Dear Andrea,
the last numbers from Researchgate:
Full readings 28269, Reserch interest index 700., Recommendtions 2065 ( in 5 months, 7 dys…)
To the next. Cheers
Steven N.Karels:
The work I made with Norman Cook and published on Arxiv and now also on Researchgate was based on these hypothesis, the evolution is in my last paper on Researchgate.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
This depends on your patience.
The first one is enough for a non professional.
When I sustained the exam of Theoretical Phylosophy with Prof Paci I had to go through all of them.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Regarding the question of fusion or fission, where you suggested an alternative, and after reading your paper,
1. would it be correct to describe the process as one of “isotope transfer”?
2. Would a starting point of such an “isotope transfer” be looking at all possible transfers that yield a positive or surplus energy output?
Dear Andrea,
Ok, sorry, I see now that you already edited the reply. But which part? All three “Ideen” books, or mainly the first one from 1913?
r:/pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
Yes.
Read Edmund Husserl “Ideas For a Pure Phenomenology and for a Phenomenological Phylosophy”.
Probably you speak German, better read it in German language. The translation in English is not perfect, in Italian makes it much more difficult than it already is for itself. But it is a gold mine for the brain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
By the way, I like your call for Epoche call, that you make every now and then. Epoche should be exercised also, and in particular, regarding the question that we are asking nature. Forget if the question is new or old, but just think if the question is meaningful and well-posed. Nature is perfect and non-mysterious, just our understanding of it is murky. Our questions are manmade and therefore must be continuously criticised.
regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea,
Well, your plasma must be tenuous, long distance between particles, because otherwise its pressure would be much higher than atmospheric and it would explode. In such plasma, electrons are well approximated by just classical point particles.
The magic of plasma, if it has some, lies in its collective interactions, that is the feedback between the charged particles and the electric and magnetic fields that they generate and in which they move. Plasma, especially when it has a magnetic field, has a much richer set of wavemodes than ordinary gas, which only has sound waves and so-called entropy wave.
The nature of the electron depends on the distance from which one is looking at it. Applies to other objects, too: for example if I look at you from an airplane at 10 km distance, you look like a mass point. Whereas if some insects crawls on your skin, he sees a thicker or thinner forest of body hair.
But why wouldn’t you just make electricity using piece of water-cooled photovoltaic panel trimmed to the wavelengths that the plasma is emitting, or if that is not practical, then transform the wavelengths first to suitable range using fluorescent glass similar to that found in fluorescent lamps.
Raffaele Bongo:
For example, the real nature of electron. By the way: Einstein wrote: ” to understand electron means to understand Physics “.
This is the issue I am focused on because from the study of it depends failure or success of the attempt I am making to get electricity directly from the plasma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck,
Yes, the “Rossilivecat.com/all” (deep history) functionality seems to be broken at the moment. You can contact the webmaster (very nice person) via the link near the top of the “Rossilivecat.com” page & find out if it’s fixable or not.
WaltC
thank you for your quick response about Rossilivecat.com/All. However, it seems ~/All is a function you might not be aware of. ~/All enabled the display of your blog postings since 03/03/2010.
If the history is no longer available with the server modifications, then so be it.
a quick question: Rossilivecat.com/all is no longer available. Is this a consequence of your recent changes at the server? Will it be functional again at some point?
MM:
Yes, I know that paper: if you go to the core of it, you discover that along the philosophy of this paper, the reality of a mountain is not the mountain itself, but its inclination and the related integral. They missed 100% the essence of the electron.
Perhaps, to respect the “symmetry”, this reference could balance: https://www.amazon.com/Higgs-Fake-Particle-Physicists-Committee/dp/1492176249
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Victor:
We have Afro Americans in our Team and they work excellently. I ignore if it is true what you say, because in the mountains of publications made about LENR it is not, obviously, specified the race. It would be illegal, besides stupid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Joseph Fine linked a paper on tresinos, also a Compton scale proposition, but with two electrons orbiting a proton, not one. The two electrons can have opposite spins, which reduces the system’s magnetic energy, I would suppose… and the entity has -1 charge so acts like H- ion. Did you look at the tresino concept? I didn’t hear about it earlier.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
I think that the key point is the study and the comprehension of the electron, that has been frozen in a self referential system based on the principle that only what receives funding is real. We need epoche’.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
I am optimist by nature and I sincerely have great hope that it will work reliably maybe within this year.
July, August and September will be months of intense R&D on this issue. I am spending substantial money that speaks for the substantial background of my hopes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Emilia:
Well, as a matter of fact it is not true in absolute, for example Dr Evelyn Foschi, a physicist from the University of Bologna, has coauthored publications about LENR, but in general you are right, the presence of women is low. I am not able to answer why, I do not see any reason for this fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
You recently said that you are optimistic about the outcome of the tests of the electric Ecat. Now, we know that you are an optimistic guy, but goes your optimism beyond your hope that it might work? Are there reasons to believe it’s going to work, already?
Great success to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Michel:
Your comment is intelligent, albeit I must in part disagree with you: I think that, speaking of Physics, we are still in a Middle Age and, as a consequence of this fact, our alchemists have made much better than turning vile iron into gold: look at the guys that have sold toilet paper, with written clowneries like “electron capture”, for millions, with “auditors” granting them billion dollars value of their shares value and using pop clowns like “guide fishes” to cheat on their investors: they turned toilet paper into gold !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S. We are still in the Middle Age of Physics, because the Standard Model did not understand what is an electron, while Albert Einstein said ” we will understand Physics when we will understand electrons”.
Nice to see you clarify the situation on cold fusion and LENR.
Obviously, the fusion of nuclei can only work at very high energies, as occurs into stars or accelerators, with neutrons production as unavoidable consequence. The alchemists of the Middle Ages have all failed to turn metals into gold because they do not have the knowledge of atomic structure and involved energies.
You do not measure any neutrons from the E-cat, so it can not be a fusion reaction, you’re absolutely right. On the other hand, you get isotopic shifts (Nickel if i remember well), which means in one way or another a neutrons transfer, and that at a relatively low temperature: do you agree?
Der Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find the comments published on other posts of this blog,
Warm Regards
A.R.
Livia:
You wouldn’t envy should you know how hard it is,
Warm Regaards,
A.R.
Ramiro Reitter:
We are working hard. I am very optimist.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Wilbert Vicenteno:
Unbelievable.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
the last numbers from Researchgate:
Full readings 28269, Reserch interest index 700., Recommendtions 2065 ( in 5 months, 7 dys…)
To the next. Cheers
How proceeds the R&D on the electricity rirectly tken from plasma?
I envy your work, regards for all the informative posts.
Steven N.Karels:
The work I made with Norman Cook and published on Arxiv and now also on Researchgate was based on these hypothesis, the evolution is in my last paper on Researchgate.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Chuck Davis:
Interesting.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
This depends on your patience.
The first one is enough for a non professional.
When I sustained the exam of Theoretical Phylosophy with Prof Paci I had to go through all of them.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
It was the Italian version of it made by Prof Enzo Paci, eventually I gave the original reference.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dear Andrea Rossi,
Regarding the question of fusion or fission, where you suggested an alternative, and after reading your paper,
1. would it be correct to describe the process as one of “isotope transfer”?
2. Would a starting point of such an “isotope transfer” be looking at all possible transfers that yield a positive or surplus energy output?
Sharp claims PV with 34% efficiency: google
Toyota testing infrared solar roof for electric cars
Warm Regards
Chuck Davis
Dear Andrea,
Ok, sorry, I see now that you already edited the reply. But which part? All three “Ideen” books, or mainly the first one from 1913?
r:/pekka
Dear Andrea,
I do not find a Hussel work with the exact title you gave. Could you check if the title you gave was correct?
regards, /pekka
Arjen:
Thank you for the link,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Pekka Janhunen:
Yes.
Read Edmund Husserl “Ideas For a Pure Phenomenology and for a Phenomenological Phylosophy”.
Probably you speak German, better read it in German language. The translation in English is not perfect, in Italian makes it much more difficult than it already is for itself. But it is a gold mine for the brain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
By the way, I like your call for Epoche call, that you make every now and then. Epoche should be exercised also, and in particular, regarding the question that we are asking nature. Forget if the question is new or old, but just think if the question is meaningful and well-posed. Nature is perfect and non-mysterious, just our understanding of it is murky. Our questions are manmade and therefore must be continuously criticised.
regards, /pekka
Dear Andrea
Just a link I think is worth to post.
http://sciexplorer.blogspot.com/2014/08/what-is-electron-really.html?m=1
I would love to see a article from you “LENR for dummies” as if I google LENR I see so much rubbish about mentioning cold fusion
I hope you succeed, and become known as Edison 2.0
Kind regards Arjen
Pekka Janhunen:
Thank you for your insight,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Roberto:
I think so. I am working on it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Have the probabilities to see the Ecat for electricity direct production increased during these last days?
Dear Andrea,
Well, your plasma must be tenuous, long distance between particles, because otherwise its pressure would be much higher than atmospheric and it would explode. In such plasma, electrons are well approximated by just classical point particles.
The magic of plasma, if it has some, lies in its collective interactions, that is the feedback between the charged particles and the electric and magnetic fields that they generate and in which they move. Plasma, especially when it has a magnetic field, has a much richer set of wavemodes than ordinary gas, which only has sound waves and so-called entropy wave.
The nature of the electron depends on the distance from which one is looking at it. Applies to other objects, too: for example if I look at you from an airplane at 10 km distance, you look like a mass point. Whereas if some insects crawls on your skin, he sees a thicker or thinner forest of body hair.
But why wouldn’t you just make electricity using piece of water-cooled photovoltaic panel trimmed to the wavelengths that the plasma is emitting, or if that is not practical, then transform the wavelengths first to suitable range using fluorescent glass similar to that found in fluorescent lamps.
regards, /pekka
Abel Renart:
Yes, so far.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck:
Understood.
Thank you for the informtion.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Raffaele Bongo:
For example, the real nature of electron. By the way: Einstein wrote: ” to understand electron means to understand Physics “.
This is the issue I am focused on because from the study of it depends failure or success of the attempt I am making to get electricity directly from the plasma.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
Did you resolve the problems you hd in the Ecaat SK to make heat?
Hello A. Rossi
You wrote that physics has not yet understood the electron.
Can you tell us, we ignorant of physics, what are the things that are not understood by physics?
I’m sorry if my question is silly.
Always a great support to the entire research team
cordially
Raffaele Bongo
Buck:
It’s all.html
r:/p.
Buck,
Yes, the “Rossilivecat.com/all” (deep history) functionality seems to be broken at the moment. You can contact the webmaster (very nice person) via the link near the top of the “Rossilivecat.com” page & find out if it’s fixable or not.
WaltC
Andrea,
thank you for your quick response about Rossilivecat.com/All. However, it seems ~/All is a function you might not be aware of. ~/All enabled the display of your blog postings since 03/03/2010.
If the history is no longer available with the server modifications, then so be it.
my best,
Buck
Buck:
The correct address is:
http://www.rossilivecat.com
It is operative without any problem.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Good Day Andrea:
a quick question: Rossilivecat.com/all is no longer available. Is this a consequence of your recent changes at the server? Will it be functional again at some point?
regards,
Buck
MM:
Yes, I know that paper: if you go to the core of it, you discover that along the philosophy of this paper, the reality of a mountain is not the mountain itself, but its inclination and the related integral. They missed 100% the essence of the electron.
Perhaps, to respect the “symmetry”, this reference could balance:
https://www.amazon.com/Higgs-Fake-Particle-Physicists-Committee/dp/1492176249
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi:
what do you think of this publication about the electron mass explained with the Higgs Boson mechanism:
https://portal.kph.uni-mainz.de/T/members/meyer/downloads/HiggsHBMeyerSymmetry.pdf
Victor:
We have Afro Americans in our Team and they work excellently. I ignore if it is true what you say, because in the mountains of publications made about LENR it is not, obviously, specified the race. It would be illegal, besides stupid.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
Also Afro-Americans are totally absent from the R&D related to LENR. How do you explain ?
Pekka Janhunen:
Not yet, but Dr Fine is worth to be read.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Joseph Fine linked a paper on tresinos, also a Compton scale proposition, but with two electrons orbiting a proton, not one. The two electrons can have opposite spins, which reduces the system’s magnetic energy, I would suppose… and the entity has -1 charge so acts like H- ion. Did you look at the tresino concept? I didn’t hear about it earlier.
regards, /pekka
Pekka Janhunen:
I think that the key point is the study and the comprehension of the electron, that has been frozen in a self referential system based on the principle that only what receives funding is real. We need epoche’.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments published today in other posts of this blog.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Gerard McEk:
I am optimist by nature and I sincerely have great hope that it will work reliably maybe within this year.
July, August and September will be months of intense R&D on this issue. I am spending substantial money that speaks for the substantial background of my hopes.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
“We are in the middle age of physics..”
Not even middle, but muddle age. In my opinion:-)
regards, /pekka
Greg:
Are you sure that itis really the most read ? I saw the stats, I continue to be stunned.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Emilia:
Well, as a matter of fact it is not true in absolute, for example Dr Evelyn Foschi, a physicist from the University of Bologna, has coauthored publications about LENR, but in general you are right, the presence of women is low. I am not able to answer why, I do not see any reason for this fact.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I noticed that in the field of LENR women are totally absent: there are not publications of females. How do you explain?
Dr Rossi:
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is as of today the most read of the 15 million publications of Researchgate, Also the recommendations of your publications (1878 as of today) are unheard of before.
Your work is making a revolution.
Dear Andrea,
You recently said that you are optimistic about the outcome of the tests of the electric Ecat. Now, we know that you are an optimistic guy, but goes your optimism beyond your hope that it might work? Are there reasons to believe it’s going to work, already?
Great success to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
Michel:
Your comment is intelligent, albeit I must in part disagree with you: I think that, speaking of Physics, we are still in a Middle Age and, as a consequence of this fact, our alchemists have made much better than turning vile iron into gold: look at the guys that have sold toilet paper, with written clowneries like “electron capture”, for millions, with “auditors” granting them billion dollars value of their shares value and using pop clowns like “guide fishes” to cheat on their investors: they turned toilet paper into gold !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
P.S. We are still in the Middle Age of Physics, because the Standard Model did not understand what is an electron, while Albert Einstein said ” we will understand Physics when we will understand electrons”.
Dear Dr Rossi,
Nice to see you clarify the situation on cold fusion and LENR.
Obviously, the fusion of nuclei can only work at very high energies, as occurs into stars or accelerators, with neutrons production as unavoidable consequence. The alchemists of the Middle Ages have all failed to turn metals into gold because they do not have the knowledge of atomic structure and involved energies.
You do not measure any neutrons from the E-cat, so it can not be a fusion reaction, you’re absolutely right. On the other hand, you get isotopic shifts (Nickel if i remember well), which means in one way or another a neutrons transfer, and that at a relatively low temperature: do you agree?
Regards,
Michel