Toussaint Francois:
Extremely important tests will be made next week: from the results will depend if we focus immediately on it or if we delay to the future its development.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
is it possible that, if you control the QX by the cloud and the connection is lost for a time or an entire day, the system goes in trouble or shut down!
My best wishes, Giuseppe
Dr Rossi,
Your commercial strategy is a winner: no tests, no proofs, no bullshit, just sell the heat at prices nobody can compete with.
Genial.
Godspeed,
Afriend
JPR:
Neutrinos have spin, albeit that is the same for neutrinos and antineutrinos: 1/2
The difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos, as far as I know, are:
1- opposite chirality
2- opposite sign of lepton numbers
Maybe there are others that I do not know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
A movie of the Star Wars series begins with a race of flying vehicles in which a plasma reactor that looks like your Ecat QX makes the throw to go: odd, isn’t it?
Godspeed,
Darren
Neutrinos have no charge, no spin, but a neutrino has its anti-neutrino: what is the difference between a neutrino and an antineutrino, if they have no charge, no spin?
JPR
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Question about the price of your heat energy. It will be fixed, or will depend on the country of the customer, and local prices of energy?
My best regards,
Jaroslaw Bem
Jag Bara Undrar?
Thank you for your opinion.
I agree on the point of the security, but I assure you that the IP will be very well defended. Nothing is impossible, but our system will be very close to impossible to be broken.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think the idea of the control of the ecats through the cloud is genial. It also cuts the throat to all the doubts: if you install at your expenses the plants and the customers have only to pay the heat, you are the undisputable winner in the LENR field. Nobody has even thought to a similar masterpiece.
Godspeed
Jack
Mr Rossi:
Did I understand well that you are not going to sell the plants, but only the heat?
Who will say to the customers that your technology works, apart you?
Keeping control of the “cat” and its control system is in my way of seeing the only possible way. Not to keep any secrets because it is not difficult for an actor with great resources to imitate them. I am convinced that it is essentially about reducing the risks of someone’s deliberately causing accidents with the new technology, which must then be investigated and investigated while the months go and the operator himself has the opportunity to develop his own products.
Dan Galburt:
I agree with you: the wallet of our Customers will be the best and most convincing witness of the economical advantages, if any, of our technology and such independent witness will not affect the defense of our IP.
I am convinced that some Customer of ours will not have difficulties about giving testimony regarding our efficiency in the delivery of thermal energy and its competitiveness.
It is obvious that in the context of this commercial strategy it is naif to ask us other demonstrations, for the same reason for which Exxon does not need to give any demo about the fact that their gas works and has the price their customers pay for each gallon.
Thank you for your comment,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Of importance to many followers of your work is the desire to have independent third party verification of the power output and COP of your E-Cat system. It is understood that you want to keep critical details of how the E-Cat operates secret. For this reason you are retaining ownership and the giving the customer no access to details of how the system works. When you install an E-Cat QX system in a customer’s facility surely the customer will be able to measure the integrated energy fed to the installed E-Cat as well as the energy outputted by the E-Cat system. In all likelihood the electrical power fed to the E-Cat would be monitored with a standard Kilowatt hour meter, and the heat produced by the E-Cat would be monitored by flow and temperature gauges installed where the hot water or steam passes from your E-Cat to his facility. The primary propose of these measurements would be to verify that the E-Cat is complying with your contract to provide net energy in the form of heat, but this data over time can potentially provide multiple third party verification of the E-Cat’s performance as a “Black box”. Hopefully such “black box” data would not give away any E-Cat secrets that would help a competitor but would increase interest in and acceptance of your E-Cat system.
Such verification will be of interest to your followers only if both you and your customers allow it to be released into the public domain. Further that the customers as independent agents publicly represent the data to be accurate. I believe (hope) that some of your customers will agree to provide such third party verification if you don’t make keeping it confidential a contractual requirement.
Questions:
1. Do you want your E-Cat system to be widely accepted as a viable energy producing system in the 2018 to 2019 time frame?
2. Assuming that some of your early customers are willing to do so; will you allow them to publically disclose electrical input and thermal output data as integrated energy values over periods of time like days, weeks, or months?
I am a retired systems engineer who worked for years on advanced technology associated with the manufacture of integrated circuits. My interest in your work is driven by the desire to see some form of safe cheap nuclear energy become a reality in my life time.
Dear Dr Rossi,
I would like to toot my horn.
Almost 6 years ago……..
Iggy Dalrymple
June 6, 2012 at 8:04 AM
Dear Dr Rossi,
Have you considered forming your own wholesale electric utility? You could sell electric power to cities, utility companies, and large industrial users. That way you could better protect your intellectual property. My small town (population 2,500) sells electricity to its citizens, but buys all its power from the grid.
Some small island states could use your service without any bureaucratic interference.
Sincerely,
Iggy Dalrymple
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Andrea Rossi
June 6, 2012 at 8:18 AM
Dear Iggy Dalrymple:
Our strategy is to sell the reactors, but your sggestion could become of actuality in future.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back then I suggested retaining ownership of your reactors and selling electricity.
Well, selling heat is the next best thing.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you still convinced that your effect comes from the annihilation of virtual low energy particles born by a temperature equal to their energy?
DT:
Nothing is impossible, but I can guarantee you the way we transmit through a cloud is very well protected, made by specialists from the highest levels of the field.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
SM:
True, but by then we will have the right solution, not to mention the fact that we will have reached a strongly dominant position in the market.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
since i was graduated, it exists the smart card technology. A small chip that is made in shape of a credit card. They costs about 10$ or less and have a full fledged CPU with RAM and ROM. More important they have the technology to keep secret what is inside (think of credit cards or bancomat). Have you thought to use this technology in the future, instead of internet? I mean use a smart card with your custom software that drive an Ecat with a proper slot. The software is not downloadable and you can put countermeasures to not let the user put oscilloscopes or testers to steal the secrets (this problem is present also now with on line tele control)…
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The idea of a centralized control system to protect the IP is surely a good idea, but when you will have millions of Ecats in the world it will be difficult to menage.
Cheers
SM
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Assuming that someone steals the elements of a plant, he will never discover the software and control signals that make it competitive.
This is, I believe, the secret to preventing reverse engineering. Is it correct?
Dear Andrea,
Your commercial strategy will surely be improved if the SK will succeed. But what will happen if it will not?
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think that paper mills can be interested to buy the heat from the Ecat?
Toussaint Francois:
Extremely important tests will be made next week: from the results will depend if we focus immediately on it or if we delay to the future its development.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
No.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you aware of a Stirling engine that can be coupled with an Ecat to fuel an EV?
Cheers
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea Rossi,
How is going on the important test you are doing with E-CAT SK ?
Warm Regards
Toussaint François
Afriend:
Thanks,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Giuseppe:
The Client must have a backup in case of blackout. The backup can be the traditional system he already has.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
is it possible that, if you control the QX by the cloud and the connection is lost for a time or an entire day, the system goes in trouble or shut down!
My best wishes, Giuseppe
Dr Rossi,
Your commercial strategy is a winner: no tests, no proofs, no bullshit, just sell the heat at prices nobody can compete with.
Genial.
Godspeed,
Afriend
Gian Luca:
We are making deals in Europe.
Every Customer will have our service.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Carissimo Andrea,
do you have sold heat/steam ECAT in Europe?
You have recived some demand? If yes…where?
There will be a costumer service in Europe? When?
Thanks
Luca
JPR:
Neutrinos have spin, albeit that is the same for neutrinos and antineutrinos: 1/2
The difference between neutrinos and antineutrinos, as far as I know, are:
1- opposite chirality
2- opposite sign of lepton numbers
Maybe there are others that I do not know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Darren:
He,he,he…I remember that scene, it was inspiring.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
Please give me the contact on
info@leonardocorp1996.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Leo:
Thank you for your kind attention to the work of our team.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sam:
Thank you for the link.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello Dr Rossi
This is a thread from ECat World about
your ECat industrial strategy
https://e-catworld.com/2018/05/20/rossis-industrial-e-cat-strategy/
Regards
Sam
Dr Andrea Rossi:
With the start of the sales of your heat made from LENR you wrote a page of history.
Godspeed,
Leo
Dr Andrea Rossi,
I know the CEO of an industry that can be interested to buy the heat from the Ecat. What can I do?
Cheers
CC
Dear Andrea,
A movie of the Star Wars series begins with a race of flying vehicles in which a plasma reactor that looks like your Ecat QX makes the throw to go: odd, isn’t it?
Godspeed,
Darren
Neutrinos have no charge, no spin, but a neutrino has its anti-neutrino: what is the difference between a neutrino and an antineutrino, if they have no charge, no spin?
JPR
Jaroslaw Bem:
It will be defined case by case depending on the situation to share the profit with the Customer.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Question about the price of your heat energy. It will be fixed, or will depend on the country of the customer, and local prices of energy?
My best regards,
Jaroslaw Bem
Jag Bara Undrar?
Thank you for your opinion.
I agree on the point of the security, but I assure you that the IP will be very well defended. Nothing is impossible, but our system will be very close to impossible to be broken.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Sceptic guy:
Their wallet.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Jack:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think the idea of the control of the ecats through the cloud is genial. It also cuts the throat to all the doubts: if you install at your expenses the plants and the customers have only to pay the heat, you are the undisputable winner in the LENR field. Nobody has even thought to a similar masterpiece.
Godspeed
Jack
Mr Rossi:
Did I understand well that you are not going to sell the plants, but only the heat?
Who will say to the customers that your technology works, apart you?
Keeping control of the “cat” and its control system is in my way of seeing the only possible way. Not to keep any secrets because it is not difficult for an actor with great resources to imitate them. I am convinced that it is essentially about reducing the risks of someone’s deliberately causing accidents with the new technology, which must then be investigated and investigated while the months go and the operator himself has the opportunity to develop his own products.
Iggy Dalrymple:
You have been right in past as well as you are right now, possibly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dan Galburt:
I agree with you: the wallet of our Customers will be the best and most convincing witness of the economical advantages, if any, of our technology and such independent witness will not affect the defense of our IP.
I am convinced that some Customer of ours will not have difficulties about giving testimony regarding our efficiency in the delivery of thermal energy and its competitiveness.
It is obvious that in the context of this commercial strategy it is naif to ask us other demonstrations, for the same reason for which Exxon does not need to give any demo about the fact that their gas works and has the price their customers pay for each gallon.
Thank you for your comment,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Of importance to many followers of your work is the desire to have independent third party verification of the power output and COP of your E-Cat system. It is understood that you want to keep critical details of how the E-Cat operates secret. For this reason you are retaining ownership and the giving the customer no access to details of how the system works. When you install an E-Cat QX system in a customer’s facility surely the customer will be able to measure the integrated energy fed to the installed E-Cat as well as the energy outputted by the E-Cat system. In all likelihood the electrical power fed to the E-Cat would be monitored with a standard Kilowatt hour meter, and the heat produced by the E-Cat would be monitored by flow and temperature gauges installed where the hot water or steam passes from your E-Cat to his facility. The primary propose of these measurements would be to verify that the E-Cat is complying with your contract to provide net energy in the form of heat, but this data over time can potentially provide multiple third party verification of the E-Cat’s performance as a “Black box”. Hopefully such “black box” data would not give away any E-Cat secrets that would help a competitor but would increase interest in and acceptance of your E-Cat system.
Such verification will be of interest to your followers only if both you and your customers allow it to be released into the public domain. Further that the customers as independent agents publicly represent the data to be accurate. I believe (hope) that some of your customers will agree to provide such third party verification if you don’t make keeping it confidential a contractual requirement.
Questions:
1. Do you want your E-Cat system to be widely accepted as a viable energy producing system in the 2018 to 2019 time frame?
2. Assuming that some of your early customers are willing to do so; will you allow them to publically disclose electrical input and thermal output data as integrated energy values over periods of time like days, weeks, or months?
I am a retired systems engineer who worked for years on advanced technology associated with the manufacture of integrated circuits. My interest in your work is driven by the desire to see some form of safe cheap nuclear energy become a reality in my life time.
Thank You,
Dan Galburt
Dear Dr Rossi,
I would like to toot my horn.
Almost 6 years ago……..
Iggy Dalrymple
June 6, 2012 at 8:04 AM
Dear Dr Rossi,
Have you considered forming your own wholesale electric utility? You could sell electric power to cities, utility companies, and large industrial users. That way you could better protect your intellectual property. My small town (population 2,500) sells electricity to its citizens, but buys all its power from the grid.
As you know, there are many small remote villages that use diesel generated electricity produced with diesel oil barged in at great expense.http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/AEO/RemotePower/RemotePower.html
Some small island states could use your service without any bureaucratic interference.
Sincerely,
Iggy Dalrymple
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Andrea Rossi
June 6, 2012 at 8:18 AM
Dear Iggy Dalrymple:
Our strategy is to sell the reactors, but your sggestion could become of actuality in future.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Back then I suggested retaining ownership of your reactors and selling electricity.
Well, selling heat is the next best thing.
Best regards,
Iggy
Philip:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
I think so.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Is your internet protection for the transmission of the control system of military grade?
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Are you still convinced that your effect comes from the annihilation of virtual low energy particles born by a temperature equal to their energy?
DT:
Nothing is impossible, but I can guarantee you the way we transmit through a cloud is very well protected, made by specialists from the highest levels of the field.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today on other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
SM:
True, but by then we will have the right solution, not to mention the fact that we will have reached a strongly dominant position in the market.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Marco:
Thank you for your suggestion, as smart as the card.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
since i was graduated, it exists the smart card technology. A small chip that is made in shape of a credit card. They costs about 10$ or less and have a full fledged CPU with RAM and ROM. More important they have the technology to keep secret what is inside (think of credit cards or bancomat). Have you thought to use this technology in the future, instead of internet? I mean use a smart card with your custom software that drive an Ecat with a proper slot. The software is not downloadable and you can put countermeasures to not let the user put oscilloscopes or testers to steal the secrets (this problem is present also now with on line tele control)…
Dr Andrea Rossi,
The idea of a centralized control system to protect the IP is surely a good idea, but when you will have millions of Ecats in the world it will be difficult to menage.
Cheers
SM
Dear DAndrea,
Do you think the control system through the cloud makes impossible the reverse engineering?
Warm Regards,
DT
Italo R.:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Frank Acland:
Yes, of course.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
With your business and technology plan for E-Cat plans, will you accept industrial customers outside the United States?
Thank you,
Frank Acland
Dear Dr. Rossi,
Assuming that someone steals the elements of a plant, he will never discover the software and control signals that make it competitive.
This is, I believe, the secret to preventing reverse engineering. Is it correct?
Best Regards,
Italo R.
@Former Sceptic,
…not to mention the theoretical study made by Andrea with carl-Oscar Gullstrom…
Cheers
John