I am glad to hear the you restarted the testing so quickly!
A couple questions please?
1. Do you continue now again with three QuarkX units (or do you use more?).
2. Do you consider that the Sigma testing will again take 10 months to achieve 3.5 Sigma or might it be sooner this time for 3.5 Sigma.
Dear Andrea,
If the Quark has high power/mass ratio, why not do the following: Make a large set of them, for example with 12-fold redundancy, then run them in shifts so that each quark runs during 12 month calendar time only 1 month active time. Then the quark has to be qualified by running it for only 1 month (probably you have already accomplished this in 2016). From the user point of view, servicing and unit replacement still happens only once per year. The system is economical if producing the quarks is cheap.
regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I approve your decision to delay the launch of the QuarkX after the end of the litigation.
It is an obvious and wise decision.
Livio
Steven N. Karels:
I think that the trial will end between July and September 2017. The work with the QuarkX is continuing in our factory, so, if the trial will end, say, in September, the presentation of the QuarkX will be made in 2017.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
W.Y.:
In a nutshell: by the Relativity theory, the energy of a massive object, whatever it is, is given, as you correctly say, by its rest mass, but you have to add to it its kinetic energy, that depends on how fast it is moving in respect to the system it is inside. If the speed is considerable in respect to the speed of light, the energy increases substantially, but at the speed we experiment in our life the increase of mass is irrelevant: for example, if the speed goes close to c ( a massive object cannot reach the value of c ) the kinetic energy is far greater than its energy at rest, but at the speed of an aeroplane the increase of energy is about one hundred billionth of its energy at rest.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi:
Hungarian scientists have replicated the effect: see this publication on Arxiv:
Charged particle assisted nuclear reactions in solid state environment: renaissance of low energy nuclear physics
Peter Kalman and Tamas Keszthelyi Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Physics, Budafoki ´ut 8. F., H-1521 Budapest, Hungary
The features of electron assisted neutron exchange processes in crystalline solids are surveyed.
It is found that, contrary to expectations, the cross section of these processes may reach an observable magnitude even in the very low energy case because of the extremely huge increment caused by the Coulomb factor of the electron assisted processes and by the effect of the crystal-lattice. The features of electron assisted heavy charged particle exchange processes, electron assisted nuclear capture processes and heavy charged particle assisted nuclear processes are also overviewed. Experimental observations, which may be related to our theoretical findings, are dealt with. A possible explanation of observations by Fleischmann and Pons is presented. The possibility of the phenomenon of nuclear transmutation is qualitatively explained with the aid of usual and charged particle assisted reactions. The electron assisted neutron exchange processes in pure Ni, Pd and Li−Ni composite systems (in the Rossi-type E-Cat) are analyzed and it is concluded that the electron assisted neutron exchange reactions in pure Ni and Li − Ni composite systems may be responsible for recent experimental observations.
Summarizing, the theoretical results expounded and their successful applications in explaining some unresolved experimental facts inspire us to say that the studying of charged particles electron assisted nuclear reactions, especially the electron assisted neutron exchange processes may start a renaissance in the field of low energy nuclear physics.
Andrea, this has been a very long game for you specifically, but for all of us cheering you on in the bleachers. Seems as though we completed several over time periods and the goal posts keep moving.There is no clear winner yet. Will there come a day when we your fans and supporters can walk with our chins up and with confidence tell our friends and family that the Time Has Come! Andrea Rossi has commercialized cold fusion (LENR)?
Cheers, Bob K
May I inquire if the heat transfer again had to be increased? Thank you for your answers to Frank, and the many others that openly try to encourage you in your work.
character assassinations do not bolster IH’s credibility. Let’s see what actually happened between IH and Rossi. Let’s see your lab records and notebooks. Let’s see how IH reps behaved when showing the 1 MW plant to investors. Let’s see the evidence, and then we shall all decide.
When you say the QuarkX is acting a ‘little different’ now, does this mean:
1) You had to repair the reactor
2) You had to adjust the control system
3) The power output is lower
4) The COP is lower
5) The QuarkX is less stable
6) You had to start over on your quest for Sigma 5
7) Something else
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I strongly appreciate your decision to wait the verdict before doing the demo with the QuarkX: very responsible for a man who has in his hands the development of one of the most important industrial initiatives.
Cheers,
Mag
I hope you are well and pray that you sustain yourself though 2017. “The conclusion of the matter, everything having been heard, is: Fear the true God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole obligation of man. For the true God will judge every deed, including every hidden thing, as to whether it is good or bad.” Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
I think the experiment performed is clear enough for other physicists to consider clearly and likely to be able to reproduce the results. The output of the experiment appears to be comparable to or greater than lenr, but as it is laser stimulated it seems to me to be a bit more like the Tomahawk project, on a very small scale with functional results for what I would estimate to be under $1,000,000 of testing (guessing). Franks comment on E-Cat World describes it this way “If Holmlid’s conclusions are correct here, then this would be a very important contribution to the body of LENR/cold fusion research.”
I think Andrea would say thank you for the link, it is a very interesting indeed experiment.
Andrea, Regards your recent comment stating you have/had a problem with regards the control of the quark X. This is just a thought but maybe your activating system should blink i.e. on off at a specific rate. I say this because everything in nature seems to need to pulse at various rates in order to maintain a balance. And also all the best with regards your upcoming court case. Regards E.A.
Dear Andrea,
I am glad to hear the you restarted the testing so quickly!
A couple questions please?
1. Do you continue now again with three QuarkX units (or do you use more?).
2. Do you consider that the Sigma testing will again take 10 months to achieve 3.5 Sigma or might it be sooner this time for 3.5 Sigma.
Thank you,
Tom
Update?
Livio:
Thank you.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank for the suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Joseph Fine:
Thank you for the updated link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ing. Michelangelo Di Meo, Andrea Rossi:
The arXiv article posted earlier (link below) Version 3 doesn’t work or has been removed, but Version 2 is working.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01474v2
Charged particle assisted nuclear reactions in solid state environment: renaissance of low energy nuclear physics
Péter Kálmán, Tamás Keszthelyi
(Submitted on 5 Feb 2015 (v1), revised 30 Mar 2015 (v2), not working now///// latest version 24 Jan 2017 (v3)) ////
Joseph
Dear Andrea,
A rather typical mid-week edition of EGO OUT
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-26-2017-lenr-fragile-or-agile-then.html
Things happen, ideas fight.
Cheers,
peter
Dear Andrea,
If the Quark has high power/mass ratio, why not do the following: Make a large set of them, for example with 12-fold redundancy, then run them in shifts so that each quark runs during 12 month calendar time only 1 month active time. Then the quark has to be qualified by running it for only 1 month (probably you have already accomplished this in 2016). From the user point of view, servicing and unit replacement still happens only once per year. The system is economical if producing the quarks is cheap.
regards, /pekka
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I approve your decision to delay the launch of the QuarkX after the end of the litigation.
It is an obvious and wise decision.
Livio
Ing. Michelangelo De Meo:
Thank you for the reference.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
I think that the trial will end between July and September 2017. The work with the QuarkX is continuing in our factory, so, if the trial will end, say, in September, the presentation of the QuarkX will be made in 2017.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Yes, we restarted. So far so good.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
W.Y.:
In a nutshell: by the Relativity theory, the energy of a massive object, whatever it is, is given, as you correctly say, by its rest mass, but you have to add to it its kinetic energy, that depends on how fast it is moving in respect to the system it is inside. If the speed is considerable in respect to the speed of light, the energy increases substantially, but at the speed we experiment in our life the increase of mass is irrelevant: for example, if the speed goes close to c ( a massive object cannot reach the value of c ) the kinetic energy is far greater than its energy at rest, but at the speed of an aeroplane the increase of energy is about one hundred billionth of its energy at rest.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr. Rossi:
Hungarian scientists have replicated the effect: see this publication on Arxiv:
Charged particle assisted nuclear reactions in solid state environment: renaissance of low energy nuclear physics
Peter Kalman and Tamas Keszthelyi Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Physics, Budafoki ´ut 8. F., H-1521 Budapest, Hungary
The features of electron assisted neutron exchange processes in crystalline solids are surveyed.
It is found that, contrary to expectations, the cross section of these processes may reach an observable magnitude even in the very low energy case because of the extremely huge increment caused by the Coulomb factor of the electron assisted processes and by the effect of the crystal-lattice. The features of electron assisted heavy charged particle exchange processes, electron assisted nuclear capture processes and heavy charged particle assisted nuclear processes are also overviewed. Experimental observations, which may be related to our theoretical findings, are dealt with. A possible explanation of observations by Fleischmann and Pons is presented. The possibility of the phenomenon of nuclear transmutation is qualitatively explained with the aid of usual and charged particle assisted reactions. The electron assisted neutron exchange processes in pure Ni, Pd and Li−Ni composite systems (in the Rossi-type E-Cat) are analyzed and it is concluded that the electron assisted neutron exchange reactions in pure Ni and Li − Ni composite systems may be responsible for recent experimental observations.
Summarizing, the theoretical results expounded and their successful applications in explaining some unresolved experimental facts inspire us to say that the studying of charged particles electron assisted nuclear reactions, especially the electron assisted neutron exchange processes may start a renaissance in the field of low energy nuclear physics.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.01474v3.pdf
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Do you see the likelihood of the QuarkX demonstration being delayed until 2018 because of the current legal action?
Has the trip toward sigma 5 restarted its race? Update?
JPR
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is the energy of every massive object given by its rest mass?
Thank you if you can answer,
W.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Bob K:
I am working at my best.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Andrea, this has been a very long game for you specifically, but for all of us cheering you on in the bleachers. Seems as though we completed several over time periods and the goal posts keep moving.There is no clear winner yet. Will there come a day when we your fans and supporters can walk with our chins up and with confidence tell our friends and family that the Time Has Come! Andrea Rossi has commercialized cold fusion (LENR)?
Cheers, Bob K
Dear Andrea,
here is EGO OUT for today
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-25-2917-lenr-nae-chat-2-info.html
cheers,
peter
Jeromy:
Heat production.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Elvin Hattier:
Electronics of the QuarkX are a crucial and proprietary part of the IP.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Going well today
Warm Regards
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are electronics a crucial element of the Quarkx, or you are just using technology off the shelf?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Can you kindly explain which will be the first employment of the E-Cat and the QuarkX when they will be massively produced?
Tom Conover:
Yes, we found a very brilliant solution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
May I inquire if the heat transfer again had to be increased? Thank you for your answers to Frank, and the many others that openly try to encourage you in your work.
Tom
JPR:
Got a good restart,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Mr Barkley:
I cannot comment issues to be disclosed in Court.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- yes
3- no
4- no
5- no
6- yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Laurel:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,The EGO OUT issue for this day is here now:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-24-2017-lenr-info-and-nae-c-hat.html
Hic and nunc; how do you say “WEBLINK” in Latin?
cheers,
peter
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Is still Leonardo Corporation working to manufacture the 1 MW plants?
Dr Rossi,
Interesting post regarding IH and their position:
character assassinations do not bolster IH’s credibility. Let’s see what actually happened between IH and Rossi. Let’s see your lab records and notebooks. Let’s see how IH reps behaved when showing the 1 MW plant to investors. Let’s see the evidence, and then we shall all decide.
Dear Andrea,
When you say the QuarkX is acting a ‘little different’ now, does this mean:
1) You had to repair the reactor
2) You had to adjust the control system
3) The power output is lower
4) The COP is lower
5) The QuarkX is less stable
6) You had to start over on your quest for Sigma 5
7) Something else
Thank you for what you can tell us.
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Tom Conover:
Thank you: I agree.
Warmest Regards,
Andrea
MHF:
Thank you for your sympathy,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I strongly appreciate your decision to wait the verdict before doing the demo with the QuarkX: very responsible for a man who has in his hands the development of one of the most important industrial initiatives.
Cheers,
Mag
Andrea,
I hope you are well and pray that you sustain yourself though 2017. “The conclusion of the matter, everything having been heard, is: Fear the true God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole obligation of man. For the true God will judge every deed, including every hidden thing, as to whether it is good or bad.” Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
Godspeed,
Tom
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@ Harvey,
I think the experiment performed is clear enough for other physicists to consider clearly and likely to be able to reproduce the results. The output of the experiment appears to be comparable to or greater than lenr, but as it is laser stimulated it seems to me to be a bit more like the Tomahawk project, on a very small scale with functional results for what I would estimate to be under $1,000,000 of testing (guessing). Franks comment on E-Cat World describes it this way “If Holmlid’s conclusions are correct here, then this would be a very important contribution to the body of LENR/cold fusion research.”
I think Andrea would say thank you for the link, it is a very interesting indeed experiment.
Tom
Dear Andrea,
Here is the link to my todaily blog issue:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-23-2017-lenr-info-questions.html
warmest greetings,
Peter
Andrea, Regards your recent comment stating you have/had a problem with regards the control of the quark X. This is just a thought but maybe your activating system should blink i.e. on off at a specific rate. I say this because everything in nature seems to need to pulse at various rates in order to maintain a balance. And also all the best with regards your upcoming court case. Regards E.A.
Harvey:
There are no problems. Maybe some Reader will be happy to comment, at the moment I have not the time to read it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.