Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that the solar satellite that NASA has launched several days ago will give information useful also for LENR?
Thank you,
Mark
Sam:
Thank you for your two very interesting links to this remarkable achievement of NASA. I am very curious to see which secrets of the Sun this “spy” will report us!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dom:
The Client will pay nothing for the plant, because it will remain of our property and the Client will pay only the heat. Should it be for sale its price would be 20 million $, but for the time being we are not going to sell.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wolofgang Schubert:
Maybe, with the gas turbines fueled by the Ecat SK. It is not impossible, albeit surely not in short term an not even in the middle term.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you hold it for possible that one day the comercial aircrafts can fly by LENR?
With best wishes,
Wolfgang Schubert
(Electrician and Electric Technician)
Gavino Mamia:
I am not an expert of eolic and photovoltaic energy, but obviously the answer depends on two factors, that are not constants:
1- the wind and solar energy statistically allowed in the specific site, that obviously are very different in different geographic sites
2- the power of the wind and P.V. modules
Without these data an answer is impossible.
We can make an example: considering modules respectively of 1 MW for the eolic generators and of 1 kW/m^2 for the P.V. and considering a site that allows about the 10% of the power turned into energy, to make 40 MWh/h of energy you need 400 eolic generators or 400 000 P.V. modules.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dott. Rossi, quante pale eoliche occorrono per produrre 40 MW di energia?
Quanti mq di pannelli fotovoltaici occorrono per produrre 40 MW?
Giusto per avere un confronto con le tecnologie green attuali…
E.Hergen:
The presentation in January will be done.
It is independent from the status od the deliveries of the plant to our Clients.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
the huge 40 MW order is a new development. What does this mean for your planned presentation for january? The 40 MW reactor will not be ready until then. Will you delay your presentation until you have a ready and running reactor?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
The preparation of a LENR 40 MW plant in an industry that will use its heat is probably the most important thing that is happening in the world.
May God help you in this miraculous enterprise.
Prof
Giovanni Fois:
Theoretically that is thinkable about, but there are mountains to climb from the permissions point of view.
For the moment the better way to go through is to be independent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
If the SK10 is a 10KW reactor you need 4000 of them to make a 40MW reactor. Sounds like it will be a challenge to fit 4000 reactors with heat exchangers in just 8 cubic meters (about 1/5th of a standard shipping container). Did you mean 80 cubic meters?
firstly, please, allow me to express my deep support, I’m not on the business side of the story but rather on the naif one, and, led by poor ignorarance I take the occasion to ask you a question, I understand you have in your hands power density mastering comparable to the actual nuclear standard power plants, as for your claims few cubic meter space requirements are for 40MW gain. Have you considered proposing retrofitting uranium facilities ? Reactor Core a part, the istallation, electrical network and the market are already there, with or without internet connection; history teach sharing costs less than splitting, politics aside.
My True Regards
Giovanni Fois
Dear Andrea,
Just my opinion: if you end up building the 40 MW out of QX’s, there is no reason to be disappointed. The QX is a ready product in a certain market segment that only partly overlaps with the SK, and the QX needs usage statistics in order to make it ready for massive production. The 40 MW installation would give that. Ideally, both QX and SK need their own 40 MW thing, but since the QX is more ready than the SK, it makes sense to do it first for the QX, then for the SK.
regards, /pekka
Frank Acland:
1- the location of our Client is for now confidential. I can say the Client is one of the biggest entities of the world in its field, if not the biggest.
2- this is the largest installation we will have to make for the time being
3- I cannot answer this question in positive or in negative
4- not yet, at the moment we are deciding which modules to use ( SK or QX series ), hoping they will be SK, and we are starting with a certified engineer of the State where the Client is the procedures for the authorizations, in collaboration with the Client. I will be in the Customer facility surely in September to define the details for the installation of the plant. Eventually the production of the modules will be started, at this point I definitely would say within the year 2018.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
When an electron changes “orbit” (actually, it is not an orbit, but a quantic status, that determines where it is most probable the electron can be found) necessarily the T is increased if the electron goes to occupy a higher quantic status ( which means goes more far from the nucleus ) or the T is decreased if the electron probability field becomes nearest to the nucleus, so that the electron gets a lower quantic status. Therefore it is impossible that the quantic status of an electron changes without a delta T.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
A question of physics maybe stupid.
When an electron changes its orbit, does it instantly with a Δt = 0? That’s what I understood.
If so, would an electron in a particle accelerator move the same way point-to-point instantaneously so that its progression would be jerky?
Would other particles like the photon do the same?
Thank you for your answer certainly less stupid than my questions.
I remember that I am not a physicist
All my support for the development of the SK.
Best regards.
Mark:
Well, astronomy gives models and models generate ideas. So, my answer is yes, albeit indirectly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rupert:
Never.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
has ever any “Rock and Troll” piece damaged your business?
Cheers
Rupert
Dear Andrea,
Are you still on schedule to make the presentation of the industrialized products by January 2019?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you think that the solar satellite that NASA has launched several days ago will give information useful also for LENR?
Thank you,
Mark
Gennady:
Enough.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
What COP are you expecting for your 40 MW plant if you are using QX? And what COP would be if you are using SK 10 units?
Regards,
Gennady
Sam:
Thank you for your two very interesting links to this remarkable achievement of NASA. I am very curious to see which secrets of the Sun this “spy” will report us!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This is another interesting link to the Parker
Solar Probe.
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/parker-solar-probe-launch-looming
Good Morning Dr Rossi
Did you watch the Solar Parker probe lift
off this morning?
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/1002057/nasa-launch-live-tv-solar-parker-probe-lift-off-sun-watch-video
Regards
Sam
Abe Vincent:
GE 90 is rated about 100 MW of power.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Judy:
Thanks for your opinion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
This apparently normal patent, with “Fluid Heater” as a low profile title, in reality can be a global game changer.
Re 40MW plant… For comparison I believe the engines on a Boeing 777 can produce around 83MW each.
Dom:
The Client will pay nothing for the plant, because it will remain of our property and the Client will pay only the heat. Should it be for sale its price would be 20 million $, but for the time being we are not going to sell.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Nicholas:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wolofgang Schubert:
Maybe, with the gas turbines fueled by the Ecat SK. It is not impossible, albeit surely not in short term an not even in the middle term.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Do you hold it for possible that one day the comercial aircrafts can fly by LENR?
With best wishes,
Wolfgang Schubert
(Electrician and Electric Technician)
Will the 40 MW Ecat plant work 24/7?
Dear Dr Rossi,
Can you tell us the price of the 40 MW plant?
Jeff Jeffreys:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Do you think the patent you got protects also the SK version of the Ecat?
Iggy Dalrymple:
Supply heat to a production process.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
TK:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Ruby:
No. The heat will be used for the industrial process of the Client.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi,
Will the heat made by the 40 MW Ecat be used to make electric power?
Dr Rossi,
Has your patent been granted also in Japan?
Thank you.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Regarding your 40 MW order, will the steam be used for
(1) heating
(2) to drive motors/turbines
(3) both
Best regards,
Iggy
Gavino Mamia:
I am not an expert of eolic and photovoltaic energy, but obviously the answer depends on two factors, that are not constants:
1- the wind and solar energy statistically allowed in the specific site, that obviously are very different in different geographic sites
2- the power of the wind and P.V. modules
Without these data an answer is impossible.
We can make an example: considering modules respectively of 1 MW for the eolic generators and of 1 kW/m^2 for the P.V. and considering a site that allows about the 10% of the power turned into energy, to make 40 MWh/h of energy you need 400 eolic generators or 400 000 P.V. modules.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dott. Rossi, quante pale eoliche occorrono per produrre 40 MW di energia?
Quanti mq di pannelli fotovoltaici occorrono per produrre 40 MW?
Giusto per avere un confronto con le tecnologie green attuali…
Prof:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
E.Hergen:
The presentation in January will be done.
It is independent from the status od the deliveries of the plant to our Clients.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Mr. Rossi,
the huge 40 MW order is a new development. What does this mean for your planned presentation for january? The 40 MW reactor will not be ready until then. Will you delay your presentation until you have a ready and running reactor?
Thank you,
E. Hergen
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
The preparation of a LENR 40 MW plant in an industry that will use its heat is probably the most important thing that is happening in the world.
May God help you in this miraculous enterprise.
Prof
Giovanni Fois:
Theoretically that is thinkable about, but there are mountains to climb from the permissions point of view.
For the moment the better way to go through is to be independent.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Abe Vincent:
I confirm my numbers.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
He,he,he
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Your enemies are making Rock and Troll, but you are Beethoven.
Godspeed,
CC
Dear Andrea,
If the SK10 is a 10KW reactor you need 4000 of them to make a 40MW reactor. Sounds like it will be a challenge to fit 4000 reactors with heat exchangers in just 8 cubic meters (about 1/5th of a standard shipping container). Did you mean 80 cubic meters?
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
firstly, please, allow me to express my deep support, I’m not on the business side of the story but rather on the naif one, and, led by poor ignorarance I take the occasion to ask you a question, I understand you have in your hands power density mastering comparable to the actual nuclear standard power plants, as for your claims few cubic meter space requirements are for 40MW gain. Have you considered proposing retrofitting uranium facilities ? Reactor Core a part, the istallation, electrical network and the market are already there, with or without internet connection; history teach sharing costs less than splitting, politics aside.
My True Regards
Giovanni Fois
Toussaint Francois:
1- within this year
2- I do not know.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for the suggestion, that makes sense. It will be decided by end September.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Just my opinion: if you end up building the 40 MW out of QX’s, there is no reason to be disappointed. The QX is a ready product in a certain market segment that only partly overlaps with the SK, and the QX needs usage statistics in order to make it ready for massive production. The 40 MW installation would give that. Ideally, both QX and SK need their own 40 MW thing, but since the QX is more ready than the SK, it makes sense to do it first for the QX, then for the SK.
regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea Rossi,
When will you know when the SK 100 Kw will be a product?
Do you think that the SK reactor will be able to scale up, 1Mw or more in the future ?
Frank Acland:
1- the location of our Client is for now confidential. I can say the Client is one of the biggest entities of the world in its field, if not the biggest.
2- this is the largest installation we will have to make for the time being
3- I cannot answer this question in positive or in negative
4- not yet, at the moment we are deciding which modules to use ( SK or QX series ), hoping they will be SK, and we are starting with a certified engineer of the State where the Client is the procedures for the authorizations, in collaboration with the Client. I will be in the Customer facility surely in September to define the details for the installation of the plant. Eventually the production of the modules will be started, at this point I definitely would say within the year 2018.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
The reactors section: m 2 x 2 x 2
Plus the control system on site.
Obviously we are taking of thermal energy.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
When an electron changes “orbit” (actually, it is not an orbit, but a quantic status, that determines where it is most probable the electron can be found) necessarily the T is increased if the electron goes to occupy a higher quantic status ( which means goes more far from the nucleus ) or the T is decreased if the electron probability field becomes nearest to the nucleus, so that the electron gets a lower quantic status. Therefore it is impossible that the quantic status of an electron changes without a delta T.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
A question of physics maybe stupid.
When an electron changes its orbit, does it instantly with a Δt = 0? That’s what I understood.
If so, would an electron in a particle accelerator move the same way point-to-point instantaneously so that its progression would be jerky?
Would other particles like the photon do the same?
Thank you for your answer certainly less stupid than my questions.
I remember that I am not a physicist
All my support for the development of the SK.
Best regards.
Raffaele
Anonymous:
Assuming we use the SK 10,
Reactors plus heat exchanger 8 cubic meters, plus the control systems and the steam circuits.
Warm Regards
A.R.