Hello A. Rossi
You wrote that there is no fusion or fission in the Rossi effect. This means that there is no phenomenon of absorption or expulsion of particles by the nucleus of the atom.
Is it possible that there is a mysterious creation of proton or neutron in the atomic nucleus or neutron / proton transmutations?
A thousand excuses if my question is silly because I am not an atomic physicist
All my respect and wishes for success
Best regards
Raffaele
Dewey:
Please go to http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
All the references cited here are the same reported in the above mentioned paper.
In [13] a fundamental connection between Aharonov-Bohm equations and an electron model is proposed, starting from a geometric interpretation of the electron wave-function complex phase [6,8,1].
This approach suggests the possibility of efficiently creating electron condensates exploiting the Aharonov-Bohm effect, a phenomenon that shows the dependence of electron wave-function phase from electromagnetic potentials [9].
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination.
Quote Barbara Grizzuti Harrison.
Dr Rossi,
I return to the comment of Neri Accornero: can you give a hint, not superficial, but not too difficult, about what can happen if your effect is not fusion, not fission, not chemical reaction?
Neri Accornero:
The reactions are not fusion reactions, but complex particle interactions: I agree upon the fact that my paper is complex, but the matter is complex. You are Physician Prof, it is like to ask you in few and simple words how a heart transpland can be done. The answer unavoidably would be so much superficial to be a nonsense. But I can guarantee that in my effect there are no fusions, nor fissions. Now we are very advanced with the theoretical bases, even if much remains to be studied.
About the F&P electrolisis, I am not able to answer, I can only say that I tried to replicate their open-source technology without being able to obtain an energetic gain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
It seems that the diffusion of your publication on Researchgate is continuing to rise: now close to 28000 full readings and 2000 recommendations and counting!
Dear Andrea Recently you said that the reaction in the ECAT is not a nuclear fusion, your article on researchgate, more and more read, is not within my reach and I certainly do not ask you for a simplified explanation but I take a reflection that I showed you some time ago. If the reaction is a plasmatic electrons “interaction” and not a nuclear reaction you should find much less obstacles in the authorization for the production also for the home system, given that Plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing. And at this point I ask you if the electrolytic experiments of Fleischmann and Pons and the others who followed them, are also special electronic reactions rather than cold fusion? And consequently does cold fusion exist?
As always congratulations and full speed ahead!
Neri
Hi,
I am following your work years since, and I’m astonished by your progress, but now it is time to shoot the engineer and go into production!
Godspeed your work and don’t forget the rest,
Astonish
If you are only getting hints of direct electricity production from the e-cat in experiments, when your guiding theory says you should get it, do you think the theory needs to change?
Gerard McEk:
The answer 1 should give COP infinite. Obviously two cigars are better than 1…and counting.
You have no idea how badly we are working on it. Theoretically we should get it, but so far experimentally we had only hints of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When would you lit the cigar for the Electrical Ecat:
1. If the electrical output exceeds the electrical input
2. If the electrical output exceeds 25% of the total output
3. If the electrical output exceeds 50% of the total output
4. Some other goals
I hope you will enjoy this victory soon.
Good luck to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
It is an evolution: we are aiming to the perfect product and we are not far from it.
Avery Ecat’s experience allowed the follow up of a better Ecat.
Warmk Regards,
A.R.
Did understand well that when you make the spectrometry of all the plasma we saw in http://www.ecatskdemo.com
you obtain a Maxwellian spectrum of the black body and the calculation of the energy gives the same result because the temperature is lower, but the surface is much bigger ?
Heinz Hause:
We are at a very advanced level. We already are able to supply thermal energy, albeit for now in limited areas where we are makinging the technology fit for a massive diffusion.
We are making strong progress for the combined production of heat and electricity directly from the plasma. Our progress is becoming exponential due to the mass of information that we are getting from our work. I understand the anxiety, but consider that our competitors of Hot Fusion with unlimited funds, in the order of tenths of billions, have obtained nothing in seventy years, while in 10 years and without public funding we made enormous progress. I hope to be ready with the direct production of electricity within this year, albeit this is a hope, not a promise. We are working very hard and, again, without external funding.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The earth atmosphere is bad also due to the use of fossil fuels, therefore your work is important. When will you be ready for a worldwide diffusion of the Ecat ?
Heinz Sause
WaltC:
1- no
2- I am not adding further information after the one, very rich, given in my paper cited by you
3-same as in 2
4- yes we have, but they are confidential
Warm Regards
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, we try to replicate all the processes we deem worth the job.
I never comment the work of our competitors, but I can say that none of our replications has been considered from us interesting. So far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Enquirer:
As I explained many times, the spectrometer was focused on the very small surface where we have the highest temperature. Consequently the S in the Boltzmann equation was very limited. If we widen the window and get the whole spectrum, we obtain a Maxwellian. In this case we have a wider surface and the results when we apply the Wien and the Boltzmann equation are very similar, as well as they both are very similar to the corresponding colorimetric measurement, because the S in the Maxwellian spectrum is much wider.
All this is well explained in my paper on Researchgate, that, probably, who made these objections either did not read, or did not understand.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi
What do you respond to them who say the graph of the video http://Www.ecatskdemo.com
Is not a Maxwellian spectrum and therefore you cannot apply the Wien equation ?
Dr Rossi,
I apologize, but most of the discussion about Fusion vs. “something else” ended up going over my head.
If someone listed some notable Nuclear Reactions:
– Elastic Scattering
– Inelastic Scattering
– Capture Reactions
– Spallation
– Induced Gamma Emission
– Alpha decay
– Fission Reactions
– Fusion Reactions (Wikipedia: Two light nuclei join to form a heavier one, with additional particles (usually protons or neutrons) emitted subsequently.)
1) Are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not one of the types listed?
2) Or broader, are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not any currently recognized Nuclear Reaction Type?
3) If they are an existing NR type, which one(s)?
4) If you believe the E-Cat-Reactions are new, do you currently have succinct labels & descriptors for them?
Before you point me (once again) in the direction of the “long_range_particle_interactions paper” (I’ve read and re-read it many times– especially whenever you assign it to me), I’m hoping that high level labels/descriptors might help me to better see the forest for the trees.
Dr Rossi:
In past you wrote here that you try to replicate all the systems claimed by your competitors: is this still true?
If yes: do you think some competitor could be able in a couple of years to reach what you did?
Dr Rossi,
I noticed you never answer to the guys that disparage you in the blogs: why?
Sam
Are you still also working to improve the heat production by the Ecat, besides the R&D on the direct plasma electricity production?
Raffaele Bongo:
There is nothing misterious. Questions are never silly.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello A. Rossi
You wrote that there is no fusion or fission in the Rossi effect. This means that there is no phenomenon of absorption or expulsion of particles by the nucleus of the atom.
Is it possible that there is a mysterious creation of proton or neutron in the atomic nucleus or neutron / proton transmutations?
A thousand excuses if my question is silly because I am not an atomic physicist
All my respect and wishes for success
Best regards
Raffaele
Sam:
Right.
Warm regards.
A.R.
Dewey:
Please go to
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
All the references cited here are the same reported in the above mentioned paper.
In [13] a fundamental connection between Aharonov-Bohm equations and an electron model is proposed, starting from a geometric interpretation of the electron wave-function complex phase [6,8,1].
This approach suggests the possibility of efficiently creating electron condensates exploiting the Aharonov-Bohm effect, a phenomenon that shows the dependence of electron wave-function phase from electromagnetic potentials [9].
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hello DR Rossi
Fantasies are more than substitutes for unpleasant reality; they are also dress rehearsals, plans. All acts performed in the world begin in the imagination.
Quote Barbara Grizzuti Harrison.
https://youtu.be/hi6s2DdBCwY
Regards
Sam
Dr Rossi,
I return to the comment of Neri Accornero: can you give a hint, not superficial, but not too difficult, about what can happen if your effect is not fusion, not fission, not chemical reaction?
Anonymous:
Thanks to you for reading it,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Francis Loung:
Thank you for your attention to our work,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Urbano:
Thank you for your opinion,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
I think that you have nothing but your fantasy. The Ecat does not exist and the electricity made directly from the plasma is a chimera
Dear Dr Rossi,
your paper
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
is one of the most important papers published in the last 10 years.
Carey:
Thank you for your attention,
Warm Regards
A.R.
David:
If we take the full spectrum it actually is enough close to a Maxwellian
Warm Regards
A.R.
Neri Accornero:
The reactions are not fusion reactions, but complex particle interactions: I agree upon the fact that my paper is complex, but the matter is complex. You are Physician Prof, it is like to ask you in few and simple words how a heart transpland can be done. The answer unavoidably would be so much superficial to be a nonsense. But I can guarantee that in my effect there are no fusions, nor fissions. Now we are very advanced with the theoretical bases, even if much remains to be studied.
About the F&P electrolisis, I am not able to answer, I can only say that I tried to replicate their open-source technology without being able to obtain an energetic gain.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dr Rossi,
The plasma shown in the video
http://www.ecatskdemo.com looks definitely like a black body.
Cheers
David
Dear Dr Andrea Rossi:
It seems that the diffusion of your publication on Researchgate is continuing to rise: now close to 28000 full readings and 2000 recommendations and counting!
Dear Andrea Recently you said that the reaction in the ECAT is not a nuclear fusion, your article on researchgate, more and more read, is not within my reach and I certainly do not ask you for a simplified explanation but I take a reflection that I showed you some time ago. If the reaction is a plasmatic electrons “interaction” and not a nuclear reaction you should find much less obstacles in the authorization for the production also for the home system, given that Plasma generators have long been sold for metal processing. And at this point I ask you if the electrolytic experiments of Fleischmann and Pons and the others who followed them, are also special electronic reactions rather than cold fusion? And consequently does cold fusion exist?
As always congratulations and full speed ahead!
Neri
Frank Acland:
The theory grows up together with the experiments in a dialectic evolution.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Astonish:
he,he,he, nice play with the nick.
We are working hard, but I can’t shoot the “engineer”: that’s me !
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Hi,
I am following your work years since, and I’m astonished by your progress, but now it is time to shoot the engineer and go into production!
Godspeed your work and don’t forget the rest,
Astonish
Dear Andrea,
If you are only getting hints of direct electricity production from the e-cat in experiments, when your guiding theory says you should get it, do you think the theory needs to change?
Many thanks,
Frank Acland
Gerard McEk:
The answer 1 should give COP infinite. Obviously two cigars are better than 1…and counting.
You have no idea how badly we are working on it. Theoretically we should get it, but so far experimentally we had only hints of it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
When would you lit the cigar for the Electrical Ecat:
1. If the electrical output exceeds the electrical input
2. If the electrical output exceeds 25% of the total output
3. If the electrical output exceeds 50% of the total output
4. Some other goals
I hope you will enjoy this victory soon.
Good luck to you and your team.
Kind regards, Gerard
JPR:
Yes, but still not cigar.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
M.B.:
Exactly. Both are close to the calorimetris system, as explained in
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/330601653_E-Cat_SK_and_long_range_particle_interactions
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
It is an evolution: we are aiming to the perfect product and we are not far from it.
Avery Ecat’s experience allowed the follow up of a better Ecat.
Warmk Regards,
A.R.
Did understand well that when you make the spectrometry of all the plasma we saw in
http://www.ecatskdemo.com
you obtain a Maxwellian spectrum of the black body and the calculation of the energy gives the same result because the temperature is lower, but the surface is much bigger ?
Dear Andrea,
Are you already obtaining electricity from the plasma?
Patrick Ellul:
True.
Yes, we continue to accept orders.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Yes what I meant is orders for the heat. Because some time ago you stopped accepting orders until issues are fixed.
Regards
Patrick
Patrick Ellul:
We do not sell the E-Cat, we sell heat to industries where we install the Ecat.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Andrea,
Are you in a position now to resume taking orders for the E-Cat SK?
Regards
Patrick
Maurine Cler:
Thank you for your attention to the work of our Team,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Dear Readers:
Please go to
http://www.roddilivecat.com
to find comments published in other posts,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Heinz Hause:
We are at a very advanced level. We already are able to supply thermal energy, albeit for now in limited areas where we are makinging the technology fit for a massive diffusion.
We are making strong progress for the combined production of heat and electricity directly from the plasma. Our progress is becoming exponential due to the mass of information that we are getting from our work. I understand the anxiety, but consider that our competitors of Hot Fusion with unlimited funds, in the order of tenths of billions, have obtained nothing in seventy years, while in 10 years and without public funding we made enormous progress. I hope to be ready with the direct production of electricity within this year, albeit this is a hope, not a promise. We are working very hard and, again, without external funding.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Rod Walton:
Thank you for the information,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
On Power Engineering July 9 2019 issue:
Renewables Mix Tops 50% for MidAmerican Energy Customers in Iowa
Rod Walton
Dr Rossi,
The earth atmosphere is bad also due to the use of fossil fuels, therefore your work is important. When will you be ready for a worldwide diffusion of the Ecat ?
Heinz Sause
Dear Andrea,
I am impressed with this site, really I am a fan.
Cheers
WaltC:
1- no
2- I am not adding further information after the one, very rich, given in my paper cited by you
3-same as in 2
4- yes we have, but they are confidential
Warm Regards
A.R.
Anonymous:
Yes, we try to replicate all the processes we deem worth the job.
I never comment the work of our competitors, but I can say that none of our replications has been considered from us interesting. So far.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Enquirer:
As I explained many times, the spectrometer was focused on the very small surface where we have the highest temperature. Consequently the S in the Boltzmann equation was very limited. If we widen the window and get the whole spectrum, we obtain a Maxwellian. In this case we have a wider surface and the results when we apply the Wien and the Boltzmann equation are very similar, as well as they both are very similar to the corresponding colorimetric measurement, because the S in the Maxwellian spectrum is much wider.
All this is well explained in my paper on Researchgate, that, probably, who made these objections either did not read, or did not understand.
Warm Regards
A.R.
Dr Rossi
What do you respond to them who say the graph of the video
http://Www.ecatskdemo.com
Is not a Maxwellian spectrum and therefore you cannot apply the Wien equation ?
Dr Rossi,
I apologize, but most of the discussion about Fusion vs. “something else” ended up going over my head.
If someone listed some notable Nuclear Reactions:
– Elastic Scattering
– Inelastic Scattering
– Capture Reactions
– Spallation
– Induced Gamma Emission
– Alpha decay
– Fission Reactions
– Fusion Reactions (Wikipedia: Two light nuclei join to form a heavier one, with additional particles (usually protons or neutrons) emitted subsequently.)
1) Are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not one of the types listed?
2) Or broader, are you saying that the Nuclear Reactions going on within the E-Cat are not any currently recognized Nuclear Reaction Type?
3) If they are an existing NR type, which one(s)?
4) If you believe the E-Cat-Reactions are new, do you currently have succinct labels & descriptors for them?
Before you point me (once again) in the direction of the “long_range_particle_interactions paper” (I’ve read and re-read it many times– especially whenever you assign it to me), I’m hoping that high level labels/descriptors might help me to better see the forest for the trees.
thanks, WaltC
Dr Rossi:
In past you wrote here that you try to replicate all the systems claimed by your competitors: is this still true?
If yes: do you think some competitor could be able in a couple of years to reach what you did?
Dear Readers:
please go to http://www.rossilivecat.com
to find comments in other posts of this blog.
S.B.:
Soon enough
Warm Regards
A.R.
When we will you show industrial important clients?