Dear Andrea Rossi:
Will it be possible for you to reassemble the original 1 MW plant of the performance test, just to expose it in your headquarters, just for the history of the titanic work of your team in the USA?
Cheers
Clovis
Maggie:
Yes, we collected more than 1,000 pages of data in all the particulars of all the components. Yes, the E-Cat QX has been born based on the same principles of the patent, therefore the data we are collecting are very precious. It is a mine of knowledge.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
You said that the 1 MW plant that worked for one year in the performance test in Doral, Florida, has been disassembled to analyze all the parts of it to study in the particulars all the problems emerged during one year of operation. Did you already obtain interesting data? Besides: will these data help also the E-Cat QX?
Cheers
M.
Reader:
You addressed to “Anonymous” a comment that in fact would have been proper address to me.
The answer is: your comment, in a nutshell, asks me if in the report I will give graciously for free our IP. The answer is, obviously, no. My patent, as you correctly say, has been replicated by experts of the art.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Will the report, when eventually published, include details on all processes and treatments of the nickel powder to allow for such a high COP? Hit and miss, finicky, challenging, enigmatic: making excess heat with nickel and a source of hydrogen (such as LiAlH4) is currently unrepeatable by the majority of replicators. Although a few highly credible respected scientists like Alexander Parkhomov and Songsheng Jiang have reported tremendous success (with rumors of positive results from other parties such as Nissan), there has yet to be an instructional guide published for serious parties interested in reproducing the effect to follow. Until such step by step details are provided, the series of successful replications that will be required for universal acceptance of the reality of the technology won’t happen.
With enough time, effort, and determination, I’m confident any competent researcher can produce undeniable excess heat; unfortunately, individuals with the work ethic of Andrea Rossi are rarities. Most people want reasonably quick results and are unwilling to perform long series of tests. But to change the mindset of official science about the Rossi Effect, such a “cheat sheet” with the details of how to process the nickel powder, how to provide electromagnetic stimulation, and how to trigger the anomalous heat events will be needed.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
To them who ask you why you do not give away your technology I would say: ask Bill Gates why he did not give away his intellectual property.
Cheers,
Oscar
Dr Andrea Rossi,
According with a person with sure knowledge of the facts, the Swedish team of Professors has replicated the experiment of Lugano. They built a reactor copying your patent and made the measurements with regular calorimetry with water in liquid state, instead of with the Boltzmann equation used in Lugano. The same person, that wants not to be identified because the report is secret being financed by a private entity that owns it, told me that the COP they reached makes certain the Effect beyond any possible doubt.
Are you aware of this fact?
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the paper ” Lemaitre’s Nebula or Primeval Atom? ” by Jacques Chauveheid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Honestly, I think the E-Cat will not make any difference in those dramatic, but exceptional and short timed situations. The market offers any kind of back up generators of electricity and heat and the difference of efficiency is a very minor issue in those situations: I think nobody gives a damn if during or in the aftermath of a hurricane or an earthquake the electricity or the heat generated by a mobile apparatus costs less.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
When you hear about natural disasters (and live through them in Miami), do you ever think about how E-Cat technology could be used to help people affected by them? If so, how would you like to see E-Cats used in those situations?
dear Andrea Rossi.
You said you are many years ahead your competitors in LENR.
Why?
1) Higher Cop
2) You think to have reached a level of knowlegde in LENR, that allows you can understand and use in a reliable way this tech.
the ECat QX can emit energy in three forms, as far as i understand: heat, electricity and light.
Obviously electricity does not need conversion, apart (A/D)C/(A/D)C conversion.
Heat requires the Carnot cycle.
Light? Photovoltaic panel! This can be the third mean…
Obviously current Carnot cycle has higher efficiency than current Photovoltaic (and as Andrea said in the past also better yield than the ECat QX itself when used to produce electricity), so the only reason i see to have all three form of energy, is that driving the ECat QX to emit a certain mix of energies is the best in terms of COP and/or stability, and it’s best not forcing the ECat to emit only heat or only light or only electricity…
Luca:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
you wrote
The business plan foresees the applications to make electricity too.
dreams, best wishes
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2017/10/04/saudi-arabias-300-mw-solar-tender-may-conclude-with-lowest-bid-ever/
Clovis Ray:
It is not impossible.
Thank you for the suggestion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi:
Will it be possible for you to reassemble the original 1 MW plant of the performance test, just to expose it in your headquarters, just for the history of the titanic work of your team in the USA?
Cheers
Clovis
Maggie:
Yes, we collected more than 1,000 pages of data in all the particulars of all the components. Yes, the E-Cat QX has been born based on the same principles of the patent, therefore the data we are collecting are very precious. It is a mine of knowledge.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Still well on our way toward Sigma 5, very close now.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
You said that the 1 MW plant that worked for one year in the performance test in Doral, Florida, has been disassembled to analyze all the parts of it to study in the particulars all the problems emerged during one year of operation. Did you already obtain interesting data? Besides: will these data help also the E-Cat QX?
Cheers
M.
R Feynmann:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Next Generation Utility – Microgrids – quick reads >
http://www.paconsulting.com/insights/next-generation-utility/microgrids/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microgrid
Charlie:
Thanks,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I like this site very much, Its a rattling nice place to read and find information about LENR.
Ekat:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Interesting for your readers:
Low-energy nuclear reactions in crystal structures
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1063779617050045
Best
Frank Acland:
The business plan foresees the applications to make electricity too.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you currently planning to build an electric power plant with your partner?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Toussaint Francois:
Premature.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you able to tell the range of electric power produced by your future QX-plant necessary for the new partner ?
Warm regards,
Toussaint François
Oscar:
Point taken.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reader:
You addressed to “Anonymous” a comment that in fact would have been proper address to me.
The answer is: your comment, in a nutshell, asks me if in the report I will give graciously for free our IP. The answer is, obviously, no. My patent, as you correctly say, has been replicated by experts of the art.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Anonymous,
Will the report, when eventually published, include details on all processes and treatments of the nickel powder to allow for such a high COP? Hit and miss, finicky, challenging, enigmatic: making excess heat with nickel and a source of hydrogen (such as LiAlH4) is currently unrepeatable by the majority of replicators. Although a few highly credible respected scientists like Alexander Parkhomov and Songsheng Jiang have reported tremendous success (with rumors of positive results from other parties such as Nissan), there has yet to be an instructional guide published for serious parties interested in reproducing the effect to follow. Until such step by step details are provided, the series of successful replications that will be required for universal acceptance of the reality of the technology won’t happen.
With enough time, effort, and determination, I’m confident any competent researcher can produce undeniable excess heat; unfortunately, individuals with the work ethic of Andrea Rossi are rarities. Most people want reasonably quick results and are unwilling to perform long series of tests. But to change the mindset of official science about the Rossi Effect, such a “cheat sheet” with the details of how to process the nickel powder, how to provide electromagnetic stimulation, and how to trigger the anomalous heat events will be needed.
Sincerely,
A Long Time Reader Of The JONP
Dr Andrea Rossi,
To them who ask you why you do not give away your technology I would say: ask Bill Gates why he did not give away his intellectual property.
Cheers,
Oscar
Tom:
The description of the demo will be given just before it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
During the demo of the E-Cat QX will you make use also of a dummy?
Tom
JPR:
Also today for us here is a great day with the E-Cat QX.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Until a publication will have been made, I will be aware of nothing.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Update?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
According with a person with sure knowledge of the facts, the Swedish team of Professors has replicated the experiment of Lugano. They built a reactor copying your patent and made the measurements with regular calorimetry with water in liquid state, instead of with the Boltzmann equation used in Lugano. The same person, that wants not to be identified because the report is secret being financed by a private entity that owns it, told me that the COP they reached makes certain the Effect beyond any possible doubt.
Are you aware of this fact?
Dear Readers:
Today has been published on the Journal of Nuclear Physics the paper ” Lemaitre’s Nebula or Primeval Atom? ” by Jacques Chauveheid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Colin Watters:
One year.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Honestly, I think the E-Cat will not make any difference in those dramatic, but exceptional and short timed situations. The market offers any kind of back up generators of electricity and heat and the difference of efficiency is a very minor issue in those situations: I think nobody gives a damn if during or in the aftermath of a hurricane or an earthquake the electricity or the heat generated by a mobile apparatus costs less.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When you hear about natural disasters (and live through them in Miami), do you ever think about how E-Cat technology could be used to help people affected by them? If so, how would you like to see E-Cats used in those situations?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Dear Mr Rossi,
If possible, can you tell us when operating at 30Wcm^-3 how long does the fuel last (eg time between refueling)? Thank you.
Marco:
It depends in the specific situations.
Thanks for your insight.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Domenico Canino:
As a matter of fact, I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
Premature to answer, but the QX version of the E-Cat majes efficient ststems inefficient with the former version.
Warm Regards
A.R.
JPR:
inversally prpportional to my tennis match.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Update?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Are you still able to directly produce electricity from the current version of your reactor?
If so, what are the variable ranges (percentages)?
Same questions for the production of light.
dear Andrea Rossi.
You said you are many years ahead your competitors in LENR.
Why?
1) Higher Cop
2) You think to have reached a level of knowlegde in LENR, that allows you can understand and use in a reliable way this tech.
Dear Andrea, Dear all,
the ECat QX can emit energy in three forms, as far as i understand: heat, electricity and light.
Obviously electricity does not need conversion, apart (A/D)C/(A/D)C conversion.
Heat requires the Carnot cycle.
Light? Photovoltaic panel! This can be the third mean…
Obviously current Carnot cycle has higher efficiency than current Photovoltaic (and as Andrea said in the past also better yield than the ECat QX itself when used to produce electricity), so the only reason i see to have all three form of energy, is that driving the ECat QX to emit a certain mix of energies is the best in terms of COP and/or stability, and it’s best not forcing the ECat to emit only heat or only light or only electricity…
Am I right?
Regards,
Marco.
Ruth:
Circa 30 Wcm^-3, without the heat exchangers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Can you tell us the value of the power density you reached so far with the E-Cat QX?
Cheers,
Ruth
Tom Conover:
I cannot give the name of our Partner, obviously in positive or in negative..
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frankalde:
Interesting.
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gil:
There could be a hypertext.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
JPR:
Also today we are working very well.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Greg Leonard:
Not so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear AR,
In your answer to Tom Conover, you mentioned ‘something new’. Could this involve the Brayton cycle?
regards,
Greg Leonard