United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

 

uspto_seal_big

 

Sigillo

 

Alloro del brevetto

.

Read the whole US Patent
Download the ZIP file of US Patent

 

32,081 comments to United States Patent US 9,115,913 B1

  • Andrea Rossi

    Anonymous:
    No.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ludwig:
    We will have the results of an experiment on course by half August.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Tony:
    True
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Tony

    In a jet engine you do not need a heat exchanger, because the thrust is made by the expansion of the air and this would resolve the issue to recover the energy with a density as high as in an Ecat SK

  • Ludwig

    Dear Andrea:
    when do you think you will have real evidence about the validity of the theory you and Gullstrom are working upon?
    All the best,
    Ludwig

  • Anonymous

    Dr Andrea Rossi,
    Does the ecat generate acustic waves?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Vikram:
    Yes
    Warm Regards
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    KN:
    We will do it directly.
    Already organized.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
    Grazie!
    Cari saluti
    A.R.

  • giannino Ferro Casagrande

    TANTI TANTI AUGURI CARO ANDREA E IMPEGNATI COME HO FATTO IO PER TUTTA LA VITA NEL LAVORO !!! E IL LAVORO NELLA RICERCA E’ IL PIU BELLO ED IL PIU MERAVIGLIOSO CHE SI POSSA IMMAGINARE !!!!!! gianni di Udin ,,,,,

  • KN

    Dear Andrea
    will the billing of the heat be made by Leonardo Corp or outsourced?

  • Vikram

    Dr Andrea Rossi
    did you patent your ecat also in India?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    thank you for your insight.
    It is not conciliable with what we do, but you are welcome to send your comments to our Readers.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    R&D:
    As a matter of fact, I am not still convinced to be wrong.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Giannino Ferro Casagrande:
    Thank you for your kind wishes,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Giannino Ferro Casagrande

    Dear Andrea,
    today is your real birthday, even if you have been registered as born on June 3: as you said, this has been an early advice about your eventual issues with the Italian burocracy!
    May this new year of your life see the industrialization of the Ecat!
    Godspeed
    Giannino Ferro Casagrande

  • R&D

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    is the theoretical work you are making with Carl Oscar Gullstrom still focused on the annihilation of virtual particles born y the temperature reached by their field?

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, You are now mentioning a new toy where you had to investigate electronics and you mention the tremendous energy between 100nm and 200nm. As you are aware I have explained that I am involved in the mechanics of energy interaction and can demonstrate a mechanical mechanism able to explain certain phenomena in physics. This mechanism is not allowed to be demonstrated within research institutions or universities although specialists in the field have asked permission higher up the chain who have denied my request. By the study of the mechanism I have come to certain conclusions with regards energy interactions. One of these being that the ‘planck length’ is in proportion to the event horizon and that the plank length is dependent upon the involved ‘Set’. Mathematics is, I believe, a tool designed by those who understood energy but there are because of comprehension two understandings, one being pure maths for those who deal in a full spectrum of energy and one for those who are unaware of the full spectrum. Those who are unaware we call trades people i.e. tile cutters, plumbers and carpet fitters etc. These people know that pi = 3.14159 whereas people who understand energy know that pi = 4 and that ‘EmptySet’ is a constituent part of the necessary links in the spectrums of an energy field. I believe that with your latest research you are aware that a unit of size dimension and a unit of volume dimension are connected and as such represent an energy value. You have put a considerable amount of time, effort and money into your research over many years and I believe that a person requires reward for his due diligence. I therefore do not want to broadcast what I think your new technology involves but maybe a few clues could give you an idea of where I am coming from and whether I am on track. Your new technology involves what I term Super Neutrals, an understanding of time as a sequence of events involving integral components and a series of transitions within a single time zone whereby volumes and sizes interact as corpuscular units of energy. Whether you have a magnetic shield is optional. The mechanical mechanism can be adapted in several ways for various applications but its main purpose is to provide a very powerful linear propelling force in the atmosphere, outside it would require the electronic version to achieve the required propulsion. As I have previously stated, I believe, your nano technology is able to demonstrate an important aspect in physics and be able to back up your new electronic understanding that will have far reaching implications for many generations to come. Again I wish you all the success in the world.
    regards Eric Ashworth.
    P.S. If what I have stated has nothing to do with your new found technology, would you allow me the opportunity of providing the maths to this ‘Super Neutral’ technology and its connection to the mechanical mechanism. I believe that there are three required aspects of physics. The nano scale scale that provides almost limitless amounts of energy, the electro magnetic macro scale and the static and mobile mechanical. Thereby both pure and applied maths are a requirement. There is also much interest in whether the universe is expanding and could the ‘Big Bang’ have been an event. Maybe this question can have an explanation.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Mellie Julian:
    because the QX is ready to be industrialized and reliable. while the SK is still immature for a long experiment.
    Warm Regards,
    Andrea

  • Mellie Julian

    Dear Andrea Rossi,
    I have understood that the experiments you will make with Carl-Oscar Gullstrom will be made using the Ecat QX.
    Why not with the SK?

  • Anonymous

    Dr Rossi,
    I think that a jet engine is the best application for the SK, because it is the easiest way to put at work all the energy produced ny means of a so small source.
    Best Regards

  • Andrea Rossi

    Ulrich Kramz:
    1- yes
    2- yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Ulrich Kranz

    I wish you succeed to put the Ecat SK in the market within this year and I want to ask:
    1- could the SK be fit for the Carnot cycle and fuel an electricity generation facility?
    2- is still on his way a 10 kW model?
    Ulrich Kranz

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eernie1:
    Now I am thinking only to the work to do and this does not allow time for anything else.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    Of course I was referring to your excess energy device other than fusion or fission devices.
    Warm regards.

  • eernie1

    Dear Andrea,
    Have you thought about the effect on society and yourself, when and if an indisputable proof of controlled excess energy will be presented to the main stream scientists and public?
    I would assume that an overwhelming amount of interest from media, academic and financial groups will be imposed upon your personal life.
    Like Einstein, people will be pressing you for interviews and information and your private life will be gone. Your ability to continue your personal research will be highly restricted.
    Have you made any plans to control this imposition on your future actions?
    Privacy regards.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Don:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Don

    Congratulations for youtube Ecat QX presentation at Stockholm.
    Very convincing demonstration.
    All the best,
    Don

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N.Karels:
    Any kind of energy can eventually be turned into another. The choice then depends on the way to obtain the highest efficiency and this depends on the system.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    In Thermodynamics there are three heat transfer mechanisms: Conduction; Convection; and Radiation. In you older eCat reactors, it appears the primary heat transfer mechanisms used for an operational system (excluding experimental testing) was conduction and convection. Do you foresee the primary heat transfer mechanism for the SK eCat reactor to be radiation?

  • Andrea Rossi

    Bob:
    I agree,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Jack Gares:
    Yes
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Jack Gares

    Will the Ecat SK be useful also for the theoretical research you are making with Carl Oscar Gullstrom we saw in the video of his lecture in Stockholm?

  • Bob

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    From what you wrote about the Ecat SK it seems good for jet engines
    Cheers

  • Andrea Rossi

    Annette:
    Thank you,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Carmelo Pietsch:
    yes, perhaps this year, in the USA.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Warren Oken:
    You mean what we saw: blinding white, like when you try to look directly at the sun. But attention: we did not look directly at the plasma, it is too dangerous for the eyes, so we were protected by due screening; what we looked at was the area around it .
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Iggy Dalrymple:
    Yes.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Eric Ashworth:
    Thank you for your insight,
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Rick57:
    We measured the peaks in the area between 100 and 200 nm, but the spectrum had lower values also through the whole visible spectrum. When you look at the spectrum of a plasma you do not see a peak perpendicular to a flat line with y=0, but a sawteeth like graph. Another reason of the white light, that is the result of all the visible lambda combined, can be the ecceleration of the electrons of the atoms around the plasma. We were, obviously, not looking where the spectrometer eye was ( too dangerous for the sight ).
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Eric Ashworth

    Dear Andrea, Over the past few weeks certain comments have been made regarding Wikipedia and Pieto asked you a question ‘Why the relativity theory of Einstein is still considered a theory of physics and not a law’. You said you thought it to be more to do with a semantic problem i.e. a problem with a language interpretation which I agree with due to specializations regarding specialists. For a long time I thought that Einstein was so far advanced with regards his knowledge that this made it difficult for him to be understood. My own thoughts now are that Einstein was the perfect candidate chosen to confuse people and purposely make physics a very difficult subject to be understood. The word physics implies physical reality. Einstein was a mathematician and this allowed him to deal with physics on a subjective level. Atomists were people who believed that all of nature was formed of just two states, the state of something and the state of nothing thereby they were said to study atomism but if you study physics, the nothing can not be studied and therefor an atomist was at a disadvantage. Today a modern atomist would have no problem studying the source of the gravitational effect and particle physics if he embraced two subjects. ‘Empty Set’ and ‘Set Theory’ with regards mass defect that would be explainable regarding the gravitational effect. Gravity being a force that, I believe, not only creates the physical but controls it, is a none physical structure that can only be dealt with by pure maths. By keeping such subjects apart physics becomes an incomplete science by being disjointed due to its components. Could an Empty Set be a component?. If a synapse is a component of nerve fibres then yes it could be. Wikipedia as more and more people are realizing is although extremely informative also has its downside by being prejudiced with regards certain information. The long and the short of it is, is that there is a mystery with regards to physics that must not be explained in mainstream academia. Nano technology being on the nano scale is, l believe, by demonstration able to expose and explain the gravitational side of nature more so than that of molecular physics by being that much more reactionary due to being closer to the power source with regards to its induced potentials. It is stated that gravity is a weak force and it is but only when not exposed. When it is exposed I believe it creates mass defect that creates the exterior electromagnetic field. When exterior magnetic fields of unequal potential interact there is created a third force being a product of two with regards to forming Flux Tubes and their created components. This I will attempt to explain at some later date. In the meantime I wish you much success with your continual research and industrialization plan.
    Regards Eric Ashworth

  • Iggy Dalrymple

    Dear Dr Rossi,
    Assuming your “heat/energy sales” business model works well for your industrial market,
    do you also anticipate selling heat/energy to home consumers once approved by safety regulators?
    Iggy

  • Rick57

    Dear Andrea,

    about the Ecat SK last tests, you said:

    “…I saw from that minuscule reactor exit a tremendously dazzling white light all around the laboratory…”

    Then you told as the measured radiation wavelength was between 100 and 200nm that is far beyond the visible spectrum (400 to 700nm).

    Can you explain ?

    Warmest Regards,

    Riccardo

  • Warren Oken

    Dear Andrea,
    can you tell us which colour was the light radiated from the Ecat SK?

  • Carmelo Pietsch

    Do you think that the first Ecat SK will be put in operation and where?
    Thank you for your work,
    C.P.

  • Annette

    Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
    You made very well making the website http://www.ingandrearossi.com
    It is important to understand and it is very well explained.
    Annette

  • Andrea Rossi

    Steven N. Karels:
    You are right on the fact that the technology of the Ecat SK is different from the technology of the QX and it is not just a dimensional issue related to the heat exchange.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Andrea Rossi

    Chuck Davis:
    Thank you for your concern, thanks to God my health is great now.
    Warm Regards,
    A.R.

  • Steven N. Karels

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    You asked the basis of my estimates of dimensions. As a product’s thermal output grows, normally the size must grow to maintain a certain temperature. Usually the heat generation grows as the cube of the linear dimension while the heat transfer increases as the square of the linear dimension. You appear to have a different technology between the two eCat reactors.

    From your description, I would guess that the SK reactor is essentially transparent, emitting its thermal energy as blackbody radiation with the majority of the energy in the 100 to 200nm range. A heat exchanger surrounding it would need to be large enough to safely capture this energy and exchange it to the outside world for useful work.

    Also from you comments, it appears you are running an arc in which the reaction is occurring. It is unclear to me how you are containing the reaction space, if my understanding is correct.

    Can you comment on the SK technology to clarify?

  • Chuck Davis

    Dear Andrea,
    in your discussion with Frank Acland I love your attitude, but, like others before me, I am concerned you are driving yourself too hard and may be damaging your health.
    Please take care of yourself, what you are doing is SO important!
    Chuck Davis

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>