This question has been raised before. The following is the text of my reply when the issue arose previously:
Dear Sir:
Mr Rossi invented, has been devoting eighteen hours a day for years to developing, and is presently planning the production and sale of a device that will: A) dramatically reduce energy costs for everyone around the world; B) drastically cut carbon dioxide emissions, as well as other damage associated with fossil fuel extraction; and C) greatly increase world productivity and living standards, to the benefit of mankind in a magnitude probably unprecedented in world history.
Is this, in your opinion, an inadequate benefit for Mr. Rossi to bestow upon the world?
I believe it is appropriate that those showing themselves prepared to make a huge investment of ingenuity, personal effort and resources, and are successful in providing the rest of the world with benefits, should be rewarded – and be rewarded, approximately, in proportion to the size of their contribution. There are other economic systems that ‘work’ on different principles but, in every case, all they have ever produced is poverty for all, other than, not infrequently, for a select group within their political leadership.
As an example: until a short time ago the monthly salary of fully qualified and practising medical doctors in Cuba was $30. (YES, monthly.) Quite recently some have had their salaries doubled to a positively whopping $67 a month:
The lesson is clear: where there are no very powerful incentives for innovation, resource conservation and impressing the hell out of the customers, there will be no innovation, resource conservation or any motivation to pay attention to customers.
I am very happy to live in a country which provides serious incentives to encourage its citizens to take risks in an effort to be productive, and where, in consequence, everyone – not just doctors, inventors or CEOs – earns a lot more than medical doctors in Cuba. (Employees serving in coffee shops here earn more than thirty times as much as Cuban physicians). So, when the time comes to acquire an E-cat, I will be positively delighted to pay Mr. Rossi’s small royalty as part of the purchase price. And I will be very happy to see Mr. Rossi benefit substantially financially in line with the rules as they presently exist, having exerted a great deal of very hard work over many years, while taking considerable financial risk on a project that, at the outset, must have seemed much more likely to fail than to succeed.
Are there any circumstances which you would open your technology 100% to the full public, instead of keeping it secret? For example, if there could be organized an X-Prize for LENR that the E-Cat or Quark X could win, what amount would be needed for you to give the technology to the world? $100 million? $1 billion?
I ask because this technology is maybe the most important ever in history. How many lives will be better, or saved, if the technology is deployed? Each day of delay is a high human cost. This human cost is now the price of your secret. When is this human cost too high for you?
Of course you must get something from your huge efforts – but how much is enough for you? (You will a great world hero in any case, no matter how big the $$ prize).
Most respectfully and best wishes in every success,
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I studied your patent allowed to you from the USPTO in the year 2000 and it is very interesting, because turns into a liquid fuel a biomass that does not increase the carbon dioxide absolute amount, but recycles it. Are you interested to return also to that kind of job?
Cheers,
Dan
reading some of me356 posts, give me an idea. To extend SSM time, the ECats or the QuarkX can be operated in a molten salt bath, the kind used in solar concentration plants (or others if 550C is not enough). The high thermal capacity of the bath can extend the SSM period, by not letting the fuel cool down. I don’t know if you already found a way to have long SSM with load (e.g. heating water up to steam), but if not, this can be a mean.
Dr Andrea Rossi
We of the silent minority are continuing to wait patiently for your products. We are aware of the strong pressure you are sustaining and of how hard is your work in this period, but we trust you.
Never give up,
Anonymous
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
Brillouin has announced that has replicated twice the effect that is derived from your US patent!
Congratulations,
Jacob
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Now comes EGO OUT for today:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-02-2017-lenr-imitation-limitation.html
Cheers,
Peter
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
the link for the first Spring-month-day Ego out is this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-01-2017-has-lenr-something-to-do.html
my very best wishes,
Peter
Carlo:
We feel very comfortable in regard of how the case is evolving.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Just fixing some insurgent problem, but not major.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I understand it is on course a huge activity related to the litigation: how do you feel about it sincerely?
In response to GBooth:
This question has been raised before. The following is the text of my reply when the issue arose previously:
Dear Sir:
Mr Rossi invented, has been devoting eighteen hours a day for years to developing, and is presently planning the production and sale of a device that will: A) dramatically reduce energy costs for everyone around the world; B) drastically cut carbon dioxide emissions, as well as other damage associated with fossil fuel extraction; and C) greatly increase world productivity and living standards, to the benefit of mankind in a magnitude probably unprecedented in world history.
Is this, in your opinion, an inadequate benefit for Mr. Rossi to bestow upon the world?
I believe it is appropriate that those showing themselves prepared to make a huge investment of ingenuity, personal effort and resources, and are successful in providing the rest of the world with benefits, should be rewarded – and be rewarded, approximately, in proportion to the size of their contribution. There are other economic systems that ‘work’ on different principles but, in every case, all they have ever produced is poverty for all, other than, not infrequently, for a select group within their political leadership.
As an example: until a short time ago the monthly salary of fully qualified and practising medical doctors in Cuba was $30. (YES, monthly.) Quite recently some have had their salaries doubled to a positively whopping $67 a month:
http://www.medicaldaily.com/cuban-doctors-get-salary-raises-67-month-after-government-cuts-100k-redundant-jobs-272310
The lesson is clear: where there are no very powerful incentives for innovation, resource conservation and impressing the hell out of the customers, there will be no innovation, resource conservation or any motivation to pay attention to customers.
I am very happy to live in a country which provides serious incentives to encourage its citizens to take risks in an effort to be productive, and where, in consequence, everyone – not just doctors, inventors or CEOs – earns a lot more than medical doctors in Cuba. (Employees serving in coffee shops here earn more than thirty times as much as Cuban physicians). So, when the time comes to acquire an E-cat, I will be positively delighted to pay Mr. Rossi’s small royalty as part of the purchase price. And I will be very happy to see Mr. Rossi benefit substantially financially in line with the rules as they presently exist, having exerted a great deal of very hard work over many years, while taking considerable financial risk on a project that, at the outset, must have seemed much more likely to fail than to succeed.
Sincerely,
Rodney Nicholson.
JPR:
Still in good standing,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
G.Booth:
Thank you for your sympathy and your suggestions.
I already answered to these considerations.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Are there any circumstances which you would open your technology 100% to the full public, instead of keeping it secret? For example, if there could be organized an X-Prize for LENR that the E-Cat or Quark X could win, what amount would be needed for you to give the technology to the world? $100 million? $1 billion?
I ask because this technology is maybe the most important ever in history. How many lives will be better, or saved, if the technology is deployed? Each day of delay is a high human cost. This human cost is now the price of your secret. When is this human cost too high for you?
Of course you must get something from your huge efforts – but how much is enough for you? (You will a great world hero in any case, no matter how big the $$ prize).
Most respectfully and best wishes in every success,
G. Booth
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
The last issue of EGO OUT for February 2017:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-28-2017-has-lenr-something-to-do.html
Spring coming!?
All the best,
peter
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
New edition:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-27-and-if-lenr-gets-big-money.html
Cheers,
peter
JPR:
I have been told there is some problem, but now I am with the Attorneys in a deposition, will see later.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
R:
It will not be a test, it will be a demo, but yes, I promise.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan:
No. I am working 16 hours per day on the present job.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
I studied your patent allowed to you from the USPTO in the year 2000 and it is very interesting, because turns into a liquid fuel a biomass that does not increase the carbon dioxide absolute amount, but recycles it. Are you interested to return also to that kind of job?
Cheers,
Dan
Dr Andrea Rossi:
You promise that after the end of the litigation we will see the QuarkX in operation in a test?
All the best,
R
Update?
Irving:
I did not see yet a full report of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Good standing so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
We already had a long SSM with a load. Thank you for your suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Yes. In March I will make a specific work on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brenda:
I cannot comment in the blogs the events related to the litigation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Here is the Sunday edition of my Blog:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-26-2017-lenr-and-thorny-mimosa.html
cheers, a hyper efficient new week!
Peter
Dr Andrea Rossi
IH continues to make comments in the blogs saying your technology does not work.
Why don’t you react?
Brenda
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Have you made progress on the theoretical understanding of your Effect?
Cheers
Dear Andrea,
reading some of me356 posts, give me an idea. To extend SSM time, the ECats or the QuarkX can be operated in a molten salt bath, the kind used in solar concentration plants (or others if 550C is not enough). The high thermal capacity of the bath can extend the SSM period, by not letting the fuel cool down. I don’t know if you already found a way to have long SSM with load (e.g. heating water up to steam), but if not, this can be a mean.
Marco
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Whattaya think of the replication of Me356?
You didn’t answer.
Godspeed,
Irving
Anonymous:
Thank you all for your sustain,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also all today with the Attorneys, now I am going to see the QuarkX, but I got info it’s ok.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sarah:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Italo R.
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Peter Gluck:
Thank you for your link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Today’s EGO OUT posting:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-25-2017-lenr-remembering-know-how.html
All the best for you and readers, fine weekend!
peter
Dr Rossi, there is a very, very interesting and complex page here about what has discovered the researcher “me356” with experiments on LENR devices:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/02/24/what-me356-taught-us-max-temple/
It would be interesting your comment
Best Regards,
Italo R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi
Me 356 has replicated your effect. Another replication!
Cheers,
Sarah
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi
We of the silent minority are continuing to wait patiently for your products. We are aware of the strong pressure you are sustaining and of how hard is your work in this period, but we trust you.
Never give up,
Anonymous
Dear Andrea,,
EGO OUT for this Friday,-link:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-24-2017-lenr-has-too-many.html
cheers,
Peter
Gary:
No.
I never attack if I am not attacked.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still on our way toward the Sigma 5.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?