Anonymous:
Spectrometer, voltage generator, laser, frequency generator, oscilloscope, quadrupole with 8 T combined, ohm-meter, T-meter, IR thermochamber, these are special features of the kind, plus the normal lab stuff.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John:
We are doing well. Now we have a spectrometric resolution of half nanometer anf this allow us to identify the particles in the plasma. Made important discoveries.
Probably a publication will follow, anyway Monday we will have clearer ideas.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I suppose that during the presentation of January 31st with the Ecat SK you will receive an enormous number of questions during the direct streaming and probably it will not be possible to answer to all: how will you resolve this problem?
Godspeed,
CC
At the January event is it possible / practical to have a camera display an unshielded Ecat at a safe distance, to visually demonstrate remote start up, constant running for a period, then remote shutdown. Even if the Ecat was directly shielded from a camera with a grade 14 glass, there would be indirect light that observers could see illuminating a room.
Alvina Tiedemann:
Very well, yesterday we have been able to calibrate the spectrometer to obtain a definition of 0.5 nm and this allows us to read much better the wavelengths, that obviously are at the base of our theoretical R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea your comment to Brokeeper November 15th is wonderful news and I wish you and your team all the success that you deserve Regards Eric Ashworth
Koen Vandewalle:
The choice to sell heat , not reactors is a strategic choice derived from commercial and IP defense issues, not from scientific issues.
I think that during the presentation of the SK the attendance will see something they never saw before. I hope.
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
There are scientists in your team who have insight and experience in the mechanisms of those temporary and imperceptible elementary particles.
Is it on their advice that you have chosen to mainly sell heat, and not the reactors?
I can imagine that competitors also have to deal with the same circumstances and problems. Of course you can work together better in that area.
Or does it have more to do with geopolitical choices or other interests?
I will certainly look at your presentation on January 31st. Hopefully we understand something about it. Do you provide a kind of explanation that allows a medium technically trained audience to understand it properly? Something should be done to transcend the hocus-pocus story and make the process plausible from classical school knowledge of chemistry and physics.
I would rather see that than a repeat of the history of the E-cat and cold fusion.
It is not because the product is good or excellent, that people will automatically appreciate it. Sometimes you have to educate the clientele. For example by explaining to which of their daily needs and concerns it will offer a solution. As you know, electricity and heat have been around for a long time, and they are also cheap and an achievement for anyone who has money ….. I suppose you do not want to go down in history as the man who made them even cheaper.
Dear Andrea:
The Rock and Troll Forum says the Ecat SK does not exist, the factory does not exist, the robots do not exist… the presentation of the industrialized product will not exist.
Question: do you exist?
Godspeed,
CC
i) If I understood well, do you need the concept of resonances and of virtual particles to explain what happens and where the energy comes from?
ii) Is this because you apply an oscillating current that causes the desired resonance in the E-Cat?
iii) And if yes, is there any similarity with what Bearden-Bedini do with their experiments with oscillating electronic circuits, that extract ‘energy from the vacuüm’, as they say? (And of course, I know, I move far from official science now, but esoterically, this makes me think of what was written in the Alice Bailey books (Theosofy/Esoteric Christianity/Esoteric Boeddhism), where, inspired by the master DK, she wrote that in the future scientists would discover the existence of the fourth (= lowest) ether, and extract energy from it?)
If yes, than it will be a difficult job to convince mainstream science… 😉
iv) If I remember well, John Bedini once had an experiment where he used an oscillating electrical/electronic circuit, loading a battery, while the environment became colder (!) instead of warmer. (Normally, because of the Joule effect (R*I²) in electronic and electrical conductors, they should heat up when current passes).
I know, this is far from official science, but just consider it as a brainstorm message.
Kind Regards and a lot of success with your scientific investigations.
Eric Ashworth:
If we take off the concept of resonances and consequently of virtual particles, the Standard Model collapses upon the energy conservation law.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
Thank you for your concern, but this work IS my life. Anyway, we arrived to a point that does make no more necessary to get this kind of risks. The SK is a magnificence. While writing this comment I am working with top US engineers that are helping me to upgrade the measurement system to better penetrate the theory: the next 5 days we will work full time on this side. Gullstrom is arriving here, we are in an important moment. Monday Prof Vassallo will work with us in conference and eventually also the Prof of Physics that teaches in Japan but wants to remain behind the curtain will be fully involved.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Thank you for citing the book of Mats Lewan
Thank you very much for your candid response. It is this very characteristic of integrity that caught my attention to the person behind the ‘impossible invention’.
Like you, the fury within, Madam Curie had delved into the physical unknown and courageously accepted the risk to investigate the unknowns for scientific and human advancement. Sometimes risks require action over prudence as the Wright brothers often discovered. With this said, don’t do it again! We, as your wife, wish you to enjoy the fruits of your labor.
With much respect,
Brokeeper
Dear Andrea with regards that many physicists regard many resonances i.e. virtual particles to not exist, they obviously are totally unaware that many irritants cause sneezes to exist. As my father use to say and he was an engineer “you cannot put sense where sense won’t go”. It is frustrating but we have to put up with it for the time being. Wishing you all the best, Eric Ashworth.
Gerard McEk:
Yes, I am fully recovered and working very hard. Thank you for your concern. I had to open the reactors and look at them while operating and this has been crucial to arrive to the QX first and the SK now. You will understand what is the SK when you will see it on Jan 31st. It is unbelievable.
We made a masterpiece.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am sorry to read that labouring your QX- baby had so much impact on your health. I do hope your are fully recovered now.
Would you be willing to write into your memoirs all details of this incident like how this could happen and how you came to the idea te develop the QX, so future generations may learn from it?
Was one of the reasons to develop the QX that it produces less radiation?
Please be careful, the world needs you!
Kind regards, Gerard
Frank Acland:
The implications are zero, because the Ecat is supposed to operate closed, not open.
All the measurements made in many years now upon our Ecats have always shown that outside the Ecat there are not ionizing radiations. Measurements have been made by University laboratories as well as Governmental healthcare control institutions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Interesting indeed about the open heart surgery you did, but I am sorry to hear of its consequences. I hope you can have a full recovery. What are the implications of all this in terms of safety in commercial E-Cat applications? I am sure that potential customers and regulators will be wondering about this.
Brokeeper:
1- yes
2- no, we will not give any particular related to the factory, at least for the time being
3- during the year long test in Doral I covered the shift from 5 PM through 10 A.M. and during the night, when I was alone, many times I opened the shielding to look inside to understand things. The Ecat does nor have emissions of ionizing radiations out of the Ecat body, but the inspection I made “open heart” were a risk and I knew it, but these inspections have allowed me to understand important things and this knowledge has born the QX and the SK versions of the Ecat. I spent a dear price in terms of health, but I could work very well and now I am healed. Also the voice returned. The fury to know I had was stronger than the good sense to be prudent, also because I was alone, the risks were all upon me. The Ecat SK you will see on Jan 31st is the son of this decision.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
1- You mentioned the broadcast would be from the factory where it is produced. Is this the same factory by which the E-Cat SK will be mass produced? This would be an ideal time to demonstrate the power of the E-Cat providing heat and/or electricity to its production facility.
2- Would this be possible during the broadcast?
3- Also, could you shed some light on how your recent illness may have been affected by the yearlong test inside the container? Some are concerned it may be due to some ‘Strange Radiation’. I am very glad to hear you are recovering.
Thank you. God be with you.
Brokeeper
Prof:
If we assume that virtual particles ( read: resonances ) do not exist, then many nuclear reactions like, for example, the Beta Decay could not exist, due to the energy conservation law, since the boson W is far more energetic than a neutron and than p+e+antineutrino. Only equations based on Feynmann diagrams within which we have resonances can resolve these problems.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Many physicists assume that resonances- virtual particcles do not exist, only real particles exist. Which is your opinion about this issue?
Cheers
Prof
KeithT:
Yes, in the January 31st presentation of the Ecat SK we will indicate the commercial route that will be privileged for the time being.
We supply a throw of heat, that you will observe very well; the Customers will decide how to make the best use of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Between the production of heat from the Ecat SK 20 kW Modules, and the supply of usable heat to an end user, there is the issue of heat exchangers.
For heat transfer there is a variety of mediums that can be used; air, water, steam, and a wide range of industrial thermal fluid oils, each targeting specific markets, each of these heat transfer mediums will require specific heat exchanger designs, each requiring specific thermal ratings, operating temperatures, pressures and flow rates.
Will your company Leonardo seek out expertise to design and manufacture all these types of heat exchangers, then incorporate all necessary pipework, instrumentation and controls in a structure, keeping all supply under your control, to then sell the heat output to the various market sectors?
Or would you consider transfer of Ecat SK module outline specifications and operation profile to third parties under agreement, for them to develop, code design, build and maintain the heat exchangers and infrastructure, with Leonardo as the main contractor who has the contract with the end user, supplying, monitoring and maintaining the Ecat modules.
Or would you consider joint ventures with industry leading companies, there would be sharing of profit but also sharing of development / certification costs and risks.
Is it possible to describe at the January demonstration the commercial route you wish to pursue for the immediate future?
Daniel De Caluwe’:
Thank you for your kind sustain, but let me say that to ask to a nuclear power operator or business investor what he does think of LENR is like to ask a lion what does he think of veggies ( with some exception, though ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
As I know about your breaktrough technology since 2011, and although I often got a lot of negative feedback (probably because I referred to your technology as the solution to eventually replace our old nuclear power plants), I from time to time (not too often 😉 participated in discussions about our Belgian energy strategy (and its many problems) in the fora of our major newspaper ‘De Standaard’, that is (like Aftenposten in Norway) the major newspaper in the Flemish/dutch (also my native language) speaking part of Belgium.
Here some links to these discussions (only in Dutch):
(Everyone who wants to read the discussion has to click on the button ‘Reacties’ (dutch) = ‘Reactions’ (english), but unfortunately, I’m afraid that most of these discussions probably are only accessible for subscribers who pay for it. Nevertheless, I here give a restricted list of discussions where I referred to your technology as a possible solution):
In 2012: (reactions posted with my userid ‘Daniel D.’)
In 2017: (reactions posted with userid ‘Angela H.’, who is a direct family member and who from that time owned the subscription to the newspaper, but I always signed my messages referring to my own initials ‘Daniel D.’)
2018: (Same remark as above: reactions posted with userid ‘Angela H.’, who is a direct family member and who from 2017 owned the subscription to the newspaper, but I always signed my messages referring to my own initials ‘Daniel D.’)
As I mostly got very skeptical reactions, I do not know if I succeeded to influence and convince the public, but as I am convinced that your technology is very necessary to solve our energy problems, it certainly was worth a try. Hopefully, some young people of Flanders found their way to your website?
Kind Regards,
Ir. Daniel De Caluwé
Flanders (Belgium)
JPR:
1- the streaming will begin at 9 A.M. US Eastern Time and will last 2 hours
2- the video will remain on youtube and a link will be maintained in our website http://www.leonardocorporation.com or http://www.ecat.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
At what time will be broadcasted the direct streaming of the Ecat SK on January 31st? Where will it remain to be seen from those which will not attend the direct streaming?
JPR
We will answer in direct streaming as much as possible, the unanswered questions will be answered on this blog on the same day.
Warm Regards.
A.R.
Anonymous:
Spectrometer, voltage generator, laser, frequency generator, oscilloscope, quadrupole with 8 T combined, ohm-meter, T-meter, IR thermochamber, these are special features of the kind, plus the normal lab stuff.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
John:
We are doing well. Now we have a spectrometric resolution of half nanometer anf this allow us to identify the particles in the plasma. Made important discoveries.
Probably a publication will follow, anyway Monday we will have clearer ideas.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
How are going the theoretical experiments you are making this week? Can you give an update
Cheers
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
I suppose that during the presentation of January 31st with the Ecat SK you will receive an enormous number of questions during the direct streaming and probably it will not be possible to answer to all: how will you resolve this problem?
Godspeed,
CC
KeithT:
Thank you for the suggestion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
At the January event is it possible / practical to have a camera display an unshielded Ecat at a safe distance, to visually demonstrate remote start up, constant running for a period, then remote shutdown. Even if the Ecat was directly shielded from a camera with a grade 14 glass, there would be indirect light that observers could see illuminating a room.
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Frank Acland:
Yes,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Will you show these microSievert readings in the test you will broadcast on January 31st?
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Kelly:
Background 0.05-0.07 microSv/h, operation 0.12-0.16 microSv/h at 1 cm of distance.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Alvina Tiedemann:
Very well, yesterday we have been able to calibrate the spectrometer to obtain a definition of 0.5 nm and this allows us to read much better the wavelengths, that obviously are at the base of our theoretical R&D.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
No, because it will be made in our factory, where for safety and security reasons nobody can have access.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Rossi,
how is going the work you scheduled to be done with your theoretical consultants this week?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
which value in microSievert do you read close to the Ecat SK when it is operating?
Thank you if you can answer,
Kelly
Eric Ashworth:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea your comment to Brokeeper November 15th is wonderful news and I wish you and your team all the success that you deserve Regards Eric Ashworth
Koen Vandewalle:
The choice to sell heat , not reactors is a strategic choice derived from commercial and IP defense issues, not from scientific issues.
I think that during the presentation of the SK the attendance will see something they never saw before. I hope.
Thank you for your suggestions,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi,
There are scientists in your team who have insight and experience in the mechanisms of those temporary and imperceptible elementary particles.
Is it on their advice that you have chosen to mainly sell heat, and not the reactors?
I can imagine that competitors also have to deal with the same circumstances and problems. Of course you can work together better in that area.
Or does it have more to do with geopolitical choices or other interests?
I will certainly look at your presentation on January 31st. Hopefully we understand something about it. Do you provide a kind of explanation that allows a medium technically trained audience to understand it properly? Something should be done to transcend the hocus-pocus story and make the process plausible from classical school knowledge of chemistry and physics.
I would rather see that than a repeat of the history of the E-cat and cold fusion.
It is not because the product is good or excellent, that people will automatically appreciate it. Sometimes you have to educate the clientele. For example by explaining to which of their daily needs and concerns it will offer a solution. As you know, electricity and heat have been around for a long time, and they are also cheap and an achievement for anyone who has money ….. I suppose you do not want to go down in history as the man who made them even cheaper.
Kind Regards,
Koen
Frank Acland:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When you opened up the E-Cats for their open heart surgery, did your detectors inform you that there was danger?
Best wishes,
Frank Acland
Daniel De Caluwe’:
i) yes
ii) no
iii) N.A.
iv) I do not know about this, can’t comment
Warm Regards,
A.R.
CC:
I am not sure.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
The Rock and Troll Forum says the Ecat SK does not exist, the factory does not exist, the robots do not exist… the presentation of the industrialized product will not exist.
Question: do you exist?
Godspeed,
CC
Dear Dr. Rossi,
i) If I understood well, do you need the concept of resonances and of virtual particles to explain what happens and where the energy comes from?
ii) Is this because you apply an oscillating current that causes the desired resonance in the E-Cat?
iii) And if yes, is there any similarity with what Bearden-Bedini do with their experiments with oscillating electronic circuits, that extract ‘energy from the vacuüm’, as they say? (And of course, I know, I move far from official science now, but esoterically, this makes me think of what was written in the Alice Bailey books (Theosofy/Esoteric Christianity/Esoteric Boeddhism), where, inspired by the master DK, she wrote that in the future scientists would discover the existence of the fourth (= lowest) ether, and extract energy from it?)
If yes, than it will be a difficult job to convince mainstream science… 😉
iv) If I remember well, John Bedini once had an experiment where he used an oscillating electrical/electronic circuit, loading a battery, while the environment became colder (!) instead of warmer. (Normally, because of the Joule effect (R*I²) in electronic and electrical conductors, they should heat up when current passes).
I know, this is far from official science, but just consider it as a brainstorm message.
Kind Regards and a lot of success with your scientific investigations.
Daniel.
Eric Ashworth:
If we take off the concept of resonances and consequently of virtual particles, the Standard Model collapses upon the energy conservation law.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Brokeeper:
Thank you for your concern, but this work IS my life. Anyway, we arrived to a point that does make no more necessary to get this kind of risks. The SK is a magnificence. While writing this comment I am working with top US engineers that are helping me to upgrade the measurement system to better penetrate the theory: the next 5 days we will work full time on this side. Gullstrom is arriving here, we are in an important moment. Monday Prof Vassallo will work with us in conference and eventually also the Prof of Physics that teaches in Japan but wants to remain behind the curtain will be fully involved.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Thank you for citing the book of Mats Lewan
Dear Andrea,
Thank you very much for your candid response. It is this very characteristic of integrity that caught my attention to the person behind the ‘impossible invention’.
Like you, the fury within, Madam Curie had delved into the physical unknown and courageously accepted the risk to investigate the unknowns for scientific and human advancement. Sometimes risks require action over prudence as the Wright brothers often discovered. With this said, don’t do it again! We, as your wife, wish you to enjoy the fruits of your labor.
With much respect,
Brokeeper
Dear Andrea with regards that many physicists regard many resonances i.e. virtual particles to not exist, they obviously are totally unaware that many irritants cause sneezes to exist. As my father use to say and he was an engineer “you cannot put sense where sense won’t go”. It is frustrating but we have to put up with it for the time being. Wishing you all the best, Eric Ashworth.
Gerard McEk:
Yes, I am fully recovered and working very hard. Thank you for your concern. I had to open the reactors and look at them while operating and this has been crucial to arrive to the QX first and the SK now. You will understand what is the SK when you will see it on Jan 31st. It is unbelievable.
We made a masterpiece.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am sorry to read that labouring your QX- baby had so much impact on your health. I do hope your are fully recovered now.
Would you be willing to write into your memoirs all details of this incident like how this could happen and how you came to the idea te develop the QX, so future generations may learn from it?
Was one of the reasons to develop the QX that it produces less radiation?
Please be careful, the world needs you!
Kind regards, Gerard
Emery:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Seriously loads of beneficial knowledge!
Frank Acland:
The implications are zero, because the Ecat is supposed to operate closed, not open.
All the measurements made in many years now upon our Ecats have always shown that outside the Ecat there are not ionizing radiations. Measurements have been made by University laboratories as well as Governmental healthcare control institutions.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Interesting indeed about the open heart surgery you did, but I am sorry to hear of its consequences. I hope you can have a full recovery. What are the implications of all this in terms of safety in commercial E-Cat applications? I am sure that potential customers and regulators will be wondering about this.
Kind regards,
Frank Acland
Brokeeper:
1- yes
2- no, we will not give any particular related to the factory, at least for the time being
3- during the year long test in Doral I covered the shift from 5 PM through 10 A.M. and during the night, when I was alone, many times I opened the shielding to look inside to understand things. The Ecat does nor have emissions of ionizing radiations out of the Ecat body, but the inspection I made “open heart” were a risk and I knew it, but these inspections have allowed me to understand important things and this knowledge has born the QX and the SK versions of the Ecat. I spent a dear price in terms of health, but I could work very well and now I am healed. Also the voice returned. The fury to know I had was stronger than the good sense to be prudent, also because I was alone, the risks were all upon me. The Ecat SK you will see on Jan 31st is the son of this decision.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1- You mentioned the broadcast would be from the factory where it is produced. Is this the same factory by which the E-Cat SK will be mass produced? This would be an ideal time to demonstrate the power of the E-Cat providing heat and/or electricity to its production facility.
2- Would this be possible during the broadcast?
3- Also, could you shed some light on how your recent illness may have been affected by the yearlong test inside the container? Some are concerned it may be due to some ‘Strange Radiation’. I am very glad to hear you are recovering.
Thank you. God be with you.
Brokeeper
Prof:
If we assume that virtual particles ( read: resonances ) do not exist, then many nuclear reactions like, for example, the Beta Decay could not exist, due to the energy conservation law, since the boson W is far more energetic than a neutron and than p+e+antineutrino. Only equations based on Feynmann diagrams within which we have resonances can resolve these problems.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gilda:
From the factory where we produce it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Yuri:
Yes, also.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S.
Your comment is the N. 44 000 of this blog
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Where will be broadcast from the video of the operating Ecat SK?
Thank you if you can answer,
Gilda
Dear Andrea,
Are you still working in the area of Miami, Florida?
Congratulations for your progress,
Yuri
Dr Andrea Rossi:
Many physicists assume that resonances- virtual particcles do not exist, only real particles exist. Which is your opinion about this issue?
Cheers
Prof
KeithT:
Yes, in the January 31st presentation of the Ecat SK we will indicate the commercial route that will be privileged for the time being.
We supply a throw of heat, that you will observe very well; the Customers will decide how to make the best use of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Between the production of heat from the Ecat SK 20 kW Modules, and the supply of usable heat to an end user, there is the issue of heat exchangers.
For heat transfer there is a variety of mediums that can be used; air, water, steam, and a wide range of industrial thermal fluid oils, each targeting specific markets, each of these heat transfer mediums will require specific heat exchanger designs, each requiring specific thermal ratings, operating temperatures, pressures and flow rates.
Will your company Leonardo seek out expertise to design and manufacture all these types of heat exchangers, then incorporate all necessary pipework, instrumentation and controls in a structure, keeping all supply under your control, to then sell the heat output to the various market sectors?
Or would you consider transfer of Ecat SK module outline specifications and operation profile to third parties under agreement, for them to develop, code design, build and maintain the heat exchangers and infrastructure, with Leonardo as the main contractor who has the contract with the end user, supplying, monitoring and maintaining the Ecat modules.
Or would you consider joint ventures with industry leading companies, there would be sharing of profit but also sharing of development / certification costs and risks.
Is it possible to describe at the January demonstration the commercial route you wish to pursue for the immediate future?
Regards,
Keith Thomson.
Daniel De Caluwe’:
Thank you for your kind sustain, but let me say that to ask to a nuclear power operator or business investor what he does think of LENR is like to ask a lion what does he think of veggies ( with some exception, though ).
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr. Rossi,
As I know about your breaktrough technology since 2011, and although I often got a lot of negative feedback (probably because I referred to your technology as the solution to eventually replace our old nuclear power plants), I from time to time (not too often 😉 participated in discussions about our Belgian energy strategy (and its many problems) in the fora of our major newspaper ‘De Standaard’, that is (like Aftenposten in Norway) the major newspaper in the Flemish/dutch (also my native language) speaking part of Belgium.
Here some links to these discussions (only in Dutch):
(Everyone who wants to read the discussion has to click on the button ‘Reacties’ (dutch) = ‘Reactions’ (english), but unfortunately, I’m afraid that most of these discussions probably are only accessible for subscribers who pay for it. Nevertheless, I here give a restricted list of discussions where I referred to your technology as a possible solution):
In 2012: (reactions posted with my userid ‘Daniel D.’)
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20120815_00259016
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20120823_00268516
…
In 2017: (reactions posted with userid ‘Angela H.’, who is a direct family member and who from that time owned the subscription to the newspaper, but I always signed my messages referring to my own initials ‘Daniel D.’)
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20170806_03005983
2018: (Same remark as above: reactions posted with userid ‘Angela H.’, who is a direct family member and who from 2017 owned the subscription to the newspaper, but I always signed my messages referring to my own initials ‘Daniel D.’)
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20180806_03651599
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20180806_03651604
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20181002_03802905
also today, I posted a message on this forum: (and maybe I have to add a reference to the January 31st presentation?)
http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20181111_03934252
As I mostly got very skeptical reactions, I do not know if I succeeded to influence and convince the public, but as I am convinced that your technology is very necessary to solve our energy problems, it certainly was worth a try. Hopefully, some young people of Flanders found their way to your website?
Kind Regards,
Ir. Daniel De Caluwé
Flanders (Belgium)
JPR:
1- the streaming will begin at 9 A.M. US Eastern Time and will last 2 hours
2- the video will remain on youtube and a link will be maintained in our website http://www.leonardocorporation.com or http://www.ecat.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Toussaint Francois:
1- yes
2- there is a consume, therefore we project a duration of one year of the charge
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
I am glad to hear that you have recovered your voice, do you think that your health problems come from the one year test inside the container ?
One question please did you notice if the reaction inside your E-CATS “eats up” the materials of your reactors ?
Dear Andrea Rossi,
At what time will be broadcasted the direct streaming of the Ecat SK on January 31st? Where will it remain to be seen from those which will not attend the direct streaming?
JPR