Guglielmo:
I suggest you to start from this:
“Physics and Our Universe: How It All Works” by Prof Richard Wolfson, Professor of Physics at Middlebury College.
Find it here: http://www.thegreatcourses.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I know nothing about Physics, just some remembrance of my high school time. I am retired and would like to start from somewhere to study physics: what can you suggest?
Thank you if you find the time to answer.
Guglielmo
Prof:
Stunned.
Obviously I am deeply grateful to all the scientists and researchers that are dedicating their time to read an undoubtly not easy paper.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Congrats on your fine theoretical paper. The one concern I have is that it does not offer why LENR reactions are so difficult to produce/re-produce. Dr. Storms talks, in his theory, about a Nuclear Active Environment (NAE) being required. Can you provide some thoughts on this issue?
On Power Engineering of June 18 2019: Rod Walton gives the latest stories in power generation, renewable energy and the smart grid, plus: coal to cofire dual fuel conversionconcernsand clarifications.
Rod Walton
Hi Andrea,
your publication today raexhed 25624 (the average is 100) full readings, 537.3 index of interest for R&D (the average is 10) 1557 recommendations (the average is 50) .
You are in the top 1% of millions of publications on Researchgate.
In particular, 1557 recommendations means 1557 experts that have put out their face recommending your paper.
How do you feel?
Cheers
Prof
“you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.”
Were the failed components involved in:
a. Electrical energy conversion (output from the LENR process)?
b. Control problems?
c. Thermal issues?
d. Starting and Stopping issues?
e. prototype board reliability?
Do you still consider the SK to be at the prototype stage? Given the amount of time and money you have spent I had hoped you were at the pre-production stage at least.
The purpose of prototype testing is to see what works and what needs improvement. Congrads on accomplishing a major step forward. Do the needed redesign and test again.
You said that you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.
1. Do you know yet what corrections need to be made?
2. What is the timetable for retesting?
3. How serious is do you feel this setback for the prospects of direct electricity production from the E-Cat SK?
Gennady:
IH cannot use our technology, based on the settlement that has been reached in June 2017. I do not have any kind of financial, industrial or commercial collaboration with them since February 2016.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I am a big fan of your work and has been following eCat for many years. Earlier today I sent a link about IH, but it looks like it did not pass the filter. I did not mean to offend you in any way. Just wanted to share what I read and my concern about IH using your technology.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- Is IH still using your technology?
2- Have you been financed by Woodford?
3- Have you ever been in contact with Neil Woodford?
4- did you have any further contact with IH after the settlement?
Gerard MkEk:
1. Partly: some parts of the Ecat SK-Leonardo worked very well, better than expected, but some worked poorly. We had to suspend the test and return to remanufacture some parts differently. Much work still to do. Never give up.
2. yes
3. yes
4. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Are you happy about the progress in testing your E-cat SKe?
2. Has the reliability of the heat supply to your customers already improved?
3. Are you already satisfied with that heat supply?
4. Do you already accept and deliver new orders for heat supply?
I hope things are developing well!
Kind regards, Gerard McEk
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Will we see another video like the http://www.ecatskdemo.com with the Ecat SK Leonardo working and making electricity enough to supply the electricity for itself plus electricity for sale, making this way an infinite COP ?
Prof:
Let me add that the average statistic numbers after years from the publication on Researchgate, are: full readings 100, research interest index 1- 10, recommendations 1-10 and recommendations are peer reviews made by experts that put their face on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
@Patrick Ellul,
You can find all going to the paper of Andrea Rossi http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Click on the paper text, you will find the full text; at the heat of it you will find a series of links, like STATS and OVERVIEW etc.
Go to the links and you will find all the information.
Today Andrea Rossi has the following stats:
total readings 24359- total research interest index 490.1- recommendations 1431
These numbers are higher than most of CERN publications and come from the free will of scientists and researchers of the whole world: if this is not a peer reviewing, what is this ? Are not one thousand four hundred thirtyone recommendations from scientists and researchers from universities and laboratories of the whole world a peer reviewing ? Is it more peer reviewed a paper that is verified from one or two persons or from 1431 persons ( and counting ) ?
All the best,
Prof
You had previously mentioned building different eCat reactor sizes, up to 100kW thermal output.
1. Are you still investigating or planning different sized reactors?
2. Is there any practical limit to the number of reactors that may be combined in parallel?
3. Can you forecast what cost you expect to charge for electrical power, e.g. $25 USD per MWhr?
Dear person that keeps posting about the statistics for Rossi’s paper on research gate
Can you explain where you are getting these numbers from? When I follow your link it simply says “20,903 reads”. Do you have insider information?
Regards
Patrick
Kirby:
I have been contacted from many journalists, but refused any interview.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Have you been interviewed about the Woodford-IH mess?
Pavel Vrbovsky:
Yes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
If we talk about your e-cats, is the fuel the same?
I think that You are mentioned Ni, LiAlH4 , H2.
Warm Regards
P.V
Guglielmo:
I suggest you to start from this:
“Physics and Our Universe: How It All Works” by Prof Richard Wolfson, Professor of Physics at Middlebury College.
Find it here:
http://www.thegreatcourses.com
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
I know nothing about Physics, just some remembrance of my high school time. I am retired and would like to start from somewhere to study physics: what can you suggest?
Thank you if you find the time to answer.
Guglielmo
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Stunned.
Obviously I am deeply grateful to all the scientists and researchers that are dedicating their time to read an undoubtly not easy paper.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Congrats on your fine theoretical paper. The one concern I have is that it does not offer why LENR reactions are so difficult to produce/re-produce. Dr. Storms talks, in his theory, about a Nuclear Active Environment (NAE) being required. Can you provide some thoughts on this issue?
On Power Engineering of June 18 2019: Rod Walton gives the latest stories in power generation, renewable energy and the smart grid, plus: coal to cofire dual fuel conversionconcernsand clarifications.
Rod Walton
Hi Andrea,
your publication today raexhed 25624 (the average is 100) full readings, 537.3 index of interest for R&D (the average is 10) 1557 recommendations (the average is 50) .
You are in the top 1% of millions of publications on Researchgate.
In particular, 1557 recommendations means 1557 experts that have put out their face recommending your paper.
How do you feel?
Cheers
Prof
Steven N. Karels:
a. yes
the others no.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
“you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.”
Were the failed components involved in:
a. Electrical energy conversion (output from the LENR process)?
b. Control problems?
c. Thermal issues?
d. Starting and Stopping issues?
e. prototype board reliability?
Colin Watters:
We are serving a restricted number of “pioneers” and fixing problems.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
We have still the R&D on course,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
Can you tell us a few words about the development of E-Cat-gas turbine coupling?
All my support to the R & D team
Best regards
Raffaele Bongo
Dear Andrea,
Do you still consider the SK to be at the prototype stage? Given the amount of time and money you have spent I had hoped you were at the pre-production stage at least.
Steven N. Karels:
Exactly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
The purpose of prototype testing is to see what works and what needs improvement. Congrads on accomplishing a major step forward. Do the needed redesign and test again.
Bob:
Thank you for your sustain,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
We strongly appreciate your candor when you tell us of your unsuccessful trials. This is evidence of your sincerity.
Cheers
Bob
Frank Acland:
1- yes
2- 1 month
3- we will never give up
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
You said that you stopped the E-Cat SK Leonardo test because of certain components failing.
1. Do you know yet what corrections need to be made?
2. What is the timetable for retesting?
3. How serious is do you feel this setback for the prospects of direct electricity production from the E-Cat SK?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Billy:
Indeed!
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Letisha Maranda:
The one contained in paragraph 4.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea:
Can you explain which is the main thread you are following after the general exposition in your Researchgate paper?
Many thanks
Dr Rossi,
I saw that the numbers on Researchgate are exploding, going exponential. More than 1500 scientists and researchers have recommended your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
That is some peer reviewing !
Gennady:
IH cannot use our technology, based on the settlement that has been reached in June 2017. I do not have any kind of financial, industrial or commercial collaboration with them since February 2016.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
I am a big fan of your work and has been following eCat for many years. Earlier today I sent a link about IH, but it looks like it did not pass the filter. I did not mean to offend you in any way. Just wanted to share what I read and my concern about IH using your technology.
Kind Regards,
Gennady
Jack:
1- no
2- no
3- no
no
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Andrea Rossi:
1- Is IH still using your technology?
2- Have you been financed by Woodford?
3- Have you ever been in contact with Neil Woodford?
4- did you have any further contact with IH after the settlement?
Dominique F.:
If we will succeed, that is probable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Reuben:
I never comment the work of our competitors.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
No, I will be too much engaged with my work, but I wish success to the organization.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Steven N. Karels:
No cigar yet.
See the answer to Gerard McEk.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard MkEk:
1. Partly: some parts of the Ecat SK-Leonardo worked very well, better than expected, but some worked poorly. We had to suspend the test and return to remanufacture some parts differently. Much work still to do. Never give up.
2. yes
3. yes
4. yes
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
1. Are you happy about the progress in testing your E-cat SKe?
2. Has the reliability of the heat supply to your customers already improved?
3. Are you already satisfied with that heat supply?
4. Do you already accept and deliver new orders for heat supply?
I hope things are developing well!
Kind regards, Gerard McEk
Dear Andrea Rossi,
On June 6 you posted “At the end of next week I will have a clear idea of the level we reached” relative to the eCat SK Electric.
Can you share any update? Success? Failure?
Dr Rossi:
Will you participate to the ICCF that is scheduled for September in Assisi, Italy?
Why do you think that the tests made by Google with the apparatuses of your competitors did not reach good results?
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi,
Will we see another video like the http://www.ecatskdemo.com with the Ecat SK Leonardo working and making electricity enough to supply the electricity for itself plus electricity for sale, making this way an infinite COP ?
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Orson:
Because to obtain an electron capture you need 750 keV.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Prof:
Let me add that the average statistic numbers after years from the publication on Researchgate, are: full readings 100, research interest index 1- 10, recommendations 1-10 and recommendations are peer reviews made by experts that put their face on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Why do you continue to say that the electron capture is impossible in LENR?
@Patrick Ellul,
You can find all going to the paper of Andrea Rossi
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Click on the paper text, you will find the full text; at the heat of it you will find a series of links, like STATS and OVERVIEW etc.
Go to the links and you will find all the information.
Today Andrea Rossi has the following stats:
total readings 24359- total research interest index 490.1- recommendations 1431
These numbers are higher than most of CERN publications and come from the free will of scientists and researchers of the whole world: if this is not a peer reviewing, what is this ? Are not one thousand four hundred thirtyone recommendations from scientists and researchers from universities and laboratories of the whole world a peer reviewing ? Is it more peer reviewed a paper that is verified from one or two persons or from 1431 persons ( and counting ) ?
All the best,
Prof
Steven N.Karels:
1- yes
2- no
3- premature
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
You had previously mentioned building different eCat reactor sizes, up to 100kW thermal output.
1. Are you still investigating or planning different sized reactors?
2. Is there any practical limit to the number of reactors that may be combined in parallel?
3. Can you forecast what cost you expect to charge for electrical power, e.g. $25 USD per MWhr?
Frank Acland:
1 it is made by our Team
2 in due time, yes
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear person that keeps posting about the statistics for Rossi’s paper on research gate
Can you explain where you are getting these numbers from? When I follow your link it simply says “20,903 reads”. Do you have insider information?
Regards
Patrick