo lavoro, ma paradossalmente è diventato indipendente dalla questione che l’E-Cat funzioni o meno.
Si può dunque dire che il cosiddetto Effetto Rossi sia andato oltre la fisica e diventato una idea, movimento ed ispirazione. Ogni nuovo tentativo di replicazione indipendente nato indirettamente grazie alle Sue imprese è una lampante dimostrazione di tale effetto.
Personalmente trovo appropriato che l’Effetto Rossi si possa spiegare ANCHE con la psicologia. Fra le altre cose questa spiegazione non richiede una rivoluzione del Modello Standard.
Grazie per l’attenzione,
Mario Lorenzi
GOOGLE TRANSLATION:
Dr. Rossi,
I will be more clear: You will have noticed by now how many people in the field of LENR studies, activates and works for experiments and maybe sell useful inventions. This is mainly thanks to your work, but paradoxically became independent from the question that the E-Cat works or not.
It can therefore say that the so-called Red Effect went beyond physics and became an idea, movement and inspiration. Further attempts at independent replication indirectly born by His business is a clear demonstration of this effect.
Personally I find it appropriate that the effect can be explained Rossi EVEN with psychology. Among other things, this explanation does not require a revolution of the Standard Model.
Mario Lorenzi:
1- if a guy breaks the bone of a leg playing football, can he resolve the problem eating spaghetti? ( this answers the text of your question )
2- can a football player, while he is playing football, be criticized because cannot play basketball ? ( this answers the hypertext of it )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Torbjorn Johnsen:
Thank you for your kind wishes!
Answer: the matter of the fact is that the 1 MW plants will be well controlled in automatic, so there will not be a dedicated operator. Any good technician of a factory can be trained to become a certified operator and he will not have to stay in the plant permanently, just check it now and again. We can provide him with an application that sends an alert when necessary and he will know what to do case by case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Must all good forces protect our Andrea!
My question: what minimum knowledge is required for the operator of a 1 MW E-Cat beyond the specific training from your personnel?
Best regards,
Torbjorn
Janne:
I answered “yes” to a possibility, not to something I was certain of.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Bernie Morrissey:
I am not able to answer now. Too premature. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that in February 2017 efforts will change from R & D to production? If not then what would be your best estimate for massive Production?
Bernie
Dear Andrea,
On October 15, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Rhames asked you:
“Is it possible that the official presentation of the QuarkX will be made around February 2017?”
To which you answered, “yes”.
This was the first mention of the February 2017 presentation on your site. Pretty interesting that Rhames guessed the date that you were planning to make the presentation by chance. 🙂
Best Regards,
Janne
Giovanni:
We did not decide yet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
you recently stated that next February 2017 you will somehow disclose to the public the results of your efforts: how do you foresee will it happen: a conference, a public demonstration or test, a press release or…??
My best regards
Giovanni
Hank Mills:
I have seen that the type that has obtained more replications has been the Lugano model.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think that by February the process of consolidation will have been completed. F8.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pietro F.:
It is premature to answer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still in good standing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carli LLoyd:
I was simply a student-worker: worked mainly during the day, studied mainly during the night.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
So far, yes. Is the safest solution we found and assembly them in thousands is easy with the robots.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today I have composed this Blog Issue:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-22-2016-lenr-toward-collaborative.html
Warm greetings…
peter
Caro Andrea
Can you tell us if the rating of 20 W is final for the elementary modules ot the QuarkX systems?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
You said that you started to manufacture waste treatment plants with recovery of energy when you were about 21 years old, but you also got a doctorate in the academic year 1974-1975 from the Universita’ Statale degli Studi of Milan, Italy: did you have the faculty of the omnipresence (to be present at the same time in different places, doing different things)?.
Update?
Come va la commercializzazione degli impianti da 1MW?
Mi domando quale sarebbe la situazione attuale se non esistesse il QuarkX.
Il mercato Le sta dando ragione?
(google translate): How’s the sale of the systems 1MW?
I wonder what would be the situation if there were no QuarkX.
The market is giving him reason?
Grazie e buon lavoro.
Pietro F.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congratulations on the good standing of the QUARK-X,at your estimation how many percentage is
left to acheive sigma 5 ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Dear Andrea,
Have you pushed aside the original “hot cat” technology in favor of the Quark?
It seems to me, the hot cat should be an easier technology for your supporters to try and replicate: somewhat lower temperature range, simple mixture of elements according to Fluid Heater, slightly larger reactor chambers for easier loading/handling, etc. If an individual qualified to work in a laboratory, utilizing all safety procedures, set out to try and replicate a single variation of your technology (low temp E-Cat, hot cat with hydrogen tank, hot cat using LiAlH4, etc), which do YOU think would be most appropriate?
Rosenbur:
Thank you for your comment.
We had many problems to resolve:
– start and stop the reaction in seconds: done
– harness the overheating caused by the very high temperature: done
– producing direct current: done, even if its use remains confined inside the reactor increasing the heat
– producing a high COP: done
– make it in a way to consent an easy passage to the industrialization in big series: done
– make a very long and uninterrupted operation to collect Sigma5: on course in one of our labs
– make sophisticated measurements: on course
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
I am very pleased that the QuarkX is doing well.
I’m sure there were a few minor problems in the last six months. Could you tell the number of problems?
Tyler Bozak:
You are correct.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
This is my first issue for this week on the Blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-21-2016-lenr-and-cherokee-wisdom.html
all the best wishes!
Peter
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I have the sensation that the QuarkX results are “too good to be true” and for this reason you are so conservative before introducing it. Am I correct?
Godspeed,
Tyler
JPR:
Still in good standing, new important measurements on course.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Green:
Yes.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Russell West:
Now that he has been elected, let him work and eventually consider the facts. I am strong enemy of assumptions in general.
By the way: a new energy source that needs politics to be developed is a cart with square wheels.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Anthony:
Yes, beyond any reasonable doubt. We measured with the oscilloscope its wave, frequency: we are using it inside the QuarkX to contribute to make heat. At the end, this is the most convenient use of it, so far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Gustav:
On 2017 it will be impossible, but on 2018 I surely will.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can the QuatkX be turned on and off instantaneously: did you resolve this problem already?
Cheers,
Dear Andrea Rossi:
What do you think about the new President of the USA? Do you think he will sustain new energies?
Dr Andrea Rossi
Independently from the convenience to recover it, has the direct production of electric energy been measured in the Quarkx?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
So, will you make the Vasaloppet in 2017?
Godspeed,
Gustav
JPR
In this moment, Sunday November 20 at 06.05 P.M. we are in good standing.
Sigma5 approaching.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea,
a new Sunday edition of the blog EGO OUT- is …out, here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/11/nov-20-2016-lenr-info-but-heresy-too.html
Warm greetings,
Peter
Mario Lorenzi:
Now I understand better.
Thank you for your insight!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi
Respect the E-Cat, the QuarkX COP is higher, very much higher, or very, very much higher?
Dott Rossi,
Sarò piĂą chiaro: Lei avrĂ notato quanta gente oramai nel campo delle LENR studia, si attiva e lavora per effettuare esperimenti e magari commercializzare invenzioni utili. Questo è principalmente grazie al Suo lavoro, ma paradossalmente è diventato indipendente dalla questione che l’E-Cat funzioni o meno.
Si può dunque dire che il cosiddetto Effetto Rossi sia andato oltre la fisica e diventato una idea, movimento ed ispirazione. Ogni nuovo tentativo di replicazione indipendente nato indirettamente grazie alle Sue imprese è una lampante dimostrazione di tale effetto.
Personalmente trovo appropriato che l’Effetto Rossi si possa spiegare ANCHE con la psicologia. Fra le altre cose questa spiegazione non richiede una rivoluzione del Modello Standard.
Grazie per l’attenzione,
Mario Lorenzi
GOOGLE TRANSLATION:
Dr. Rossi,
I will be more clear: You will have noticed by now how many people in the field of LENR studies, activates and works for experiments and maybe sell useful inventions. This is mainly thanks to your work, but paradoxically became independent from the question that the E-Cat works or not.
It can therefore say that the so-called Red Effect went beyond physics and became an idea, movement and inspiration. Further attempts at independent replication indirectly born by His business is a clear demonstration of this effect.
Personally I find it appropriate that the effect can be explained Rossi EVEN with psychology. Among other things, this explanation does not require a revolution of the Standard Model.
Thanks for the attention,
Mario Lorenzi
Mario Lorenzi:
1- if a guy breaks the bone of a leg playing football, can he resolve the problem eating spaghetti? ( this answers the text of your question )
2- can a football player, while he is playing football, be criticized because cannot play basketball ? ( this answers the hypertext of it )
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dott. Rossi,
L’effetto Rossi può essere spiegato con la PSICOLOGIA?
The Rossi effect can be explained with the PSYCOLOGY?
Mario Lorenzi
Torbjorn Johnsen:
Thank you for your kind wishes!
Answer: the matter of the fact is that the 1 MW plants will be well controlled in automatic, so there will not be a dedicated operator. Any good technician of a factory can be trained to become a certified operator and he will not have to stay in the plant permanently, just check it now and again. We can provide him with an application that sends an alert when necessary and he will know what to do case by case.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Must all good forces protect our Andrea!
My question: what minimum knowledge is required for the operator of a 1 MW E-Cat beyond the specific training from your personnel?
Best regards,
Torbjorn
Ronaldo:
Before any opinion of mine, I wait for the evidence of what Jo said.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JJ:
Thank you for your opinion and good luck for your bet,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.