Hello Dr Rossi.
I know you are a very busy man. and i want take to much of your time.as you know i have been around since your first public demo and before, I have had an excellent time following your every move, and can say you have handled each move with brilliance and well thought through experiments, i have always believed in your work.
We have all been waiting for so long to see your new QUARK X, could you give us a little on how you envision how this test will be performed, how big it will be, what part of the world it will take place, you said it will be streaming that’s nice, please take some time and give us a little more about the demo. as it will be coming up fast. who will be in charge of the details, surly that is not to secret. how time fly’s huh .
Sorry if you have already answered these ? will it be powering something, will it be a new device or one that has already been in use. can your most loyal fans get a preview if we keep it quit for a while, private group of course. of your choice of course, but a private viewing would be great do you have anyone that can manage such a thing. thanks sir and may the Father always have his hand on your shoulder. — from Oklahoma with great admiration.
I also had a strange dream during this New Year. Somehow I was able to sneak my phone into my dream-state and film the dream. I think that you might see some similarities to your dream.
Dear Andrea
Around 90% of the worlds electricity is produced by using steam as the energy carrier.
Roughly 50% of this steam is made by burning coal. 25% by burning gas and 25% by nuclear power.
All this energy sources are polluting one way or another.
An invention that may produce steam without pollution and to a lower price than the sources mentioned above, is what most of the world is dreaming of. A change of the steam generating parts of the powerworks may then be possible without any major interruptions.
Individuals, companies and societies that benefits of the business of supplying the energy sources of today will strongly fight against a change. These forces are economical heavy and well organized.
Your presentation in February must trigger stronger forces to succeed. You need to show the owners of the electricity power works, the OEM’s that produce steam generators and politicians this new possibility.
As you often repeat there are much outstanding work to be done before the QuarkX is ready for the marked. To do all this work at many levels and in time, you need far more staff. To hire all the staff necessary, you need funding. My hope is that you may get the funding necessary without losing your controlling position.
In your quest for funding and attention, your now present partners name is of high importance. I hope he will stay forward in conjunction with the February presentation and that new individuals and companies of importance, will join your goals.
Best regards: Svein Henrik.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You have all my sympathy about what you said of Wikipedia: many persons have been blackmailed with the system you described. Why don’t you organize a class A action?
Anyway, continue your good job, which is the sole thing that really counts here.
All the best,
Norberto
Dear Andrea:
I saw the last HHT of Brillouin, but it is just the copy of your old Hot cat, while their supposed “Q Pulse”, that pretends to be an invention, is nothing but a normal wave used in all the gensets of the world! It is a real bogus, not an IP!
In the electronic jargon this is called a “rectified square wave”, because it is used in the gensets that from direct current they first get a square wave, then they pass to a rectified square wave, then by a series of integrals they recreate a sinusoidal wave.
This smartasses have just invented a trade mark for a device that is one century old and that every electrician learns in his first year of school.
The COP they got comes only after their agreement with Industrial heat. Before that agreement Brillouin was just losing his time with electrolitic bullshit, as it clearly appears from their publications.
About what they call a “third party”: we have discovered that all the members of the “third party” that made their Washington test are members of their company…
My suspect is that they are just trying to fool the investors of IH, like Woodford, with smoke in the eyes, after they lost your license.
Godspeed, Andrea!
From Russia, with love,
D.T.
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the article
” Energy Deficit in Beta Decay Process “, by Dr George J. Chang, Theoretical Physics Department, N.1 Gong, 1st Road, Cyuan Sing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
We did not yet decide.
Thank you for your support and kind words. Probably whoever wants in the world will be able to attend in streaming, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Do you plan to invite any high level government officials, media notables or industry CEOs to your planned demonstration? Those of us who have followed your work since 2011 are already convinced of the significance of this disruptive technology. It’s time to make it known to the rest of the world. Godspeed Dr. Rossi.
Can you reveal at this time what configuration you plan to test/demonstrate?
a. 100W or 20W or something else output per QuarkX?
b. Number of units (, 2, 3 or more) in the test/demonstration?
c. Duration of the test/demonstration (hours or days)?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About Wikipedia: they have been sued from many persons that have been misrepresented in their posts by corrupted editors. It is not just you, they use this as a blackmailing method.
Cheers,
San
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The many replications made in America, Russia, China and Europe of your patent have confirmed the validity of your technology.
Godspeed,
Anonymous
Dr Andrea Rossi:
After your comment of today, I read on http://www.ingandrearossi.com the real story and I have been impressed.
Never give up, continue your great job,
Barry
Ike:
I know perfectly the Wikipedia issue, because we too have tried to correct the falsities, but, as you say, after few seconds the corrections are canceled: this fact gives evidence of the fact that there is a team of powerful editors that full time takes care of it, otherwise the corrections would be made now and again, as it happens normally. Probably you too have experienced the fact that when we tried to insist in the due corrections on this page, the guy who tries to correct is banned from the editing system. This gives evidence that there is an organized gang of editors, not just candid guys.
Now I have better to do than take care of Wikipedia, its turn will arrive in due time, in due place, in due ways.
By the way: the probabilities that our Customers will not buy our products because of the stupidities written by our foes on Wiki are 0%, therefore it is not a priority. They damage my personal image, but not our product and what counts here is not my person ( I myself do not take myself seriously in the global context ), what counts here is the product I am working upon.
Besides, every person not stupid and not biased understands after reading the first lines that it is just vulgar libelling made by our well known foes.
Suggested reading related to the issue: http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Brillouin has again replicated your effect, substantially copying your patent. They did it after the agreement they made with IH: what a coincidence! Before that Brillouin made only electrolysis…
It is important that many replications have been made so far of your patent: this fact adds value to it!
Godspeed,
C.
Dear Andrea:
In the English version of Wikipedia the article “Andrea Rossi” is managed by powerful editors paid by your foes. We tried many times to correct all the slanders contained in it, but after few seconds all the corrections are erased. In that article all the updates against you, usually totally false, are accepted, while all the corrections are sistematically erased within seconds. We think that a corrupted editor controls it full time. The text reports all the comments of your well known foes and rejects all the comments that can contain anything non negative related to you. Why don’t you sue them?
Thank you for your important job,
Ike
Gerard McEk:
The demo will be defined when we will be ready for it.
The description of the demo will be given during the test itself. Obviously will be carried on by professionals.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Obviously the demonstration you will make of the QuarkX will be made in collaboration with experts of the matter to make measurements etc.
Is that true?
Cheers,
Susy
Dear Andrea,
I am looking forward to the demonstration of the QuarkX. I hope you will make it such that it allows for independent measurement of the main variables like water flow, water temperatures and input power.
1. You told us that it does not depend on the ongoing 5 Sigma testing if the demo would take place or not, but where it does depend on?
2. Will the QuarkX be visible?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
If the QuarkX unit is generating a nominal 20W of excess thermal power, then I would recommend a water calorimetric test, with no phase transition (no boiling). This is the type of testing that Andrea Rossi performed more than 5 years ago and he is quite proficient in the conduct of the testing. Obviously, electrical input must be simultaneously measured (all phases). Properly conducted, it should be very accurate. I would like to see a 20C to 40C temperature differential between the input water and the output water but some variations in range is acceptable. My two cents worth.
If I were to design the test, I would use a live QuarkX and a dummy unit (no fuel), electrically attached in series so each unit receives identical input power and the water input and water output temperatures precisely measured along with the flow rate for each. Each unit would be in its own insulated container. In this way, the amount of input power is precisely known to be identical for the dummy unit and the actual unit. Any differences in excess heat produced must therefore be due to the QuarkX unit’s activity. However, there may be control issues that could preclude this approach to testing. I am confident Andrea Rossi will design and implement a carefully engineered test methodology.
Hello Dr Rossi.
I know you are a very busy man. and i want take to much of your time.as you know i have been around since your first public demo and before, I have had an excellent time following your every move, and can say you have handled each move with brilliance and well thought through experiments, i have always believed in your work.
We have all been waiting for so long to see your new QUARK X, could you give us a little on how you envision how this test will be performed, how big it will be, what part of the world it will take place, you said it will be streaming that’s nice, please take some time and give us a little more about the demo. as it will be coming up fast. who will be in charge of the details, surly that is not to secret. how time fly’s huh .
Sorry if you have already answered these ? will it be powering something, will it be a new device or one that has already been in use. can your most loyal fans get a preview if we keep it quit for a while, private group of course. of your choice of course, but a private viewing would be great do you have anyone that can manage such a thing. thanks sir and may the Father always have his hand on your shoulder. — from Oklahoma with great admiration.
JPR:
We are going well,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please find on
http://www.rossilivecat.com
today’s comments on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ashford:
I can’t comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Thomas Florek:
Ha,ha,ha !!!
That’s some fun, thank you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Andrea,
I also had a strange dream during this New Year. Somehow I was able to sneak my phone into my dream-state and film the dream. I think that you might see some similarities to your dream.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBGlY7Q8Okw
Update?
The establishment Gurus in California claim to have an “independent validation”
even though they are old friends from years back?
Gods Speed to you Dr Rossi
Svein Henrik:
Thank you for your suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea
Around 90% of the worlds electricity is produced by using steam as the energy carrier.
Roughly 50% of this steam is made by burning coal. 25% by burning gas and 25% by nuclear power.
All this energy sources are polluting one way or another.
An invention that may produce steam without pollution and to a lower price than the sources mentioned above, is what most of the world is dreaming of. A change of the steam generating parts of the powerworks may then be possible without any major interruptions.
Individuals, companies and societies that benefits of the business of supplying the energy sources of today will strongly fight against a change. These forces are economical heavy and well organized.
Your presentation in February must trigger stronger forces to succeed. You need to show the owners of the electricity power works, the OEM’s that produce steam generators and politicians this new possibility.
As you often repeat there are much outstanding work to be done before the QuarkX is ready for the marked. To do all this work at many levels and in time, you need far more staff. To hire all the staff necessary, you need funding. My hope is that you may get the funding necessary without losing your controlling position.
In your quest for funding and attention, your now present partners name is of high importance. I hope he will stay forward in conjunction with the February presentation and that new individuals and companies of importance, will join your goals.
Best regards: Svein Henrik.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
DT:
I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fermin:
He,he,he…
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Norberto Panuccio:
Thank you for your sympathy,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You have all my sympathy about what you said of Wikipedia: many persons have been blackmailed with the system you described. Why don’t you organize a class A action?
Anyway, continue your good job, which is the sole thing that really counts here.
All the best,
Norberto
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congrats for your act as Simplicio (ha,ha,ha)
Very funny,
Fermin
Dear Andrea:
I saw the last HHT of Brillouin, but it is just the copy of your old Hot cat, while their supposed “Q Pulse”, that pretends to be an invention, is nothing but a normal wave used in all the gensets of the world! It is a real bogus, not an IP!
In the electronic jargon this is called a “rectified square wave”, because it is used in the gensets that from direct current they first get a square wave, then they pass to a rectified square wave, then by a series of integrals they recreate a sinusoidal wave.
This smartasses have just invented a trade mark for a device that is one century old and that every electrician learns in his first year of school.
The COP they got comes only after their agreement with Industrial heat. Before that agreement Brillouin was just losing his time with electrolitic bullshit, as it clearly appears from their publications.
About what they call a “third party”: we have discovered that all the members of the “third party” that made their Washington test are members of their company…
My suspect is that they are just trying to fool the investors of IH, like Woodford, with smoke in the eyes, after they lost your license.
Godspeed, Andrea!
From Russia, with love,
D.T.
Dear Andrea,,
EGO OUT for this dy can be read at:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-07-2017-lenr-info-reform-purity.html
Warm regards very warm from a frosty area of Terra..
Peter
JPR:
At the dawn of Saturday January 07 the QuarkX is working well, still on its way toward 5 Sigma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the article
” Energy Deficit in Beta Decay Process “, by Dr George J. Chang, Theoretical Physics Department, N.1 Gong, 1st Road, Cyuan Sing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Drew G.:
We did not yet decide.
Thank you for your support and kind words. Probably whoever wants in the world will be able to attend in streaming, though.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr. Rossi:
Do you plan to invite any high level government officials, media notables or industry CEOs to your planned demonstration? Those of us who have followed your work since 2011 are already convinced of the significance of this disruptive technology. It’s time to make it known to the rest of the world. Godspeed Dr. Rossi.
Drew G.
Steven N. Karels:
Information related to the demo will be given during the demo itself.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Can you reveal at this time what configuration you plan to test/demonstrate?
a. 100W or 20W or something else output per QuarkX?
b. Number of units (, 2, 3 or more) in the test/demonstration?
c. Duration of the test/demonstration (hours or days)?
Dear Andrea,\
EGO OUT edition for today is here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-06-2017-lenr-info.html
Cheers,
Peter
Barry:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
San:
Thank you for the information: can you send me evidence of what you wrote?
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
About Wikipedia: they have been sued from many persons that have been misrepresented in their posts by corrupted editors. It is not just you, they use this as a blackmailing method.
Cheers,
San
Dr Andrea Rossi:
The many replications made in America, Russia, China and Europe of your patent have confirmed the validity of your technology.
Godspeed,
Anonymous
Dr Andrea Rossi:
After your comment of today, I read on http://www.ingandrearossi.com the real story and I have been impressed.
Never give up, continue your great job,
Barry
Toussaint:
We have still to decide these particulars.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
The QuarkX is behaving well, on his way toward the 5Sigma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
C.:
Replications in scientific contexts are useful and permitted.
I am always delighted to read about them.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ike:
I know perfectly the Wikipedia issue, because we too have tried to correct the falsities, but, as you say, after few seconds the corrections are canceled: this fact gives evidence of the fact that there is a team of powerful editors that full time takes care of it, otherwise the corrections would be made now and again, as it happens normally. Probably you too have experienced the fact that when we tried to insist in the due corrections on this page, the guy who tries to correct is banned from the editing system. This gives evidence that there is an organized gang of editors, not just candid guys.
Now I have better to do than take care of Wikipedia, its turn will arrive in due time, in due place, in due ways.
By the way: the probabilities that our Customers will not buy our products because of the stupidities written by our foes on Wiki are 0%, therefore it is not a priority. They damage my personal image, but not our product and what counts here is not my person ( I myself do not take myself seriously in the global context ), what counts here is the product I am working upon.
Besides, every person not stupid and not biased understands after reading the first lines that it is just vulgar libelling made by our well known foes.
Suggested reading related to the issue:
http://www.ingandrearossi.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Brillouin has again replicated your effect, substantially copying your patent. They did it after the agreement they made with IH: what a coincidence! Before that Brillouin made only electrolysis…
It is important that many replications have been made so far of your patent: this fact adds value to it!
Godspeed,
C.
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi
I wish you all the best for this new year.
One question please, will you invite some personality to your QUARK-X presentation ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint françois
Dear Andrea:
In the English version of Wikipedia the article “Andrea Rossi” is managed by powerful editors paid by your foes. We tried many times to correct all the slanders contained in it, but after few seconds all the corrections are erased. In that article all the updates against you, usually totally false, are accepted, while all the corrections are sistematically erased within seconds. We think that a corrupted editor controls it full time. The text reports all the comments of your well known foes and rejects all the comments that can contain anything non negative related to you. Why don’t you sue them?
Thank you for your important job,
Ike
Susy:
Of course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
The demo will be defined when we will be ready for it.
The description of the demo will be given during the test itself. Obviously will be carried on by professionals.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi:
Obviously the demonstration you will make of the QuarkX will be made in collaboration with experts of the matter to make measurements etc.
Is that true?
Cheers,
Susy
Dear Andrea,
I am looking forward to the demonstration of the QuarkX. I hope you will make it such that it allows for independent measurement of the main variables like water flow, water temperatures and input power.
1. You told us that it does not depend on the ongoing 5 Sigma testing if the demo would take place or not, but where it does depend on?
2. Will the QuarkX be visible?
Thanks, kind regards, Gerard
Dear Andrea,
Blog issue for today is this one:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-05-2017-lenr-success-learning-from.html
Cheers,
peter
DT:
Yes, I agree.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Thank you for the suggestions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If the QuarkX unit is generating a nominal 20W of excess thermal power, then I would recommend a water calorimetric test, with no phase transition (no boiling). This is the type of testing that Andrea Rossi performed more than 5 years ago and he is quite proficient in the conduct of the testing. Obviously, electrical input must be simultaneously measured (all phases). Properly conducted, it should be very accurate. I would like to see a 20C to 40C temperature differential between the input water and the output water but some variations in range is acceptable. My two cents worth.
If I were to design the test, I would use a live QuarkX and a dummy unit (no fuel), electrically attached in series so each unit receives identical input power and the water input and water output temperatures precisely measured along with the flow rate for each. Each unit would be in its own insulated container. In this way, the amount of input power is precisely known to be identical for the dummy unit and the actual unit. Any differences in excess heat produced must therefore be due to the QuarkX unit’s activity. However, there may be control issues that could preclude this approach to testing. I am confident Andrea Rossi will design and implement a carefully engineered test methodology.