United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

31,896 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Yrka:
    Our work has never been damaged by the trolls, therefore I don’t care. On the contrary, the common reaction is this: ” If there are all those paid trolls to make false information, blatantly false information, about Rossi, this means that Rossi has something very important going on “. Somebody asked me if I am the one that pays the trolls to say stupidities about me…I cannot answer in positive, or in negative… ( he,he,he…)
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    DT:
    1 eV (circa), measured by means of the spectrometer.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    How you can start the industrialization within this year is a mistery to me: if you will succeed, you are damn good.
    We’ll see

  • DT

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    Which is the temperature you are reaching now in the big reactors of the Ecat ?
    Warm Regards,
    DT

  • Yrka

    Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi.
    If you are attacked by bad guys, there is no broad public opinion for protection.
    I think it is necessary to tell the press about your great achievements. This is important for protection. Only broad support of the people can protect from corporations!
    I wish you success!

    Was there tennis on Sunday?

    Yuriy Isaev
    Engineer
    Tyumen, Russia

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Will the Ecats be mobile, I mean will it be possible to change place for them like, for example, a TV set? If yes, within which power limit?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    Yes. And the vice versa too is still possible.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Cecilia

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I am a teacher: would you be available to make a lecture about your effect in Miami?
    Thank you if you can answer,
    Cecilia

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    You say that the most developed aspect of your current work is the industrialization in the USA.

    Can you hold the presentation in 2018 if you reach your goal in the USA, even if the work in Sweden is not completed?

    Thank you very much,

    Frank Acland

  • Andrea Rossi

    Fabio:
    To stabilize a magnetic field of those dimensions at a temperature of 1600 eV is more difficult than to make an elephant cross the distance above the Niagara Falls in equilibrium on a rope with a diameter of 1 inch.
    If they will succeed, they are damn good !!!
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jacques:
    1- no
    2- no
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    CC:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    Thank you for your opinion,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Thomas:
    Thank you for your attention to our work.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Thomas

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Thank you for the fantastic six-minutes video with the summary od the convincing demo made at the IVA of Stockholm.
    Godspeed,
    Thomas

  • Anonymous

    Mr Rossi:
    We are already beyond the half of March and you still have done nothing: is it not arrived the time for you to confess that the presentation of an industrialized product is a bluff? Come on, show us the cards!

  • CC

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    I agree with you: the sole way not to be hacked on confidential issues is not to make use of internet with any confidential issue.
    By the way: are you sure you are already tapped?
    All the best,

  • Jacques

    Dr Rossi,
    You wrote you are sure that the reverse engineering on the Ecat will be impossible:
    1- does this mean you have not anymore the necessity to adopt very low prices to make the Ecat very competitive economically?
    2- can you explain how you resolved the problem of the reverse engineering?
    Thanks if you can answer,
    Jacques

  • Fabio

    Carissimo Andrea:
    what do you think about the ITER project for the hot fusion, in which ENI has put 50 millions of the Italian taxpayers?
    Ciao,
    Fabio

  • Andrea Rossi

    M.Murray:
    Thank you for your kind attention to our work and for your concern about the vulnerability of the internet. My opinion on this issue is that whatever you do, it is useless, because if there is not left a backdoor, there will be screwed a backhole. Amen.
    My defense is a very simple system: the computer where I have serious things is not connectable with the internet and never has been connected with the internet. All the rest…I think is already tapped all around the world, but it is not a big issue. There is not even a possibility to get information to blackmail me: I respect the law, have not lovers, apart my wife.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • M. Murray

    Dear Dr. Rossi

    I have been a supporter of you from the beginning because of your dedication to your work and your moral character. Always being a true inventor and Scientist. Because of the new vulnerabilities that exist in all modern computers I implore you to safeguard your electronic data. I am a cyber security researcher that is aware of many threats to some one like you. Please understand that all operating systems are compromised with back doors that spy on the user. I wish I was of the level to give you a solution but I am not quite there yet. I am sure a man of your means can find a cyber security processional that will be loyal to your cause. As soon as I am able I will gladly help in anyway I can.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Daniel:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ken:
    The industrialization in the USA.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Thank you for your insight. As I explained, I cannot comment on this kind of questions in positive, or in negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    If eCats work with diatomic hydrogen, I see no rational reason that eCat reactors should not work with Helium-3. Of course, it may only be economically possible for lunar operations as Helium-3 is much more abundant there than natural hydrogen. Still, I find it significant that you tested eCats with Helium-3. Likewise for deuterium. It should work at least as well as natural hydrogen but the economic cost may be prohibitive compared to natural hydrogen.

  • Ken

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    You said you are directing 4 teams, one for the industrialization of the Ecat in the USA, one in Sweden, one for the theoretical studies and one for the new prototypes of 10 and 100 kW of power. Which of these teams is more close to the realization of the final target?
    Thanks if you can answer,
    Ken

  • Daniel

    Dr Rossi,
    Are all the components described in the patent of the fluid heater applied also to the Ecat QX?
    Cheers
    Daniel

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    Sorry, I never give this kind of information, in positive or in negative.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea,

    Can you comment further on the results with:

    A. Deuterium
    B. Helium-3

  • Andrea Rossi

    Nelson:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steben N. Karels:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    I understand that your current approach uses common hydrogen plus nickel and other elements. Have you re-visited or tried what happens when you use:

    a. Deuterium?
    b. Helium-3?

  • Nelson

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
    Have you resolved the problem of the overheating of the Ecat QX electronic components?
    Cheers
    Nelson

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steve:
    Thank you for the link,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Buck:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    WaltC:
    Nothing of all, it is just a pure guessing now under mathematical and experimental investigation. Experimentally, this is the sole hypothesis that can make equations sustainable. Still, it could be wrong. The white part of me says it is wrong. The black part says it is right. Hopefully, they will settle somewhere.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mario Marini:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Mario Marini

    Dear Andrea,
    Did you see this interview published on the blog of Ecat-thenewfire?
    Did you really release it?
    In English: http://www.ecat-thenewfire.com/blog/rossi-replies-part-serious-part-ironical/
    In Italian: http://www.ecat-ilnuovofuoco.it/blog/rossi-vi-risponde-serio-faceto

  • WaltC

    Dear Andrea,
    My college studies are seriously out of date with respect to your current theory. So I can better understand the scope of your proposal:

    1) Are there other physical phenomena that are believed by current-day science to be explained by “the annihilation of low energy virtual waves”? (If so, what? (so I can read up on that also.))

    2) Is “the annihilation of low energy virtual waves” commonly accepted in current-day science as (a) real or (b) mathematically possible but still unproven?

    Thanks,
    WaltC

  • Buck

    Good Day Andrea:

    I hope you find all going well.

    An interesting topic arose at ECatWorld. Do you see a resonance between your work and the work described in the SAFIRE project described in the associated video? FYI, the first 30 minutes is background. The LENR related topic begins at the 33 minute mark. And, there is an interesting 20MW energy discharge at 1:03:18.

    LINK>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=keJAQIWEyzY
    LINK>> http://e-catworld.com/2018/03/16/lenr-is-occuring-in-safire-axil-axil/

    Again, my best to all

    Buck

  • steve

    Dear Dr rossi I spotted this while surfing the web, and thought it may be of interest to you.

    https://engr.source.colostate.edu/in-csu-lab-laser-heated-nanowires-produce-micro-scale-nuclear-fusion-with-record-efficiency/

    regards and Godspeed with the production lines.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Just a few thoughts. Although the standard model is no doubt accurate, the very basics of nuclear interactions ,if misconceived, with regards the structuring process could, in theory, create an ongoing problem with regards the coulomb barrier and an ability to over come it. If the atomic structure is not an instantaneous construction process but involves distances/time dimensions to form the required structural potentials then to safely deconstruct, I would think, requires a reversal of the process. As an example if a rope is constructed of x3 strands it would require more energy to snap it instantaneously than if each strand was unwound and snapped individually over a period of time i.e. releasing the same quantity of energy but in quanta proportions into the environment. This is how I believe LENRs overcome the barrier. Hydrogen, I believe, is ( the product of a second stage reaction That I shall describe later) constructed over a period of time whereby paired quarks (due to one becoming a positive charge and the other a negative charge) are drawn into a zero point of gravity in a synchronized sequence of events. (the mechanical mechanism as previously mentioned is designed with regards several factors, geometry and sequence being time dimensions of angular degrees). The radius of a circle is an important aspect of material manufacture from quarks and 90 degrees is the other important factor. The locus being the zero point of gravity is the common denominator. Without mass deficit no occurrence would take place i.e. no initial fusion and no subsequent energy release i.e. heat. This takes place within the systemic reactor of our systemic system with regards a percentage of released energy from constructed neutrons which by reduction produces an amount of heat and hydrogen. I intend to explain this process and more in detail but it requires considerations at every step. I believe that by understanding the dynamics of the E-Cat a new understanding in physics can be achieved that would lead into new territories of discovery. Wikipedia deals with electricity, both static and kinetic. It explains the phenomena aspects but not the mechanics of the interactions that creates the phenomena. It is known that silver is the best conductor of current and copper is second. Both elements have a single electron in there outer shell providing a greater degree of manipulation/distortion of the electron. Silver being softer than copper has more ability for its electron to be compressed/expanded/distorted than copper (graphite 3rd). Electricity, I believe, is nothing other than the distortion of an electron quark (conduction is a transmission of the distortion). Thereby silver is the best substance by which to produce an electric current due to possessing a greater manipulation property with regards its outer electron. To generate a continuous kinetic electric current (as is known) a coil of copper wire/single atomic substance is rotated between the poles of a magnet. [A magnet with regards its x2 poles contains two opposite static pressure densities that thereby provides interactive force potentials, capable of distorting an outer electron]. This rotating of the coil expands the outer electron to become more negative but between the magnetic poles the outer electron, when in the presence of the north field, is attracted (the north field potential is in a static contacted state of locked compression with its south). Maximum compression within inner central field position, transforming it into a greater volume negative charge by its expansion and alternatively when in the presence of the south field, is repelled (the south field potential is in a static contacted state of locked expansion with its north). Maximum expansion outer field central position, transforming it into a size positive charge by compression. One atomic substance is unable to support two unequal electron charge potentials simultaneously. Centrifugal force acts as a separator with regards an opposing force interaction within the coil. (A magnetic centroid formed by centrifugal force is able to demonstrate the directions of these magnetic forces). Outside of the coil these two created unequal potentials continually readjust when in close enough proximity. The size positive electron potential expands into the volume negative electron potential which being in an expanded state collapses thereby both potentials become two equal potentials and by which a vibration/shock wave is produced within the environment which transmits the shock wave as a detectable unit of energy. Magnetic fields could in theory be condensed quarks, due to the structure, that respond in accordance to the magnetic atomic poles of the central locus/zero point and thereby able to interact with an outer electron of a structure. There are two types of magnetic fields. Those of metal formed of micro atomic substance which has been formed within a structure by fusing quarks and by which a magnetic field is produced as a bi product. The producer of the micro substance is a macro structure that has its bi product of a magnetic field. The micro substance can be either a semi or fully closed system involving quarks, whereas the macro structure is a contained open reaction system involving the fusing of quarks. A system which is a product of the macro is thereby unable to produce anything other than its magnetic field. Two very different systems. Also when fields are none directional but vibrational they provide a degree of defined static space between structure ie. reduce the gravity factor. More explanation is needed with regards structure in these instances. In the meantime, all the best Eric Ashworth.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jean:
    This is what we are studying upon. This is the sole hypothesis that allows us to reconcile all the equations.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jean

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    So you think your effect could be made by annihilaton of low energy virtual waves?
    Genial, but very audacious…
    Jean

  • Andrea Rossi

    Raffaele Bongo:
    Questions are never stupid.
    The answer is: I do not think so, albeit I think that resonances are at the base of our effect, as explained in the summary of 6 minutes of the demo we made at the IVA of Stockholm: you can easily find the link to it on
    http://www.ecat.com
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Frank Acland:
    We already have a secured situation in the USA, not yet in Sweden.
    Yes, we decided to dedicate to Sven Kullander the high energy reactors. We are strongly indebted with him and I will never forget that he, while fighting for his health in the last days of his life, still helped our work with his priceless suggestions.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tom Conover:
    A- no
    B- yes
    C- I do not know, yet
    Thank you for your attention to the work of our Teams,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tom Conover

    Dear Andrea,

    The 80W cats still have a very valid position in the marketplace, especially for small appliances. Large groupings of the 80W units also have industrial significance, but the fully automated manufacturing costs and support costs of the 80W INDUSTRIAL UNITS costs would logically be at least ten times more than the 10k/100k units. These units are difficult if not impossible to recharge without recycling them. The 80W cats would be obsolete before they get to market.

    A) Have you therefore already changed your plans over to the 10/100 cat line for the primary manufacturing, pending Sigma 5 on these units?

    B) Are the existing 80W Sigma test results that currently exist able to be used to reduce the time it takes to achieve Sigma 5 results with the 10K and 100K cats?

    C) Can sigma validation for the 10/100 line be completed by July or August of 2018?

    I would rather see the 80W cats soon, instead of waiting longer for the 10/100 series. I would rather see the 10/100 units manufactured THIS YEAR instead of the 80s units. I would rather see the 80w units THIS YEAR than wait longer for the 10/100 series manufacturing to begin.

    Thank you in advance for your answers to A,B & C if you can reply, and thank you again for you and your awesome teams (Plural!) work efforts!

    Warmest Regards,
    Tom

  • Frank Acland

    Dear Andrea,

    Thank you for your response. Do you have factory locations secured for production in the USA and Sweden yet?

    I see you have the initials SK for Sven Kullander on the new E-Cat you are testing – you must hold him in high esteem!

    Best wishes,

    Frank

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>